Beam-powered propulsion, also known as directed energy propulsion, is a class of aircraft or spacecraft propulsion that uses energy beamed to the spacecraft from a remote power plant to provide energy. The beam is typically either a microwave or a laser beam and it is either pulsed or continuous. A continuous beam lends itself to thermal rockets, photonic thrusters and light sails, whereas a pulsed beam lends itself to ablative thrusters and pulse detonation engines.[1]

The rule of thumb that is usually quoted is that it takes a megawatt of power beamed to a vehicle per kg of payload while it is being accelerated to permit it to reach low Earth orbit.[2]

Other than launching to orbit, applications for moving around the world quickly have also been proposed.

Background

Rockets are momentum machines; they use mass ejected from the rocket to provide momentum to the rocket. Momentum is the product of mass and velocity, so rockets generally attempt to put as much velocity into their working mass as possible, thereby minimizing the amount of working mass that is needed. In order to accelerate the working mass, energy is required. In a conventional rocket, the fuel is chemically combined to provide the energy, and the resulting fuel products, the ash or exhaust, are used as the working mass.

There is no particular reason why the same fuel has to be used for both energy and momentum. In the jet engine, for instance, the fuel is used only to produce energy, the working mass is provided from the air that the jet aircraft flies through. In modern jet engines, the amount of air propelled is much greater than the amount of air used for energy. This is not a solution for the rocket, however, as they quickly climb to altitudes where the air is too thin to be useful as a source of working mass.

Rockets can, however, carry their working mass and use some other source of energy. The problem is finding an energy source with a power-to-weight ratio that competes with chemical fuels. Small nuclear reactors can compete in this regard, and considerable work on nuclear thermal propulsion was carried out in the 1960s, but environmental concerns and rising costs led to the ending of most of these programs.

A further improvement can be made by removing the energy creation from the spacecraft. If the nuclear reactor is left on the ground and its energy transmitted to the spacecraft, the weight of the reactor is removed as well. The issue then is to get the energy into the spacecraft. This is the idea behind beamed power.

With beamed propulsion one can leave the power-source stationary on the ground, and directly (or via a heat exchanger) heat propellant on the spacecraft with a maser or a laser beam from a fixed installation. This permits the spacecraft to leave its power-source at home, saving significant amounts of mass, greatly improving performance.

Laser propulsion

Since a laser can heat propellant to extremely high temperatures, this potentially greatly improves the efficiency of a rocket, as exhaust velocity is proportional to the square root of the temperature. Normal chemical rockets have an exhaust speed limited by the fixed amount of energy in the propellants, but beamed propulsion systems have no particular theoretical limit (although in practice there are temperature limits).

Microwave propulsion

In microwave thermal propulsion, an external microwave beam is used to heat a refractory heat exchanger to >1,500 K, in turn heating a propellant such as hydrogen, methane or ammonia. This improves the specific impulse and thrust/weight ratio of the propulsion system relative to conventional rocket propulsion. For example, hydrogen can provide a specific impulse of 700–900 seconds and a thrust/weight ratio of 50-150.[3]

A variation, developed by brothers James Benford and Gregory Benford, is to use thermal desorption of propellant trapped in the material of a very large microwave sail. This produces a very high acceleration compared to microwave pushed sails alone.

Electric propulsion

Some proposed spacecraft propulsion mechanisms use electrically powered spacecraft propulsion, in which electrical energy is used by an electrically powered rocket engine, such as an ion thruster or plasma propulsion engine. Usually these schemes assume either solar panels, or an on-board reactor. However, both power sources are heavy.

Beamed propulsion in the form of laser can be used to send power to a photovoltaic panel, for Laser electric propulsion. In this system, if high intensity is incident on the solar array, careful design of the panels is necessary to avoid a fall-off of the conversion efficiency due to heating effects. John Brophy has analyzed transmission of laser power to a photovoltaic array powering a high-efficiency electric propulsion system as a means of accomplishing high delta-V missions such as an interstellar precursor mission in a NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts project.[4]

A microwave beam could be used to send power to a rectenna, for microwave electric propulsion. Microwave broadcast power has been practically demonstrated several times (e.g. Goldstone, California in 1974), rectennas are potentially lightweight and can handle high power at high conversion efficiency. However, rectennas tend to need to be very large for a significant amount of power to be captured.

Direct impulse

A beam could also be used to provide impulse by directly "pushing" on the sail.

