Khalil
Al-Malik al-Ashraf
Coinage of al-Ashraf Khalil
Sultan of Egypt and Syria
Reign12 November 1290 – 14 December 1293
PredecessorAl-Mansur Qalawun
SuccessorAn-Nasir Muhammad
Bornc. 1260s
Cairo, Mamluk Sultanate
Died14 December 1293 (age early 30s or younger)
Turuja, Buhayra
ConsortArdukin
IssueTwo daughters
Names
Al-Malik al-Ashraf Salah ad-Din Khalil ibn Qalawun
HouseQalawuni
DynastyBahri
FatherAl-Mansur Qalawun
MotherQutqutiya
ReligionIslam

Al-Ashraf Salāh ad-Dīn Khalil ibn Qalawūn (Arabic: الملك الأشرف صلاح الدين خليل بن قلاوون; c. 1260s – 14 December 1293) was the eighth Bahri Mamluk sultan, succeeding his father Qalawun. He served from 12 November 1290 until his assassination in December 1293. He was well known for conquering the last of the Crusader states in Palestine after the siege of Acre in 1291. While walking with a friend, Khalil was attacked and assassinated by Baydara (his commander in chief) and his followers, who was then killed under the orders of Kitbugha.

Early life

Khalil's exact year of birth is not known, although according to the Mamluk-era historian al-Safadi, he died "in his thirties or less".[1] He was the second son of Sultan Qalawun (r. 1279–1290) and his mother was a woman named Qutqutiya.[1][2] Khalil had three brothers, as-Salih Ali, an-Nasir Muhammad and Ahmad, and two sisters.[3] In 1284, Khalil married Ardukin, the daughter of Sayf ad-Din Nukih ibn Bayan, a Mongol emir of Qalawun.[4] As-Salih Ali, al-Ashraf Khalil's brother, married Ardukin's sister, and both wives were chosen by Qalawun's second wife because of their Mongol ethnicity, which was considered prestigious by the Mamluks.[4] Khalil had two daughters with Ardukin, who are unnamed in the Mamluk sources.[5]

Qalawun had proclaimed as-Salih Ali as his heir apparent in 1280. From that point on, as-Salih Ali's name was added next to Qalawun's name in treaties. Khalil's name also began to be added to treaties in the regal style of "al-Malik al-Ashraf" starting in 1285 in the treaty between Qalawun and the king of Lesser Armenia. When as-Salih Ali died in 1288, Qalawun appointed al-Ashraf Khalil as his co-sultan.[6] While al-Ashraf Khalil's name was read alongside Qalawun's name in the khutbah (Friday prayer sermon) and the emirs swore their allegiance to him,[2] Qalawun did not sign the ahd (diploma of investiture) confirming al-Ashraf Khalil's appointment.[2][6] The reason for Qalawun's apparent hesitance is not clear, but he may have considered al-Ashraf Khalil unsuitable for the sultanate or was wary of the enmity between al-Ashraf Khalil and the na'ib as-saltana (viceroy of Egypt), Emir Husam ad-Din Turuntay, who had been a strong advocate for as-Salih Ali's accession.[2]

Reign

Al-Ashraf Khalil succeeded Qalawun following the latter's death on 9 November 1290. He prevented Qalawun's burial for two months, either as a precaution to ensure his smooth succession or to wait until Qalawun's mausoleum was completed.[3] With his ascendancy, al-Ashraf Khalil absorbed his father's roughly 6,000 Mansuriyya mamluks into his own 1,200-strong,[7] mostly Circassian,[8] mamluk corps, the Ashrafiyya.[7] The Mansuriyya were the most powerful mamluk regiment in the sultanate and al-Ashraf Khalil sought to co-opt them.[7]

