States of Φ(A)

With τ a state of A, let π_τ denote the corresponding GNS representation on the Hilbert space H_τ. Using the notation defined here, τ is ω_x ∘ π_τ for a suitable unit vector x(=x_τ) in H_τ. Thus τ is ω_y ∘ Φ, where y is the unit vector Σ_ρ∈S ⊕y_ρ in H_Φ, defined by y_τ=x, y_ρ=0(ρ≠τ). Since the mapping τ → τ ∘ Φ⁻¹ takes the state space of A onto the state space of Φ(A), it follows that each state of Φ(A) is a vector state.

Bounded functionals of Φ(A)

Let Φ(A)⁻ denote the weak-operator closure of Φ(A) in B(H_Φ). Each bounded linear functional ρ on Φ(A) is weak-operator continuous and extends uniquely preserving norm, to a weak-operator continuous linear functional ρ on the von Neumann algebra Φ(A)⁻. If ρ is hermitian, or positive, the same is true of ρ. The mapping ρ → ρ is an isometric isomorphism from the dual space Φ(A)^* onto the predual of Φ(A)⁻. As the set of linear functionals determining the weak topologies coincide, the weak-operator topology on Φ(A)⁻ coincides with the ultraweak topology. Thus the weak-operator and ultraweak topologies on Φ(A) both coincide with the weak topology of Φ(A) obtained from its norm-dual as a Banach space.

Ideals of Φ(A)

If K is a convex subset of Φ(A), the ultraweak closure of K (denoted by K⁻)coincides with the strong-operator, weak-operator closures of K in B(H_Φ). The norm closure of K is Φ(A) ∩ K⁻. One can give a description of norm-closed left ideals in Φ(A) from the structure theory of ideals for von Neumann algebras, which is relatively much more simple. If K is a norm-closed left ideal in Φ(A), there is a projection E in Φ(A)⁻ such that

${\displaystyle K=\Phi (A)\cap \Phi (A)^{-}E,K^{-}=\Phi (A)^{-}E}$

If K is a norm-closed two-sided ideal in Φ(A), E lies in the center of Φ(A)⁻.

Representations of A

If π is a representation of A, there is a projection P in the center of Φ(A)⁻ and a *-isomorphism α from the von Neumann algebra Φ(A)⁻P onto π(A)⁻ such that π(a) = α(Φ(a)P) for each a in A. This can be conveniently captured in the commutative diagram below :

Here ψ is the map that sends a to aP, α₀ denotes the restriction of α to Φ(A)P, ι denotes the inclusion map.

As α is ultraweakly bicontinuous, the same is true of α₀. Moreover, ψ is ultraweakly continuous, and is a *-isomorphism if π is a faithful representation.

Ultraweakly continuous, and singular components

Let A be a C*-algebra acting on a Hilbert space H. For ρ in A^* and S in Φ(A)⁻, let Sρ in A^* be defined by Sρ(a) = ρ∘Φ⁻¹(Φ(a)S) for all a in A. If P is the projection in the above commutative diagram when π:A → B(H) is the inclusion mapping, then ρ in A^* is ultraweakly continuous if and only if ρ = Pρ. A functional ρ in A^* is said to be singular if Pρ = 0. Each ρ in A^* can be uniquely expressed in the form ρ=ρ_u+ρ_s, with ρ_u ultraweakly continuous and ρ_s singular. Moreover, ||ρ||=||ρ_u||+||ρ_s|| and if ρ is positive, or hermitian, the same is true of ρ_u, ρ_s.

Christensen–Haagerup principle

Let f and g be continuous, real-valued functions on C^4m and C⁴ⁿ, respectively, σ₁, σ₂, ..., σ_m be ultraweakly continuous, linear functionals on a von Neumann algebra R acting on the Hilbert space H, and ρ₁, ρ₂, ..., ρ_n be bounded linear functionals on R such that, for each a in R,

${\displaystyle f(\sigma _{1}(a),\sigma _{1}(a^{*}),\sigma _{1}(aa^{*}),\sigma _{1}(a^{*}a),\cdots ,\sigma _{m}(a),\sigma _{m}(a^{*}),\sigma _{m}(aa^{*}),\sigma _{m}(a^{*}a))}$

${\displaystyle \leq g(\rho _{1}(a),\rho _{1}(a^{*}),\rho _{1}(aa^{*}),\rho _{1}(a^{*}a),\cdots ,\rho _{n}(a),\rho _{n}(a^{*}),\rho _{n}(aa^{*}),\rho _{n}(a^{*}a)).}$

Then the above inequality holds if each ρ_j is replaced by its ultraweakly continuous component (ρ_j)_u.