One example of this would be using a solar sail to reflect a laser beam. This concept, called a laser-pushed lightsail, was initially proposed by G. Marx[5] but first analyzed in detail, and elaborated on, by physicist Robert L. Forward in 1989[6] as a method of interstellar travel that would avoid extremely high mass ratios by not carrying fuel. Further analysis of the concept was done by Landis,[7][8] Mallove and Matloff,[9] Andrews[10] Lubin,[11] and others.

In a later paper, Forward proposed pushing a sail with a microwave beam.[12] This has the advantage that the sail need not be a continuous surface. Forward tagged his proposal for an ultralight sail "Starwisp". A later analysis by Landis[13] suggested that the Starwisp concept as originally proposed by Forward would not work, but variations on the proposal might be implemented.

The beam has to have a large diameter so that only a small portion of the beam misses the sail due to diffraction and the laser or microwave antenna has to have a good pointing stability so that the craft can tilt its sails fast enough to follow the center of the beam. This gets more important when going from interplanetary travel to interstellar travel, and when going from a fly-by mission, to a landing mission, to a return mission. The laser or the microwave sender would probably be a large phased array of small devices, which get their energy directly from solar radiation. The size of the array negates the need for a lens or mirror.

Another beam-pushed concept would be to use a magnetic sail or MMPP sail to divert a beam of charged particles from a particle accelerator or plasma jet.[14] Landis proposed a particle beam pushed sail in 1989,[7] and analyzed in more detail in a 2004 paper.[15] Jordin Kare has proposed a variant to this whereby a "beam" of small laser accelerated light sails would transfer momentum to a magsail vehicle.[16]

Another beam-pushed concept uses pellets or projectiles of ordinary matter. A stream of pellets from a stationary mass-driver is "reflected" by the spacecraft, cf. mass driver.[17] The spacecraft neither needs energy nor reaction mass for propulsion of its own.

Proposed systems

Lightcraft

A lightcraft is a vehicle currently under development that uses an external pulsed source of laser or maser energy to provide power for producing thrust.

The laser shines on a parabolic reflector on the underside of the vehicle that concentrates the light to produce a region of extremely high temperature. The air in this region is heated and expands violently, producing thrust with each pulse of laser light. In space, a lightcraft would need to provide this gas itself from onboard tanks or from an ablative solid. By leaving the vehicle's power source on the ground and by using ambient atmosphere as reaction mass for much of its ascent, a lightcraft would be capable of delivering a very large percentage of its launch mass to orbit. It could also potentially be very cheap to manufacture.

Testing

Early in the morning of 2 October 2000 at the High Energy Laser Systems Test Facility (HELSTF), Lightcraft Technologies, Inc. (LTI) with the help of Franklin B. Mead of the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory and Leik Myrabo set a new world's altitude record of 233 feet (71 m) for its 4.8 inch (12.2 cm) diameter, 1.8-ounce (51 g), laser-boosted rocket in a flight lasting 12.7 seconds.[18] Although much of the 8:35 am flight was spent hovering at 230+ feet, the Lightcraft earned a world record for the longest ever laser-powered free flight and the greatest "air time" (i.e., launch-to-landing/recovery) from a light-propelled object. This is comparable to Robert Goddard's first test flight of his rocket design. Increasing the laser power to 100 kilowatts will enable flights up to a 30-kilometer altitude. Their goal is to accelerate a one-kilogram microsatellite into low Earth orbit using a custom-built, one megawatt ground-based laser. Such a system would use just about 20 dollars' worth of electricity, placing launch costs per kilogram to many times less than current launch costs (which are measured in thousands of dollars).

Myrabo's "lightcraft" design is a reflective funnel-shaped craft that channels heat from the laser, towards the center, using a reflective parabolic surface causing the laser to literally explode the air underneath it, generating lift. Reflective surfaces in the craft focus the beam into a ring, where it heats air to a temperature nearly five times hotter than the surface of the Sun, causing the air to expand explosively for thrust.

