The Haken-Kelso-Bunz (HKB) is a theoretical model of motor coordination originally formulated by Hermann Haken, J. A. Scott Kelso and H. Bunz.[1] The model attempts to provide the framework for understanding coordinated behavior in living things. It accounts for experimental observations on human bimanual coordination that revealed fundamental features of self-organization: multistability, and phase transitions (switching).[2] HKB is one of the most extensively tested quantitative models in the field of human movement behavior.[3]

Phase Transitions ('Switches')

The HKB model differs from other motor coordination models with the addition of phase transitions (‘switches’). Kelso initially observed this phenomenon while conducting an experiment looking at subjects’ finger movements. Subjects oscillated their fingers rhythmically in the transverse plane (i.e., abduction-adduction) in one of two patterns, parallel or anti-parallel. In the parallel pattern, the finger muscles contract in an alternating fashion; in the anti-parallel pattern, the homologous finger muscles contract simultaneously. Kelso's study observed that when the subject begins in the parallel mode and increases the speed of movement, a spontaneous switch to symmetrical, anti-parallel movement occurs. This transition happens swiftly at a certain critical frequency. Surprisingly, after the switch has occurred and the movement rate decreases, Kelso's subjects remain in the symmetrical model (did not switch back). Kelso's study indicates that while humans are able to produce two patterns at low frequency values, only one—the symmetrical, anti-parallel mode remains stable as frequency is scaled beyond a critical value.[2]

Prediction

The HKB model states that dynamic instability causes switching to occur. HKB measures stability in the following ways: 1. Critical slowing down. If a perturbation is applied to a system that takes it away from its stationary state, the time for a system to return to the stationary state (local relaxation time) is a measure of the system's stability. The less stable the pattern, the longer it should take to return to the established pattern. HKB predicts critical slowing down.[4] As the parallel pattern loses stability as frequency is increased, the local relaxation time should increase as the system approaches the critical point. 2. Critical fluctuations. If switching patterns of behavior is due to loss of stability, direct measures of fluctuations of the order parameter should be detectable as the critical point approaches.

Equation

In the HKB model ϕ is the relative phase or phase relation between the fingers. The parameter k in the model has a correspondence to the cycle-to-cycle period of the finger movements, or, the inverse of the movement rate or oscillation frequency in the experiment.

The equation:

The equation predicts that for k > 0.25 relative phase values of 0 ±π are both stable, a condition coined as bistability. An increase in movement rate, starting in parallel-phase, leads to a switch to anti-parallel phase at a critical frequency. Starting with a large k and decreasing k leads to a destabilization of the fixed point at π which becomes unstable at the value kc=0.25.[2]

Uses

The HKB model has had a profound effect on many conceptual, methodological, and practical models since its inception. HKB has been able to model task context,[5] biomechanical factors,[6] perception,[7] cognitive demands, learning and memory.[8] The latest noninvasive neuroimaging methods such as fMRI, MEG and high density EEG arrays are increasingly being used along with behavioral recordings and analysis to identify the neural circuitry and mechanisms of pattern stability and switching.[9][10][11][12]

See also

  • Excitator model

References

  1. ↑ Haken, H.; Kelso, J.A.S.; Bunz, H. (1985). "A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements". Biological Cybernetics. 51: 347–356. doi:10.1007/BF00336922.
  2. 1 2 3 Kelso, J.A.S. (2008). "Haken-Kelso-Bunz model. Scholarpedia. , 3(10):1612".
  3. ↑ Fuchs, A.; Jirsa, V.K., eds. (2008). Coordination: Neural, Behavioral and Social Dynamics. Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74479-5. ISBN 978-3-540-74476-4.
  4. ↑ Schöner, G., Haken, H., & Kelso, J.A.S. (1986). A stochastic theory of phase transitions in human hand movement. Biological Cybernetics, 53, 247-257.
  5. ↑ Pellecchia, G., Shockley, K., & Turvey, M. T. (2005). Concurrent cognitive task modulates coordination dynamics. Cognitive Science, 29, 531-557
  6. ↑ Carson, RG, Riek, S, Smethurst, CJ, Lison-Parraga, JF & Byblow, WD. (2000) Neuromuscular-skeletal constraints upon the dynamics of unimanual and bimanual coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 131 (2), 196-214.
  7. ↑ Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414, 69-73.
  8. ↑ Temprado JJ, Monno A, Zanone PG, Kelso JAS (2002) Attentional demands reflect learning-induced alterations of bimanual coordination dynamics. European Journal of Neuroscience 16: 1390-1394
  9. ↑ Aramaki, Y., Honda, M., Okada, T., & Sadato, N. (2006) Neural correlates of the spontaneous phase transition during bimanual coordination. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1338-1348.
  10. ↑ Kelso JAS, Fuchs A, Lancaster R, Holroyd T, Cheyne D, Weinberg H (1998) Dynamic cortical activity in the human brain reveals motor equivalence. Nature 392: 814-818
  11. ↑ Meyer-Lindenberg A, Ziemann U, Hajak G, Cohen L, Berman KF (2002) Transitions between dynamical states of differing stability in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 99: 10948-10953
  12. ↑ Swinnen SP (2002) Intermanual coordination: From behavioural principles to neural-network interactions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3: 350-361.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.