Algebraic structure → Group theory Group theory
Basic notions Subgroup Normal subgroup Quotient group (Semi-)direct product Group homomorphisms kernel image direct sum wreath product simple finite infinite continuous multiplicative additive cyclic abelian dihedral nilpotent solvable action Glossary of group theory List of group theory topics
Finite groups Cyclic group Zn Symmetric group Sn Alternating group An Dihedral group Dn Quaternion group Q Cauchy's theorem Lagrange's theorem Sylow theorems Hall's theorem p-group Elementary abelian group Frobenius group Schur multiplier Classification of finite simple groups cyclic alternating Lie type sporadic
Discrete groups Lattices Integers (${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$) Free group Modular groups PSL(2, ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$) SL(2, ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$) Arithmetic group Lattice Hyperbolic group
Topological and Lie groups Solenoid Circle General linear GL(n) Special linear SL(n) Orthogonal O(n) Euclidean E(n) Special orthogonal SO(n) Unitary U(n) Special unitary SU(n) Symplectic Sp(n) G2 F4 E6 E7 E8 Lorentz Poincaré Conformal Diffeomorphism Loop Infinite dimensional Lie group O(∞) SU(∞) Sp(∞)
Algebraic groups Linear algebraic group Reductive group Abelian variety Elliptic curve

Lie groups and Lie algebras
Classical groups General linear GL(n) Special linear SL(n) Orthogonal O(n) Special orthogonal SO(n) Unitary U(n) Special unitary SU(n) Symplectic Sp(n)
Simple Lie groups Classical An Bn Cn Dn Exceptional G2 F4 E6 E7 E8
Other Lie groups Circle Lorentz Poincaré Conformal group Diffeomorphism Loop Euclidean
Lie algebras Lie group–Lie algebra correspondence Exponential map Adjoint representation Killing form Index Simple Lie algebra Loop algebra Affine Lie algebra
Semisimple Lie algebra Dynkin diagrams Cartan subalgebra Root system Weyl group Real form Complexification Split Lie algebra Compact Lie algebra
Representation theory Lie group representation Lie algebra representation Representation theory of semisimple Lie algebras Representations of classical Lie groups Theorem of the highest weight Borel–Weil–Bott theorem
Lie groups in physics Particle physics and representation theory Lorentz group representations Poincaré group representations Galilean group representations
Scientists Sophus Lie Henri Poincaré Wilhelm Killing Élie Cartan Hermann Weyl Claude Chevalley Harish-Chandra Armand Borel
Glossary Table of Lie groups

In mathematics, E₈ is any of several closely related exceptional simple Lie groups, linear algebraic groups or Lie algebras of dimension 248; the same notation is used for the corresponding root lattice, which has rank 8. The designation E₈ comes from the Cartan–Killing classification of the complex simple Lie algebras, which fall into four infinite series labeled A_n, B_n, C_n, D_n, and five exceptional cases labeled G₂, F₄, E₆, E₇, and E₈. The E₈ algebra is the largest and most complicated of these exceptional cases.

Basic description

The Lie group E₈ has dimension 248. Its rank, which is the dimension of its maximal torus, is eight.

Therefore, the vectors of the root system are in eight-dimensional Euclidean space: they are described explicitly later in this article. The Weyl group of E₈, which is the group of symmetries of the maximal torus which are induced by conjugations in the whole group, has order 2¹⁴ 3⁵ 5² 7 = 696729600.

The compact group E₈ is unique among simple compact Lie groups in that its non-trivial representation of smallest dimension is the adjoint representation (of dimension 248) acting on the Lie algebra E₈ itself; it is also the unique one which has the following four properties: trivial center, compact, simply connected, and simply laced (all roots have the same length).

There is a Lie algebra E_k for every integer k ≥ 3. The largest value of k for which E_k is finite-dimensional is k = 8, that is, E_k is infinite-dimensional for any k > 8.

Real and complex forms

There is a unique complex Lie algebra of type E₈, corresponding to a complex group of complex dimension 248. The complex Lie group E₈ of complex dimension 248 can be considered as a simple real Lie group of real dimension 496. This is simply connected, has maximal compact subgroup the compact form (see below) of E₈, and has an outer automorphism group of order 2 generated by complex conjugation.