Laser thermal rocket

A laser thermal rocket is a thermal rocket in which the propellant is heated by energy provided by an external laser beam.[19][20] In 1992, the late Jordin Kare proposed a simpler, nearer term concept which has a rocket containing liquid hydrogen.[21] The propellant is heated in a heat exchanger that the laser beam shines on before leaving the vehicle via a conventional nozzle. This concept can use continuous beam lasers, and the semiconductor lasers are now cost effective for this application.[22][23]

Microwave thermal rocket

In 2002, Kevin L.G. Parkin proposed a similar system using microwaves.[3][24][25][26] In May 2012, the DARPA/NASA Millimeter-wave Thermal Launch System (MTLS) Project[27] began the first steps toward implementing this idea. The MTLS Project was the first to demonstrate a millimeter-wave absorbent refractory heat exchanger, subsequently integrating it into the propulsion system of a small rocket to produce the first millimeter-wave thermal rocket. Simultaneously, it developed the first high power cooperative target millimeter-wave beam director and used it to attempt the first millimeter-wave thermal rocket launch. Several launches were attempted but problems with the beam director could not be resolved before funding ran out in March 2014.

Economics

Motivation to develop beam-powered propulsion systems comes from the economic advantages that would be gained as a result of improved propulsion performance. In the case of beam-powered launch vehicles, better propulsion performance enables some combination of increased payload fraction, increased structural margins and fewer stages. JASON's 1977 study of laser propulsion,[28] authored by Freeman Dyson, succinctly articulates the promise of beam-powered launch:

"Laser propulsion as an idea that may produce a revolution in space technology. A single laser facility on the ground can in theory launch single-stage vehicles into low or high earth orbit. The payload can be 20% or 30% of the vehicle take-off weight. It is far more economical in the use of mass and energy than chemical propulsion, and it is far more flexible in putting identical vehicles into a variety of orbits."

This promise was quantified in a 1978 Lockheed Study[29] conducted for NASA:

"The results of the study showed that, with advanced technology, laser rocket system with either a space- or ground-based laser transmitter could reduce the national budget allocated to space transportation by 10 to 345 billion dollars over a 10-year life cycle when compared to advanced chemical propulsion systems (LO2-LH2) of equal capability."

Beam director cost

The 1970s-era studies and others since have cited beam director cost as a possible impediment to beam-powered launch systems. A recent cost-benefit analysis[30] estimates that microwave (or laser) thermal rockets would be economical once beam director cost falls below 20 $/Watt. The current cost of suitable lasers is <100 $/Watt and the current cost of suitable microwave sources is <$5/Watt. Mass production has lowered the production cost of microwave oven magnetrons to <0.01 $/Watt and some medical lasers to <10 $/Watt, though these are thought to be unsuitable for use in beam directors.

Non-spacecraft applications

In 1964 William C. Brown demonstrated a miniature helicopter equipped with a combination antenna and rectifier device called a rectenna. The rectenna converted microwave power into electricity, allowing the helicopter to fly.[31]

In 2002 a Japanese group propelled a tiny aluminium airplane by using a laser to vaporize a water droplet clinging to it, and in 2003 NASA researchers flew an 11-ounce (312 g) model airplane with a propeller powered with solar panels illuminated by a laser.[32] It is possible that such beam-powered propulsion could be useful for long-duration high altitude unmanned aircraft or balloons, perhaps designed to serve – like satellites do today – as communication relays, science platforms, or surveillance platforms.

A "laser broom" has been proposed to sweep space debris from Earth orbit. This is another proposed use of beam-powered propulsion, used on objects that were not designed to be propelled by it, for example small pieces of scrap knocked off ("spalled") satellites. The technique works since the laser power ablates one side of the object, giving an impulse that changes the eccentricity of the object's orbit. The orbit would then intersect the atmosphere and burn up.

