The Shrine Consolidation Policy (Jinja seirei, also Jinja gōshi, Jinja gappei) was an effort by the Government of Meiji Japan to abolish numerous smaller Shinto shrines and consolidate their functions with larger regional shrines.[1][2] In 1900, the Shrine Bureau (Jinja kyoku) was created as a branch of the Home Ministry, and it was this organ that was responsible for the implementation of the policy.[2]

The aim of the policy was to reduce the political influence of Shinto, bringing the remaining shrines under government jurisdiction and making them easier to control. Within the first twenty years of the policy, 77,899 Shinto shrines were closed, despite considerable local opposition.[3][1][4] The policy remained in effect until the end of World War II, although its greatest impact occurred in the first six years after its implementation in 1906; by 1912, the rate at which shrines were closed had fallen considerably.[5]

Overview

The process of Shrine Consolidation involved either enshrining the deities of multiple shrines in one shrine (§ Inahachikonten Shrine), or relocating them to the Setsumatsusha of one shrine and eliminating the other shrines.

The Japanese government carried out shrine merger policies between the end of the Meiji and the start of the Taisho eras, with the goal of enhancing the presence of shrines as a whole.[1]The Shrine Bureau in the Home Ministry planned the reorganization and abolition of smaller, unviable shrines, particularly village shrines and unranked shrines. The government's stated purpose was to organize existing shrines and limit the provision of shrine offerings to a select few. [1] However it was accused of corruption and attempting to seize land for financial gain An imperial edict in 1906 entitled "With Regard to the Provision of Offerings to Shrines of Prefectural Rank and Below" was the beginning of this. The sought to financially support shrines but only those that were thriving, so the government started merging shrines so only supported shrines would be present. [1]The surrender of land belonging to merged shrines, temples, and other sacred sites was required under the 1906 edict, without compensation. [1]Local authorities in Wakayama and Mie prefectures in particular forced through a rigorous program of mergers, resulting in a significant reduction in the number of shrines by 1914. [1]

Some intellectuals and politicians resisted the merger policy, leading to its eventual eschewal by the Shrine Bureau. [1][4]

Shrine merger at the end of the Meiji period

Purpose of Shrine merger

The purpose of Shrine merger was to reduce the number of shrines and concentrate expenses on the remaining shrines so that they would be equipped with facilities and property above a certain standard, to maintain the dignity of the shrines, and to establish the continuous management of the shrines. In addition, the Meiji government's national principle that sect Shinto is recognized as a religion, but that shrines are not religions but "national religious ceremonies" (suzoku, seiji, sasai system)[6]）The policy was also to reduce the number of shrines until it was financially feasible for local governments to provide public funds to prefectural shrines and smaller shrines in accordance with the Ministry of the Interior.

This policy was led by the Ministry of Home Affairs Shrine Bureau, but apparently the Ministry's Regional Bureaus were also involved. The local bureaus were reluctant to allow local governments to contribute public funds to shrines below the prefectural level, which was one of the purposes of Shrine merger, because it would require local governments to bear an additional fiscal burden. It was incorporated into the policy.

The shrine-centered theory refers to the idea that local autonomy should be centered on shrines, and this led to the application of the "one town, one village, one shrine" standard to the policy of Shrine merging. By aligning the shrine's Ujiko area with administrative divisions, the government sought to make the sole shrine of a town village the center of local activities.

Background of the ritual policy

The shrine ritual policy was promoted by the edict issued by the Minister of the Interior, Takashi Hara, in the 1st Saionji Cabinet in 1906 (Meiji 39), and initially it was given a considerable range according to the actual situation of the region. there were. However, 70,000 shrines, which were about 200,000 by 1914 (Taisho 3), were demolished nationwide because Tosuke Hirata, the Minister of Interior of the Second Katsura Cabinet, ordered that the instruction be strongly promoted. rice field. In particular, Mie Prefecture had a particularly strong policy of enshrining, and about 90% of all shrines in the prefecture were abolished. Wakayama and Ehime prefectures were followed by a ritual policy. However, since it was left to the governor's discretion to proceed with this policy, the degree of implementation will vary from region to region, and in Kyoto Prefecture it is about 10%.