As well as the complex Lie group of type E₈, there are three real forms of the Lie algebra, three real forms of the group with trivial center (two of which have non-algebraic double covers, giving two further real forms), all of real dimension 248, as follows:

• The compact form (which is usually the one meant if no other information is given), which is simply connected and has trivial outer automorphism group.
• The split form, EVIII (or E₈₍₈₎), which has maximal compact subgroup Spin(16)/(Z/2Z), fundamental group of order 2 (implying that it has a double cover, which is a simply connected Lie real group but is not algebraic, see below) and has trivial outer automorphism group.
• EIX (or E₈₍₋₂₄₎), which has maximal compact subgroup E₇×SU(2)/(−1,−1), fundamental group of order 2 (again implying a double cover, which is not algebraic) and has trivial outer automorphism group.

For a complete list of real forms of simple Lie algebras, see the list of simple Lie groups.

E₈ as an algebraic group

By means of a Chevalley basis for the Lie algebra, one can define E₈ as a linear algebraic group over the integers and, consequently, over any commutative ring and in particular over any field: this defines the so-called split (sometimes also known as “untwisted”) form of E₈. Over an algebraically closed field, this is the only form; however, over other fields, there are often many other forms, or “twists” of E₈, which are classified in the general framework of Galois cohomology (over a perfect field k) by the set H¹(k,Aut(E₈)) which, because the Dynkin diagram of E₈ (see below) has no automorphisms, coincides with H¹(k,E₈).^[1]

Over R, the real connected component of the identity of these algebraically twisted forms of E₈ coincide with the three real Lie groups mentioned above, but with a subtlety concerning the fundamental group: all forms of E₈ are simply connected in the sense of algebraic geometry, meaning that they admit no non-trivial algebraic coverings; the non-compact and simply connected real Lie group forms of E₈ are therefore not algebraic and admit no faithful finite-dimensional representations.

Over finite fields, the Lang–Steinberg theorem implies that H¹(k,E₈)=0, meaning that E₈ has no twisted forms: see below.

The characters of finite dimensional representations of the real and complex Lie algebras and Lie groups are all given by the Weyl character formula. The dimensions of the smallest irreducible representations are (sequence A121732 in the OEIS):

1, 248, 3875, 27000, 30380, 147250, 779247, 1763125, 2450240, 4096000, 4881384, 6696000, 26411008, 70680000, 76271625, 79143000, 146325270, 203205000, 281545875, 301694976, 344452500, 820260000, 1094951000, 2172667860, 2275896000, 2642777280, 2903770000, 3929713760, 4076399250, 4825673125, 6899079264, 8634368000 (twice), 12692520960…

The 248-dimensional representation is the adjoint representation. There are two non-isomorphic irreducible representations of dimension 8634368000 (it is not unique; however, the next integer with this property is 175898504162692612600853299200000 (sequence A181746 in the OEIS)). The fundamental representations are those with dimensions 3875, 6696000, 6899079264, 146325270, 2450240, 30380, 248 and 147250 (corresponding to the eight nodes in the Dynkin diagram in the order chosen for the Cartan matrix below, i.e., the nodes are read in the seven-node chain first, with the last node being connected to the third).

The coefficients of the character formulas for infinite dimensional irreducible representations of E₈ depend on some large square matrices consisting of polynomials, the Lusztig–Vogan polynomials, an analogue of Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials introduced for reductive groups in general by George Lusztig and David Kazhdan (1983). The values at 1 of the Lusztig–Vogan polynomials give the coefficients of the matrices relating the standard representations (whose characters are easy to describe) with the irreducible representations.

These matrices were computed after four years of collaboration by a group of 18 mathematicians and computer scientists, led by Jeffrey Adams, with much of the programming done by Fokko du Cloux. The most difficult case (for exceptional groups) is the split real form of E₈ (see above), where the largest matrix is of size 453060×453060. The Lusztig–Vogan polynomials for all other exceptional simple groups have been known for some time; the calculation for the split form of E₈ is far longer than any other case. The announcement of the result in March 2007 received extraordinary attention from the media (see the external links), to the surprise of the mathematicians working on it.