See also

References

  1. Breakthrough (2018-05-29), Progress in beamed energy propulsion | Kevin Parkin, retrieved 2018-06-07
  2. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-09-28. Retrieved 2009-08-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. 1 2 Parkin, Kevin L.G. (2006), The Microwave Thermal Thruster and Its Application to the Launch Problem, California Institute of Technology, doi:10.7907/T337-T709
  4. John Brophy, A Breakthrough Propulsion Architecture for Interstellar Precursor Missions, NASA, March 30, 2018. Accessed Nov. 18, 2019.
  5. G. Marx, "Interstellar Vehicle Propelled by Laser Beam," Nature, Vol. 211, July 1966, pp. 22-23.
  6. R. L. Forward, "Roundtrip Interstellar Travel Using Laser-Pushed lightsails," J. Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 21, pp 187-195 (Mar-Apr. 1989)
  7. 1 2 G. A. Landis, "Optics and Materials Considerations for a Laser-Propelled Lightsail", paper IAA-89-664, the 40th International Astronautical Federation Congress, Málaga, Spain, Oct. 7-12, 1989 (abstract)(full paper)
  8. G. A. Landis, "Small Laser-Pushed Lightsail Interstellar Probe: A Study of Parameter Variations", J. British Interplanetary Society, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 149-154 (1997); Paper IAA-95-4.1.1.02,
  9. Eugene Mallove & Gregory Matloff (1989). The Starflight Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-61912-3.
  10. Andrews, Dana G. (1994). "Cost considerations for interstellar missions". Acta Astronautica. Elsevier BV. 34: 357–365. Bibcode:1994AcAau..34..357A. doi:10.1016/0094-5765(94)90272-0. ISSN 0094-5765.
  11. P. Lubin, et al, "Directed Energy For Relativistic Propulsion and Interstellar Communications," J. British Interplanetary Soc., Vol. 68, No. 5/6, May, 2015, pp. 172.
  12. Forward, Robert L. (1985). "Starwisp - An ultra-light interstellar probe". Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). 22 (3): 345–350. Bibcode:1985JSpRo..22..345F. doi:10.2514/3.25754. ISSN 0022-4650.
  13. G. A. Landis, "Microwave Pushed Interstellar Sail: Starwisp Revisited", paper AIAA-2000-3337, 36th Joint Propulsion Conference, Huntsville AL, July 17–19, 2000. ("American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics - Meeting Papers". Archived from the original on 2007-02-17. Retrieved 2007-02-28.)
  14. Gilster, Paul (April 18, 2005). "Interstellar Flight by Particle Beam Revisited". Centauri Dreams.
  15. G. A. Landis, "Interstellar Flight by Particle Beam," Acta Astronautica, Vol 55, No. 11, 931-934 (Dec. 2004).
  16. J. T. Kare, High-acceleration Micro-scale Laser Sails for Interstellar Propulsion, Final Report, NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts, 31 December 2001
  17. Gilster, Paul (July 16, 2014). "'Smart Pellets' and Interstellar Propulsion". Centauri Dreams.
  18. Myrabo (2007-06-27), LightCraft Launch Oct 2000 - laserbeam powered propulsion, archived from the original on 2021-12-11, retrieved 2016-12-08
  19. H. Krier and R. J. Glumb. "Concepts and status of laser-supported rocket propulsion", Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 21, No. 1 (1984), pp. 70-79. https://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.8610
  20. "Laser Thermal Propulsion". Orbit-Raising and Maneuvering Propulsion: Research Status and Needs. 1984. pp. 129–148. doi:10.2514/5.9781600865633.0129.0148. ISBN 978-0-915928-82-8.
  21. Kare, J. T. (1992). Development of Laser-Driven Heat Exchanger Rocket for Ground to-Orbit Launch. Washington, DC International Astronautical Federation Congress. Bibcode:1992wadc.iafcQY...K
  22. Jordin T. Kare (March 24, 2004). "Modular Laser Launch Architecture: Analysis and Beam Module Design" (PDF). niac.usra.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved July 19, 2016.
  23. "HX Laser Launch: It's Steamship Time" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 24, 2011. Retrieved August 11, 2010.
  24. Parkin, K. L. G., et al. (2002). A Microwave-Thermal Thruster for Ultra Low-Cost Launch of Microsatellites, Jet Propulsion Center, California Institute of Technology.
  25. Patel, Prachi (25 January 2011). "NASA Exploring Laser Beams to Zap Rockets Into Outer Space". Fox News. Archived from the original on 2011-01-27.
  26. "Microwave-Powered Rockets Would Slash Cost of Reaching Orbit". Scientific American. December 1, 2015. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1215-33.
  27. Parkin, Kevin (2017). Microwave Thermal Propulsion - Final Report. NASA. hdl:2060/20170009162.
  28. Dyson, Freeman; Perkins (1977). "JASON Laser Propulsion Study". Stanford Research Institute. Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2016-12-08.
  29. Jones, W. (1979). "Final Report. Laser Rocket System Analysis". Lockheed Missiles and Space Company.
  30. Parkin, Kevin. "Microwave Thermal Rockets".
  31. EXPERIMENTAL AIRBORNE MICROWAVE SUPPORTED PLATFORM Archived March 2, 2010, at the Wayback Machine Descriptive Note : Final rept. Jun 64-Apr 65
  32. "NASA Armstrong Fact Sheet: Beamed Laser Power for UAVs". 2015-03-31.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.