The shrine consolidation policy, which was based on bureaucratic rationalism, was not always implemented in accordance with the wishes of the shrine parishioners and worshippers. Settlements and administrative divisions did not always match, which resulted in some Ujigami being moved to places far from their worshippers due to the shrine mergers. As a result, some Ujigami were unable to be worshipped. Although some shrine parishioners refused to worship, in some places they were forced to worship.

Opposition movement

On the part of the shrine parishioners and worshippers, they sometimes held meetings in opposition, but mainly they could not make any major movements, and could only show their dissatisfaction in the form of talking about how the deities of the shrines that had been abolished by the merged shrine had caused hauntings, etc.[7]

That said, intellectuals such as Kumagusu Minakata, a naturalist and folklore scholar known for his research on slime molds, strongly opposed this policy.[8] In the south, the shrine merger movement was

  1. weakening the godly thought,
  2. hindering the harmony of the people,
  3. debilitating the regions,
  4. depriving the people of comfort, diminishing humanity and harming customs,
  5. damaging patriotism, and
  6. damaging security of the land.
  7. historic sites and ancient traditions would be destroyed
  8. natural landscapes and natural monuments would be destroyed.

These opposition movements gradually came to a halt, and through the responses of the Imperial Diet, the sudden increase in Shrine merging was temporarily halted after 1910 (1910-1943). However, it was already too late, and this policy of Shrine merging had left a large impact, resulting in the disappearance of many rituals and customs, and damaging religious beliefs. However, it was too late, and the scars left by this ritual policy were large, and many ritual customs disappeared, resulting in damage to religious beliefs.

Inahachikonten Shrine

Inahachikonten Shrine (稲八金天神社) is an alleged shrine name of many such merged shrines in the Wakayama Prefecture.

The name was intended as a merger of the first characters of the most frequently merged shrines Inari Shrine, Hachiman Shrine, Kotohira Shrines, and Tenmangu Shrine.

Masajiro Takigawa said such shrines lacked sacredness

No such shrines have been confirmed to have this name, possibly because they changed their names in embarrassment.

Reconstruction of destroyed shrines

After the war, the prewar shrine non-religious system was dismantled and everything became a religious corporation . Many shrines were once merged and then revived. Even after the shrine was nominally enshrined, there were some places where facilities such as the shrine were left, and it was easy to rehabilitate in those places. Overall, it was easy to rehabilitate where the pre-government reverence base was maintained, but if the community that became the worship base disappeared or changed due to the consolidation of administrative divisions or changes in circumstances.

Influence on the division of Shrine Shinto

Along with the post-war reconstruction movement, antipathy to the former compulsory goshi policy is seen as responsible for the splitting of the Hokkaido shrine association off from the Association of Shinto Shrines

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Encyclopedia of Shinto詳細". 國學院大學デジタルミュージアム (in Japanese). Retrieved 10 March 2023.
  2. 1 2 Koremaru, Sakamoto. "Jinja gōshi". Encyclopedia of Shinto. Kokugakuin University. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  3. ↑ Stuart D. B. Picken (28 December 2010). Historical Dictionary of Shinto. Scarecrow Press. pp. 136–137. ISBN 978-0-8108-7372-8.
  4. 1 2 "Opposition to Shrine Merger Policy – 南方熊楠記念館". 1 August 2021. Archived from the original on 1 August 2021. Retrieved 13 March 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  5. ↑ Christopher M. Todd (2007). Mapping the Gods: A Geographic Analysis of the Effects of the Shrine Merger Policy on Japanese Sacred Space. pp. 1–2. ISBN 978-0-549-42677-6.
  6. ↑ 「日本的霊性」を問い直す Archived 10 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine 鎌田東二、千葉大学公共研究　第3巻第1号（2006 年6月）
  7. ↑ "Opposition to Shrine Merger Policy｜Minakata Kumagusu Museum". Opposition to Shrine Merger Policy｜Minakata Kumagusu Museum. Retrieved 31 March 2023.
  8. ↑ "Anti-Shrine-Consolidation Protests｜Minakata Kumagusu Museum". Anti-Shrine-Consolidation Protests｜Minakata Kumagusu Museum. Retrieved 5 April 2023.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.