Part of a series on |
Slavery |
---|
The Black Sea slave trade trafficked people across the Black Sea from Europe and Caucasus to slavery in the Mediterranean and the Middle East. The Black Sea slave trade was a center of the slave trade between Europe and the rest of the world from antiquity until the 19th century.[1]
The Black Sea was situated in a region historically dominated by the margins of empires, conquests and major trade routes between Europe, the Mediterranean and Central Asia, notably the Ancient Silk road, made the Black Sea ideal for a slave trade of war captives sold along the trade routes.[2] One of the major slave trades of the Black Sea region was the trade of the Crimean Khanate, known as the Crimean slave trade.
Antiquity
In antiquity, enslaved people were sold via the Ancient Greek and Roman city ports of the Black Sea East to Asia via the Silk road, and West to the Ancient Mediterranean world.[3]
In antiquity, the Black Sea was called the Pontic Sea and people from the region often simply called Pontics. Greek colonies were established along the Black Sea, which engaged in slave trade between the tribes of the interior North of the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. Slaves were sold by their families or as war captives to the Greek cities, who exported them West to the Mediterranean or East to Asia along the Silk road.
In the 1st-century, the Roman writer Strabo described Dioscurias, the major Black Sea port of the Caucasus, and the Greek city of Tanais, as major ports of the Pontic slave trade, from which "Pontic" slaves, such as Scythians or Paphlagonians, who had been sold as war captives by enemy tribes or sold by their families as adolescents, were exported to the Mediterranean and could be find in Ancient Athens.[4]
Middle ages
During the Middle Ages, informal slave zoones were formed alongside religious borders, which were also crossed at the Black Sea region. Both Christians and Muslims banned the enslavement of people of their own faith, but both approved of the enslavement of people of a different faith.[5]
The slave trade thus organized alongside religious principles. While Christians did not enslave Christians, and Muslims did not enslave Muslims, both did allow the enslavement of people they regarded to be heretics, which allowed Catholic Christians to enslave Orthodox Christians, and Sunni Muslims to enslave Shia Muslims.[6]
However, both Christians and Muslims approved of enslaving Pagans, who came to be a preferred target of the slave trade in the Middle Ages, and Pagan war captives were sold by Pagan enemies to the slave trade.[6]
Byzantine slave trade (5th-century–13th-century)
Background
The slave trade trafficking humans from the Black Sea region to the Mediterranean Sea during the Roman period continued during the Byzantine Empire, but the Byzantine slave trade is not fully documented, though it appear to have continued to function via the old principles war-captives and children sold by their families.[7]
During the Middle Ages, the slave market was organized alongside religious borders. Christian slaves could not be sold in Christian slave markets, and Muslim slaves could not be sold on Muslims slave markets. The slave trade adjusted to this, and the result was that Pagans, who could be sold to both Christians and Muslims, came to be highly valued. Pagans from Eastern and Northern Europe came to be the most popular targets for slavery in both the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Arab world during the early Middle Ages, where they were forced to convert to Christianity and Islam respectively after their enslavement.[8]
Slave trade
Various slave routes passed via the Black Sea and the Byzantine Crimea to the Byzantine Mediterranean world and the Islamic Middle East. Different people acquired captives and shipped them down to Byzantine Crimea and other ports around the Black Sea, from where they continued to the slave market of the Mediterranean via Byzantine Constantinople, and to the Middle East.
