In model theory, a branch of mathematical logic, a C-minimal theory is a theory that is "minimal" with respect to a ternary relation C with certain properties. Algebraically closed fields with a (Krull) valuation are perhaps the most important example.

This notion was defined in analogy to the o-minimal theories, which are "minimal" (in the same sense) with respect to a linear order.

Definition

A C-relation is a ternary relation C(x; y, z) that satisfies the following axioms.

1. ${\displaystyle \forall xyz\,[C(x;y,z)\rightarrow C(x;z,y)],}$
2. ${\displaystyle \forall xyz\,[C(x;y,z)\rightarrow \neg C(y;x,z)],}$
3. ${\displaystyle \forall xyzw\,[C(x;y,z)\rightarrow (C(w;y,z)\vee C(x;w,z))],}$
4. ${\displaystyle \forall xy\,[x\neq y\rightarrow \exists z\neq y\,C(x;y,z)].}$

A C-minimal structure is a structure M, in a signature containing the symbol C, such that C satisfies the above axioms and every set of elements of M that is definable with parameters in M is a Boolean combination of instances of C, i.e. of formulas of the form C(x; b, c), where b and c are elements of M.

A theory is called C-minimal if all of its models are C-minimal. A structure is called strongly C-minimal if its theory is C-minimal. One can construct C-minimal structures which are not strongly C-minimal.

Example

For a prime number p and a p-adic number a, let |a|_p denote its p-adic absolute value. Then the relation defined by ${\displaystyle C(a;b,c)\iff |b-c|_{p}<|a-c|_{p}}$ is a C-relation, and the theory of Q_p with addition and this relation is C-minimal. The theory of Q_p as a field, however, is not C-minimal.

References

• Macpherson, Dugald; Steinhorn, Charles (1996), "On variants of o-minimality", Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 79 (2): 165–209, doi:10.1016/0168-0072(95)00037-2
• Haskell, Deirdre; Macpherson, Dugald (1994), "Cell decompositions of C-minimal structures", Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 66 (2): 113–162, doi:10.1016/0168-0072(94)90064-7