The representations of the E₈ groups over finite fields are given by Deligne–Lusztig theory.

Constructions

One can construct the (compact form of the) E₈ group as the automorphism group of the corresponding e₈ Lie algebra. This algebra has a 120-dimensional subalgebra so(16) generated by J_ij as well as 128 new generators Q_a that transform as a Weyl–Majorana spinor of spin(16). These statements determine the commutators

${\displaystyle \left[J_{ij},J_{k\ell }\right]=\delta _{jk}J_{i\ell }-\delta _{j\ell }J_{ik}-\delta _{ik}J_{j\ell }+\delta _{i\ell }J_{jk}}$

as well as

${\displaystyle \left[J_{ij},Q_{a}\right]={\frac {1}{4}}\left(\gamma _{i}\gamma _{j}-\gamma _{j}\gamma _{i}\right)_{ab}Q_{b},}$

while the remaining commutators (not anticommutators!) between the spinor generators are defined as

${\displaystyle \left[Q_{a},Q_{b}\right]=\gamma _{ac}^{[i}\gamma _{cb}^{j]}J_{ij}.}$

It is then possible to check that the Jacobi identity is satisfied.

Geometry

The compact real form of E₈ is the isometry group of the 128-dimensional exceptional compact Riemannian symmetric space EVIII (in Cartan's classification). It is known informally as the "octooctonionic projective plane" because it can be built using an algebra that is the tensor product of the octonions with themselves, and is also known as a Rosenfeld projective plane, though it does not obey the usual axioms of a projective plane. This can be seen systematically using a construction known as the magic square, due to Hans Freudenthal and Jacques Tits (Landsberg & Manivel 2001).

E₈ root system

Zome model of the E₈ root system, projected into three-space, and represented by the vertices of the 4₂₁ polytope,

Shown in 3D projection using the basis vectors [u,v,w] giving H3 symmetry:

• u = (1, φ, 0, −1, φ, 0,0,0)
• v = (φ, 0, 1, φ, 0, −1,0,0)
• w = (0, 1, φ, 0, −1, φ,0,0)

The projected 4₂₁ polytope vertices are sorted and tallied by their 3D norm generating the increasingly transparent hulls of each set of tallied norms. These show:

1. 4 points at the origin
2. 2 icosahedrons
3. 2 dodecahedrons
4. 4 icosahedrons
5. 1 icosadodecahedron
6. 2 dodecahedrons
7. 2 icosahedrons
8. 1 icosadodecahedron

for 240 vertices. These are two concentric sets of hulls from the H4 symmetry of the 600-cell scaled by the golden ratio.^[2]

A root system of rank r is a particular finite configuration of vectors, called roots, which span an r-dimensional Euclidean space and satisfy certain geometrical properties. In particular, the root system must be invariant under reflection through the hyperplane perpendicular to any root.

The E₈ root system is a rank 8 root system containing 240 root vectors spanning R⁸. It is irreducible in the sense that it cannot be built from root systems of smaller rank. All the root vectors in E₈ have the same length. It is convenient for a number of purposes to normalize them to have length √2. These 240 vectors are the vertices of a semi-regular polytope discovered by Thorold Gosset in 1900, sometimes known as the 4₂₁ polytope.

Construction

In the so-called even coordinate system, E₈ is given as the set of all vectors in R⁸ with length squared equal to 2 such that coordinates are either all integers or all half-integers and the sum of the coordinates is even.

Explicitly, there are 112 roots with integer entries obtained from

${\displaystyle \left(\pm 1,\pm 1,0,0,0,0,0,0\right)\,}$

by taking an arbitrary combination of signs and an arbitrary permutation of coordinates, and 128 roots with half-integer entries obtained from

${\displaystyle \left(\pm {\tfrac {1}{2}},\pm {\tfrac {1}{2}},\pm {\tfrac {1}{2}},\pm {\tfrac {1}{2}},\pm {\tfrac {1}{2}},\pm {\tfrac {1}{2}},\pm {\tfrac {1}{2}},\pm {\tfrac {1}{2}}\right)\,}$

by taking an even number of minus signs (or, equivalently, requiring that the sum of all the eight coordinates be even). There are 240 roots in all.