Magyars of Hungary
The slave trade from the Balkans was mainly directed toward the Balkan slave trade of the Adriatic Sea rather than the Black Sea. However, in the 9th-century, the Magyars of Hungary conducted regular slava raids toward the Slavs, and sold their captives to the Byzantine slave traders in the Black Sea port of Kerch in exchange for brocades, wool and other products.[9]
Ahmad ibn Rustah, a 10th-century Persian traveller, remembers it this way:
"The Magyar country (Etelköz) is rich in wood and water. The land is well watered and harvests abundant. They lord over all the Slavs who neighbour them and impose a heavy tribute on them. These Slavs are completely at their mercy, like prisoners. The Magyars are pagans, worshipping fire. They make piratical raids on the Slavs and follow the coast [of the Black Sea] with their captives to a port in Byzantine territory named Karkh."[10]
Viking slave trade
During the early Middle Ages and the 11th-century, the Black Sea was one of the two slave trade destinations of the Viking Volga trade route, which exported slaves to the Abbasid Caliphate in the Middle East via the Caspian Sea and the Samanid slave trade to Iran; and to the Byzantine Empire and the Mediterranean via Dnieper and the Black Sea.[11][12]
The so-called saqaliba, which was the term for white slaves in the Islamic Middle East (often provided by the Vikings), is not likely to stand for exclusively Slavic ethnicity in practice, since many victims of the Viking's saqaliba slave trade was in fact other ethnicities such as Baltics, Lithuanians and Finno-Ugric people.[13]
The Vikings also captured slaves in raids from all of Western Europe, from the British Island to France and Spain. The people the Vikings captured in Christian Western Europe were taken first to Scandinavia, and from there trafficked South East through Pagan Eastern Europe toward the Black Sea. Archbishop Rimbert of Bremen (d. 888) reported the he wittnessed a “large throng of captured Christians being hauled away” in the Viking port of Hedeby in Denmark, one of whom was a woman who sang psalms to identify herself as a Christian nun, and who the bishop was able to free by exchanging his horse for her freedom.[14]
Until the 9th-century, the Vikings trafficked slaves from the Baltic Sea in the North or the North Sea in the West via the Wisla or the Donau rivers South East through Europe to the Black Sea.[15] In the 9th-century, the Viking slave route was redirected, and until the 11th-century, the Vikings trafficked slave from the Baltic Sea via Ladoga, Novgorod and the Msta river to the Black Sea (and the Byzantine Empire), or to the Caspian Sea (and the Middle East) via the Volgas trade route.[15]
The Viking slave trade stopped in the 11th-century.
Baltics, Sweden and Finland
Since both Christians and Muslims banned the enslavement of people of their own faith but viewed Pagans as legitimate targets for slavery, the Pagans of North Eastern Europe became highly targeted by the slave traders when the rest of Europe had become Christian in the 12th-century. The Pagan Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, Livonians and Latgallians raided each other, Ingria and Novgorod during the 12th- and 13th-centuries, and sold war captives south to the Black Sea slave trade.[16]
The Christian Russians also raided the Pagan Estonians to sell them to the slave trade, since they were viewed as legitimate target because they were Pagans.[16]
When the Norse Vikings disappeared in the 11th-century, they were succeeded in by pirates from the Baltics, who raided the coasts of the Baltic Sea for slaves.[17] The island of Saaremaa was a base for the Baltic pirates, who were noted to sell women captives to the slave trade.[18] In 1226, the Baltic pirates from Saaremaa conducted a slave raid toward Sweden, where they captured many women and girls to sell as slaves.[17]
When the Viking slave trade stopped in the mid-11th century, the old slave trade route between the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea and Central Asia via the Russian rivers was uphold by Baltic slave traders, who sold slaves via Daguava to the Black Sea and East, which was now the only remaining slave trade in Europe when the slave market in Western Europe died out in the 12th-century.[19]
Russian slave trade
When the Kievan Rus' started to disintegrate in internal warfare between the smaller Russian states in the 12th-century, the various Russian princes and their Cuman (kipchak) allies captured the subjects of enemy Russian princes during their wars, which were sold to the slave traders.[9]
The Bulgar Khan regularly conducted slave raids toward the Russian principalities and captured Russian "infidels" whom they sold to the Islamic Middle East via the Black Sea slave trade in exchange for weapons.[9]
Slave market
Slavery in the Byzantine Empire were still widely practiced during the early Middle Ages. Emperor Basil I owned 3,000 slaves, and when Emperor Manuel I manumitted all the slaves in the capital of Constantinople in the 12th-century, Eustathius of Thessalonica noted that most of the slaves came from "beyond the Danube" by origin and have arrived via the "Northern winds" from Pontian lands, likely a euphemism from slaves exported to Byzantine by the Vikings via the Black Sea slave trade.[20]
Abolition
Information about the Byzantine slave trade is fragmentary prior to the 13th-century, when it was taken over by Genuese and Venetian merchants, who established Italian colonies on the Crimea in the late 13th-century.[20]
Italian slave trade (13th-century – 15th-century)
In the late Middle Ages (13th-century-15th-century), the Black Sea was the center of the Italian slave trade, which exported slaves from Eastern Europe via the Italian cities on the Crimea to Spain and Italy and to the Islamic Middle East.[21][22]
Background
Slavery died out in Western Europe after the 12th-century, but the demand for laborers after the Black Death resulted in a revival of slavery in Southern Europe in Italy and the in Italy, as well as an increase in the demand for slaves in Egypt.[23]
Italian merchants, particularly the Genuese and Venetians, who had a large net of contacts as traders in the Mediterranean Sea, early established themselves in the slave trade. Initially they did so as travelling merchants, but eventually they managed to acquire their own trading colonies on the Crimea.
