A by-election was held for the New South Wales Legislative Assembly electorate of New England on 10 January 1887 because of the resignation of William Proctor.[1] He had been found guilty by a jury of having sat and voted in parliament whilst he had an interest in a contract with the Government and the statutory penalty of £500 was imposed. Proceedings were stayed pending Proctor's appeal to the Full Court of the Supreme Court, however he resigned stating that he desired to have the verdict of his constituents.[2]

Dates

DateEvent
18 December 1886 Proctor found guilty of having sat and voted whilst he had an interest in a government contract.[3]
20 December 1886 William Proctor resigned.[1]
29 December 1886 Writ of election issued by the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly.[4]
6 January 1887 Nominations.[5]
10 January 1887 Polling day
20 January 1887 Return of writ
26 January 1887 Parliament dissolved
14 November 1887 Proctor's conviction set aside by the Full Court of the Supreme Court.[6]

Background

Thomas Logan and David Proudfoot were partners in a contract for the construction of a section of the Illawarra railway. Proudfoot became insolvent which dissolved the partnership. Logan wanted to carry on the contract and sought Proctor's assistance to get him a bank guarantee. Proctor became one of Logan's guarantors, and wishing to protect himself took an assignment of the contract from Logan. At the time of taking the assignment Proctor was a member of the Legislative Assembly, and Proudfoot sought to recover the penalty of £500 because Proctor, being a member of the Legislative Assembly, had entered into a contract with the Government for or on account of the public service, within the meaning of s. 28 of the Constitution of New South Wales. The jury found for Proudfoot for the full amount claimed. Proceedings were stayed pending Proctor's appeal to the Full Court of the Supreme Court.[7][8]

Candidates

This by-election was at the emergence of political parties in New South Wales, where the division was on fiscal lines of free trade and protection.

  • William Cleghorn declared himself to be a free trader.[9] This was the only occasion on which he stood for election.[10]
  • Charles Givney was a protectionist.[11] This was the second of five times in which he stood unsuccessfully for parliament.[10]

Result

1887 New England by-election
Monday 10 January [13]
Candidate Votes %
William Proctor (re-elected) 673 45.7
Charles Givney 484 32.8
William Cleghorn 317 21.5
Total formal votes 1,474 100.0
Informal votes 0 0.0
Turnout 1,474 37.7

Aftermath

Proctor resumed his seat in the Legislative Assembly however Parliament was dissolved on 26 January. He did not stand as a candidate at the election on 10 February.[14]

His appeal the Full Court of the Supreme Court was successful, which held that (1) Proctor did not receive any money that was payable under the contract and (2) the contract required the consent of the government. As that had not been given, Proctor had no rights against the government nor did the government have any rights against Proctor. The Full Court's view was that this was not a sufficient interest to disqualify Proctor from sitting and voting as a member.[6][15]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 "Mr William Consett Proctor (1850-1905)". Former members of the Parliament of New South Wales. Retrieved 26 June 2019.
  2. ↑ "The New England electorate: Mr Proctor's address". The Sydney Morning Herald. 5 January 1887. p. 7. Retrieved 12 May 2021 – via Trove.
  3. ↑ "Supreme Court: Proudfoot v Proctor". The Sydney Morning Herald. 20 December 1886. p. 3. Retrieved 12 May 2021 – via Trove.
  4. ↑ "Writ of election: New England". New South Wales Government Gazette. No. 739. 24 December 1886. p. 8769. Retrieved 12 May 2021 – via Trove.
  5. ↑ "The nomination". The Armidale Express and New England General Advertiser. 7 January 1887. p. 4. Retrieved 13 May 2021 – via Trove.
  6. 1 2 Proudfoot v Proctor [1887] NSWLawRp 90, (1887) 8 LR (NSW) 459 (14 November 1887), Supreme Court (Full Court).
  7. ↑ "Supreme Court: Proudfoot v Proctor". The Sydney Morning Herald. 17 December 1886. p. 3. Retrieved 12 May 2021 – via Trove.
  8. ↑ "Supreme Court: Proudfoot v Proctor (part heard)". The Sydney Morning Herald. 20 December 1886. p. 3. Retrieved 12 May 2021 – via Trove.
  9. ↑ "Mr. William Cleghorn's meeting". The Armidale Express and New England General Advertiser. 7 January 1887. p. 4. Retrieved 12 May 2021 – via Trove.
  10. 1 2 Green, Antony. "Index to Candidates: Chedid to Coady". New South Wales Election Results 1856-2007. Parliament of New South Wales. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
  11. ↑ "Mr Givney at Walcha". The Armidale Express and New England General Advertiser. 4 January 1887. p. 4. Retrieved 12 May 2021 – via Trove.
  12. ↑ "Mr. Proctor's Meeting". The Armidale Express and New England General Advertiser. 4 January 1887. p. 5. Retrieved 13 May 2021 – via Trove.
  13. ↑ Green, Antony. "1887 New England by-election". New South Wales Election Results 1856-2007. Parliament of New South Wales. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
  14. ↑ Green, Antony. "1887 New England". New South Wales Election Results 1856-2007. Parliament of New South Wales. Retrieved 29 September 2020.
  15. ↑ Twomey, Anne (2004). The Constitution of New South Wales. Federation Press. pp. 414. ISBN 9781862875166. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.