E₈ 2d projection with thread made by hand

The 112 roots with integer entries form a D₈ root system. The E₈ root system also contains a copy of A₈ (which has 72 roots) as well as E₆ and E₇ (in fact, the latter two are usually defined as subsets of E₈).

In the odd coordinate system, E₈ is given by taking the roots in the even coordinate system and changing the sign of any one coordinate. The roots with integer entries are the same while those with half-integer entries have an odd number of minus signs rather than an even number.

Simple roots

Hasse diagram of E₈ root poset with edge labels identifying added simple root position

A set of simple roots for a root system Φ is a set of roots that form a basis for the Euclidean space spanned by Φ with the special property that each root has components with respect to this basis that are either all nonnegative or all nonpositive.

Given the E₈ Cartan matrix (above) and a Dynkin diagram node ordering of:

One choice of simple roots is given by the rows of the following matrix:

${\displaystyle \left[{\begin{array}{rr}1&-1&0&0&0&0&0&0\\0&1&-1&0&0&0&0&0\\0&0&1&-1&0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&1&-1&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0&1&-1&0&0\\0&0&0&0&0&1&1&0\\-{\frac {1}{2}}&-{\frac {1}{2}}&-{\frac {1}{2}}&-{\frac {1}{2}}&-{\frac {1}{2}}&-{\frac {1}{2}}&-{\frac {1}{2}}&-{\frac {1}{2}}\\0&0&0&0&0&1&-1&0\\\end{array}}\right].}$

With this numbering of nodes in the Dynkin diagram, the highest root in the root system has Coxeter labels (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 4, 2, 3). Using this representation of the simple roots, the lowest root is given by

${\displaystyle \left[{\begin{array}{rr}-1&0&0&0&0&0&0&1\\\end{array}}\right].}$

The only simple root that can be added to the lowest root to obtain another root is the one corresponding to node 1 in this labeling of the Dynkin diagram — as is to be expected from the affine Dynkin diagram for ${\displaystyle {\tilde {E}}_{8}}$. The Hasse diagram to the right enumerates the 120 roots of positive height relative to any particular choice of simple roots consistent with this node numbering.

Note that the Hasse diagram does not represent the full Lie algebra, or even the full root system. The 120 roots of negative height relative to the same set of simple roots can be adequately represented by a second copy of the Hasse diagram with the arrows reversed; but it is less straightforward to connect these two diagrams via a basis for the eight-dimensional Cartan subalgebra. In the notation of the exposition of Chevalley generators and Serre relations: Insofar as an arrow represents the Lie bracket by the generator ${\displaystyle e_{i}}$ associated with a simple root, each root in the height -1 layer of the reversed Hasse diagram must correspond to some ${\displaystyle f_{i}}$ and can have only one upward arrow, connected to a node in the height 0 layer representing the element of the Cartan subalgebra given by ${\displaystyle h_{i}=[e_{i},f_{i}]}$. But the upward arrows from the height 0 layer must then represent ${\displaystyle [e_{i},h_{j}]=-a_{ji}e_{i}}$, where ${\displaystyle a_{ji}}$ is (the transpose of) the Cartan matrix. One could draw multiple upward arrows from each ${\displaystyle h_{j}}$ associated with all ${\displaystyle e_{i}}$ for which ${\displaystyle [e_{i},h_{j}]}$ is nonzero; but this neither captures the numerical entries in the Cartan matrix nor reflects the fact that each ${\displaystyle e_{i}}$ only has nonzero Lie bracket with one degree of freedom in the Cartan subalgebra (just not the same degree of freedom as ${\displaystyle h_{i}}$).

More fundamentally, this organization implies that the span of the generators designated as "the" Cartan subalgebra is somehow inherently special, when in most applications, any mutually commuting set of eight of the 248 Lie algebra generators (of which there are many!) — or any eight linearly independent, mutually commuting Lie derivations on any manifold with E₈ structure — would have served just as well. Once a Cartan subalgebra has been selected (or defined a priori, as in the case of a lattice), a basis of "Cartan generators" (the ${\displaystyle h_{i}}$ among the Chevalley generators) and a root system are a useful way to describe structure relative to this subalgebra. But the root system map is not the Lie algebra (let alone group!) territory. Given a set of Chevalley generators, most degrees of freedom in a Lie algebra and their sparse Lie brackets with ${\displaystyle {e_{i}}}$ can be represented schematically as circles and arrows, but this simply breaks down on the chosen Cartan subalgebra. Such are the hazards of schematic visual representations of mathematical structures.

