The only US aircraft to carry a nuclear reactor was the NB-36H. The reactor was never actually connected to the engines.[1] The program was canceled in 1958.

A nuclear-powered aircraft is a concept for an aircraft intended to be powered by nuclear energy. The intention was to produce a jet engine that would heat compressed air with heat from fission, instead of heat from burning fuel.[1] During the Cold War, the United States and Soviet Union researched nuclear-powered bomber aircraft, the greater endurance of which could enhance nuclear deterrence, but neither country created any such operational aircraft.[2]

One inadequately solved design problem was the need for heavy shielding to protect the crew and those on the ground from radiation; other potential problems included dealing with crashes.[1][3]

Some missile designs included nuclear-powered hypersonic cruise missiles.

However, the advent of ICBMs and nuclear submarines in the 1960s greatly diminished the strategic advantage of such aircraft, and respective projects were canceled.[1]

U.S. programs

NEPA and ANP

In May 1946, the United States Army Air Forces started the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project, which conducted studies until the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program replaced NEPA in 1951. The ANP program included provisions for studying two different types of nuclear-powered jet engines: General Electric's Direct Air Cycle and Pratt & Whitney's Indirect Air Cycle. ANP planned for Convair to modify two B-36s under the MX-1589 project. One of the B-36s, the NB-36H, was to be used for studying shielding requirements for an airborne reactor, while the other was to be the X-6; however, the program was canceled before the X-6 was completed.[4]

The first operation of a nuclear aircraft engine occurred on January 31, 1956 using a modified General Electric J47 turbojet engine.[5] The Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion program was terminated by President Kennedy after his annual budget message to Congress in 1961.[1]

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory researched and developed nuclear aircraft engines. Two shielded reactors powered two General Electric J87 turbojet engines to nearly full thrust. Two experimental reactors, HTRE-2 with its turbojet engines intact, and HTRE-3 with its engines removed, are at the EBR-1 facility south of the Idaho National Laboratory.

Experimental HTRE reactors for nuclear aircraft, (HTRE-2 left and HTRE-3 right) on display at the Experimental Breeder Reactor I facility (43°30′42.22″N 113°0′18″W / 43.5117278°N 113.00500°W / 43.5117278; -113.00500).

The U.S. designed these engines for use in a new, specially-designed nuclear bomber, the WS-125. Although President Eisenhower eventually terminated it by cutting NEPA and telling Congress that the program was not urgent, he backed a small program for developing high-temperature materials and high-performance reactors; that program was terminated early in the Kennedy administration.

Project Pluto

In 1957, the Air Force and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission contracted with the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory to study the feasibility of applying heat from nuclear reactors to ramjet engines.[1] This research became known as Project Pluto. This program was to provide engines for an unmanned cruise missile, called SLAM, for Supersonic Low Altitude Missile.[1] The program succeeded in producing two test engines, which were operated on the ground. On May 14, 1961, the world's first nuclear ramjet engine, "Tory-IIA," mounted on a railroad car, roared to life for just a few seconds. On July 1, 1964, seven years and six months after it was born, "Project Pluto" was canceled.[6]

Airships

There were several studies and proposals for nuclear-powered airships, starting with a 1954 study by F. W. Locke Jr. for US Navy.[7] In 1957 Edwin J. Kirschner published the book The Zeppelin in the Atomic Age,[8] which promoted the use of atomic airships. In 1959 Goodyear presented a plan for nuclear-powered airship for both military and commercial use. Several other proposals and papers were published during the next decades.[9]

Soviet programs

Soviet nuclear bomber scare

The 1 December 1958 issue of Aviation Week included an article, "Soviets Flight Testing Nuclear Bomber", that claimed that the Soviets had greatly progressed a nuclear aircraft program:[10] "[a] nuclear-powered bomber is being flight tested in the Soviet Union. Completed about six months ago, this aircraft has been flying in the Moscow area for at least two months. It has been observed both in flight and on the ground by a wide variety of foreign observers from Communist and non-Communist countries." Unlike the US designs of the same era, which were purely experimental, the article noted that "The Soviet aircraft is a prototype of a design to perform a military mission as a continuous airborne alert warning system and missile launching platform." Photographs illustrated the article, along with technical diagrams on the proposed layout; these were so widely seen that one company produced a plastic model aircraft based on the diagrams in the article. An editorial on the topic accompanied the article.[11]

Concerns were soon expressed in Washington that "the Russians were from three to five years ahead of the US in the field of atomic aircraft engines and that they would move even further ahead unless the US pressed forward with its own program".[12] These concerns caused continued but temporary funding of the US's own program.

The aircraft in the photographs was later revealed to be the conventional Myasishchev M-50 Bounder, a medium-range strategic bomber that performed like the United States Air Force-operated B-58 Hustler. The design was considered a failure, never entered service, and was revealed to the public on Soviet Aviation Day in 1963 at Monino, putting the issue to rest.[13]

Tupolev Tu-119

The Soviet program of nuclear aircraft development resulted in the experimental Tupolev Tu-95LAL (Russian: LAL- Летающая Атомная Лаборатория, lit. 'Flying Nuclear Laboratory') which derived from the Tupolev Tu-95 bomber, but with a reactor fitted in the bomb bay.[1] The aircraft is reported to have been flown up to 40 times from 1961 to 1969.[14] The main purpose of the flight phase was examining the effectiveness of the radiation shielding. A follow-up design, the Tu-119, was planned to have two conventional turboprop engines and two direct-cycle nuclear jet engines, but was never completed. Several other projects, like the supersonic Tupolev Tu-120,[15] reached only the design phase.[16][17]

