Battle of La Rochelle
Part of the Caroline phase of the Hundred Years' War

The naval battle of La Rochelle, chronicle of Jean Froissart, 15th century.
Date22–23 June 1372
Location
off La Rochelle
46°09′30″N 01°13′40″W / 46.15833°N 1.22778°W / 46.15833; -1.22778
Result Castilian victory[1]
Belligerents
England Castile
Commanders and leaders
Earl of Pembroke  (POW) Ambrosio Boccanegra
Strength
14–57 ships and barges[1][2][3] 22 ships[1][4]
Casualties and losses
48 ships sunk or captured[1]
400 knights and 8,000 soldiers captured[1]
Whole fleet sunk or captured[1][5]
800 men killed
Between 160 and 400 knights prisoners[5]		 minor

The Battle of La Rochelle was a naval battle fought on 22 and 23 June 1372[6] between a Castilian fleet commanded by the Castilian Almirant Ambrosio Boccanegra and an English fleet commanded by John Hastings, 2nd Earl of Pembroke. The Castilian fleet had been sent to attack the English at La Rochelle, which was being besieged by the French. Besides Boccanegra, other Castilian commanders were Cabeza de Vaca,[7] Fernando de Peón[8] and Ruy Díaz de Rojas.[9]

Pembroke had been dispatched to the town with a small retinue of 160 soldiers, £12,000 and instructions to use the money to recruit an army of 3,000 soldiers around Aquitaine for at least four months.[10] The strength of the fleet is estimated as between the 12 galleys given by the Castilian chronicler and naval captain López de Ayala and the 40 sailing ships, of which three ships were warships and 13 barges mentioned by the French chronicler Jean Froissart. Probably it consisted of 22 ships, mainly galleys and some naos (carracks) three- or four-masted ocean sailing ships. The English fleet probably consisted of 32 ships and 17 small barges of about 50 tons.[11]

The Castilian victory was complete and the entire English fleet was captured or destroyed. On his return to the Iberian Peninsula, Boccanegra seized another four English ships off Bordeaux.[12] This defeat undermined English seaborne trade and supplies through the English Channel and threatened their Gascon possessions.[13]

Background

Edward III of England. Probably a 16th-century interpretation.

In 1372 the English monarch Edward III planned an important campaign in Aquitaine under the new lieutenant of the Duchy, the Earl of Pembroke. He contracted to serve a year in the duchy with a retinue of 24 knights, 55 squires and 80 archers besides other companies led by Sir Hugh Calveley and Sir John Devereux, who finally did not serve or did not appear. Pembroke was given £12,000 with instructions to use the money to recruit a host of 500 knights, 1,500 esquires and 1,500 archers in France for at least four months. One of Edward's clerks, John Wilton, was appointed to accompany the Earl and administer the funds.[14]

The Earl of Pembroke, his retinue and Wilton embarked at Plymouth aboard a transport fleet which was unprepared for serious engagement.[15] The Castilian chronicler Pero López de Ayala estimated that this fleet had 36 ships, whereas the chronicler of the French court estimated it to be 35. Jean Froissart, in one of his two descriptions of the battle, put the English force on 'perhaps' 14 ships. A fleet of 20 vessels is considered a creditable force. Sir Philip Courtenay, Admiral of the West, provided escort with 3 larger fighting ships (large tonnage and archer towers).[2]

The English rule in Aquitaine was by then under threat.[16] Since 1370 large parts of the region had fallen under French rule. In 1372, Bertrand du Guesclin lay siege at La Rochelle. To respond to the demands of the Franco-Castilian alliance of 1368, the king of Castile, Henry II of Trastámara, dispatched a fleet to Aquitaine under Ambrosio Boccanegra, assisted by Cabeza de Vaca, Fernando de Peón and Rui Díaz de Rojas. The size of this fleet is also uncertain.[17] According to López de Ayala, it was composed of 12 galleys. Froissart, in his first account, mentioned 40 sailing ships and 13 barges, but later reduced this number to 13 galleys. Quatre Premiers Valois and Chronique des Pays-Bas mention respectively 20 and 22 galleys.[4]

Battle

a colourful Medieval depiction of a naval battle, with men-at-arms engaging hand to hand
The Battle of La Rochelle as depicted in a miniature sometime after 1380. The English ships are lower than the Castilian; this advantage allowed the latter to throw arrows and bolts on their enemy with impunity.

On 21 June the English fleet arrived at La Rochelle and the battle began as Pembroke's ships approached the harbour. This lay at the head of an inlet which was partially unnavigable at low water. The first Castilian attacks met strong resistance. The English, despite the inferiority of their numbers, defended themselves vigorously. At dusk, when the tide rose, the two fleets separated. Though they had lost two or four vessels, according to Froissart, the English were not yet defeated. Pembroke then withdrew some way from land, while Boccanegra anchored in front of La Rochelle. The Chronicle Quatre Premiers Valois, unlike López de Ayala and Froissart, implies that only some skirmishes took place on the first day, as Boccanegra would have ordered his galleys to withdraw, reserving them for the main action. According to this chronicle, the anchoring sites were reversed: the English off the town and the Castilians on the open sea.[4]