Simple subalgebras of E₈

An incomplete simple subgroup tree of E₈

The Lie algebra E₈ contains as subalgebras all the exceptional Lie algebras as well as many other important Lie algebras in mathematics and physics. The height of the Lie algebra on the diagram approximately corresponds to the rank of the algebra. A line from an algebra down to a lower algebra indicates that the lower algebra is a subalgebra of the higher algebra.

Chevalley groups of type E₈

Chevalley (1955) showed that the points of the (split) algebraic group E₈ (see above) over a finite field with q elements form a finite Chevalley group, generally written E₈(q), which is simple for any q,^[4][5] and constitutes one of the infinite families addressed by the classification of finite simple groups. Its number of elements is given by the formula (sequence A008868 in the OEIS):

${\displaystyle q^{120}\left(q^{30}-1\right)\left(q^{24}-1\right)\left(q^{20}-1\right)\left(q^{18}-1\right)\left(q^{14}-1\right)\left(q^{12}-1\right)\left(q^{8}-1\right)\left(q^{2}-1\right)}$

The first term in this sequence, the order of E₈(2), namely 337804753143634806261388190614085595079991692242467651576160959909068800000 ≈ 3.38×10⁷⁴, is already larger than the size of the Monster group. This group E₈(2) is the last one described (but without its character table) in the ATLAS of Finite Groups.^[6]

The Schur multiplier of E₈(q) is trivial, and its outer automorphism group is that of field automorphisms (i.e., cyclic of order f if q=p^f where p is prime).

Lusztig (1979) described the unipotent representations of finite groups of type E₈.

Subgroups, subalgebras, and extensions

The smaller exceptional groups E₇ and E₆ sit inside E₈. In the compact group, both E₆×SU(3)/(Z/3Z) and E₇×SU(2)/(+1,−1) are maximal subgroups of E₈.

Embeddings of the maximal subgroups of E₈ up to dimension 248 with associated projection matrix.

The 248-dimensional adjoint representation of E₈ may be considered in terms of its restricted representation to the first of these subgroups. It transforms under E₆×SU(3) as a sum of tensor product representations, which may be labelled as a pair of dimensions as (78,1) + (1,8) + (27,3) + (27,3). (Since the maximal subgroup is actually the quotient of this group product by a finite group, these notations may strictly be taken as indicating the infinitesimal (Lie algebra) representations.) Since the adjoint representation can be described by the roots together with the generators in the Cartan subalgebra, we may choose a particular E₆ root system within E₈ and decompose the sum representation relative to this E₆. In this description,

• (78,1), a copy of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{6}}$, consists of the 72 roots with (−1⁄2,−1⁄2,−1⁄2), (0,0,0), or (1⁄2,1⁄2,1⁄2) in the last three dimensions, together with five Cartan generators corresponding to the first five dimensions and one Cartan generator corresponding to an equally weighted sum of the last three Cartan generators of the E₈ system;
• (1,8), a copy of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su}}(3)}$, consists of the six roots with permutations of (0,1,−1) in the last three dimensions, together with two Cartan generators corresponding to the two trace-free combinations of the last three Cartan generators of the E₈ system;
• (27,3) consists of all roots with permutations of (-1,0,0), (−1⁄2,1⁄2,1⁄2), or (0,1,1) in the last three dimensions; and
• (27,3) consists of all roots with permutations of (1,0,0), (1⁄2,−1⁄2,−1⁄2), or (0,-1,-1) in the last three dimensions.