In the royal procession following al-Ashraf Khalil's accession to the throne, Turuntay launched an assassination attempt against al-Ashraf Khalil, but it failed.[9] Instead, al-Ashraf Khalil had Turuntay imprisoned in the Cairo Citadel.[9] After being heavily tortured for three days, Turuntay was put to death in November.[9] He was briefly replaced by Emir ‘Alam al-Din Sanjar al-Shuja‘i al-Mansuri (عَلَمُ الدِّينِ سَنْجَرُ الشُّجَاعِيُّ المَنْصُورِيُّ‎, romanised: ʿAlam ad-Dīn Sanǧar aš-Šuǧāʿī al-Manṣūrī) until the latter was dispatched to Damascus and replaced by Emir Baydara. Al-Ashraf Khalil made Baydara na'ib as-saltana and atabeg al-asakir (commander in chief). The frequent exchanging of offices between the Mansuri emirs and their frequent imprisonment and release was a phenomenon that marked al-Ashraf Khalil's three-year reign. According to historian Amir Mazor, "Al-Ashraf Khalil's policy toward the Mansuriyya was totally arbitrary, haphazard and lacked long-term political vision",[10] but he nonetheless did not target the Mansuri mamluks as a faction and did not replace Mansuri officeholders with his Ashrafi mamluks.[9]

Conquest of Acre

An 1840 painting depicting the 1291 Siege of Acre

Qalawun had conquered the County of Tripoli in 1289 and made clear his determination to end the Crusader presence in Syria.[11] In November 1290, he began his march toward Acre, the capital of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, but died outside of Cairo shortly after.[11] With the siege plans having already been prepared by Qalawun and his lieutenants, al-Ashraf Khalil resumed his father's offensive on 2 March 1291.[12] As he led the Mamluk army of Egypt, he sent orders to the Mamluk emirs of Syria, including the sultanate's Ayyubid vassals in Hama under al-Muzaffar III Mahmud, to assemble their mangonels and head toward Acre.[13] The other Syrian Mamluk armies were from Damascus (led by Lajin), Tripoli (led by Bilban) and al-Karak (led by Baibars al-Dawadar). There are no reliable figures for the size of the Mamluk army, but it was likely a significantly larger force than that of the Crusader defenders of Acre.[14]

In May 1291, al-Ashraf Khalil's army launched the assault against Acre. Heavy fighting ensued with the Knights Templar, which controlled the fortress.[13] By 17 June, the Mamluks captured Acre, and a number of its inhabitants fled by sea.[13] Remaining Crusader defenders held out in some of the towers in the city, but after further fighting they surrendered.[13] Al-Ashraf Khalil ordered the execution of the remaining defenders and inhabitants.[13] After abundant amounts of loot were plundered from the city by the Mamluk troops, al-Ashraf Khalil had Acre's fortifications destroyed.[13]

Remains of the Templar fortress of Atlit, the last Crusader outpost in Syria conquered by al-Ashraf Khalil's forces

Capture of other Crusader fortresses

The news of the conquest of Acre reached Damascus and Cairo. Al-Ashraf Khalil entered the decorated city of Damascus with Franks chained at the feet and the captured crusader standards which were carried upside-down as a sign of their defeat. After celebrating his victory in Damascus, Khalil left for Cairo which was also decorated and celebrating.[15] Arriving at Cairo, he ordered the release of Philip Mainebeuf and the men who accompanied him to Cairo earlier.[16]

Following Acre's capture, al-Ashraf Khalil and his generals proceeded to wrest control of the remaining Crusader-held fortresses along the Syrian coast.[13] Within weeks, the Mamluks conquered Tyre, Sidon, Beirut, Haifa and Tartus.[13] In August, the last Crusader outpost in Syria, the Templar fortress of Atlit south of Acre, was taken and on 7 August, al-Ashraf Khalil returned to Cairo in triumph as the "final victor in the long struggle with the Crusaders", according to historian Peter Malcolm Holt.[13]

In 1292, Al-Ashraf Khalil accompanied by his vizier Ibn al-Sal'us arrived in Damascus and then travelled via Aleppo to besiege the castle of Qal'at ar-Rum (Castle of the Romans) and was known as Hromgla in Armenian. Qal'at ar-Rum, which was the seat of the Patriarch of Armenia, was besieged by more than 30 catapults[17] and was captured after 30 days by Khalil, who renamed it Qal'at al-Muslimin (Castle of the Muslims).[18] Khalil left Emir al-Shuja‘i at the castle and returned to Damascus with prisoners. The population of Damascus bid farewell to the victorious Sultan on his way to Cairo at night with thousands of lighted candles. The Sultan entered Cairo through the Victory Gate (Bab al-Nasr) and was greeted by the celebrating population, also with thousands of lighted candles .

