In computational number theory and computational algebra, Pollard's kangaroo algorithm (also Pollard's lambda algorithm, see Naming below) is an algorithm for solving the discrete logarithm problem. The algorithm was introduced in 1978 by the number theorist John M. Pollard, in the same paper as his better-known Pollard's rho algorithm for solving the same problem.^[1][2] Although Pollard described the application of his algorithm to the discrete logarithm problem in the multiplicative group of units modulo a prime p, it is in fact a generic discrete logarithm algorithm—it will work in any finite cyclic group.

Algorithm

Suppose ${\displaystyle G}$ is a finite cyclic group of order ${\displaystyle n}$ which is generated by the element ${\displaystyle \alpha }$, and we seek to find the discrete logarithm ${\displaystyle x}$ of the element ${\displaystyle \beta }$ to the base ${\displaystyle \alpha }$. In other words, one seeks ${\displaystyle x\in Z_{n}}$ such that ${\displaystyle \alpha ^{x}=\beta }$. The lambda algorithm allows one to search for ${\displaystyle x}$ in some interval ${\displaystyle [a,\ldots ,b]\subset Z_{n}}$. One may search the entire range of possible logarithms by setting ${\displaystyle a=0}$ and ${\displaystyle b=n-1}$.

1. Choose a set ${\displaystyle S}$ of positive integers of mean roughly ${\displaystyle {\sqrt {b-a}}}$ and define a pseudorandom map ${\displaystyle f:G\rightarrow S}$.

2. Choose an integer ${\displaystyle N}$ and compute a sequence of group elements ${\displaystyle \{x_{0},x_{1},\ldots ,x_{N}\}}$ according to:

• ${\displaystyle x_{0}=\alpha ^{b}\,}$
• ${\displaystyle x_{i+1}=x_{i}\alpha ^{f(x_{i})}{\text{ for }}i=0,1,\ldots ,N-1}$

3. Compute

${\displaystyle d=\sum _{i=0}^{N-1}f(x_{i}).}$

Observe that:

${\displaystyle x_{N}=x_{0}\alpha ^{d}=\alpha ^{b+d}\,.}$

4. Begin computing a second sequence of group elements ${\displaystyle \{y_{0},y_{1},\ldots \}}$ according to:

• ${\displaystyle y_{0}=\beta \,}$
• ${\displaystyle y_{i+1}=y_{i}\alpha ^{f(y_{i})}{\text{ for }}i=0,1,\ldots ,N-1}$

and a corresponding sequence of integers ${\displaystyle \{d_{0},d_{1},\ldots \}}$ according to:

${\displaystyle d_{n}=\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}f(y_{i})}$.

Observe that:

${\displaystyle y_{i}=y_{0}\alpha ^{d_{i}}=\beta \alpha ^{d_{i}}{\mbox{ for }}i=0,1,\ldots ,N-1}$

5. Stop computing terms of ${\displaystyle \{y_{i}\}}$ and ${\displaystyle \{d_{i}\}}$ when either of the following conditions are met:

A) ${\displaystyle y_{j}=x_{N}}$ for some ${\displaystyle j}$. If the sequences ${\displaystyle \{x_{i}\}}$ and ${\displaystyle \{y_{j}\}}$ "collide" in this manner, then we have:

${\displaystyle x_{N}=y_{j}\Rightarrow \alpha ^{b+d}=\beta \alpha ^{d_{j}}\Rightarrow \beta =\alpha ^{b+d-d_{j}}\Rightarrow x\equiv b+d-d_{j}{\pmod {n}}}$

and so we are done.

B) ${\displaystyle d_{i}>b-a+d}$. If this occurs, then the algorithm has failed to find ${\displaystyle x}$. Subsequent attempts can be made by changing the choice of ${\displaystyle S}$ and/or ${\displaystyle f}$.

Complexity

Pollard gives the time complexity of the algorithm as ${\displaystyle O({\sqrt {b-a}})}$, using a probabilistic argument based on the assumption that ${\displaystyle f}$ acts pseudorandomly. Since ${\displaystyle a,b}$ can be represented using ${\displaystyle O(\log b)}$ bits, this is exponential in the problem size (though still a significant improvement over the trivial brute-force algorithm that takes time ${\displaystyle O(b-a)}$). For an example of a subexponential time discrete logarithm algorithm, see the index calculus algorithm.

Naming

The algorithm is well known by two names.

The first is "Pollard's kangaroo algorithm". This name is a reference to an analogy used in the paper presenting the algorithm, where the algorithm is explained in terms of using a tame kangaroo to trap a wild kangaroo. Pollard has explained^[3] that this analogy was inspired by a "fascinating" article published in the same issue of Scientific American as an exposition of the RSA public key cryptosystem. The article^[4] described an experiment in which a kangaroo's "energetic cost of locomotion, measured in terms of oxygen consumption at various speeds, was determined by placing kangaroos on a treadmill".

The second is "Pollard's lambda algorithm". Much like the name of another of Pollard's discrete logarithm algorithms, Pollard's rho algorithm, this name refers to the similarity between a visualisation of the algorithm and the Greek letter lambda (${\displaystyle \lambda }$). The shorter stroke of the letter lambda corresponds to the sequence ${\displaystyle \{x_{i}\}}$, since it starts from the position b to the right of x. Accordingly, the longer stroke corresponds to the sequence ${\displaystyle \{y_{i}\}}$, which "collides with" the first sequence (just like the strokes of a lambda intersect) and then follows it subsequently.

Pollard has expressed a preference for the name "kangaroo algorithm",^[5] as this avoids confusion with some parallel versions of his rho algorithm, which have also been called "lambda algorithms".

See also

• Dynkin's card trick
• Kruskal count^[6]
• Rainbow table

References

Further reading

• Montenegro, Ravi [at Wikidata]; Tetali, Prasad V. (2010-11-07) [2009-05-31]. How Long Does it Take to Catch a Wild Kangaroo? (PDF). Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC 2009). pp. 553–560. arXiv:0812.0789. doi:10.1145/1536414.1536490. S2CID 12797847. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2023-08-20. Retrieved 2023-08-20.