The 248-dimensional adjoint representation of E₈, when similarly restricted to the second maximal subgroup, transforms under E₇×SU(2) as: (133,1) + (1,3) + (56,2). We may again see the decomposition by looking at the roots together with the generators in the Cartan subalgebra. In this description,

• (133,1), a copy of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{7}}$, consists of the 126 roots with (−1,−1), (−1⁄2,−1⁄2), (0,0), (1⁄2,1⁄2), or (1,1) in the last two dimensions, together with six Cartan generators corresponding to the first six dimensions and one Cartan generator corresponding to an equally weighted sum of the last two Cartan generators of the E₈ system;
• (1,3), a copy of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su}}(2)}$, consists of the two roots (0,0,0,0,0,0,1,−1), (0,0,0,0,0,0,−1,1), together with one Cartan generator corresponding to the trace-free combination of the last two Cartan generators of the E₈ system; and
• (56,2) consists of all roots with permutations of (0,-1), (1⁄2,−1⁄2), or (1,0) in the last two dimensions.

The connection between these two descriptions is given by the graded exceptional Lie algebra constructions of J. Tits and B. N. Allison. Any 27-dimensional representation of E₆ can be equipped with a non-associative (but strictly power-associative) Jordan product operation to form an Albert algebra (an important exceptional case in algebraic constructions). The Kantor–Koecher–Tits construction applied to this Albert algebra recovers the 78-dimensional ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{6}}$ as the reduced structure algebra of the Albert algebra. This ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{6}}$, together with the 27 and 27 representations and the grade operator (the element of the Cartan subalgebra with weight -1 on the 27, +1 on the 27, and 0 on the 78), forms an ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{7}}$ 3-graded Lie algebra. A complete exposition of this construction may be found in standard texts on Jordan algebras such as Jacobson 1968 or McCrimmon 2004.

Starting this 3-graded Lie algebra construction with any particular 27-dimensional representation, embedded within ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{8}}$, of any particular E₆ subgroup of E₈ produces the corresponding ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{7}}$ subalgebra. The particular ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{7}}$ in the E₇×SU(2) decomposition given above corresponds to choosing the 27 consisting of all roots with (1,0,0), (1⁄2,-1⁄2,-1⁄2), or (0,-1,-1) in the last three dimensions (in order), with the grade operator having weight (-1,1⁄2,1⁄2) in these dimensions; or equivalently to choosing the "27" consisting of all roots with (-1,0,0), (−1⁄2,1⁄2,1⁄2), or (0,1,1) in the last three dimensions (in order), with the grade operator having weight (1,-1⁄2,-1⁄2) in these dimensions. Note that there is nothing special about this choice of dimensions — the ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{8}}$ within which the root system is embedded is not the set of eight independent but non-orthogonal axes corresponding to the simple roots, and any three dimensions will do — and there are also constructions using other equivalent groupings of roots. What matters is that the kernel of the Lie bracket with the generator chosen as the "grade operator" be an ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{6}}$ subalgebra (plus a central ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}}$ associated with the grade operator itself and the remaining generator of the Cartan subalgebra), not ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {a}}_{6}\oplus \mathbb {R} ^{2}}$, ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {a}}_{7}\oplus \mathbb {R} }$, ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{7}\oplus \mathbb {R} }$, etc.

(In the simple Lie algebra case, the sign of the grade of the 27 versus the 27 representation is a matter of convention, as is the scale of the grading. However, choosing -1 as the grade of the 27-dimensional "vector" representation is consistent with an extension of the 3-graded algebra to higher positive grades via the exterior algebra over the 27 "covector" representation. The "vector" representation then lies, not in this nonnegative-graded exterior algebra, but in the graded algebra of derivations over the exterior algebra; the 78-dimensional ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{6}}$ is the grade 0 subalgebra (a subalgebra of the inner derivations by "vector-valued 1-forms") of this graded algebra of derivations. For details on how this asymmetric structure works starting from a general 3-graded algebra, see references at Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket. The relevance of this observation to E₈ is simply that E₇ and E₈ are their own clusters of structures, distinguished as exceptional simple Lie groups/algebras, and that any particular reconstruction of them using representations of their subgroups/subalgebras will have extensions beyond the motivating case. Varying conventions of sign, scale, and conjugate relationship in the literature are due not just to inaccuracies but also to the directions in which the authors seek to extend their constructions.)