The Kingdom of Cilician Armenia, 1199–1375.

The Sultan returned to Damascus and assembled an army to invade Sis,[19] the capital of the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, but an Armenian embassy in Damascus had made terms with him first. Til Hemdun, Marash and Behesni were given to the Sultan in order to maintain peace. The Armenian kingdom had thus began to diminish much like its allied Crusader states.

The crusaders' kingdom of Jerusalem had already been destroyed by Saladin, Baibars and Qalawun, and Louis IX's Seventh Crusade against Egypt ended in a complete failure, but the crusaders tried to keep their strongholds on the Syrian coast intact, hoping to be able one day to recapture what they had lost. Pope Nicholas IV tried to act but he died in 1292,[20] and the European kings, who became involved in internal conflicts and struggles,[21] became unable to organize new effective crusades. As for the Templars, they were accused of heresy in Europe and badly persecuted by King Philip IV of France and Pope Clement V.

Sack of Dongola

After the death of the great Sultan of Egypt, El-Mansur Qalawun, and the ascension of his son the conqueror of Acre, Sultan El-Ashraf Khalil, to the Egyptian throne, the Kingdom of Makuria had been under Egyptian rule since its conquest by the Egyptian army led by the Egyptian Prince Ezz el-Din el-Kourani in the Fourth battle of Dongola, and it annually sent the taxes and royalties imposed on it from Egypt in accordance with the ancient Baqt agreement. The Makurian king Samamoun thought that the new Egyptian Sultan was weak and still a young man, and this was a great misconception on his part, and after a letter that was completely deceptive to El-Ashraf Khalil in which he said that due to the attacks of the Egyptian army on his kingdom during the reign of El-Mansur Qalawun and El-Zahir Baybars, the treasury of the Kingdom of Makuria has become empty and he will not be able to pay the imposed taxes and royalties. The Egyptian Sultan El-Ashraf Khalil bin Qalawun was known for his temper and that he did not joke, so he sent a letter full of threats and promises to the Makurian king, a letter that struck terror in Samamoun’s heart to the point that he described his country as being ruled by women. However, these words did not enter the mind of Sultan Khalil, who went on to order the movement of the Egyptian army under the leadership of Prince Ezz el-Din el-Afram, who moved from Cairo and arrived in Makuria and won a crushing victory over the Makurian forces. He entered the capital, Dongola, and plundered it all. King Samamoun fled from Makuria as he had fled before in the campaigns of El-Mansur Qalawun.[22][23]

Threatening the Republic of Venice with invasion

In 1292, Venetian pirates kidnapped Egyptian sailors and merchants in the Mediterranean Sea. This made the blood boil in El-Ashraf Khalil’s veins to the point that he began to actually think about invading the Republic of Venice, becoming the only Egyptian Sultan who thought about that. It was logical at the time that Egypt would think about invading any country, as the Egyptian army at that time was considered the strongest army in the world and in less than 3 years, he eliminated the last 8 Crusader states in the East and invaded the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia. This also does not prevent the difficulty or near impossibility of invading this country due to its naval power, its impregnable geographical location, and the country's support for the Crusades and its location close to the Vatican, which will make the entire European and Christian world unite against Egypt. The Sultan, in light of his thoughts about invading Venice, gave orders to the Egyptian Navy to arrest any ship belonging to the Republic of Venice that entered the Egyptian coast, even if for the purpose of trade. In fact, the Egyptian Navy arrested Venetian ships that landed in Alexandria, and all their goods were seized and placed in the Egyptian treasury. The Sultan ordered the Venetian sailors and merchants to be placed in Egyptian prisons. This made the Republic of Venice speak officially with the Sultanate of Egypt, and they sent a high-ranking official delegation with a lot of gifts. The delegation, when it met El-Ashraf Khalil, completely denied any relationship linking them to the pirates who kidnapped the Egyptian sailors, and that they did not know anything about this subject. Sultan El-Ashraf Khalil was very angry and preferred to be determined and tell them that the Venetian prisoners will not be released except when the Egyptian sailors and merchants to return. Later they reached an agreement in the end that the Venetians would pay a very large ransom to release their captives, in addition to that they would hand over the pirates to Egypt and return the kidnapped Egyptians. After that, the Venetians asked the Kingdom of Aragon to mediate with them in Egypt, and in fact a peace treaty was concluded between the Sultanate of Egypt and the Republic of Venice through the mediation of the Spanish Kingdom of Aragon.[24]

