Areas of effect

The Safe Third Country Agreement applies to refugee claimants who are seeking entry to Canada or the United States at Canada-United States land border crossings (including by rail). It also applies at airports if a person who is seeking refugee protection in country B was determined not to be a refugee in country A, and is in transit through country A as part of their deportation.

For example, a refugee claimant in Canada who has been determined not to be a refugee in the United States, has been ordered deported from the United States, and is in transit through a Canadian airport as part of their removal from the United States.

Exceptions

Exceptions to the Safe Third Country Agreement are defined as four types:

1. family member exceptions;
2. unaccompanied minors exception;
3. document holder exceptions; and
4. public interest exceptions.

In addition to meeting the criteria for an exception under the agreement, refugee claimants must still meet all other eligibility criteria of the relevant immigration legislation for the country that they are claiming status in. Though refugee claimants who enter Canada at official crossings are usually sent back to the US, they would not be sent back if they cross at locations in between designated ports of entry; in this case, their claims will be heard, and many immigration experts consider this to be a loophole within the agreement.^[5][6]

2023 revision

On March 24, 2023, the U.S. and Canada revised the asylum seeker policy. Under the revision, Canada will be allowed to send migrants who cross at unofficial ports of entry at America's northern border back to the U.S., while the U.S. will also be able to turn back asylum seekers who travel across the border from Canada.^[3] In return, Canada agreed to allow 15,000 more people from the Western Hemisphere to migrate to Canada legally.^[3] Nevertheless, the revision is acknowledged to have limited the movement of asylum seekers.^[2] Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau confirmed that the revisions would go into effect that midnight.^[3]

Following U.S. executive orders

Shortly after inauguration, U.S. President Donald Trump signed these Executive Orders, which have since been revoked by his successor, Joe Biden:

• Executive Order 13769, which suspended the United States Refugee Admissions Program and banned travel from seven African and Middle-Eastern countries;
• Executive Order 13768, which revoked eligibility for federal funding for sanctuary jurisdictions; and
• Executive Order 13767, which directed that a wall be built along the Mexico–United States border.

In response to Executive Order 13769, immigrant and civil-rights advocacy groups in Canada called for the federal government to suspend the Safe Third Country Agreement.^[7] These groups included Amnesty International,^[8] the Canadian Civil Liberties Association,^[9] the Association québécoise des avocats et avocates en droit de l'immigration,^[10] the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association,^[11][12] the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers,^[13] the Canadian Council for Refugees,^[14] and a group of 200 law professors from universities across Canada.^[15]

Compliance with international law

Safe third country agreements are not explicitly mentioned in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees or the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. Instead, their legality is derived from Article 31 of the 1951 convention, which states that a refugee should not be punished for illegally entering a country if they are arriving directly from a country where they were under threat. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) itself has cautioned against interpreting safe third country agreements too broadly, though it acknowledges that they may be acceptable in some circumstances.^[21] Such ambiguities have led some legal professionals in Canada to question the legality of the Canada–United States Safe Third Country Agreement.^[22]

Irregular border crossings

As of February 2017, increasing numbers of refugee claimants began to cross the Canadian border at locations other than official border checkpoints. This is in order to avoid the effects of the agreement, any refugees presenting at a border crossing would be automatically turned back to the United States under the STCA provisions.^[23] As it was not illegal under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act or its associated regulations to cross the border outside of a port of entry as long as the person presented themselves to a Canada Border Services Agency officer without delay and STCA did not apply to claims outside of a port of entry, it was possible for persons otherwise ineligible to make a claim after crossing irregularly.^[24] In some cases, these refugees have received amputations due to frostbite^[22] and concerns have been raised that some refugees may freeze to death on their way across the border.^[25] This loophole was closed after the expansion of the STCA in 2023 which made asylum seekers not eligible to make an asylum claim within 14 days of entering Canada from the US along the land border.^[2]

Julie Taub, an immigration and refugee lawyer, claims that, since the introduction of the Agreement in late 2004, the Canada Border Services Agency has lost its capacity and would be "overwhelmed" if the agreement were repealed.^[22]

A family preparing to enter Canada, where RCMP await them, via the Roxham Road irregular crossing in August 2017

From January 2017 to March 2018, the RCMP intercepted 25,645 people crossing the border into Canada outside official border checkpoints.^[26][27] Roxham Road near the route between Plattsburgh, New York and Montreal saw the most crossings and became a proxy name for this trend. Public Safety Canada estimates another 2,500 came across in April 2018 for a total at just over 28,000.^[28] As of early 2019, over 40,000 people crossed into Canada from the United States since early 2017.^[29]

Roxham Road was shut down months after the expansion of the STCA in 2023.^[2][30]