Slave trade
The majority of the slaves in the Italian Black Sea slave trade came to be enslaved via three main methods; as war captives during warfare, such as the Mongol invasions, the wars between the Golden Horde and the Ilkhanate, and the conquests of Timur Lenk; via slave raids; or through parents selling their own children or relatives to slavery, which occurred because of poverty and was a regular and common occurrence especially after the Black Death, when the demand for slave was high in both Southern Europe and the Middle East.[24]
Common targets of slavery were Pagan Finno-Ugric and Turkish people.[25]
Baltics and Finland
In this time period, religious conviction was an important factor in who was considered legitimate to enslave. Christians could not be enslaved by Christians, and Muslims could not be enslaved by Muslims.[25] However, since both Christians and Muslims regarded Pagans to be legitimate targets of slavery, the remaining Pagans of North Eastern Europe became an economical choice for the slave traders.[25]
In the 13th-century all of Europe had became Christian with the exception of the Baltics, Eastern Finland and Carelia, which became supply zones for slaves to the Black Sea slave trade, from were they were trafficked by Italian slave traders to Southern Europe and the Islamic Middle East.[26]
Caucasus
Genuese slave traders bought slaves from a number of different ethnic groups in the Caucasus, such as Abkhazians, Mingrelians and Circassians, from which families sold their own children and adolescents to slave traders.[27]
People from the Caucasus were not only sold by their families but also taken captive in slave raids. In the 14th-century, a contemporary witness from Sultaniyyah described how Circassian tribal noblemen conducted slave raids toward other Circassian tribes, "go out from one village to another publicly, or else secretely if they can, and violently seize children and adults of the other village, and immediately sell [them] to merchants by the sea. And in the same way as the Tatars were accustomed to sell theirs, so too these wretched people", after which the slaves were taken to the Crimea, where a wittness statement noted that slave traders were "selling Christians forna price on market days, where they are dragged with a rope tied from the tail of a horse to the nech of those who are sold".[28]
However, the slave trade was not confined to the Caucasus, but extended along the entire Black Sea coastline, the official slave sale records of the town notaries of the Crimean town of Kaffa lists the following nations: "many Armeni, Ziqui, Gothi, Tat, Valachus, Rus, Ivlach, Alani, Avari, Kumuch" then a little later again lists more slaves by ethnicity in the document "Ziqui, Abhaz, Lech, Georgi, Rus, unknown, Borgar, Ungalus, Maniar."[29]
Slave market
The Italian slave trade had two main routes; from the Crimea to Byzantine Constantiople, and via Crete and the Balearic Islands to Italy and Spain; or to the Mamluk Sultanate in Egypt, which received the majority of the slaves.[30]
From at least 1382 onward, the majority of the mamluks of the Egyptian Mamluk sultanate with slave origin came from the Black Sea slave trade; cirka 100 Circassian males intended for mamluks were being trafficked via the Black Sea slave trade until the 19th-century.[31]
The majority of the slaves trafficked to South Europe (Italy and Spain) were girls, since they were intended to become ancillae maid servants, while the majority of the slaves, cirka 2,000 annually, were trafficked to the Egyptian Mamluk Sultanate, in that case most of them boys, since the Mamluk sultanate needed slave soldiers.[32]
Abolition
After the Fall of Constantinople in 1453, the Ottomans closed the trade between the Crimea and the West.[30] The slave trade gradually diminished, and in 1472, only 300 slaves are registered to have been trafficked from Caffa.[33]
