A genetic isolate is a population of organisms with little genetic mixing with other organisms within the same species due to geographic isolation or other factors that prevent reproduction. Genetic isolates form new species through an evolutionary process known as speciation. All modern species diversity is a product of genetic isolates and evolution.

The current distribution of genetic differences and isolation within and among populations is also influenced by genetic processes, which can give significant input into evolution's basic principles. The resulting genetic diversity within a species' distribution range is frequently unequally distributed, and significant disparities can occur in the series of fields when population dispersion and isolation are critical for species survival.[1]

The interrelationship of genetic drift, gene flow, and natural selection determines the level and dispersion of genetic differences between populations and among species assemblages.[2] Geographic and natural elements may likewise add to these cycles and further impact species' advanced examples of hereditary variety, such as genetic differences that cause genetic isolation.[3] Genetic variations are often unequally distributed over a species' geographic distribution, with differences between populations at the geographic center and the range's extremities.[4]

Significant gene flow occurs in core populations, resulting in genetic uniformity. In contrast, low gene flow, severe genetic drift, and diverse selection conditions occur in range periphery populations, enhancing genetic isolation and heterogeneity among people.[5] Genetic differentiation resulting from genetic isolation occurs as significant alterations in genetic variations, such as fluctuations in allelic frequencies, that accumulate over time with geographic regional boundaries.

Significant genetic diversity can be detected toward the limits of a species range, where population fragmentation and isolation are more likely to affect genetic processes. Fragmentation is the division of a large population into smaller, geographically separated habitats, resulting in genetic differences within and across groups.[6] Regional splitting is produced by a variety of factors, including environmental processes that regularly change a species' indigenous distribution.[7] Additionally, human-caused environmental changes such as deforestation and land degradation can result in rapid changes in a species' distribution, leading to population decrease, segmentation, and regional isolation.[8]

History

Isolation, in combination with diminishing habitat quality and a limited population density, is likely to result in a population's collapse and ultimate extinction.[9] Random mutation rate, drift, high rates of inbreeding, restricted gene flow, and regional extinction have all been shown to increase with isolation. Varying climatic conditions, such as particular geographic climatic changes, can cause pressures that can drastically change a species' genetic composition, yielding differences through starkly different selection processes[10] as well as leading to increased genetic isolation among populations on a landscape heterogeneity.[11]

Environmental heterogeneity has historically been identified as a vital source of genetic variations and distinctions due to isolation, and several studies have found correlations between neutral genetic differences, ecological heterogeneity, and genetic isolation. The genetic isolation and different associations in regional heterogeneity could be cited as evidence of diversifying selection working across entire genomes, encompassing manifestly neutral genes. They can be used to predict the long-term effects of environmental factors on genetic diversity and isolation.[12]

Definition

Genetic isolation is the population of organisms with little genetic mixing with other organisms within the same species. This may result in speciation, but this is not necessarily true. Genetic isolates may form new species in several ways:

  • Allopatric speciation, in which two populations of the same species are geographically isolated from one another by an extrinsic barrier and evolve intrinsic (genetic) reproductive isolation.
  • Peripatric speciation, in which a small group of a population is separated from the prominent people and experiences genetic drift.
  • Parapatric speciation, in which zones of two diverging populations are separate but do overlap somewhat; partial separation is afforded by geography, so individuals of each species may come in contact from time to time, but selection for specific behaviors or mechanisms may prevent breeding between the two groups.
  • Sympatric speciation, a contentious method of speciation in which species diverge while inhabiting the same place.

Human influences on genetic isolates include restricted breeding of dogs or a community living secluded away from others (such as Tristan da Cunha or Pitcairn Islands). Far more significant and less secluded human genetic isolates are peoples like Sardinians or also the Finns, natives of Finland.

Genetic isolation and the Giraffa camelopardalis

Genetic isolation can happen in a variety of ways. Many ongoing research projects are evaluating how various species have diverged through the process of genetic isolation, the giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis, being one example. Giraffes are recognized to have nine separate subspecies, each varying in coloration and patterns.[13] After much research, it is accepted that genetic isolation allowed the G. camelopardalis species to diverge.