The distinguished ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su}}(2)}$ in the E₇×SU(2) decomposition above is then given by the subalgebra of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su}}(3)}$ that commutes with the grade operator (which lies in the Cartan subalgebra of this ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su}}(3)}$). Of the four remaining roots in the ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su}}(3)}$, two are of grade 1⁄2 and two are of grade -1⁄2. In the convention where the 27 of E₆ used to construct the ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{7}}$ has grade -1 and the 27 has grade +1, the other two 27's have grade +1⁄2 and the other two 27's have grade -1⁄2, as is apparent from permuting the values of the last three roots in the description above. Grouping these 4×(1+27)=112 generators to form the grade +1⁄2 and -1⁄2 subspaces of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{8}}$ (relative to the original choice of grade operator within ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{7}}$), each subspace may be given a quite particular non-associative (nor even power-associative) product operation, resulting in two copies of Brown's 56-dimensional structurable algebra. Allison's 5-graded Lie algebra construction based on this structurable algebra recovers the original ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{8}}$. (Allison's 5-grading differs from the above by a factor -2.) Grouping these generators differently, based on their weights relative to the Cartan generator of the ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su}}(2)}$ orthogonal to ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{7}}$, gives two 56-dimensional subspaces which each carry the lowest-dimensional non-trivial irreducible representation of E₇. Either of these may be combined with the Cartan generator to form a 57-dimensional Heisenberg algebra, and adjoining this to ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{7}}$ produces the (non-simple) Lie algebra E7½ described by Landsberg and Manivel.

From the perspective in which the 27-dimensional grade -1 subspace of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{8}}$ (relative to a choice of grade operator) plays the role of "vector" representation of E₆ and the 27 with roots opposite it plays the role of "covector" representation, it is natural to look for "spinor" representations in the grade +1⁄2 and -1⁄2 subspaces, or in some other combination of the (27,3) and (27,3) representations of E₆×SU(3), and to attempt to relate these to geometrical spinors in the Clifford algebra sense as employed in quantum field theory. Variations on this idea are common in the physics literature. See Distler and Garibaldi 2009 for discussion of the mathematical obstacles to constructing a chiral gauge theory based on E₈. The structure of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{8}}$ relative to its ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {e}}_{6}}$ subalgebra, together with the conventional scaling of elements of the Cartan subalgebra, invites extensions by geometric analogy but does not necessarily imply a relationship to low-dimensional geometry or low-energy physics. The same may be said of connections to Jordan and Heisenberg algebras, whose historical origins are intertwined with the development of quantum mechanics. Not every visual representation evocative of a tobacco pipe will hold tobacco.

The finite quasisimple groups that can embed in (the compact form of) E₈ were found by Griess & Ryba (1999).

The Dempwolff group is a subgroup of (the compact form of) E₈. It is contained in the Thompson sporadic group, which acts on the underlying vector space of the Lie group E₈ but does not preserve the Lie bracket. The Thompson group fixes a lattice and does preserve the Lie bracket of this lattice mod 3, giving an embedding of the Thompson group into E₈(F₃).

The embeddings of the maximal subgroups of E₈ up to dimension 248 are shown to the right.

Applications

The E₈ Lie group has applications in theoretical physics and especially in string theory and supergravity. E₈×E₈ is the gauge group of one of the two types of heterotic string and is one of two anomaly-free gauge groups that can be coupled to the N = 1 supergravity in ten dimensions. E₈ is the U-duality group of supergravity on an eight-torus (in its split form).

One way to incorporate the standard model of particle physics into heterotic string theory is the symmetry breaking of E₈ to its maximal subalgebra SU(3)×E₆.

In 1982, Michael Freedman used the E₈ lattice to construct an example of a topological 4-manifold, the E₈ manifold, which has no smooth structure.

