苏联政府压抑的科学研究

有一系列科学研究受到苏联政府的压抑，相关研究员经常受到不公正对待，动辄被贴上“资产阶级学者”的标签。

生物学

1930年代中期起，李森科在斯大林支持下发动了一场反对基因遗传学的运动。[1]该学说的创始人孟德尔是一个天主教聖職人員，这一点格外地激怒斯大林。[2][3][4][5]

语言学

斯大林上台时，尼古拉·马尔的雅弗理论居于统治地位，他认为语言是一种阶级构成。斯大林读到了一封齐克巴瓦的反对马尔的来信，于是把他召来进行了一次几个小时的谈话，作了大量的笔记。[6]于是他找到了足够的材料来反对马尔，结束了后者在苏联语言学界的统治地位，而斯大林自己就语言学只写过一篇论文，《马克思主义和语言学问题》。[7]斯大林统治下也把比较语言学打为伪科学。[8]

控制论

斯大林也认定魏纳的控制论为“资产阶级伪科学”。[9]在苏联，意识形态期刊《哲学问题》在1953年的一篇文章中评价控制论为“帝国主义者没有办法摧毁资本主义中的根本矛盾，他们不能阻止即将发生的经济危机。所以，他们尝试从狂热的军备竞赛和意识形态战争中寻找答案。在深层的绝望中，他们寻求伪科学带来的一线希望以苟延残喘”，1954年版《简明哲学词典》中称控制论为“反动的伪科学，首先出现在二战后的美国，后广泛传播于资本主义国家，是一种现代的机械论。”[10]

参考文献

Hudson, P. S., and R. H. Richens. The New Genetics in the Soviet Union. Cambridge, U.K.: English School of Agriculture, 1946.
. History of Science Society, Académie internationale d'histoire des sciences. 1947 [2007-10-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-20）. The fact that Mendel was a priest has been similarly used to discredit his ideas.
. Duckworth. 1952 [2007-10-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-20）. Was not Mendel a priest ? If, as the reactionaries maintain, genetic processes are subject to the laws of chance ...
George Aiken Taylor. . Southern Presbyterian Journal Co. 1972 [2007-10-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-18）. Mendel, of course, must be discredited, in Communist thought, because he was a product of the West and of the Church.
. Australasian Association of Psychology and Philosophy. 1945 [2007-10-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-19）. He trenchantly criticises Lysenko's vilification of the work of Mendel and Morgan as "fascist, bourgeois-capitalistic, and inspired by clerics" (that Mendel was a priest is taken as sufficient to discredit his experiments).
Montefiore. p.638, Phoenix, Reprinted paperback.
Joseph V. Stalin (1950-06-20). "Concerning Marxism in Linguistics", Pravda. Available online as Marxism and Problems of Linguistics （页面存档备份，存于） including other articles and letters also published in Pravda soon after February 8 and July 4, 1950.
Robert Conquest Reflections on a Ravaged Century (2000) ISBN 0-393-04818-7, page 101-111
苏联解体对当代中国政治的影响
《信息论与编码引论：剑桥大学真题精解》前言

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Hudson, P. S., and R. H. Richens. The New Genetics in the Soviet Union. Cambridge, U.K.: English School of Agriculture, 1946.

[George_Sarton-2] . History of Science Society, Académie internationale d'histoire des sciences. 1947 [2007-10-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-20）. The fact that Mendel was a priest has been similarly used to discredit his ideas.

[Charles_Paton_Blacker-3] . Duckworth. 1952 [2007-10-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-20）. Was not Mendel a priest ? If, as the reactionaries maintain, genetic processes are subject to the laws of chance ...

[George_Aiken_Taylord-4] George Aiken Taylor. . Southern Presbyterian Journal Co. 1972 [2007-10-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-18）. Mendel, of course, must be discredited, in Communist thought, because he was a product of the West and of the Church.

[Australasian_Association_of_Psychology_and_Philosophy-5] . Australasian Association of Psychology and Philosophy. 1945 [2007-10-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-19）. He trenchantly criticises Lysenko's vilification of the work of Mendel and Morgan as "fascist, bourgeois-capitalistic, and inspired by clerics" (that Mendel was a priest is taken as sufficient to discredit his experiments).

[6] Montefiore. p.638, Phoenix, Reprinted paperback.

[7] Joseph V. Stalin (1950-06-20). "Concerning Marxism in Linguistics", Pravda. Available online as Marxism and Problems of Linguistics （页面存档备份，存于） including other articles and letters also published in Pravda soon after February 8 and July 4, 1950.

[reflections-8] Robert Conquest Reflections on a Ravaged Century (2000) ISBN 0-393-04818-7, page 101-111

[9] 苏联解体对当代中国政治的影响

[10] 《信息论与编码引论：剑桥大学真题精解》前言