The Great Bombay Textile Strike was a textile strike called on 18 January 1982 by the mill workers of Mumbai under trade union leader Dutta Samant. The purpose of the strike was to obtain a bonus payment and an increase in wages. Nearly 250,000 workers of 65 textile mills went on strike in Mumbai.[1]

History of mills in Bombay

Built in 1887, Swadeshi was Bombay's first textile mill, the first of the factories that spread over many parts of the island city in the next decades. Rastriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh was the officially recognized union of the Mills. By 1982, a new militant union leader by the name of Datta Samant had arrived on the scene. Earlier he had got major wage increases for workers of Premier Automobiles and a section of the mill workers were hoping for the same. The major difference between Premier Automobiles and the mills was that the former was a very profitable company and the mills were all sick units. Later that year Dutta Samant led the textile strike, over 240,000 people worked in Girangaon.[2]

Protests

In late 1981, Dutta Samant was chosen by a large group of Bombay mill workers to lead them in a precarious conflict between the Bombay Mill Owners' Association and the unions, thus rejecting the INTUC-affiliated Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh which had represented the mill workers for decades. Samant planned a massive strike, forcing the entire industry of the city to be shut down for over a year. It was estimated that nearly 250,000 workers went on strike and more than 50 textile mills were shut in Bombay permanently.

Samant demanded that, along with wage hikes, the government scrap the Bombay Industrial Act of 1947 and that the RMMS would no longer be the only official union of the city industry. While fighting for greater pay and better conditions for the workers, Samant and his allies also sought to capitalize on and establish their power on the trade union scene in Mumbai. Although Samant had links with the Congress and Maharashtra politician Abdul Rehman Antulay, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi considered him a serious political threat. Samant's control of the mill workers made the Congress leaders fear that his influence would spread to the port and dock workers and make him the most powerful union leader in India's commercial capital. Thus the government took a firm stance of rejecting Samant's demands and refusing to budge despite the severe economic losses suffered by the city and the industry. As the strike progressed through the months, Samant's militancy in the face of government obstinacy led to the failure of any attempts at negotiation. Disunity and dissatisfaction over the strike soon became apparent, and many textile mill owners began moving their plants outside the city. After a prolonged and destabilizing confrontation, the strike collapsed with no concessions having been obtained for the workers. The closure of textile mills across the city left tens of thousands of mill workers unemployed and, in the succeeding years, most of the industry moved away from Bombay after decades of being plagued by rising costs and union militancy. It is one reason why some industries in India settled in Gujarat Although Samant remained popular with a large block of union activists, his clout and control over Bombay trade unions disappeared.[3]

Consequences

The majority of the over 80 mills in Central Mumbai closed during and after the strike, leaving more than 150,000 workers unemployed.[4] The textile industry in Mumbai has largely disappeared, reducing labour migration after the strikes.[5]

One of the consequences of the strike's failure was that labour laws in the country were mellowed and 'liberalized' since unions lost their foothold. Until 1980s, labour laws were stringent to appease the unions. As labour market became less transparent and unified, exploitative placement agencies popped up in the city, so a large population moved to contractual employment, which lacked all the benefits of organised sector like provident funds or even job security. This job insecurity also pushed a lot of the youth, especially Maharashtrian youth into the arms of the regional party Shiv Sena, so even if their parents had been communists, the children became Shiv Sainiks.

The industries in Mumbai shut down and moved to the periphery or to other states as the land became a real estate gold mine. Mumbai's functional nature changed from industrial to commercial.[6]

The city was remade by the Dutta Samant-led textile strike.[7] Many Bollywood film directors started making politically relevant films on textile strikes in Bombay, and textile mill strikes have become an important theme of modern-day Indian films. Producer Sangeeta Ahir, who is also a co-founder of the NGO Shree Sankalp Pratisthan[8][9] is making a film on the Great Bombay Textile Strike worker movement of the city.[10]

See also

References

  1. ↑ "The Great Mumbai Textile Strike... 25 Years On". Rediff.com India Limited. 18 January 2007. Retrieved 20 November 2008.
  2. ↑ Praveen Swami (14–27 April 2001). "A raw deal and desperation". Frontline. The Hindu. 18 (8). Archived from the original on 31 May 2010. Retrieved 20 November 2008.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  3. ↑ Anand, Javed (17 January 1997). "In the experience of blue-collared men, he remained the only trade union leader who put workers before politics". Rediff.com.
  4. ↑ Shiv Kumar (25 March 2005). "Maharashtra may give more mills' land for public use". The Tribune. Retrieved 20 November 2008.
  5. ↑ P Devarajan (25 March 2000). "India Interior". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 28 September 2008. Retrieved 20 November 2008.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  6. ↑ Bhattacharya, Pramit (19 August 2012). "Untangling the knot between Mumbai and its mills". Livemint. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
  7. ↑ Amrita Shah (30 October 2008). "Remember Nojh Dharmu". Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. Retrieved 20 November 2008.
  8. ↑ "Shree Sankalp Pratishthan". www.shreesankalp.org.
  9. ↑ "Govinda". Mumbai Mirror.
  10. ↑ Nisha Tiwari (4 July 2007). "Who's the mill worker?". Bombay Times. The Times of India. Retrieved 20 November 2008.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.