From the 1440s, Spain and Portugal started to import their slaves from first the Canary Islands, and then from Africa; initially via the Trans-Saharan slave trade from Libya, and then from by starting the Transatlantic slave trade.[34]
The Ottoman Empire and the Crimean Khanate conquered the Italian cities on the Crimea in 1475, and the slave trade was then taken over by Muslim slave traders.[35]
Crimean Khanate slave trade (1441–1783)
During the Early Modern age the Crimean Khanate (1441-1783) was a major center of the international slave trade. The Crimean slave trade was the main source of income of the Khanate, and one of the biggest sources of slaves to the Ottoman Empire. The Crimean slave trade in Eastern Europe, and the Barbary slave trade in West and South Europe, were the two main sources of European slaves to the Ottoman Empire.
During this period the Crimea was the destination of the Crimean–Nogai slave raids in Eastern Europe, and European and Circassian slaves were trafficked to the Middle East via the Crimea.[36]
Background
When the Crimean Khanate was founded in the 1440s, the Crimean Tatars initially taxed the Italian slave trade in the Italian cities - mainly Caffa - on the Crimea.
The Crimean Khanate had a small population and a rudimentary agriculture, and it needed a different income for taxes and as slave laborers to the estates they founded, and therefore started to tax the slave trade, and conduct slave raids to produce more income from the slave trade.[37]
In 1475 the Crimean Khanate and the Ottoman Empire united to conquer the Italian cities on the Crimea, transforming Caffa to an Ottoman province, after which the slave trade was taken over by Muslim Ottoman slave traders in collaboration with the Crimea Khanate.[38]
Slave trade
The Nogai Horde were vassals of the Crimean Khanate and economically dependent upon the slave trade, and performed the slave raids independently, or in collaboration with the Crimean Tatars, who were dependent on slave trade and slave labor on their estates.[37]
The slaves were captured in southern Russia, Poland-Lithuania, Moldavia, Wallachia, and Circassia by Tatar horsemen in a trade known as the "harvesting of the steppe". Slave raids were conducted by the Nogai Horde and or the Crimean Tatars toward Russia, Poland-Lithuania and the Caucasus twice every year; during the harvest and during the winter.[39]
A Ukrainian folk song remembered to despair and devastation of the slave raids:
- "The fires are burning behind the river.
- The Tatars are dividing their captives.
- Our village is burnt and our property plundered.
- Old mother is sabred and my dear is taken into captivity."[40]
The majority of the slaves captured was forced in slave caravans by land and then by sea to the city of Caffa, which was an Ottoman province in the Crimean Khanate and a major center of the Crimean slave trade.[41] There were reportedly always around 30,000 slaves in Caffa.[42] The Lithuanian Mikhalon Litvin referred to Caffa in the 16th-century as: "not a town, but an abyss into which our blood is pouring".[43] From Caffa, the captives were distributed between the Ottomans and the Crimean Tatars, and some where distributed to the smaller slave markets in the Crimean Khanate,[41] while the rest were sold in Caffa and trafficked to the rest of the Ottoman Empire and the Islamic Middle East.[44]
The Crimean slave trade are estimated to have been as large in numbers as the Transatlantic slave trade until the 18th-century, when the Atlantic slave trade exploded and surpassed the Crimean slave trade in numbers.[41]
Balkans and Hungary
The Crimean slave raids to the Balkans were conducted in collaboration with the Ottomans, or with Ottoman approval, since the majority of the Balkans were under Ottoman Suzerainty, and Islamic law banned the enslavement of people living under Islamic rule. Raids were conducted when the various territories were in conflict with the Ottoman Empire and thus defined as enemy territory.
