塔夫脱时期美国最高法院案例列表
这是一个美国最高法院首席大法官威廉·霍华德·塔夫脱 (1921年7月11日 - 1930年2月3日)任职期间依时间顺序排列的案例列表。
| 案件名 | 引用 | 简介 | 
|---|---|---|
| United States v. Phellis | 257 U.S. 156 (1921) | shares in a subsidiary corporation issued to stockholders in the parent corporation considered taxable income | 
| 萊瑟訴加內特案 | 258 U.S. 130 (1922) | constitutionality of Nineteenth Amendment | 
| 巴尔扎克诉波多黎各案 | 258 U.S. 298 (1922) | 海岛案 | 
| 美国诉莫兰德案 | 258 U.S. 433 (1922) | 第五宪法修正案 | 
| 童工税案 | 259 U.S. 20 (1922) | docket title Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co., found the Child Labor Tax Law of 1919 was not a valid use of Congress' power under the Taxing and Spending Clause | 
| Hill v. Wallace | 259 U.S. 44 (1922) | use of congressional taxing power under the Taxing and Spending Clause; relationship to Commerce Clause | 
| 联邦棒球俱乐部诉全国联赛案 | 259 U.S. 200 (1922) | 棒球和反托拉斯管理 | 
| 怀俄明州诉科罗拉多州案 | 259 U.S. 419 (1922) | 科罗拉多州是否可以转移跨州水系拉勒米河的水资源 | 
| 高雄小泽诉合众国案 | 260 U.S. 178 (1922) | 规划和种族(日裔美国人) | 
| 宾夕法尼亚煤炭公司诉马洪案 | 260 U.S. 393 (1922) | Substantive Due Process, Takings clause of the Fifth Amendment | 
| 摩尔诉登普西案 | 261 U.S. 86 (1923) | mob-dominated trials, federal writ of habeas corpus, due process | 
| United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind | 261 U.S. 204 (1923) | 归化和种族(印度裔美国人) | 
| 阿德金斯诉儿童医院案 | 261 U.S. 525 (1923) | 定约自由;最低公司法 | 
| 巴尔的摩和俄亥俄铁路公司诉合众国案 | 261 U.S. 592 (1923) | creation of implied-in-fact contracts | 
| 芝加哥市贸易委员会诉奥尔森案 | 262 U.S. 1 (1923) | constitutionality of the Grain Futures Act under the Commerce Clause | 
| Meyer v. Nebraska | 262 U.S. 390 (1923) | constitutionality of law prohibiting teaching of foreign languages; substantive due process | 
| Frothingham v. Mellon | 262 U.S. 447 (1923) | 纳税人标准被废弃 | 
| Rindge Co. v. County of Los Angeles | 262 U.S. 700 (1923) | eminent domain and the building of a scenic road | 
| Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. | 263 U.S. 413 (1923) | review of state court decisions by U.S. District Courts | 
| Chung Fook v. White | 264 U.S. 443 (1924) | Interpretation of Immigration Act of 1917; marked end of era of strict plain meaning interpretation of statutes | 
| United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels (More or Less) Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar | 265 U.S. 438 (1924) | legality of misleading but factually accurate packaging statements under the Pure Food and Drug Act | 
| 卡罗尔诉合众国案 | 267 U.S. 132 (1925) | whether police searches of automobiles without a warrant violate the Fourth Amendment | 
| George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. Maloy | 267 U.S. 317 (1925) | Dormant Commerce Clause; states are not permitted to regulate common carriers engaged in interstate commerce on state highways | 
| 林德诉合众国案 | 268 U.S. 5 (1925) | prosecution of physicians under the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act | 
| Irwin v. Gavit | 268 U.S. 161 (1925) | taxation of income from a trust | 
| Pierce v. Society of Sisters | 268 U.S. 510 (1925) | 隐私 | 
| 吉特洛诉纽约州案 | 268 U.S. 652 (1925) | prosecution of seditious speech | 
| Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co. | 271 U.S. 170 (1926) | taxation of reduced loss on exchanged currency | 
| 迈尔斯诉合众国案 | 272 U.S. 52 (1926) | Presidential authority to remove executive branch officials | 
| Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co. | 272 U.S. 365 (1926) | zoning, due process | 
| 美国诉通用电气公司案 | 272 U.S. 476 (1926) | patentee who grants a single license to a competitor to manufacture the patented product may lawfully fix the price at which the licensee may sell the product | 
| Farrington v. Tokushige | 273 U.S. 284 (1927) | constitutionality of anti-foreign language statute in the Territory of Hawaii under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment | 
| 尼克松诉赫尔顿案 | 273 U.S. 536 (1927) | challenging the white primaries in Texas | 
| 巴克诉贝尔案 | 274 U.S. 200 (1927) | compulsory sterilization, eugenics | 
| Hess v. Pawloski | 274 U.S. 352 (1927) | consent to in personam jurisdiction | 
| 惠特尼诉加利福尼亚州案 | 274 U.S. 357 (1927) | prosecution of criminal syndicalism | 
| Gong Lum v. Rice | 275 U.S. 78 (1927) | admission of Chinese girl to school for White children in Mississippi | 
| 新墨西哥州诉得克萨斯州案 | 275 U.S. 279 (1927) | 两州边界之争 | 
| Miller v. Schoene | 276 U.S. 272 (1928) | Substantive due process, takings clause | 
| Black and White Taxicab Co. v. Brown and Yellow Taxicab Co. | 276 U.S. 518 (1928) | what law is to be applied when courts sit in diversity jurisdiction | 
| Olmstead v. United States | 277 U.S. 438 (1928) | admissibility of illegally-obtained phone wiretaps as evidence | 
| 威斯康星州诉伊利诺伊州案 | 278 U.S. 367 (1930) | federal power over state interests, Chicago Sanitary Canal | 
| 塔夫脱诉鲍尔斯案 | 278 U.S. 470 (1929) | taxation of a gift of shares of stock under the Sixteenth Amendment (Chief Justice Taft did not participate) | 
| United States v. Schwimmer | 279 U.S. 644 (1929) | denial of naturalization to a pacifist, overruled by Girouard v. United States (1946) | 
| Pocket Veto Case | 279 U.S. 655 (1929) | constitutionality of the pocket veto | 
| Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner | 279 U.S. 716 (1929) | third-party payment of income tax, effect of Revenue Act of 1926 | 
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.