Bulletproof glass, ballistic glass, transparent armor, or bullet-resistant glass is a strong and optically transparent material that is particularly resistant to penetration by projectiles. Like any other material, it is not completely impenetrable. It is usually made from a combination of two or more types of glass, one hard and one soft.[1] The softer layer makes the glass more elastic, so that it can flex instead of shatter. The index of refraction for all of the glasses used in the bulletproof layers must be almost the same to keep the glass transparent and allow a clear, undistorted view through the glass. Bulletproof glass varies in thickness from 3⁄4 to 3+1⁄2 inches (19 to 89 mm).[2][3]
Bulletproof glass is used in windows of buildings that require such security, such as jewelry stores and embassies, and of military and private vehicles.
Construction
Bullet-resistant glass is constructed using layers of laminated glass. The more layers there are, the more protection the glass offers. When a weight reduction is needed, polycarbonate (a thermoplastic) is laminated onto the safe side to stop spall. The aim is to make a material with the appearance and clarity of standard glass but with effective protection from small arms. Polycarbonate designs usually consist of products such as Armormax, Makroclear, Cyrolon: a soft coating that heals after being scratched (such as elastomeric carbon-based polymers) or a hard coating that prevents scratching (such as silicon-based polymers).[4]
The plastic in laminate designs also provides resistance to impact from physical assault from blunt and sharp objects. The plastic provides little in the way of bullet-resistance. The glass, which is much harder than plastic, flattens the bullet, and the plastic deforms, with the aim of absorbing the rest of the energy and preventing penetration. The ability of the polycarbonate layer to stop projectiles with varying energy is directly proportional to its thickness,[5] and bulletproof glass of this design may be up to 3.5 inches thick.[3]
Laminated glass layers are built from glass sheets bonded together with polyvinyl butyral, polyurethane, Sentryglas, or ethylene-vinyl acetate. When treated with chemical processes, the glass becomes much stronger. This design has been in regular use on combat vehicles since World War II. It is typically thick and is usually extremely heavy.[6]
Sample thickness and weight for bullet-resistant glass materials[7][8][9] | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Stopped | Glass Laminate | Polycarbonate | Acrylic | Glass-Clad Polycarbonate | Aluminum oxynitride | ||||||||||||||||
Protection Level | (example) | Thickness | Weight | Thickness | Weight | Thickness | Weight | Thickness | Weight | Thickness | Weight | ||||||||||
in. | mm | lb/sq. ft. | kg/m2 | in. | mm | lb/sq. ft. | kg/m2 | in. | mm | lb/sq. ft. | kg/m2 | in. | mm | lb/sq. ft. | kg/m2 | in. | mm | lb/sq. ft. | kg/m2 | ||
UL 752 Level 1 | 9 mm 3 shots | 1.185 | 30.09 | 15.25 | 74.46 | 0.75 | 19.05 | 4.6 | 22.46 | 1.25 | 31.75 | 7.7 | 37.6 | 0.818 | 20.78 | 8.99 | 43.9 | ||||
UL 752 Level 2 | .357 Magnum 3 shots | 1.4 | 35.56 | 17.94 | 87.6 | 1.03 | 26.16 | 6.4 | 31.25 | 1.375 | 34.92 | 8.5 | 41.50 | 1.075 | 27.3 | 11.68 | 57.02 | ||||
UL 752 Level 3 (approximately NIJ IIIA[10]) | .44 Magnum 3 shots (5 shots for NIJ IIIa) | 1.59 | 40.38 | 20.94 | 102.24 | 1.25 | 31.75 | 7.7 | 37.6 | 1.288 | 32.71 | 14.23 | 69.47 | ||||||||
UL 752 Level 4 | .30-06 1 shot | 1.338 | 35.25 | 14.43 | 69.47 | ||||||||||||||||
UL 752 Level 5 | 7.62 mm 1 shot | ||||||||||||||||||||
UL 752 Level 6 | .357 Magnum underloaded 5 shots | ||||||||||||||||||||
UL 752 Level 7 | 5.56x45 5 shots | ||||||||||||||||||||
UL 752 Level 8 (approximately NIJ III) | 7.62 mm NATO 5 shots | 2.374 | 60.3 | 26.01 | 126.99 | 18.25 | |||||||||||||||
UL 752 Level 9 | .30-06 M2 AP 1 shot | ||||||||||||||||||||
UL 752 Level 10 | .50 BMG 1 shot | 1.6 | 40.6 | 30.76 | 150.1 |
9mm 124gr @ 1175-1293fps (1400-1530fps for Level 6), 357M 158gr @ 1250-1375fps, 44M 240gr @ 1350-1485fps, 30-06 180gr @ 2540-2794fps, 5.56NATO 55gr @ 3080-3388fps, 7.62NATO 150gr @ 2750-3025fps. For all ratings in the above chart; all copper-jacketed lead FMJ, except 44 mg is lead semi-wadcutter gas-check, and 30-06 is LEAD core soft point.
