偽學術
偽學術（英語：），又称假學術，是指任何经宣称为學術或學術研究，或描述方式看起来像學術，但实际上并不符合相關學術研究的基本方法要求及知识、缺乏支持证据，经不起可信性测试，缺乏嚴謹客觀的研究，或缺乏學術要求的形式。伪學術經常使用模糊的、自相矛盾的、誇張的、無法證明及無法證偽的主張，过度依赖确認而不是严格的反驳，缺乏其它专家的公开确认，缺乏系统化、理性化、學術化的理论过程。[1]
偽學術的例子包括:
參考
- Jerome V. Jacobsen, "Notes and Comment:
Pseudo-scholarship", Mid-America: An Historical Review, Volumes 23–24, (Chicago: Loyola University, 1941) p. 315
- Steve J. Stern, "Between Tragedy and Promise" （页面存档备份，存于）, in Gilbert Michael Joseph, Reclaiming the Political in Latin American History (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001) p. 33
- Shaye J. D. Cohen, "In Memoriam Morton Smith" （页面存档备份，存于）, in Shaye J. D. Cohen, Studies in the Cult of Yahweh, Vol. 2: New Testament, Early Christianity, & Magic (Leiden: BRILL, 1996) p. 285
- Jeremy Bernstein, A Comprehensible World: On Modern Science and Its Origins, 2nd ed. (New York: Random House, 1967) p. 193
- Marshall Fishwick, American Studies in Transition (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1969) p. 265-266
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.