China's Maritime Militia
中国海上民兵
Chinese paramilitary trawler 00001 a Philippines boat resupplying Spratlys.[1]
Country China
Allegiance Chinese Communist Party
TypeMaritime militia
RoleNaval patrols, reconnaissance, search and rescue; greyzone warfare
Fleet370,000 non-powered FVs (2015)[2]
672,000 powered FVs (2015)[2]
Engagements

The Maritime Militia, also called the Fishing Militia (Chinese: 中国海上民兵), is one of the three forces, next to the China Coast Guard (CCG) and the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), used in maritime operations by the People’s Republic of China (PRC).[3]

As of 2022, the PRC and Vietnam were the only nations worldwide that had officially established a legal regime for their maritime militia.[4]

Name

The US Military refers to the Maritime Militia as the People's Armed Forces Maritime Militia (PAFMM).[5]

For reportedly operating in the South China Sea without clear identification, they are sometimes referred to as the "little blue men", a term coined by Andrew S. Erickson of the Naval War College, in reference to Russia's "little green men" during its 2014 annexation of Crimea.[6]

History

China's maritime militia was established after the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) won the Chinese Civil War and forced the Kuomintang (KMT) to flee the mainland to Taiwan. The newly consolidated communist government needed to augment their maritime defenses against the nationalist forces, which had retreated offshore and remained entrenched on a number of coastal islands. Therefore, the concept of people's war was applied to the sea with fishermen and other nautical laborers being drafted into a maritime militia. The nationalists had maintained a maritime militia during their time in power, but the communist government preferred to craft theirs anew given their suspicion of organizations created by the nationalists. The CCP also instituted a national-level maritime militia command to unite the local militias, something the KMT had never done. In the early 1950s, the Bureau of Aquatic Products played a key role in institutionalizing and strengthening the maritime militia as it collectivized local fisheries. Bureau of Aquatic Products leaders were also generally former high-ranking PLAN officers which lead to close relations between the organizations. The formation of the maritime militia was influenced by the Soviet "Young School" of military theory, which emphasized coastal defense over naval power projection for nascent communist powers.[5]

In the 1960s and 1970s, the PLAN established maritime militia schools near the three main fleet headquarters of Qingdao, Shanghai, and Guangzhou.[5] Through the first half of the 1970s, the maritime militia mostly stayed near shore and close to China. However, by the later 1970s, the maritime militia had evolved an important sovereignty support function which brought it into increasing conflict with China's neighbors, especially in the South China Sea. The maritime militia contributed significantly to the Battle of the Paracel Islands, especially in providing amphibious lift capacity to Chinese forces.[5]

In the 2000s, the involvement of the maritime militia in more aggressive operations, namely, the physical interference with the navigation of Navy ships by the US, increased.[7]

China's fishing fleet was being downsized until 2008, when maritime militia funding lead instead to an expansion. This expansion has led to an increase in illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.[2]

In 2019, the United States issued a warning to China over aggressive and unsafe action by their Coast Guard and maritime militia.[8]

The maritime militia is believed to be behind a number of incidents in the South China Sea where high powered lasers were pointed at the cockpits of aircraft. This includes an attack against a Royal Australian Navy helicopter.[9]

In 2022, satellite images showed that more than a hundred militia vessels operated in the South China Sea on a daily basis. The number of vessels peaked in July 2022, when around 400 militia vessels were deployed in the South China Sea. The movement and the observed behavior of the militia vessels remained consistent over the years.[10]

Structure and Characteristics

China’s fishing militia consists of a mixture of purpose-built maritime militia fishing vessels (MMFV) as well as normal fishing boats, called Spratly Backbone Fishing Vessels (SBFVs), which get recruited by the central government via various subsidy programs.[7] Most of the boats are between 45 and 65 meters long.[10] A vast majority of the fleet is owned by natural persons, and not the government itself.[7] This means, a large part of the armed mass organization is made up of civilians, who still maintain regular jobs in the marine economy, while being part of the militia. Although the militia is independent from the PLAN and the CCG, it is trained by both.[11] The maritime militia operates from mainly ten ports within the Guangdong and Hainan Provinces of China.[7]

Capabilities

The Maritime Militia has utilized both rented fishing vessels and purpose-built ships in its operations.[12]

Although the maritime militia is part of the armed forces of the PRC, in 2018 it was usually unarmed.[3] The violence used by the militia is mostly limited to dangerous maneuvers and, on occasion, the ramming or shouldering of other vessels. Professional militia vessels can be equipped with large water cannons.[7] Most vessels are issued with navigation and communication equipment while some are also issued small arms.[13][14] Some Maritime Militia units are equipped with naval mines and anti-aircraft weapons.[15] [16]