Test standards
Bullet-resistant materials are tested using a gun to fire a projectile from a set distance into the material, in a specific pattern. Levels of protection are based on the ability of the target to stop a specific type of projectile traveling at a specific speed. Experiments suggest that polycarbonate fails at lower velocities with regular shaped projectiles compared to irregular ones (like fragments), meaning that testing with regular shaped projectiles gives a conservative estimate of its resistance.[11] When projectiles do not penetrate, the depth of the dent left by the impact can be measured and related to the projectile’s velocity and thickness of the material.[5] Some researchers have developed mathematical models based on results of this kind of testing to help them design bulletproof glass to resist specific anticipated threats.[12]
Environmental effects
The properties of bullet-resistant glass can be affected by temperature and by exposure to solvents or UV radiation, usually from sunlight. If the polycarbonate layer is below a glass layer, it has some protection from UV radiation due to the glass and bonding layer. Over time the polycarbonate becomes more brittle because it is an amorphous polymer (which is necessary for it to be transparent) that moves toward thermodynamic equilibrium.[4]
An impact on polycarbonate by a projectile at temperatures below −7 °C sometimes creates spall, pieces of polycarbonate that are broken off and become projectiles themselves. Experiments have demonstrated that the size of the spall is related to the thickness of the laminate rather than the size of the projectile. The spall starts in surface flaws caused by bending of the inner, polycarbonate layer and the cracks move “backwards” through to the impact surface. It has been suggested that a second inner layer of polycarbonate may effectively resist penetration by the spall.[4]
2000s advances
In 2005, it was reported that U.S. military researchers were developing a class of transparent armor incorporating aluminum oxynitride (ALON) as the outside "strike plate" layer. Traditional glass/polymer was demonstrated by ALON's manufacturer to require 2.3 times more thickness than ALON's, to guard against a .50 BMG projectile.[13] ALON is much lighter and performs much better than traditional glass/polymer laminates. Aluminum oxynitride "glass" can defeat threats like the .50 caliber armor-piercing rounds using material that is not prohibitively heavy.[14][15]
Spinel ceramics
Certain types of ceramics can also be used for transparent armor due to their properties of increased density and hardness when compared to traditional glass. These types of synthetic ceramic transparent armors can allow for thinner armor with equivalent stopping power to traditional laminated glass.[16]
Air chamber glass
The newest type of curved transparent vehicle armor has an air chamber between the glass and the polycarbonate. Level IIIA (high speed 9 mm) armor consists of 8 mm of laminated glass (strike face), a 1 mm air gap, and 7 mm of polycarbonate. This solution stops the bullets in a totally different way. The glass, being hard, deforms the incoming bullet. The deformed bullet completely penetrates the glass and then it is stopped by the flexible polycarbonate. The weight reduction over traditional glass-clad polycarbonate is 35%, weighing 0.25 kilogram per square meter for level NIJ 06 IIIA (NIJ 07 HG2). It is also thinner (16.2 mm) vs conventional Glass Clad Polycarbonate (21 mm).
See also
References
- ↑ "How Ballistic Glass Is Made". Insulgard Security Products. 2020-07-08. Retrieved 2021-05-11.
- ↑ Bertino, AJ, Bertino PN, Forensic Science: Fundamentals and Investigations, Cengage Learning, 2008, p. 407
- 1 2 "Bullet Resistant Glass & Laminates: Military Vehicles Humvees Protection". Usarmorllc.com. 2013-12-31. Archived from the original on 2014-05-01. Retrieved 2014-08-04.
- 1 2 3 Walley, S.M.; Field J.E.; Blair, P.W.; Milford, A.J. (March 11, 2003). "The effect of temperature on the impact behaviour of glass/polycarbonate laminates" (pdf-1.17 Mb). International Journal of Impact Engineering. Elsevier Science Ltd. 30 (30?): 31–52. doi:10.1016/S0734-743X(03)00046-0. Retrieved September 15, 2013.
- 1 2 Gunnarsson CA; et al. (June 2009). "Deformation and Failure of Polycarbonate during Impact as a Function of Thickness" (PDF). Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM) Annual Conference, June 1–4, 2009, Albuquerque New Mexico, USA. Society for Experimental Mechanics Inc. Archived from the original (pdf-443Kb) on 2013-10-04. Retrieved September 15, 2013.
- ↑ Shah, Q. H.
- ↑ Company specifications from Total Security Solutions and/or Pacific Bulletproof. Retrieved May 9, 2011
- ↑ Nationwide Structures Inc. "Ballistic Charts". Nationwidestructures.com. Retrieved 2014-08-04.
- ↑ "Surmet's ALON® Transparent Armor 50 Caliber Test". YouTube. 2011-03-14. Retrieved 2014-08-04.
- ↑ UL 752 Level 3 Bullet Resistant Fiberglass click on the lower chart
- ↑ Chandal D, Chrysler J. A numerical analysis of the ballistic performance of a 6.35 mm transparent polycarbonate plate. Defense Research Establishment, Valcartier, Quebec, Canada. DREV-TM-9834, 1998.
- ↑ Cros PE, Rota L, Contento CE, Schirer R, Fond C. Experimental and numerical analysis of the impact behavior of polycarbonate and polyurethane liner Phys IV, France 10:Pr9-671 – Pr9-676, 2000.
- ↑ Surmet's ALON® Transparent Armor 50 Caliber Test
- ↑ Lundin, Laura (October 17, 2005). "Air Force testing new transparent armor". Air Force Research Laboratory Public Affairs. Retrieved February 16, 2021.
- ↑ "Sapphire gem based transparent armor protects soldiers from snipers". Fox News. October 18, 2018. Retrieved February 16, 2021.
- ↑ Ceramic Transparent Armor May Replace “Bullet-Proof Glass” Archived August 30, 2011, at the Wayback Machine