There are various ideas behind how genetic isolation has occurred within the giraffe species. Extant giraffe populations have been studied to make small-scale migratory movements based on the African climate's wet and dry seasons.[14] The feeding ecology of giraffes is highly researched. It has shown that giraffes will follow the growth patterns of the Acacia tree based upon seasonal change, changing locations from mountain ranges to desert ranges.[15] Though this is not evidence for current-day genetic isolation, it suggests past large-scale migrations that may have caused separation within the species, caused genetic isolation, and led to the beginnings of the sub-speciation of the giraffe population.

Giraffes also tend to travel in loose social herds. However, these loose social herds have been researched to be based on a non-random system. This non-random system follows a trend of kinship or the sharing of similar genes between individuals. These loose-social herds keep kin and familiar individuals within the same group, with only slight movements of individuals from the pack, only to return to the same group.[16] This is evidence for genetic isolation by interaction only between familiar individuals. This is the cause of interbreeding and the accumulation of specific alleles. These alleles could potentially code for pelage color and pattern within a population, causing differences between people and, ultimately, the sub-speciation of the giraffe species.

Geographic separation has also been studied to play a role in the genetic isolation of the giraffe. The mitochondrial DNA of the giraffe has been looking for mutations and loci substitutions between subspecies and suggests diversification around the Late Pleistocene, where geographic isolation was likely.[17]

Allopatric speciation

The giraffe can represent the allopatric speciation that occurs due to the genetic isolation of a population. Several clades of giraffes show differentiation within their mitochondrial DNA, varying between regions throughout Africa. These differences date back to the middle of the Pleistocene epoch and coincide with genetic isolation due to climatic and geographical separations within the population, allowing for the evolution and sub speciation of the separate subspecies of giraffes and differences in their pelage.[18] In addition, when a species splits into two different groups that are isolated from one another, this is known as allopatric speciation.[19]

Genetic isolation and speciation

A genetic species is a collection of biologically compatible crossbreeding natural populations genetically distinct from genetically related people. In contrast to the biological species concept, the genetic species concept emphasizes genetic isolation rather than reproductive separation. The finding of genetically separate but not reproductively isolated species advances our knowledge of biodiversity, speciation, related issues, and organism evolution. Consider the development of two allopatric populations. Over lengthy periods, each group undergoes numerous substitutions, resulting in genetic differentiation and isolation. Would it be possible to transplant a divergent gene from one group into the genome of another? It's simple to see the gene being reasonably successful on this connected genetic background. That's also easy to see how it wouldn't work out because they are now genetically isolated from one another.[20]

Genetic isolation by environment or distance

Strong gene flow across populations can help local adaptation by bringing new genetic variations for selection, but it can also impede adaptation by clogging up locally beneficial genes. Population size, genetic diversity, and the environment can all impact the outcome. Isolation by distance (IBD), wherein population growth rates and immigration numbers are inversely proportional to population distance, may correlate gene flow patterns with geographic distance. Gene flow may also follow patterns of isolation by habitat, with higher rates of gene flow among an increasingly common form. Moreover, gene flow may be greatest across dissimilar areas, which is the typical genomic swamping situation.[21] When the population size is limited, and individuals are subjected to strong selection, gene flow can boost population numbers, even if the phenotypes that arise are generally mis-adapted. This can lead to increases in genetic differences that lead to isolation, allowing new adaptations to take hold and even enlarge a habitat zone.[22]

Genetic isolation in fragmented populations

The link between statistical genetic differences and population size has gotten little scientific attention, even though small populations have less genetic variation at marker loci. Researchers show that in smaller fragmented meta-population, both neutral and quantifiable genetic variation is reduced, and both drift and selection change is amplified.[23]

Genetic isolation in sympatric species

Adaptation to diverse positions and climatic conditions could be a significant source of genetic differences and population isolation. Pleiotropic-induced sexual selection between individuals of these genetically diverse populations can be caused by biological features selected in each habitat. This circumstance could make sympatric speciation easier. For example, successful host transitions in phytophagous insects provide compelling evidence for ecological diversification in sympatric speciation.[24]

