In the mathematical subject of group theory, a co-Hopfian group is a group that is not isomorphic to any of its proper subgroups. The notion is dual to that of a Hopfian group, named after Heinz Hopf. [1]

Formal definition

A group G is called co-Hopfian if whenever is an injective group homomorphism then is surjective, that is .[2]

Examples and non-examples

  • Every finite group G is co-Hopfian.
  • The infinite cyclic group is not co-Hopfian since is an injective but non-surjective homomorphism.
  • The additive group of real numbers is not co-Hopfian, since is an infinite-dimensional vector space over and therefore, as a group .[2]
  • The additive group of rational numbers and the quotient group are co-Hopfian.[2]
  • The multiplicative group of nonzero rational numbers is not co-Hopfian, since the map is an injective but non-surjective homomorphism.[2] In the same way, the group of positive rational numbers is not co-Hopfian.
  • The multiplicative group of nonzero complex numbers is not co-Hopfian.[2]
  • For every the free abelian group is not co-Hopfian.[2]
  • For every the free group is not co-Hopfian.[2]
  • There exists a finitely generated non-elementary (that is, not virtually cyclic) virtually free group which is co-Hopfian. Thus a subgroup of finite index in a finitely generated co-Hopfian group need not be co-Hopfian, and being co-Hopfian is not a quasi-isometry invariant for finitely generated groups.[3]
  • Baumslag–Solitar groups , where , are not co-Hopfian.[4]
  • If G is the fundamental group of a closed aspherical manifold with nonzero Euler characteristic (or with nonzero simplicial volume or nonzero L2-Betti number), then G is co-Hopfian.[5]
  • If G is the fundamental group of a closed connected oriented irreducible 3-manifold M then G is co-Hopfian if and only if no finite cover of M is a torus bundle over the circle or the product of a circle and a closed surface.[6]
  • If G is an irreducible lattice in a real semi-simple Lie group and G is not a virtually free group then G is co-Hopfian.[7] E.g. this fact applies to the group for .
  • If G is a one-ended torsion-free word-hyperbolic group then G is co-Hopfian, by a result of Sela.[8]
  • If G is the fundamental group of a complete finite volume smooth Riemannian n-manifold (where n > 2) of pinched negative curvature then G is co-Hopfian. [9]
  • The mapping class group of a closed hyperbolic surface is co-Hopfian.[10]
  • The group Out(Fn) (where n>2) is co-Hopfian.[11]
  • Delzant and Polyagailo gave a characterization of co-Hopficity for geometrically finite Kleinian groups of isometries of without 2-torsion.[12]
  • A right-angled Artin group (where is a finite nonempty graph) is not co-Hopfian; sending every standard generator of to a power defines and endomorphism of which is injective but not surjective.[13]
  • A finitely generated torsion-free nilpotent group G may be either co-Hopfian or not co-Hopfian, depending on the properties of its associated rational Lie algebra.[5][3]
  • If G is a relatively hyperbolic group and is an injective but non-surjective endomorphism of G then either is parabolic for some k >1 or G splits over a virtually cyclic or a parabolic subgroup.[14]
  • Grigorchuk group G of intermediate growth is not co-Hopfian.[15]
  • Thompson group F is not co-Hopfian.[16]
  • There exists a finitely generated group G which is not co-Hopfian but has Kazhdan's property (T).[17]
  • If G is Higman's universal finitely presented group then G is not co-Hopfian, and G cannot be embedded in a finitely generated recursively presented co-Hopfian group.[18]
  • A group G is called finitely co-Hopfian[19] if whenever is an injective endomorphism whose image has finite index in G then . For example, for the free group is not co-Hopfian but it is finitely co-Hopfian.
  • A finitely generated group G is called scale-invariant if there exists a nested sequence of subgroups of finite index of G, each isomorphic to G, and whose intersection is a finite group.[4]
  • A group G is called dis-cohopfian[3] if there exists an injective endomorphism such that .
  • In coarse geometry, a metric space X is called quasi-isometrically co-Hopf if every quasi-isometric embedding is coarsely surjective (that is, is a quasi-isometry). Similarly, X is called coarsely co-Hopf if every coarse embedding is coarsely surjective. [20]
  • In metric geometry, a metric space K is called quasisymmetrically co-Hopf if every quasisymmetric embedding is onto. [21]