Until 1699, Habsburg Hungary was the only part of the Balkans not under Ottoman Suzerainty. Between 1521 and 1717 the Crimean Khanate conducted slave raids to Hungary in collaboration with or with permission from the Ottoman Empire during the warfare between the Ottoman Empire and the Habsburg Monarchy.[45]
During the war between the Ottoman Empire and the Principality of Transylvania in the 1660s, the Crimean Khanate conducted raids as far West as Moravia.[45]
The last Crimean slave raid to Hungary was conducted in 1717, during which 1,464 people was captured in the Ugocsa County, 861 of which succeeded in escaping during the caravan back to the Crimea.[46]
Circassia and Cacasus
The slave trade with Circassians from Caucasus had been a big slave route already during the Italian slave trade period, but during the Crimean slave trade it came to be a permanent luxury slave trade route providing elite slaves to the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East.[47][48]
The question how Muslims Circassians could be enslaved by Muslims despite the Islamic law allowing Muslims to take only non-Muslims as slaves, has been an issue of speculation.[49] Circassians in Caucasus were however split between Muslims, Christians and Pagans until the late 18th-century, with different religions dominating in different regions and different social classes.[49]
The Crimean Khan regarded the Circassians tribal princes as their vassals, defined them as infidels and thus viewed them as legitimate targets for slave tributes for the Crimean Khanate as well as the Ottoman Empire, as well as punitary slave raid expeditions in collaboration with Ottoman troops.[49] The Circassian elite gradually converted to Islam during the between the 16th-century and 18th-century, and were therefore able to participate themselwes in the raids for slave tributes performed by the Crimean-Ottoman against other Circassians.[49]
The Circassian slave trade of elite slaves to the Ottoman Empire came to be so essential for the Middle Eastern slave market that it survived the fall of the Crimean Khanate in 1783. After the annexation of the Crimea by Russia, the Circassian slave trade was redirected from the Crimea and came to be conducted directly by Ottoman slave traders from the Caucasus, a trade that continued during the 19th-century.[49]
Poland-Lithuania and Ukraine
In this time period, Poland and Lithuania was united, and Ukraine was a part of Poland-Lithuania. The first major Crimean-Nogai raid were conducted toward South Eastern Poland in 1468.
It is not documented exactly how many raids were conducted, were and how, and exactly the number of people abducted between the late 15th-century and the late 18th-century. Between 1474 and 1569, 75 major slave raids are estimated to have been conducted toward Polish-Lithuanian territory.[50] During the year of 1676 alone, cirka 40,000 people are estimated to have been abducted from the territory of Volhynia-Podolia-Galicia, and at least 20,000 people are estimated to have been abducted from the territory of Poland-Lithuania every year between 1500 and 1644, or at least one million people.[42]
A Polish proverb described death as a better fate than being captured by a slave raid: "O how much better to lie on one's bier, than to be captive on the way to Tatary".[40]
Polish captives were marched down to the port of Ochakiv, where they were loaded on to slave ships and trafficked to Caffa on the Crimea.[40]
Polish was such a common ethnicity for a slave on the Crimea Khanate, that Polish language was the second language in the Crimea.[51]
Among the most known victims of the Crimean slave raids from Poland were Roxelana.[40]
Russia
Muscovite Russia and the Crimean Khanate were both the vassals of the Golden Horde, which initially protected Russia from being subjected to the slave raids the Crimean Khanate conducted toward Poland and Lithuania. However, when the Golden Horde fell in 1502, Russia's protective status against the Crimean Khanate ended and from that point onward the Crimean raids where conducted against Russia as well as Poland.