The communications systems can be used both for communication and espionage. Often, fishermen supply their own vessels. However, there are also core contingents of the maritime militia who operate vessels fitted out for militia work instead of fishing; these vessels feature reinforced bows for ramming and high-powered water cannons.[17] The increasing sophistication of militia vessels' communication equipment is a double-edged sword for Chinese authorities. New equipment, as well as training in its use, has substantially improved command, control, and coordination of militia units. However, the vessels' resulting professionalism and sophisticated maneuvers make them more identifiable as government-sponsored actors, dampening their ability to function as a gray-zone force. Such improvements also potentially make militia vessels more threatening during at-sea confrontations, raising the risk of unintended escalations with foreign militaries.[18]

Tasks

The PRC considers its large fishing fleet an essential part of its sea power, helping with the pursuit of its maritime interests in disputed waters.[19] The maritime militia carries out three different tasks in China’s dispute strategy, also referred to as maritime rights protection:[20] It is active in disputes over the territorial features as well as disputes over the extent of zones of jurisdictions, and it regulates foreign activities - especially military activities - in waters claimed by the PRC. While the first two tasks target mostly neighboring countries, such as Brunei, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam and their conflicting interests in the South China and East China Sea, the third task is primarily a response to the Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPs) by the US.[3]

According to a Congressional Research Service report, the Maritime Militia and coast guard are deployed more regularly than the PLAN in maritime sovereignty-assertion operations.[12]

Greyzone Warfare

Various academic journals and media articles claim that the maritime militia increasingly takes part in anti-access and area denial missions in a continuously growing area of the western Pacific. By using law enforcement and fishing vessels, instead of traditional naval assets, the PRC is able to stay with its actions in a greyzone area, avoiding a military conflict while still being able to successfully pursue its maritime claims.[11] The use of the maritime militia, which consists of civilians, allows the PRC to benefit from the legal ambiguity and the diplomatic arbitrariness coming from the involvement of civilians in such maritime operations.[21]

According to research from the Taiwanese Institute for National Defense and Security Research, China's maritime militia is part of their “grey zone" tactics, which are used to wage conflict against China's neighbors without crossing the threshold into conventional war.[22] The maritime militia is a particularly useful gray zone force because Chinese authorities can deny or claim affiliation with its members depending on context. China can send its militia to harass foreign vessels in contested areas, but publicly assert that the vessels are independent from government control, thus avoiding escalation with other states. At the same time, if militia members are hurt during confrontations with foreign vessels, the Chinese government can claim the need to "defend" its own fishermen, mobilizing domestic nationalism to improve its bargaining position in a crisis.[18]

Some of the incidents, which are generally defined as greyzone operations within the academic discourse, are the harassment of the USNS Impeccable in 2009,[23] the Senkaku Island incident in 2010,[24] the Scarborough Shoal standoff in 2012, the Hai Yang Shi You 981 standoff in 2014,[19] and the Natuna Islands incident in 2016.[25]

Control

It is uncertain how much control the Chinese authorities have over the fishing vessels operating in the South China Sea. Funding problems are apparent, since fishermen earn more by fishing, than participating in militia operations. Command and coordination arrangements of the maritime militia are unclear as well and only a weak exertion of control on fishermen can be noticed.[11] Since most members of the maritime militia are simultaneously fishermen, they regularly pursue their own agendas, sometimes contradictory to what the government wants.[26] For instance, multiple fishermen went against the central government by using maritime militia policy to fish for protected and endangered species in disputed waters.[11] Moreover, factors such as food security and economic advantages influence fishermen to operate outside of China’s exclusive economic zone,[19] since the PRCs jurisdictional waters are polluted, and a depletion of China’s fishery resources can be noticed.[25] Therefore, while the maritime militia is involved in greyzone operations, it is misleading to portray it as a professional coherent body, which can be systematically used by the central government.[11]