Incomplete Cyprus invasion

In late 1292, Cypriots kidnapped Egyptian sailors in the Mediterranean Sea. The Egyptian Sultan El-Ashraf Khalil bin Qalawun, who was known for his extreme pride and temper, ordered immediately to prepare and build 100 huge warships to invade all of Cyprus. He preferred to follow the construction of these ships himself, and every now and then he would visit Egyptian ports and repeat the same sentence, with anger and sarcasm in his face:[25]

"Cyprus... Cyprus... to the grave"[25]

This means that Cyprus will be buried, but unfortunately, the Sultan died later and the dream of invading Cyprus died until the era of El-Ashraf Barsbay when the Cypriots attacked the ship of the Egyptian merchant Ahmad bin El-Hameem, and Egypt was fed up with Cyprus.[25]

Mongol threat

In 1293, Mongol ruler Gaykhatu sent his messengers with a threatening letter to the Sultan el-Ashraf Khalil saying:[26]

"The Khan wishes to enter Aleppo and reside in it, it belongs to the conquests of his father Hulagu Khan by his sword, if you do not allow that, then he will cross to the Levant."[26]

El-Ashraf Khalil immediately responded to them without stopping, while smiling and said:[26]

"Alhamdulillah my brother the Khan agreed to what was in my mind and I talked about it with my princes that I request Baghdad from my brother, so if he does not allow that, I rode and conquered it with my troops, ravaged his country, killed his men, took it by force and appointed a representative there. Baghdad is the house of Islam and I wish to return it back to Islam but let him know we will see who enters whose country's first."[26]

He took them out to where he had dropped them off and immediately wrote to the deputies of the Levant to prepare the accommodation and to get the soldiers ready to cross the Euphrates River and invade Baghdad. He presented to the princes and soldiers of Egypt to put on the war machine and come to Salah al-Din Square. Mongol messengers were sent to watch the soldiers. Most of the people of Cairo and Egypt went out to see the parade of the soldiers. It was a memorable day. The Sultan rode after the noon call to prayer, wearing a qarqal (an iron plate covered with brocade), and a keffiyeh over his head, and a shattaf in his hand. He entered the field, followed by the princes, one by one, with the latest war machines on them, and each of them carrying a spear on their robes. They fought and fled, displaying their war flags, until the afternoon call to prayer came.[26] This was the third military parade he presented during his sultanate. When their matter was over, he came down, took off his clothes, and made himself ready. He summoned the Mongol messengers and said to them:[26]

"Inform my brother Gaykhatu that whoever has such soldiers with him does not stop entering your country or the country of others. I swear on my father's grave, I will enter his place and destroy the homes of all the Mongols and make it an Islamic country until the Day of Resurrection, unless my time comes!"[26]

Then he sent them back, and wrote urging the deputies, but his death was soon before he reached his hope following that.[26]

Future ambitions

El-Ashraf Khalil once stated that he has plans of invading Constantinople, Persia and Iraq:[27]

"I am the king of the world and the sultan of the earth. God willing, we will conquer the East (Persia), the Roms (Byzantines; Constantinople), and Iraq, and we will possess the countries from the setting of the sun to the rising of the sun, and God will support me."[27]

But unfortunately he dies before achieving them.[27]