Genetic isolation and the burden of genetic diversity

Species with enormous ecological amplitudes, on the whole, have a lot of genetic diversity. On the other hand, more specialized species with small ecological amplitude and frequency have minimal genetic diversity. Inbreeding depressions may pose the greatest threat to species with moderate habitat demands and substantial genetic diversity.[25]

The Influence of dispersal and diet on patterns of genetic isolation

Gene flow across populations is considered key in evolving local adaptations and speciation. Assessing genetic separation by distance is necessary to determine the impacts of dispersal ability and food breadth on genetic population structure. Strong dispersers have a mild IBD (isolation by distance) because of the homogenizing effects of gene flow, whereas stationary species have limited gene flow, which permits nearly all populations to isolate. Genetic uniformity is achieved at small geographical scales in intermediate dispersers, whereas limited dispersal increases genetic variability across vast distances. IBD is also thought to rise with decreasing food breadth and no other pattern, putting the theory that specialization promotes speciation by affecting population genetic subdivision to the test. In studies of IBD, the number of people is more essential than the number of multiple alleles per locus.[26]

Current patterns of genetic isolation on islands

Individuals from several vegetation types on the island are genetically connected, demonstrating that ecological and climatic factors have a role in determining gene flow configurations on a small island. Climatic differentiation, as a single factor is included as separate variability, provides to decreases in immigration and reproduction in as many species belong to a wide range of herbs families and with variable amounts of evolutionary understanding. The genetic structure of species on an isolated island is influenced by a range of environmental variables, with some species being influenced by single contours and others being influenced by many species. Sister species and congenerics have various contributing elements to isolation within species.[27]

Advantages

In most situations, highly specialized species are constrained to a small portion of the accessible environment, characterized by extremely isolated populations.[28] This ecological specialization, and consequently geographical constraint of indigenous populations is frequently accompanied by a reduction in gene flow, resulting in small population sizes and genetic differentiation. As a result, due to genetic isolation, such species can only survive if they are suited to minimal genetic isolation.[29][30] In the search for lethal genes, genetic isolates with a background of a small founding population, long-term isolation, and population bottlenecks are invaluable resources. Specific rare, monogenic disorders get enhanced, and families with numerous sick members become common enough to be employed in locus-identifying linkage analyses. Besides that, most cases are caused by the same mutation, and diseased alleles expose the linkage of disequilibrium with molecular markers over strong genetic distances, making disease locus recognition easier in small study samples with few individuals affected using a similarity search for a shared genotype. The presence of disequilibrium linkage in disease alleles enhances linkage analysis and aids in determining the precise position of the disease locus on the genome sequence.[31]

Disadvantages

Many species fall somewhere between generalist and specialist on the generalist specialist range. Such species generally exhibit moderate environmental specialization, being neither pure generalists nor pure specialists, resulting in fluid changes that must be subjective when categorizing species. Despite their considerable habitat specialization, environmentally transitional species generally do not exhibit the low genetic diversity seen in pure specialists but instead exhibit species-specific genetic differences on the scale with generalists. Conversely, these taxa are categorized as far more endangered than their degree of specialization would suggest. This scenario can be harmful in the progression of population decline and may be one of the promoters of extinction in this instance, owing to the genomic instability of populations and unpredictable aggregation of detrimental genes.[32]

Example:

Genetic isolation in the cyclic rodent Microtus avails

Microtus arvalis, a small-sized mouse with short dispersal ranges that achieves relatively high richness, has been used as a model to investigate the effects of roads on genetic diversity and organization in fragmented and competitive habitats. The species' remarkable colonization potential has been observed in recent decades,[33] making it particularly well suited to studying small mammal dispersion strategies over short periods. Furthermore, these mouse populations achieve high local abundances and may endure significant population fluctuations in a few years, with well-defined periods.[34] In comparison to what has been reported for other morphologically similar small mammals with more reasonably expected populations, this species' cyclic variation in population size makes it particularly fascinating to explore the possible sensitivity to road barriers.[35] In a system with considerable population size changes, the lowest population size experiences the highest amounts of genetic drift. As a result, demographic bottlenecks are likely to significantly impact genetic isolations and variations, reducing variability within populations while increasing variance between them. On the other hand, the enormous population size and gene flow at the highest stages may lessen the effects of drift and bottlenecks. However, the species may take many generations to achieve new equilibrium values.[36]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Tóth, Endre Gy; Tremblay, Francine; Housset, Johann M.; Bergeron, Yves; Carcaillet, Christopher (2019-10-17). "Geographic isolation and climatic variability contribute to genetic differentiation in fragmented populations of the long-lived subalpine conifer Pinus cembra L. in the western Alps". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 19 (1): 190. doi:10.1186/s12862-019-1510-4. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC 6798344. PMID 31623551.
  2. ↑ ECKERT, C. G.; SAMIS, K. E.; LOUGHEED, S. C. (March 2008). "Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: the central–marginal hypothesis and beyond". Molecular Ecology. 17 (5): 1170–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03659.x. ISSN 0962-1083. PMID 18302683. S2CID 13746514.
  3. ↑ Marchelli, P; Gallo, L A (September 2001). "Genetic diversity and differentiation in a southern beech subjected to introgressive hybridization". Heredity. 87 (3): 284–293. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00882.x. ISSN 0018-067X. PMID 11737275. S2CID 22211025.
  4. ↑ Hampe, Arndt; Petit, Rémy J. (2005-03-07). "Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters". Ecology Letters. 8 (5): 461–467. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x. hdl:10261/64087. ISSN 1461-023X. PMID 21352449.
  5. ↑ Brunet, Johanne; Larson-Rabin, Zachary; Stewart, Christy M. (June 2012). "The Distribution of Genetic Diversity Within and Among Populations of the Rocky Mountain Columbine: The Impact of Gene Flow, Pollinators, and Mating System". International Journal of Plant Sciences. 173 (5): 484–494. doi:10.1086/665263. ISSN 1058-5893. S2CID 84162712.
  6. ↑ Provan, Jim; Maggs, Christine A. (2011-05-18). "Unique genetic variation at a species' rear edge is under threat from global climate change". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1726): 39–47. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0536. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 3223643. PMID 21593035.
  7. ↑ Hampe, Arndt; Petit, Rémy J. (2005-03-07). "Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters". Ecology Letters. 8 (5): 461–467. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x. hdl:10261/64087. ISSN 1461-023X. PMID 21352449.
  8. ↑ Cheptou, Pierre-Olivier; Hargreaves, Anna L.; Bonte, Dries; Jacquemyn, Hans (2017-01-19). "Adaptation to fragmentation: evolutionary dynamics driven by human influences". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 372 (1712): 20160037. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0037. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 5182433. PMID 27920382.
