Mawlā (Arabic: مَوْلَى, plural mawālī مَوَالِي), is a polysemous Arabic word, whose meaning varied in different periods and contexts.[1]
Before the Islamic prophet Muhammad, the term originally applied to any form of tribal association.[2]
In the Quran and hadiths it is used in a number of senses, including 'Lord', 'guardian', and 'trustee'.[1]
After Muhammad's death, this institution was adapted by the Umayyad dynasty to incorporate new converts to Islam into Arab-Muslim society and the word mawali gained currency as an appellation for converted non-Arab Muslims in the early Islamic caliphates.
Etymology
The word mawla is derived from the root و ل ي w-l-y , meaning "to be close to" or "to have power over". Mawla can have reciprocal meanings, depending on whether it is used in the active or passive voice: "master" Originally, mawāli were clients of an Arab people, but with the advent of Islam, the term came to refer to non-Arab Muslims and other allies.
Under the Abbasid rulers of the 9th century, the non-Arab converts comprised an important part of the army. The institution of wala' as a requirement to enter Muslim society ceased to exist after the fall of the Umayyads, as the Abbasids favoured a universal interpretation of Islam that was not the exclusive religion of the Arab elite. However, the rise to political power of non-Arab ethnic groups eventually restricted the power of the Abbasid caliph in Baghdad, as Persian, Turkic and Berber Muslims began to form independent sultanates.
Abu Hanifa was the founder of the Hanafi school of jurisprudence within Sunni Islam and lived through the Abbasid Revolution. He famously stated in one of his sayings: "The belief of a newly converted Turk is the same as that of an Arab from Hejaz."
However, this institution continued in the Abbasid period on a much smaller scale with the formation of armies entirely composed of non-Muslims in the service of the Caliph. These men were considered to be the mawali of the Caliph and were thus in theory more loyal to the Caliph. This practice persisted throughout Islamic history through to the Ottoman period.
Ghadir Khumm
The word "Mawla" is regarded as a considerable word in the Ghadir Khumm event (regarding the sentence which was declared by the Islamic prophet Muhammad in Islam about Ali, when he said: "For whoever I am his mawla, 'Ali is his mawla."). There have been mentioned meanings for this use of the word "mawla", including leader,[3] administrator,[4] friend,[5] Lord, owner, master, follower, one who has more right in something, wali, an ally, etc.[6] Shias argue that in the context of the sermon (Ghadir Khumm), intended that the word "mawla" to be taken as "leader". They therefore see this to be the official designation of Ali as the prophet's successor.[7]
See also
Notes
- 1 2 A.J. Wensinck, Encyclopedia of Islam 2nd ed, Brill. "Mawlā", vol. 6, p. 874.
- ↑ Goldziher, Ignác (1889). Muhammedanische Studien. Halle. p. 105.
- ↑ The meaning of Mawla pasokhgoo.ir Retrieved 1 Dec 2018
- ↑ Mawla meaning makarem.ir Retrieved 8 Dec 2018
- ↑ Meaning and Implication al-islam.org
- ↑ "wali"and "Mawla" al-islam.org Retrieved 8 Dec 2018
- ↑ Vaglieri, Laura Veccia (2012). "G̲h̲adīr K̲h̲umm". Encyclopædia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill Online. Retrieved 11 October 2019.
References
- Hourani, Albert. A History of the Arab People. Chapter 1.
- Mas'udi. The Meadows of Gold. Trans. and eds. Paul Lunde and Caroline Stone.
- Pipes, Daniel (1981). Slave Soldiers and Islam The Genesis of a Military System (hardcover). Yale University Press. p. 120. ISBN 9780300024470. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
Further reading
- Conversion and Poll-Tax in Early Islam, D.C. Dennett, Cambridge 1950.
- The Encyclopaedia of Islam, second edition.
- Slaves on Horses, P. Crone, Cambridge 1980.
- Roman, Provincial and Islamic Law: The Origins of the Islamic Patronate, P. Crone, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
- Patronate And Patronage in Early And Classical Islam, M. Bernards, J. Nawas, Brill, 2005.
- Mawlas: Freed slaves and converts in early Islam, Daniel Pipes, in: Slavery & Abolition, 1980, 1:2, 132–177