Domestic conflicts and assassination

Militarily, Al-Ashraf Khalil possessed the vigor and capability of two of his predecessors, Baibars and his father Qalawun. But many Emirs disliked him. He started his reign by executing and imprisoning a few prominent Emirs of his father, among them the vice-Sultan Turuntay. During the battle for Acre he arrested Hosam ad-Din Lajin and later after he returned to Cairo he executed Sunqur al-Ashqar,[lower-alpha 1] and a few Emirs. Khalil continued his father's policy of replacing Turkish Mamluks with Circassians, a policy which contributed in the intensification of the rivalry among the Mamluks. After his victories against the Franks, arrogance got hold of al-Ashraf Khalil, he treated the Emirs roughly and began to sign messages and documents with the letter "KH" only.[29] In addition, his Vizier Ibn al-Salus was envied by many Emirs and by the vice-Sultan Baydara in particular. Ibn al-Salus who, originally, was neither a Mamluk nor an Emir but a merchant from Damascus, became the most influential official during the reign of Khalil. While Al-Ashraf was rough on the Emirs, he was very generous towards Ibn al-Salus who did not treat the Emirs with respect.[30] Ibn al-Salus was involved in the unjustly persecution of the supreme judge of Egypt Ibn Bint al-A'az, as he was involved in provoking the Sultan against Baydara on several occasions.

In December 1293, Al-Ashraf Khalil, accompanied by Ibn al-Salus, Baydara and other Emirs went to Turug[31][32] in northern Egypt on a bird-hunting expedition. He sent Ibn Al-Salus to the nearby city of Alexandria to bring materials and to collect the taxes. Arriving at Alexandria, Ibn Al-Salus found out that the deputies of Baydara had already taken everything. On receiving a message from Ibn Al-Salus with this news, Al-Ashraf summoned Baydara to his Dihlis and insulted and threatened him in the presence of other Emirs. The distressed Baydar left the Dihlis and called Lajin, Qara Sunqur and other Emirs and together they decided to kill the Sultan. On 14 December,[33][34] while the Sultan was walking with his friend Emir Shihab ad-Din Ahmad he was attacked and assassinated by Baydara and his followers. The Emirs who struck the Sultan after Baydara were Hosam ad-Din Lajin and Bahadir Ras Nubah followed by other Emirs. After the assassination of Al-Ashraf Khalil, Baydara and his followers went to the Dihliz and proclaimed Baydara the new Sultan. But Baydara was soon arrested by the Sultani Mamluks and Emirs.[lower-alpha 2] Baydara was killed by the Sultani Emirs led by Kitbugha[37] and Baibars al-Jashnikir[38] and his head was sent to Cairo. Ibn al-Salus was arrested in Alexandria and was sent to Cairo where he was mistreated and at last beaten to death. The Emirs who were involved in the assassination of Al-Ashraf Khalil were severely punished and executed. Lajin and Qara Sunqur fled and disappeared.[lower-alpha 3]

Mausoleum of al-Ashraf Khalil in Cairo, built in 1288

After the death of Al-Ashraf Khalil, the Emirs decided to install his 9-year-old brother Al-Nasir Muhammad as the new Sultan with Kitbugha as vice-Sultan and al-Shuja‘i as the new Vizier. But the death of Al-Ashraf Khalil was concealed for some time. While Al-Ashraf was dead, his brother Al-Nasir Muhammad was proclaimed Vice-Sultan and heir. A message from Egypt to the Syrian Emirs said: "I appointed my brother al-Malik al-Nasir Muhammad as my Vicegerent and heir so that when I go to fight the enemy he replaces me ".[40] As soon as everything was under control the death of Al-Ahraf Khalil was revealed to the public in Egypt and Syria.[41] He was buried in a mausoleum attached to a madrasa that he commissioned and built in 1288 (prior to his accession to the throne). His funerary complex, located in the Southern Cemetery of Cairo, is partly ruined today, though the domed structure over his tomb remains standing.[42]

Al-Ashraf Khalil ruled about three years and two months. He had two daughters. Besides being remembered as the conqueror of Acre, he was remembered by Muslim historians as an intelligent Sultan who was fond of reading and learning.[43]

