In critical race theory, the black–white binary is a paradigm through which racial history is presented as a linear story between White and Black Americans.[1] This binary has largely defined how civil rights legislation is approached in the United States, as African Americans led most of the major racial justice movements that informed civil rights era reformation.[2] The paradigm conceptualizes Black and White people as the two predominant racial groups, viewing all racism accordant to anti-blackness, and the Black–White relation as central to racial analysis.[3] According to critical race scholars, the binary acts to govern racial classifications and describe how race is understood and approached politically and socially throughout American history.[4] The black-white binary is a product of white socialization and reduces race relations to an oppressor/oppressed dichotomy.[5]

While the black–white binary defines how racism has been widely approached in the United States, many scholars of color have scrutinized the concept for contributing to the marginalization of non-Black people of color, and omitting them from American civil rights history.[1] Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic propose a criticism of the black–white binary in an introductory book on critical race theory, arguing that because anti-discrimination law is designed with African American civil rights in mind, it fails to address the forms of discrimination that non-Black people of color experience.[6] This legal blind spot, they argued, leaves non-Black racial minorities less protected by civil rights laws.

Non-Black and non-White racial groups, such as Asian Americans and Native Americans, are understood as being positioned in relation to blackness and whiteness.[4] The measurement of non-Black, non-White racial groups through this binary led to the concept of white adjacency, which refers to racial groups considered adjacent to whiteness.[7] The application of white adjacency to Asian Americans through the model minority myth further marginalizes Asian Americans under the black–white binary, measuring them by their perceived proximity to whiteness, and their subsequent positional opposition to blackness.[8]

Queerness is racialized as normatively white through the black-white binary, further marginalizing queer people of color.[9] As the racial binary categorizes subjects as either White or Black, queer identity is often associated with white, Western society.

To address the issues that stem from the black-white binary, it is important for a "coalition of forces" to work towards racial justice. It is through this multi-dimensional approach that a fuller understanding of racism and other intersectional factors affect people's lives and inform what action is needed to address racism.[10]

References

  1. 1 2 Perea, Juan (1997). "The Black/White Binary Paradigm of Race: The "Normal Science" of American Racial Thought". California Law Review, la Raza Journal. 85 (5): 1213–1258. doi:10.2307/3481059. JSTOR 3481059.
  2. ↑ Brooks, Roy L. (1994). "In Defense of the Black/White Binary: Reclaiming a Tradition of Civil Rights Scholarship". Berkely Law: 107–112.
  3. ↑ Westmoreland, Peter (2013). "Racism in a Black White Binary: On the Reaction to Trayvon Martin's Death". University of Florida Law Scholarship: 1, 2.
  4. 1 2 Martín Alcoff, Linda (2003). "Latino/As, Asian Americans, and the Black-White Binary". The Journal of Ethics. 7 (1): 5–7. doi:10.1023/A:1022870628484. JSTOR 25115747. S2CID 142835332.
  5. ↑ Gil De Lamadrid, Daniel (2022). "The Whiteness of Prejudice Plus Power". Academia.
  6. ↑ Delgado, Richard &, Stefancic, Jean (2017). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction (Third ed.). NYU Press. p. 76. ISBN 978-1479802760.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ↑ Rahman, Rhea (2021). "Racializing the Good Muslim: Muslim White Adjacency and Black Muslim Activism in South Africa". Religions. 12: 58. doi:10.3390/rel12010058.
  8. ↑ Lee, Phillip (2021). "Lee, P. (2021). Rejecting Honorary Whiteness: Asian Americans and the Attack on Race-Conscious Admissions. Emory Law Journal, 70(7), 1475-1506". Emory Law Journal. 70 (7): 1494–1498.
  9. ↑ Gil De Lamadrid, Daniel (2023). "QueerCrit: The Intersection of Queerness and the Black-White Binary". Academia.
  10. ↑ Alcoff, Linda Martín (2013-04-01). "Afterword:The Black/White Binary and Antiblack Racism". Critical Philosophy of Race. 1 (1): 121–124. doi:10.5325/critphilrace.1.1.0121. ISSN 2165-8684.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.