怀特时期美国最高法院案例列表
这是一个美国最高法院首席大法官爱德华·道格拉斯·怀特 (1910年12月19日 - 1921年5月19日)任职期间依时间顺序排列的案例列表。
| 案件名 | 引用 | 简介 |
|---|---|---|
| 威姆斯诉合众国案 | 217 U.S. 349 (1910年) | cruel and unusual punishment |
| 玛斯夸特诉合众国案 | 219 U.S. 346 (1911年) | Advisory opinion doctrine |
| Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. | 220 U.S. 107 (1911年) | constitutionality of corporate income tax |
| 美国诉格里莫 | 220 U.S. 506 (1911年) | 森林储备的控制 |
| 标准石油公司诉合众国案 | 221 U.S. 1 (1910年) | dissolving interstate monopolies |
| 道威尔诉合众国案 | 221 U.S. 325 (1911年) | 海岛案 |
| Gompers v. Buck's Stove and Range Co. | 221 U.S. 418 (1911年) | contempt for violating an injunction against a worker's boycott |
| 霍克诉合众国案 | 227 U.S. 308 (1913) | upheld the Mann Act, but held that Congress could not regulate prostitution |
| Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell | 229 U.S. 1 (1913) | extensions of patents by use of licenses, rights of copyright holder regarding “use” of copyrighted works |
| 查尔顿诉凯利案 | 229 U.S. 447 (1913) | procedures to approve extradition of criminal suspect to another country |
| Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. Howbert | 231 U.S. 399 (1913) | |
| 威克斯诉合众国案 | 232 U.S. 383 (1914) | establishment of the exclusionary rule for illegally obtained evidence |
| 奥坎波诉合众国案 | 234 U.S. 91 (1914) | 海岛案 |
| Shreveport Rate Case | 234 U.S. 342 (1914) | Commerce clause, regulation of intrastate railroad rates |
| Coppage v. Kansas | 236 U.S. 1 (1915) | Economic due process and yellow-dog contracts |
| 伯迪克诉合众国案 | 236 U.S. 79 (1915) | 宽恕的法律效应 |
| Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio | 236 U.S. 230 (1915) | free speech and the censorship of motion pictures |
| 吉恩诉合众国案 | 238 U.S. 347 (1915) | constitutionality of Oklahoma's "grandfather law" used to disenfranchise African-American voters |
| Hadacheck v. Sebastian | 239 U.S. 394 (1915) | municipal regulation of land use |
| Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization | 239 U.S. 441 (1915) | denial of due process procedural protections for legislative and rulemaking acts, as opposed to adjudicatory proceedings |
| Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad | 240 U.S. 1 (1916) | power to tax income under the Sixteenth Amendment |
| Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co. | 240 U.S. 103 (1916) | power to tax income under the Sixteenth Amendment |
| Georgia, Florida, & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co. | 241 U.S. 190 (1916) | responsibilities of parties under a bill of lading |
| United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola | 241 U.S. 265 (1916) | case brought against Coca-Cola under the Pure Food and Drug Act |
| 美国诉奥本海默案 | 242 U.S. 85 (1916) | doctrine of res judicata applies to criminal cases |
| American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co. | 241 U.S. 257 (1916) | scope of federal question jurisdiction in patent law case |
| 凯密乃提诉合众国案 | 242 U.S. 470 (1917) | Mann Act applies to consensual extramarital sex |
| 邦廷诉俄勒冈州案 | 243 U.S. 426 (1917) | 劳工法；十小时工作制 |
| 亚当斯诉坦纳案 | 244 U.S. 590 (1917) | Substantive due process, state's prohibition of employment agencies was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment |
| Buchanan v. Warley | 245 U.S. 60 (1917) | constitutionality of local ordinance compelling racial segregation of residential housing |
| 芝加哥贸易委员会诉合众国案 | 246 U.S. 231 (1918) | Rules of a commodities exchange examined under rule of reason |
| Hammer v. Dagenhart | 247 U.S. 251 (1918) | Congressional power to regulate child labor under the Commerce Clause |
| International News Service v. Associated Press | 248 U.S. 215 (1918) | 新闻的财产权 |
| 申克诉合众国案 | 249 U.S. 47 (1919) | 言论自由，明显和当前的危险标准，戏院火警 |
| 德布斯诉合众国案 | 249 U.S. 211 (1919) | 暴动 |
| 艾布拉姆斯诉合众国案 | 250 U.S. 616 (1919) | validity of criminalizing criticism of the government |
| 史维基托恩木材公司诉合众国案 | 251 U.S. 385 (1920年) | Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine in a tax evasion case |
| Eisner v. Macomber | 252 U.S. 189 (1920年) | pro rata stock dividend not taxable income |
| Missouri v. Holland | 252 U.S. 416 (1920年) | 州权 |
| 美国诉惠勒案 | 254 U.S. 281 (1920年) | Privileges and Immunities Clause and kidnapping |
| Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. | 255 U.S. 180 (1921年) | federal question jurisdiction in state corporate law matter |
| 纽贝里诉合众国案 | 256 U.S. 232 (1921年) | Congress lacks the power to regulate primary elections |
| Dillon v. Gloss | 256 U.S. 368 (1921年) | 宪法修正案程序 |
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.