Coinage

Coins of al-Ashraf Khalil were unique in Mamluk coinage history. New kinds of titles were inscribed on his coins, including: al-Sultan al-Malik al-Ashraf Salah al-Din Nasir al-Milah al-Muhamadiyah Muhyyi al-Dawalah al-Abasiyah (The Sultan King al-Ashraf Salah al-Din the Promoter of the Muhammadan Nation and the Revitalizer of the Abbasid Caliphate) and al-Sultan al-Malik al-Ashraf Salah al-Donya wa al-Din Qasim Amir al-mu'minin (The Sultan King al-Ashraf reform of temporal world and faith sharer of the Emir of the faithful), "Emir of the faithful" being the title of the Abbasid Caliph. His father Qalawun was also mentioned on Al-Ashraf's coins as: Mawlana al-Sultan al-Malik al-Mansur (Our benefactor the Sultan King al-Mansur).[44]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Shams ad-Din Sunqur al-Ashqar, was a prominent Emir and one of the most devoted Bahri Emirs since days of Sultan Baibars. He was taken prisoner by the Armenians and was freed in exchange for Leo the son of King Hethum I who was captured during the invasion of the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia in 1266. During the reign of Baibars' son Solmish he was the deputy of the Sultan in Damascus. During the reign of Qalawun he proclaimed himself a Sultan while in Damascus, taking the royal name al-Malik al-Kamil. He fought a few battles against Qalawun's Emirs but was pardoned later after he joined Qalawun's army against the Mongols.[28]
  2. ↑ Before the arrest of Baydara he was asked by Baibars, Emir of Jandar, whether other Emirs knew about his plan to kill Al-Ashraf. He answered: "Yes, I killed him according to their advice and under their eyes" then he added the reasons for killing him which included: "He did not respect the Emirs and the Mamluks of his father. He made Ibn Al-Salus a Vizier. He arrested Izz ad-Din al-Afram and executed Sunqur al-Ashqar and others. He promoted his Mamluks to the rank of Emir". When he was asked whether Kitbugha knew about his plan, he replied: "Yes, he was the first one to suggest it."[35][36]
  3. ↑ Lajin appeared sometime after the assassination of Al-Ashraf Khalil. He was pardoned by al-Nasir Muhammad who became the new Sultan.[39]