See also

References

  1. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/12/asia/china-maritime-militia-philippines-tensions-intl-hnk-ml/index.html
  2. 1 2 3 Kraska, James. "China's Maritime Militia Vessels May Be Military Objectives During Armed Conflict". thediplomat.com. The Diplomat. Retrieved 8 July 2020.
  3. 1 2 3 Kennedy, Conor (2018). "The Struggle for Blue Territory. Chinese Maritime Militia Grey-Zone Operations". RUSI Journal. 163 (5): 8 via Taylor & Francis Online.
  4. Cui, Haoran; Shi, Yubing (2022). "A Comparative Analysis of the Legislation on Maritime Militia Between China and Vietnam". Ocean Development & International Law. 53 (2–3): 149 via Taylor & Francis Online.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Grossman, Derek; Ma, Logan (6 April 2020). "A Short History of China's Fishing Militia and What It May Tell Us". rand.org. RAND Corporation. Archived from the original on 8 July 2020. Retrieved 9 July 2020.
  6. Jakhar, Pratik (15 April 2019). "Analysis: What's so fishy about China's 'maritime militia'?". monitoring.bbc.co.uk. BBC Monitoring. Archived from the original on 15 May 2021. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Poling, Gregory B.; Mallory, Tabitha Grace; Prétat, Harrison; The Center for Advanced Defense Studies (2021). "Pulling Back the Curtain on China's Maritime Militia".
  8. Sevastopulo, Demetri; Hille, Kathrin (28 April 2019). "US warns China on aggressive acts by fishing boats and coast guard". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 8 July 2020. Retrieved 9 July 2020.
  9. Yeo, Mike (31 May 2019). "Testing the waters: China's maritime militia challenges foreign forces at sea". Defense News. Retrieved 9 July 2020.
  10. 1 2 Center for Strategic and International Studies (2022). "The Ebb and Flow of Beijing's South China Sea Militia".
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Luo, Shuxian; Panter, Jonathan G. (2021). "China's Maritime Militia and Fishing Fleets. A Primer for Operational Staffs and Tactical Leaders". Military Review: 11–15.
  12. 1 2 "Ronald O'Rourke, U.S.-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas: Implications for U.S. Interests—Background and Issues for Congress, R42784. Congressional Research Service. pp. 13, 76". Archived from the original on 2021-01-26. Retrieved 2021-02-14.
  13. Owens, Tess (1 May 2016). "China Is Reportedly Training a 'Maritime Militia' to Patrol the Disputed South China Sea". vice.com. Vice News. Archived from the original on 9 July 2020. Retrieved 9 July 2020.
  14. Song, Andrew (2021). "Civilian at Sea: Understanding Fisheries' Entanglement with Maritime Border Security". Geopolitics: 10 via Taylor & Francis Online.
  15. Chan, Eric. "Escalating Clarity without Fighting: Countering Gray Zone Warfare against Taiwan (Part 2)". globaltaiwan.org. The Global Taiwan Institute. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  16. Song, Andrew (2021). "Civilian at Sea: Understanding Fisheries' Entanglement with Maritime Border Security". Geopolitics: 10 via Taylor & Francis Online.
  17. Manthorpe, Jonathan (28 April 2019). "Beijing's maritime militia, the scourge of South China Sea". Asia Times. Archived from the original on 15 May 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2020.
  18. 1 2 Luo, Shuxian; Panter, Jonathan (January–February 2021). "China's Maritime Militia and Fishing Fleets: A Primer for Operational Staffs and Tactical Leaders". Military Review. 101 (1): 6–21. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 19 January 2021.
  19. 1 2 3 Zhang, Hongzhou (2016). "Chinese fishermen in disputed waters: Not quite a "people's war"". Marine Policy. 68: 65–68 via Elsevier Science Direct.
  20. Martinson, Ryan (2021). "Catching sovereignty fish: Chinese fishers in the southern Spratlys". Marine Policy. 125: 8 via Elsevier Science Direct.
  21. Yoo, Su Jin; Koo, Min Gyo (2022). "Is China Responsible for Its Maritime Militia's Internationally Wrongful Acts? The Attribution of the Conduct of a Parastatal Entity to the State". Business and Politics. 24: 278 via Cambridge University Press.
  22. "DIPLOMACY: Maritime militia warning issued". Taipei Times. 16 June 2020. Archived from the original on 17 June 2020. Retrieved 8 July 2020.
  23. Pedrozo, Raul (2009). "Close Encounters at Sea: The USNS Impeccable Incident". Naval War College Review. 62 (3): 106 via JSTOR.
  24. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (2023). "Japanese Territory. Trends in China Coast Guard and Other Vessels in the Waters Surrounding the Senkaku Islands, and Japan's Response".
  25. 1 2 Zhang, Hongzhou; Bateman, Sam (2017). "Fishing Militia, the Securitization of Fishery and the South China Sea Dispute". Contemporary Southeast Asia. 39 (2): 292–294 via JSTOR.
  26. Roszko, Edyta (2021). "Navigating Seas, Markets, and Sovereignties: Fishers and Occupational Slippage in the South China Sea". Anthropological Quarterly. 94 (4): 663 via Project Muse.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.