Froissart described a discussion between Pembroke and his men during the night of 21–22 June regarding how to escape the trap. An attempt to escape under the cover of the night was dismissed due to the fear of the Castilian galleys, as well as another to enter La Rochelle because of the low draft of the passage. In the end, the low tide left the English ships aground. Castilian galleys could maneuver freely in shallow water. That gave them a decisive tactical advantage.[5] An additional handicap for the English was the taller air draught of the Castilian ships, which enabled their crews to build wooden breastworks and throw arrows and bolts from a higher position.[18][8] The Castilian vessels were equipped with arbalests that loosed quarrels on the wooden decks of the English ships.[18] When the fight resumed on the morning of the 22nd, the Castilians managed to set fire to some of them by spraying oil on their decks and rigging and then igniting it with flaming arrows.[5] Many of the English were killed or burned alive, while others surrendered, among them Pembroke. The Spanish naval historian Cesáreo Fernández Duro claims that the English prisoners amounted to 400 knights and 8,000 soldiers, without counting the slain.[19] Estimates in English chronicles speak of about 1,500 casualties, 800 deaths and between 160 and 400 prisoners. The whole fleet was destroyed or captured and £12,000 fell into Castilian hands. The English defeat appeared inevitable from the beginning because of the major inequality in strength.[5]

Aftermath

The battle of La Rochelle was the first important English naval defeat of the Hundred Years' War;[5] furthermore, it was described by historian J. H. Ramsay as the worst defeat ever inflicted on the English navy,[20] Its effect upon the course of the war was significant: La Rochelle was lost on 7 September. Its capture was followed during the second half of the year by nearly all of Poitou, Angoumois and Saintonge, which Bertrand du Guesclin cleared of English garrisons.[21] Some authors claim that the battle cost England its naval supremacy along the French coast but others disagree, though asserting that England's naval policy had become misguided.[22][23] The projected resources to support John of Gaunt's claims to the Castilian throne were largely suspended, while a great expedition under Edward III himself had to be postponed because of contrary winds.[24]

Main attacks on England by Tovar and Vienne (1374–1380)

The English needed a year to rebuild their fleet through the efforts of fourteen towns. In April 1373 a powerful force under William de Montacute, Earl of Salisbury, set sail for Portugal. It was commanded by Admirals Neville and Courtenay in two divisions, the first consisting of 15 ships and 9 barges and the second, 12 ships and 9 barges, 44 fighting vessels all told. Other ships and barges joined the large concentration and by July, Salisbury had 56 ships crewed by 2,500 sailors and an army of 2,600 soldiers. This campaign of 1373 was successful, seeing, amongst other events, the burning of a Castilian merchant convoy at Saint-Malo.[25] In retaliation, Fernando Sanchez de Tovar, who had succeeded Boccanegra as Major Admiral of Castile after his death in 1374, joined forces with the French admiral Jean de Vienne against England. Naval supremacy in the English channel, won in the battle of La Rochelle, allowed the allied fleet to plunder and burn the Isle of Wight and the English ports of Rye, Rottingdean, Winchelsea, Lewes, Folkestone, Plymouth, Portsmouth and Hastings between 1374 and 1380. Local levy troops raised by the Earl of Arundel were defeated in a land battle at Lewes. In 1380 the joint fleet sailed up the Thames and set Gravesend on fire.[26][13]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fernández Duro 1894, p. 130.
  2. 1 2 Sherborne & Tuck 1994, p. 42.
  3. ↑ Hill & Ranft 2002, p. 11.
  4. 1 2 3 Sherborne & Tuck 1994, p. 43.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sherborne & Tuck 1994, p. 44.
  6. ↑ Sherborne, J. W. (1969). "The Battle of La Rochelle and the War at Sea, 1372-5". Historical Research. 42 (105): 17–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2281.1969.tb02322.x. ISSN 1468-2281.
  7. ↑ "Cabeza de Vaca's Travels Through Mid-North America 1528-1536". www.sjsu.edu. Retrieved 26 March 2020.
  8. 1 2 Nicolas, Sir Nicholas Harris (1847). A History of the Royal Navy: 1327-1422. R. Bentley. pp. 142–44.
  9. ↑ Villalon, Andrew; Kagay, Donald (17 July 2017). To Win and Lose a Medieval Battle: Nájera (April 3, 1367), A Pyrrhic Victory for the Black Prince. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-34580-5.
  10. ↑ Sherborne & Tuck 1994, p. 41.
  11. ↑ Luce 1862, pp. 232–234; De Smet 1856, p. 259.
  12. ↑ "1372 Combate Naval de la Rochelle". Melilla, Mar y Medioambiente (in Spanish). 23 February 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2022.
  13. 1 2 William, Hunt; Poole, R. L.; Oman, C. (1906). The History of England. Volume 4. Рипол Классик. pp. 5–6. ISBN 978-5-87804-823-1.
  14. ↑ Sumption 2012, p. 138; Sherborne & Tuck 1994, pp. 16–17.
  15. ↑ Sherborne & Tuck 1994, p. 17.
  16. ↑ Harriss 2006, p. 410.
  17. ↑ Fernández Duro 1894, pp. 129–130.
  18. 1 2 Sumption 2012, p. 193.
  19. ↑ Fernández Duro 1894, p. 132.
  20. ↑ Ramsay 1913, pp. 22–23.
  21. ↑ Harriss 2006, p. 414.
  22. ↑ Villalon & Kagay 2005, p. xxxvi.
  23. ↑ Sherborne & Tuck 1994, p. 50.
  24. ↑ Sumption 2012, p. 144.
  25. ↑ Sherborne & Tuck 1994, pp. 49–50.
  26. ↑ Díaz González, Calderón Ortega (2001), p. 344-45

Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.