From 1507 onward, Russia was a constant target of the Crimean-Nogai raids. It is not documented exactly how many raids were conducted, were and how, and exactly the number of people abducted, but at least 43 major raids were documented toward Russia between 1500 and 1550.[50]
In the period of circa 1600 and 1650, between 150,000 and 200,000 Russians are estimated to have been abducted in the raids; in the period of 1633–1646, around 15,115 people were either killed or abducted during raids toward Kursk alone.[42]
The last major Crimean-Nogai raid were reportedly conducted toward Russian territory in 1769, during the Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774), when 20,000 people were abducted.[51]
Among the victims of the Crimean slave raids from Russia were Turhan Sultan.
Sweden-Finland and the Baltics
Between the 16th-century and the end of the Great Northern war (1700-1721), the Baltics was a part of the Swedish Empire, as was Finland.
The slave raids conducted by private Russian slave traders over the border into Eastern Finland, capturing Finns and trafficking them south to the Black Sea, had been conducted since the Middle Ages and are estimated to have continued throughout the 17th-century.[52]
During the Great Northern war between 1700 and 1721, Russia invaded the Swedish provinces of Finland and Estonia and Livonia in the Baltics. Since the 15th-century, the Russian army had allowed private soldiers to capture and sell war captives, and during the Great Northern war many Russian soldiers captured Swedes, Finns and Baltic civilians (particularly children) from the Swedish provinces and sold them, some of which ended up in the Black Sea slave trade and Persia.[53] One of these occasions was the fall of Narva, were Lovisa von Burghausen was a famous victim of those captured to Russian soldiers with intent to sell.[54] Another case was that of Annika Svahn and Afrosinya. Lovisa, together with two other female slaves, one from Finland and one from Narva, were sold on the Russian slave market in Moscow; the Finnish woman was sold to an Armenian, the woman from Narva to a Russian clerk, and Lovisa to a Turkish-Ottoman merchant.[55] [56] Many of the Swedish citizens captured and sold by Russian soldiers ended up via the Crimean slave trade in the slave market in Constantiople, were the Swedish ambassador to Constantinople managed to buy some of them free, many of whom were women.[53]
From June 1710, the Swedish ambassador Thomas Funck made trips to the slave market in Constantiople to buy Swedish citizens, tours which was noted by his legation priest Sven Agrell. Agrell noted, for example, the purchase of a "carpenter's daughter from Narva" for §82, a "Captain's wife" for §240, Catharina Pereswetoff-Morath, age 18, for §275, and an entire Swedish-Livonian family, Anders Jonsson with his wife and children.[53] Those bought free with Swedish funds were probably escorted to the war camp of king Charles XII of Sweden in Bender and return to Sweden with him. It was noted however, that though many Swedish citizens were bought free by the Swedish ambassador, it was impossible to buy everyone on sale for the limited financial funds during wartime, many young women and children being far too expensive, and that many were therefore purchased on market by actual buyers and left in the Ottoman Empire.[53]
Slave market
The slave market was in practice divided in two parallel sources of income. One category was made up of rich captives, who were kept in captivity on the Crimea during the negotiations of their ransom, after which they were released and allowed to depart.[44] Another category was made up of poor people, who were not expected to be ransomed, and who were instead sold on the slave market. The Crimean Khanate received its main income from the trade in captives, and the ransom for a rich captive, as well as the sale of a poor captive as a slave, was seen as an equally legitimate income for the Khanate state.[57]
Ransome captives
The kin of rich prisoners were given the opportunity to buy back the hostage by paying ransom money, which was normally always the case when the captive belonged to the upper class, after which the prisoner was allowed to leave with a certificate of free passing and liberation.[58]
The ransom for a captive was normally the market price that would have been paid for the person if they were sold on the slave market or, if the prisoner was from a rich family, double that amount.[59]
A common go-between during the negotiations for ransom were Polish-Armenians. Polish Armenians were normally able to speak Turkish languages and had contacts with the Armenian communities on the Crimea, and they often acted as agents, negotiated for the ransom and escorted the hostages back home from the Crimea.[44]