See also

References

  1. Wilhelm Magnus, Abraham Karrass, Donald Solitar, Combinatorial group theory. Presentations of groups in terms of generators and relations, Reprint of the 1976 second edition, Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2004. ISBN 0-486-43830-9
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 P. de la Harpe, Topics in geometric group theory. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2000. ISBN 0-226-31719-6; p. 58
  3. 1 2 3 Yves Cornulier, Gradings on Lie algebras, systolic growth, and cohopfian properties of nilpotent groups. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 144 (2016), no. 4, pp. 693–744
  4. 1 2 Volodymyr Nekrashevych, and Gábor Pete, Scale-invariant groups. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics 5 (2011), no. 1, pp. 139–167
  5. 1 2 Igor Belegradek, On co-Hopfian nilpotent groups. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 35 (2003), no. 6, pp. 805–811
  6. Shi Cheng Wang, and Ying Qing Wu, Covering invariants and co-Hopficity of 3-manifold groups. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 68 (1994), no. 1, pp. 203–224
  7. Gopal Prasad Discrete subgroups isomorphic to lattices in semisimple Lie groups. American Journal of Mathematics 98 (1976), no. 1, 241–261
  8. Zlil Sela, Structure and rigidity in (Gromov) hyperbolic groups and discrete groups in rank 1 Lie groups. II. Geometric and Functional Analysis 7 (1997), no. 3, pp. 561–593
  9. I. Belegradek, On Mostow rigidity for variable negative curvature. Topology 41 (2002), no. 2, pp. 341–361
  10. Nikolai Ivanov and John McCarthy, On injective homomorphisms between Teichmüller modular groups. I. Inventiones Mathematicae 135 (1999), no. 2, pp. 425–486
  11. Benson Farb and Michael Handel, Commensurations of Out(Fn), Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS 105 (2007), pp. 1–48
  12. Thomas Delzant and Leonid Potyagailo, Endomorphisms of Kleinian groups. Geometric and Functional Analysis 13 (2003), no. 2, pp. 396–436
  13. Montserrat Casals-Ruiz, Embeddability and quasi-isometric classification of partially commutative groups. Algebraic and Geometric Topology 16 (2016), no. 1, 597–620
  14. Cornelia Druţu and Mark Sapir, Groups acting on tree-graded spaces and splittings of relatively hyperbolic groups. Advances in Mathematics 217 (2008), no. 3, pp. 1313–1367
  15. Igor Lysënok, A set of defining relations for the Grigorchuk group. (in Russian) Matematicheskie Zametki 38 (1985), no. 4, 503–516
  16. Bronlyn Wassink, Subgroups of R. Thompson's group F that are isomorphic to F. Groups, Complexity, Cryptology 3 (2011), no. 2, 239–256
  17. Yann Ollivier, and Daniel Wise, Kazhdan groups with infinite outer automorphism group. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 359 (2007), no. 5, pp. 1959–1976
  18. Charles F. Miller, and Paul Schupp, Embeddings into Hopfian groups. Journal of Algebra 17 (1971), pp. 171–176
  19. Martin Bridson, Daniel Groves, Jonathan Hillman, Gaven Martin, Cofinitely Hopfian groups, open mappings and knot complements. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics 4 (2010), no. 4, pp. 693–707
  20. Ilya Kapovich, and Anton Lukyanenko, Quasi-isometric co-Hopficity of non-uniform lattices in rank-one semi-simple Lie groups. Conformal Geometry and Dynamics 16 (2012), pp. 269–282
  21. Sergei Merenkov, A Sierpiński carpet with the co-Hopfian property. Inventiones Mathematicae 180 (2010), no. 2, pp. 361–388

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.