Russian programs

In February 2018, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia had developed a new, nuclear-powered cruise missile with nuclear warhead that can evade air and missile defenses and hit any point on the globe.[1] According to the statements, its first flight test occurred in 2017. The missile was said to feature "a small-size super-powerful power plant that can be placed inside the hull of a cruise missile and guarantee a range of flight ten times greater than that of other missiles." The video showed the missile evading defense systems over the Atlantic, flying over Cape Horn and finally north towards Hawaii.[18][19][20][21] To-date there is no publicly available evidence to verify these statements. The Pentagon stated that it is aware of a Russian test of a nuclear-powered cruise missile but the system is still under development and had crashed in the Arctic in 2017.[22][23][24]

A RAND Corporation researcher specializing in Russia said "My guess is they're not bluffing, that they've flight-tested this thing. But that's incredible."[25] According to a CSIS fellow, such a nuclear-powered missile "has an almost unlimited range – you could have it flying around for long periods of time before you order it to hit something"[26] Putin's statements and the video showing a concept of the missile in flight suggest that it is not a supersonic ramjet like Project Pluto but a subsonic vehicle with a nuclear-heated turbojet or turbofan engine.

The new cruise missile is named 9M730 Burevestnik (Russian: Буревестник; "Storm petrel").[27]

See also

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Trakimavičius, Lukas. "The Future Role of Nuclear Propulsion in the Military" (PDF). NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence. Retrieved 2021-10-15.
  2. ↑ Gallagher, Sean (22 March 2018). "Best bad idea ever? Why Putin's nuclear-powered missile is possible… and awful". Ars Technica. Retrieved 12 August 2019.
  3. ↑ Ruhl, Christian (January 20, 2019). "Why There Are No Nuclear Airplanes". The Atlantic. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  4. ↑ Waid, Jack (21 June 2021). "Manned Nuclear Aircraft Program" (PDF). US Dept. of Defense. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
  5. ↑ Thornton, G. (February 26–28, 1963). Introduction to nuclear propulsion: Lecture 1: Introduction and background. NASA Technical Report Server (Report). hdl:2060/19640019868.
  6. ↑ "U.S. QUIETLY KILLS ITS ATOM MISSILE; Project Pluto Canceled After Outlay of $200 Million". The New York Times Company. 13 July 1964. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
  7. ↑ Atomic Airships by John J. Geoghegan. Originally published in the January 2013 issue of Aviation History magazine.
  8. ↑ The Zeppelin in the Atomic Age: The Past, Present, and Future of the Rigid Lighter-Than-Air Aircraft, Kirschner, Edwin J. Published by University of Illinois Press (1957)
  9. ↑ JURICH, LEO (1 January 1960). "The Nuclear Powered Airship". SAE Mobilus. SAE Technical Paper Series. SAE International. 1. doi:10.4271/600278.
  10. ↑ Soviets Flight Testing Nuclear Bomber, Aviation Week, 1 December 1958, p. 27.
  11. ↑ "Modelarchives". modelarchives.free.fr. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  12. ↑ Soviet Nuclear Plane Possibility Conceded, Ford Eastman, Aviation Week, 19 January 1959, p. 29.
  13. ↑ "AURORA Russian Nuclear Bomber : the Sources". Modelarchives. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  14. ↑ Aitken, A. (producer), Kerevan, G. (writer/executive producer), "The 'Planes That Never Flew': The Nuclear Bomber", Alba Communications (for Discovery Europe), 2003
  15. ↑ ""120" (Ту-120): Дальний сверхзвуковой бомбардировщик с ядерной силовой установкой" [«120» (Ту-120): Long-range nuclear-powered supersonic bomber] (in Russian). testpilot.ru. Retrieved 12 August 2019.
  16. ↑ Buttler & Gordon 2004, pp. 78–83
  17. ↑ Colon 2009
  18. ↑ "Putin Reveals New Russian Nuclear Missile Defense". www.defenseworld.net. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  19. ↑ "Putin declares creation of unstoppable nuclear-powered missile". TASS. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  20. ↑ Troianovski, Anton (1 March 2018). "Putin claims Russia is developing nuclear arms capable of avoiding missile defenses". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  21. ↑ "Putin says 'no one in the world has anything like' all-powerful nuclear missile". USA Today. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  22. ↑ Bump, Philip (1 March 2018). "What Russia's newly announced nuclear systems actually mean". Retrieved 2 March 2018 – via www.washingtonpost.com.
  23. ↑ MacFarquhar, Neil; Sanger, David E. (1 March 2018). "Putin's 'Invincible' Missile Is Aimed at U.S. Vulnerabilities". The New York Times. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  24. ↑ Trevithick, Joseph (2 March 2018). "U.S. Has Been Secretly Watching Russia's Nuclear-Powered Cruise Missiles Crash and Burn". thedrive.com. Retrieved 12 August 2019.
  25. ↑ Brumfiel, Geoff (March 2018). "Experts Aghast At Russian Claim Of Nuclear-Powered Missile With Unlimited Range". Parallels. NPR. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  26. ↑ Baumgartner, Pete (March 2018). "Q&A: Arms Expert Says Putin's Weapons Boasts Look Like 'Overkill'". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  27. ↑ Fiorenza, Nicholas (23 March 2018). "New Russian weapons named". Jane's 360. Jane's Information Group. Archived from the original on 31 July 2018. Retrieved 12 August 2019.

General and cited sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.