  9. ↑ Sterling, Ken A.; Reed, David H.; Noonan, Brice P.; Warren, Melvin L. (2012-03-28). "Genetic effects of habitat fragmentation and population isolation on Etheostoma raneyi (Percidae)". Conservation Genetics. 13 (3): 859–872. doi:10.1007/s10592-012-0335-0. ISSN 1566-0621. S2CID 14016133.
  10. ↑ Kreyling, Juergen; Buhk, Constanze; Backhaus, Sabrina; Hallinger, Martin; Huber, Gerhard; Huber, Lukas; Jentsch, Anke; Konnert, Monika; Thiel, Daniel; Wilmking, Martin; Beierkuhnlein, Carl (2014-02-07). "Local adaptations to frost in marginal and central populations of the dominant forest tree F agus sylvatica L . as affected by temperature and extreme drought in common garden experiments". Ecology and Evolution. 4 (5): 594–605. doi:10.1002/ece3.971. ISSN 2045-7758. PMC 4098140. PMID 25035801.
  11. ↑ Bockelmann, A.-C.; Reusch, T. B. H.; Bijlsma, R.; Bakker, J. P. (February 2003). "Habitat differentiation vs. isolation-by-distance: the genetic population structure of Elymus athletics in European salt marshes". Molecular Ecology. 12 (2): 505–515. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01706.x. ISSN 0962-1083. PMID 12535100. S2CID 23544230.
  12. ↑ Jiang, Xiao-Long; An, Miao; Zheng, Si-Si; Deng, Min; Su, Zhi-Hao (2017-12-27). "Geographical isolation and environmental heterogeneity contribute to the spatial genetic patterns of Quercus kerrii (Fagaceae)". Heredity. 120 (3): 219–233. doi:10.1038/s41437-017-0012-7. ISSN 0018-067X. PMC 5836588. PMID 29279604.
  13. ↑ "Giraffe Subspecies". Giraffe Conservation Foundation. Archived from the original on 30 June 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2014.
  14. ↑ Pellew, R (1984). "The feeding ecology of a selective browser, the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi". Journal of Zoology. 202: 57–81. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1984.tb04288.x.
  15. ↑ Fennessy, J (2009). "Home range and seasonal movements of Giraffa camelopardalis angolensis in the northern Namib Desert". African Journal of Ecology. 47 (3): 318–327. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.00963.x.
  16. ↑ Bercovitch, F.B. (2013). "Herd composition, kinship and fission–fusion social dynamics among wild giraffe". African Journal of Ecology. 51 (2): 206–216. doi:10.1111/aje.12024.
  17. ↑ Hassanin, A (2007). "Mitochondrial DNA variability in Giraffa camelopardalis: consequences for taxonomy, phylogeography and conservation of giraffes in West and Central Africa". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 330 (3): 265–274. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2007.02.008. PMID 17434121.
  18. ↑ Brown, D. M.; Brenneman, R. A.; Koepfli, K. P.; Pollinger, J. P.; Milá, B.; Georgiadis, N. J.; Wayne, R. K. (2007). "Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe". BMC Biology. 5 (1): 57. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-57. PMC 2254591. PMID 18154651.
  19. ↑ "speciation". National Geographic Society. 2011-01-21. Retrieved 2021-09-24.
  20. ↑ Baker, Robert J.; Bradley, Robert D. (August 2006). "Speciation in Mammals and the Genetic Species Concept". Journal of Mammalogy. 87 (4): 643–662. doi:10.1644/06-mamm-f-038r2.1. ISSN 0022-2372. PMC 2771874. PMID 19890476.
  21. ↑ Sexton, Jason P.; Hangartner, Sandra B.; Hoffmann, Ary A. (January 2014). "Genetic Isolation by Environment or Distance: Which Pattern of Gene Flow is Most Common?". Evolution. 68 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1111/evo.12258. PMID 24111567. S2CID 10975665.
  22. ↑ Holt, Robert D.; Gomulkiewicz, Richard (March 1997). "How Does Immigration Influence Local Adaptation? A Reexamination of a Familiar Paradigm". The American Naturalist. 149 (3): 563–572. doi:10.1086/286005. ISSN 0003-0147. S2CID 83733282.
  23. ↑ WILLI, Y.; VAN BUSKIRK, J.; SCHMID, B.; FISCHER, M. (March 2007). "Genetic isolation of fragmented populations is exacerbated by drift and selection". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 20 (2): 534–542. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01263.x. ISSN 1010-061X. PMID 17305819. S2CID 1324102.