Antony Garrett Lisi's incomplete "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" attempts to describe all known fundamental interactions in physics as part of the E₈ Lie algebra.^[7][8]

R. Coldea, D. A. Tennant, and E. M. Wheeler et al. (2010) reported an experiment where the electron spins of a cobalt-niobium crystal exhibited, under certain conditions, two of the eight peaks related to E₈ that were predicted by Zamolodchikov (1989).^[9][10]

History

Wilhelm Killing (1888a, 1888b, 1889, 1890) discovered the complex Lie algebra E₈ during his classification of simple compact Lie algebras, though he did not prove its existence, which was first shown by Élie Cartan. Cartan determined that a complex simple Lie algebra of type E₈ admits three real forms. Each of them gives rise to a simple Lie group of dimension 248, exactly one of which (as for any complex simple Lie algebra) is compact. Chevalley (1955) introduced algebraic groups and Lie algebras of type E₈ over other fields: for example, in the case of finite fields they lead to an infinite family of finite simple groups of Lie type. E₈ continues to be an area of active basic research by Atlas of Lie Groups and Representations, which aims to determine the unitary representations of all the Lie groups.^[11]

See also

• E_n

Footnotes

References

• Adams, J. Frank (1996), Lectures on exceptional Lie groups, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-00526-3, MR 1428422
• Baez, John C. (2002), "The octonions", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, New Series, 39 (2): 145–205, arXiv:math/0105155, doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-01-00934-X, MR 1886087, S2CID 586512
• Chevalley, Claude (1955), "Sur certains groupes simples", The Tohoku Mathematical Journal, Second Series, 7 (1–2): 14–66, doi:10.2748/tmj/1178245104, ISSN 0040-8735, MR 0073602
• Coldea, R.; Tennant, D. A.; Wheeler, E. M.; Wawrzynska, E.; Prabhakaran, D.; Telling, M.; Habicht, K.; Smeibidl, P.; Kiefer, K. (2010), "Quantum Criticality in an Ising Chain: Experimental Evidence for Emergent E₈ Symmetry", Science, 327 (5962): 177–180, arXiv:1103.3694, Bibcode:2010Sci...327..177C, doi:10.1126/science.1180085, PMID 20056884, S2CID 206522808
• Garibaldi, Skip (2016), "E₈, the most exceptional group", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 53 (4): 643–671, arXiv:1605.01721, doi:10.1090/bull/1540, S2CID 15810796
• Griess, Robert L.; Ryba, A. J. E. (1999), "Finite simple groups which projectively embed in an exceptional Lie group are classified!", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, New Series, 36 (1): 75–93, doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-99-00771-5, MR 1653177
• Killing, Wilhelm (1888a), "Die Zusammensetzung der stetigen endlichen Transformationsgruppen", Mathematische Annalen, 31 (2): 252–290, doi:10.1007/BF01211904, S2CID 120501356
• Killing, Wilhelm (1888b), "Die Zusammensetzung der stetigen endlichen Transformationsgruppen", Mathematische Annalen, 33 (1): 1–48, doi:10.1007/BF01444109, S2CID 124198118
• Killing, Wilhelm (1889), "Die Zusammensetzung der stetigen endlichen Transformationsgruppen", Mathematische Annalen, 34 (1): 57–122, doi:10.1007/BF01446792, S2CID 179177899, archived from the original on 2015-02-21, retrieved 2013-09-12
• Killing, Wilhelm (1890), "Die Zusammensetzung der stetigen endlichen Transformationsgruppen", Mathematische Annalen, 36 (2): 161–189, doi:10.1007/BF01207837, S2CID 179178061
• Landsberg, Joseph M.; Manivel, Laurent (2001), "The projective geometry of Freudenthal's magic square", Journal of Algebra, 239 (2): 477–512, arXiv:math/9908039, doi:10.1006/jabr.2000.8697, MR 1832903, S2CID 16320642
• Lusztig, George (1979), "Unipotent representations of a finite Chevalley group of type E8", The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, Second Series, 30 (3): 315–338, doi:10.1093/qmath/30.3.301, ISSN 0033-5606, MR 0545068
• Lusztig, George; Vogan, David (1983), "Singularities of closures of K-orbits on flag manifolds", Inventiones Mathematicae, Springer-Verlag, 71 (2): 365–379, Bibcode:1983InMat..71..365L, doi:10.1007/BF01389103, S2CID 120917588
• Zamolodchikov, A. B. (1989), "Integrals of motion and S-matrix of the (scaled) T=T_c Ising model with magnetic field", International Journal of Modern Physics A, 4 (16): 4235–4248, Bibcode:1989IJMPA...4.4235Z, doi:10.1142/S0217751X8900176X, MR 1017357

External links