References

  1. 1 2 Richards, Donald S. (2001). "A Mamluk Amir's Mamluk History: Baybars al-Mansuri and the Zubdat al-Fikra". In Kennedy, Hugh N. (ed.). The Historiography of Islamic Egypt: (c. 950–1800). Brill. p. 37. ISBN 9789004117945.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Northrup 1998, p. 143.
  3. 1 2 Northrup 1998, p. 158.
  4. 1 2 Northrup 1998, p. 117.
  5. ↑ Bauden, Frédéric. "The Qalawunids: A Pedigree" (PDF). University of Chicago. Retrieved 25 February 2016.
  6. 1 2 Holt 1986, p. 103.
  7. 1 2 3 Mazor 2015, p. 75.
  8. ↑ Holt 1986, p. 106.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Mazor 2015, pp. 75–76.
  10. ↑ Mazor 2015, p. 78.
  11. 1 2 Northrup 1998, p. 157.
  12. ↑ Northrup 1998, pp. 157–158.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Holt 1986, p. 104.
  14. ↑ Asili, p.111
  15. ↑ The gate of the San Andreas Church was transported from Acre to Cairo to be used in the Al-Ashraf's Mosque which the Sultan was building. Asili, p. 123
  16. ↑ Ibn Taghri, p.9/ vol.8
  17. ↑ Abu Al-Fida, p.386/ vol.13. According to Al-Maqrizi, al-Ashraf besieged Qal'at ar-Rum with 20 catapults. Al-Maqrizi, p.233/vol.2
  18. ↑ al-Maqrizi, p.234/ vol.2
  19. ↑ The Holy See moved to Sis after al-Ashraf Khalil captured Qal'at ar-Rum
  20. ↑ Pope Nicholas IV was a promoter of the crusaders. After Qalawun recaptured Tripoli in 1289, Nicholas sent twenty galleys, which were armed in Venice, to the aid of the city of Acre. — the Templar of Tyre. Gestes des Chiprois, P.101/ part 3
  21. ↑ One of these conflicts was the war that broke out between England and France in 1293. see also Philip IV of France
  22. ↑ عبد الفتاح عاشور, سعيد (1972). العصر المماليكي في مصر والشام (2nd ed.). Cairo: دار النهضة. pp. 94, 95.
  23. ↑ محمد مسعد, مصطفى (1960). الإسلام والنوبة في العصور الوسطى. مكتبة الأنجلو مصرية. pp. 154, 155.
  24. ↑ بن عبد الظاهر, محيي الدين. الألطاف الخفية من السيرة الشريفة السلطانية الأشرفية الجزء الثالث. p. 44.
  25. 1 2 3 بن عبد الظاهر, محيي الدين. الألطاف الخفية من السيرة الشريفة السلطانية الأشرفية الجزء الثالث. p. 40.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 al-Maqrizi, Taqi al-Din. المقفي الكبير الجزء الثالث. Beirut, Lebanon: دار الغرب الإسلامي. pp. 803, 804.
  27. 1 2 3 al-Ayni, Badr al-Din (1992). عقد الجمان في تاريخ أهل الزمان الجزء الأول. General Egyptian Book Organisation. p. 239.
  28. ↑ Al-Maqrizi, p.51, 121, 127, 131–133, 145/vol.2
  29. ↑ In Arabic "Kh" is one letter (خ).
  30. ↑ Al-Maqrizi, pp.221–222 and 251/vol.2. Ibn Taghri, p.45/vol.8. Abu Al-Fida, p.395/vol.13
  31. ↑ Now Kom Turuga
  32. ↑ "Google Maps".
  33. ↑ Bosworth, Clifford Edmund (1 January 1989). The Islamic World from Classical to Modern Times: Essays in Honor of Bernard Lewis. Darwin Press. p. 143. ISBN 9780878500666. Retrieved 15 December 2017.
  34. ↑ Holt, P. M. (1973). "The sultanate of al-Mansūr Lāchīn (696–8/1296–9)". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 36 (3): 521. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00119834. S2CID 162537370.
  35. ↑ Ibn Taghri, p. 18/ vol.8.
  36. ↑ Al-Maqrizi, p.247/ vol2.
  37. ↑ Kitbugha became Sultan of Egypt in 1295. See al-Adil Kitbugha
  38. ↑ Baibars al-Jashnikir (Baibars II) became Sultan of Egypt in 1308. See Baibars II
  39. ↑ Ibn Taghri, p.40/ vol.8. Al-Maqrizi, p.255/ vol.2 .
  40. ↑ According to Al-Maqrizi this letter was sent according to the instruction given by Emir al-Shuja‘i. Al-Maqrizi, p.249/vol.2
  41. ↑ Al-Maqrizi, pp.249–250/vol.2
  42. ↑ Behrens-Abouseif, Doris (2007). Cairo of the Mamluks: A History of Architecture and its Culture. The American University in Cairo Press. pp. 142–143. ISBN 9789774160776.
  43. ↑ Also the chronicler Ludolph of Suchem described Al-Ashrafe Khalil as "an exceedingly wise man".Ludolphi, Rectoris Ecclesiæ Parochialis in suchem, p.42
  44. ↑ Mahdi, p. 97

Bibliography

Primary sources

  • Abu al-Fida, The Concise History of Humanity. (The historian Abu al-Fida took part in the sieges of Tripoli and Acre.)
  • Al-Maqrizi, Al-Mawaiz wa al-'i'tibar bi Dhikr al-Khitat wa al-'athar, Matabat Aladab, Cairo, 1996, ISBN 977-241-175-X
  • Al-Maqrizi, Al-Selouk Leme'refatt Dewall al-Melouk, Dar al-Kotob, 1997.
  • Bohn, Henry G., The Road to Knowledge of the Return of Kings, Chronicles of the Crusades, AMS Press, 1969.
  • (In French) Bouriant, Urbain, Description Topographique et Historique de l'Egypte, Paris, 1895
  • Ibn Taghri, al-Nujum al-Zahirah Fi Milook Misr wa al-Qahirah, Dar al-Kotob, Beirut, 1992
  • Ludolph of Suchem, Description of the Holy Land and of the Way Thither. Translated by Aubrey Stewart. London: Palestine Pilgrims' Text Society, 1895. Reprinted in James Brundage, The Crusades: A Documentary History, Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press 1962
  • William Popper, Yusef, History of Egypt, 1382–1469 AD. Translated by Abu L-Mahasin ibn Taghri Birdi, University of California Press 1954
  • The Templar of Tyre, Chronicle (Getes des Chiprois), Published by Crawford, P., Ashgate Publishing. Ltd, Cyprus 2003. ISBN 1-84014-618-4
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.