Slave captives
The majority of the captives were brought to Kefe (Caffa), which was the center of the slave trade.[41] In Caffa there was already existing accommodations for slave trade since the Italian slave trade, but they were significantly enlarged, since the Crimean slave trade was much bigger than the Italian had been. In Caffa, the captives were handed over to Ottoman slave traders. The Ottoman slave traders were often Jews, Greek or Armenian Ottomans.[40] The prisoners were divided between the different participants according to age, sex and aptitude for resale and market price.[40] Evliya Celebi described the process:
- "A man who has not seen this market has seen nothing in this world. There a mother is severed from her son and daughter, a son from his father and brother, and they are sold among lamentations, cries for help, weeping, and sorrow".[40]
A fifth of the captives were gifted from the Crimean Khan to the Ottoman sultan as a vassal tribute, since the Khan was formally the vassal of the Sultan; another share were divided between the Crimean-Tatar tribal aristocracy as field slaves, the Khan's officials and the Nogai-Tatars as slave-shepherds, and the final share were sold, either in the domestic Crimean markets of Bakhchisarai, Karaseibazar and Evpatoria, or in Kaffa, from where they were exported to the rest of the Ottoman Empire.[42] Slaves trafficked from the Crimean slave trade could be sold far away in the Mediterranean and the Middle East; a Convent in Sinai in Egypt is for example noted to have bought a male slave originating from Kozlov in Russia.[42]
The Crimean khan received 12 percent of the price for every slave sold in the Crimean slave trade.[60]
In this period, African slaves provided by the Trans-Saharan slave trade, the Red Sea slave trade and the Indian Ocean slave trade trade was popular for use as domestic servants and laborers, and white slaves provided by the Barbary slave trade and the Black Sea slave trade were used for different purposes in the Middle East. In the 18th-century, slave soldiers (mamluk) in the Middle East were still often made up of white male slaves - janissary, from the Barbary slave trade or the Crimean slave trade. Men without particular skills were used for hard agricultural labor on the estates of the Crimean tribal aristocrats.[61] The worst fate for a male slave was reportedly to become a galley slave; every Ottoman galley required 200 galley slaves, and the Ottoman fleet consisted of between 45,000 and 60,000 galleys in the late 18th-century, and these galleys were supplied with many slaves from the Crimean slave trade.[62] In 1642, when an Ottoman galley was captured, 200 galley slaves were liberated, 207 of whom were from Ukraine and 20 were Russian men, some of whom had spent 40 years in captivity.[42] In 1645, the Ottoman Sultan Ibrahim reportedly approved of a slave raid to Poland and Russia specifically because he was constructing 100 new galley ships and required gally slaves to man them.[42] A young healthy Russian man was sold for 100-50 rubles, while Polish and Ukrainian men were more expensive.[42]
While African slave women were foremost bought as domestic laborers, white slave women were preferred for exclusively sexual slavery; as concubines or as wives. The Crimean slave trade was one of the biggest suppliers of women to the Ottoman Imperial Harem. The Imperial Harem was a big institution with 104 female slaves during the reign of Murad III (1574-1595), increasing in size with 295 in 1622, 433 in 1633, 446 during the reign of Mahmud I (r. 1730–1754) and 720 during Selim III (r. 1789–1807); the harem population begun to shrink gradually only during the second half of the 19th-century. Girls to the Imperial Harem were sent there as war captives during military campaigns, but also as gifts, or through purchase. Young virgin girls (normally arriving as children) were gifted to the Sultan from local statesmen, family members, grand dignitaries and provincial governors, and particularly from the Crimean Khan; Ahmed III received one hundred Circassian virgin girl slaves as presents upon his accession to the throne. Other girls were bought to the harem by the vizier or by private slave dealers, in private or from the Avrat bazar slave market. Except for the maidservants and the concubines, the harem also required wet nurses (daye cariyes) for the Sultan's children, who were required to be Circassian or Georgian.[63] Since they were bought for sexual purposes, the price of female slaves varied according to the girl's beauty, and the price of female slaves therefore varied greatly between different individuals; the prices of Georgian and Russian girls bought for the Imperial Harem of Ahmed III varied between 150 kuruş and 250 kuruş, while others cost up to 320 kuruş.[63] Preserved documentation does not clearly provide the place of origin for the majority of the slaves to the Imperial Harem, but it is clear that some of the European female slaves were from Greece, Hungary, Poland, Wallachia, Italy and Malta, some of whom were acquired from local Ottoman governors, though more Circassian, Georgian, Abkhasian and Russian (meaning the arrived via the Crimean slave trade).[63]