  24. ↑ Thomas, Yan; Bethenod, Marie-Thérèse; Pelozuelo, Laurent; Frérot, Brigitte; Bourguet, Denis (February 2003). "Genetic Isolation Between Two Sympatric Host-Plant Races of the European Corn Borer, Ostrinia Nubilalis Hubner I. Sex Pheromone, Moth Emergence Timing, and Parasitism". Evolution. 57 (2): 261–273. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00261.x. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 12683523. S2CID 221734366.
  25. ↑ Habel, Jan Christian; Schmitt, Thomas (March 2012). "The burden of genetic diversity". Biological Conservation. 147 (1): 270–274. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.028. ISSN 0006-3207.
  26. ↑ Peterson, Merrill A.; Denno, Robert F. (September 1998). "The Influence of Dispersal and Diet Breadth on Patterns of Genetic Isolation by Distance in Phytophagous Insects". The American Naturalist. 152 (3): 428–446. doi:10.1086/286180. ISSN 0003-0147. PMID 18811450. S2CID 3497508.
  27. ↑ Haider, Sylvia; Kueffer, Christoph; Edwards, Peter J.; Alexander, Jake M. (September 2012). "Genetically based differentiation in growth of multiple non-native plant species along a steep environmental gradient". Oecologia. 170 (1): 89–99. Bibcode:2012Oecol.170...89H. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2291-2. ISSN 0029-8549. PMID 22434406. S2CID 6346092.
  28. ↑ Johansson, Per; Ehrlén, Johan (April 2003). "Influence of habitat quantity, quality and isolation on the distribution and abundance of two epiphytic lichens". Journal of Ecology. 91 (2): 213–221. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00755.x. ISSN 0022-0477. S2CID 90492074.
  29. ↑ Kawamura, Kouichi; Kubota, Masashi; Furukawa, Miki; Harada, Yasushi (2007-01-05). "The genetic structure of endangered indigenous populations of the amago salmon, Oncorhynchus masou ishikawae, in Japan". Conservation Genetics. 8 (5): 1163–1176. doi:10.1007/s10592-006-9271-1. ISSN 1566-0621. S2CID 32130367.
  30. ↑ Besold, Joachim; Schmitt, Thomas; Tammaru, Toomas; Cassel-Lundhagen, Anna (November 2008). "Strong genetic impoverishment from the centre of distribution in southern Europe to peripheral Baltic and isolated Scandinavian populations of the pearly heath butterfly". Journal of Biogeography. 35 (11): 2090–2101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01939.x. ISSN 0305-0270. S2CID 84534648.
  31. ↑ Peltonen, Leena (1999-10-01). "Positional Cloning of Disease Genes: Advantages of Genetic Isolates". Human Heredity. 50 (1): 66–75. doi:10.1159/000022892. ISSN 0001-5652. PMID 10545759. S2CID 25810192.
  32. ↑ Habel, Jan Christian; Schmitt, Thomas (March 2012). "The burden of genetic diversity". Biological Conservation. 147 (1): 270–274. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.028. ISSN 0006-3207.
  33. ↑ Luque-Larena, Juan J.; Mougeot, Francois; Viñuela, Javier; Jareño, Daniel; Arroyo, Leticia; Lambin, Xavier; Arroyo, Beatriz (August 2013). "Recent large-scale range expansion and outbreaks of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) in NW Spain". Basic and Applied Ecology. 14 (5): 432–441. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2013.04.006. hdl:10261/142920. ISSN 1439-1791.
  34. ↑ Gerlach, Gabriele; Musolf, Kerstin (2000-08-15). "Fragmentation of Landscape as a Cause for Genetic Subdivision in Bank Voles". Conservation Biology. 14 (4): 1066–1074. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98519.x. ISSN 0888-8892. S2CID 84124977.
  35. ↑ Ascensão, Fernando; Mata, Cristina; Malo, Juan E.; Ruiz-Capillas, Pablo; Silva, Catarina; Silva, André P.; Santos-Reis, Margarida; Fernandes, Carlos (2016-03-15). "Disentangle the Causes of the Road Barrier Effect in Small Mammals through Genetic Patterns". PLOS ONE. 11 (3): e0151500. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1151500A. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151500. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4792435. PMID 26978779.
  36. ↑ Parra, Guido J.; Cagnazzi, Daniele; Jedensjö, Maria; Ackermann, Corinne; Frere, Celine; Seddon, Jennifer; Nikolic, Natacha; Krützen, Michael (April 2018). "Low genetic diversity, limited gene flow, and widespread genetic bottleneck effects in a threatened dolphin species, the Australian humpback dolphin". Biological Conservation. 220: 192–200. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.028. ISSN 0006-3207.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.