The Imperial Harem was a model for the private harems of other rich men in the Middle East. Circassian women were popular as slave concubines by the Crimean Tatar aristocrats,[64] and Ebulgazi Bahadir stated that many Crimean-Tatar men preferred enslaved women as wives because of their beauty.[65]
The male Mamluk aristocrats of Ottoman Egypt, who themselves were often of white slave origin (often Circassian or from Georgia), preferred to marry women of similar ethnicity, while black slave women were used as domestic maids.[66] The white slave women bought to become concubines and wives of the Mamluks, such as for example Nafisa al-Bayda, were often from the Caucasus, Circassians or Georgian.[67]
Outside of the Ottoman Empire, girls from the Black Sea region were also trafficked to Persia during this period. The slave concubines (and later mothers) of the Safavid imperial harem of The Persian Shah mainly consisted of enslaved Circassian, Georgian and Armenian women, captured as war booty, bought at the slave market, or received as gifts from local potentates.[68] Even some of the slave concubines in the Mughal harem in India were sometimes of the same origin as the victims of the Crimean slave trade, sich as for example Udaipuri Mahal, who has sometimes been referred to as a Georgian or Circassian.
Abolition
The last slave raid was conducted in 1769, during the Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774), when 20,000 people were taken captive.[44]
In the peace negotiations with Russia in 1773, all Russians captives were released home from the Crimea without needing to pay ransom.[44] After the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca of 1774, all slaves and captives on the Crimea regardless of nationality were released.[44] The emancipation of such a large slave population as the one in the Crimea was a major project that could not be fullfilled fast or easy, and in 1775, thousands of slaves were reported to still be left in the Crimea after others were departing or had already left.[44]
In 1783, the Crimean Khanate was dissolved after the Annexation of the Crimean Khanate by the Russian Empire. As late as 1805 and 1811, when Crimea had been a Russian province for over two decades, thousands of people were still registered to remain in slavery (yasyr) under the Crimea Tatars in the Crimea.[44]
Circassian slave trade (18th-century–20th-century)
Background
The Crimean slave trade was ended with the Annexation of the Crimean Khanate by the Russian Empire in the late 18th-century. However, the slave trade with Circassians from the Caucasus to the Middle East was redirected from the Crimea and instead went directly from tha Caucasus to the Ottoman Empire, was significantly expanded and continued until the early 20th-century.
The Circassian slave trade was heavily (though not entirely) focused on girls. In the Islamic Middle East, African women – trafficked via the Trans-Saharan slave trade, the Red Sea slave trade and the Indian Ocean slave trade – were primarily used as domestic house servants and not exclusively for sexual slavery, while white women, trafficked via the Black Sea slave trade and the Barbary slave trade, where preferred for the use of concubines (sex slaves) or wives, and there was therefore a constant demand for them in the Middle East.[69]
From the late 18th-century onward, when first the Crimean Khanate slave trade ended with the Russian annexation of 1783, followed by the end of the Barbary slave trade after the Barbary war, the Circassian slave trade became the main source of white slaves to the Islamic Middle East, and these slaves were referred to as "Circassians".[70]
In the context of the Circassian slave trade, the term Circassians did not necessarily refer to ethnic Circassians, but was used as an umbrella term for a number of different ethnicities from the Caucasus region, such as Georgians, Adyge and Abkhazians, in the same fashion as the term "Abbyssinians" was used as a term also for African slaves who were not from Abyssinia.[71]
Muslims were banned from enslaving other people who were Muslims before their capture; technically, this made enslaving ethnic Circassians a problem, since many of them were Muslims before their enslavement, but in practice, the fact that so many Circassian slave girls were already Muslims were tolerated as an "open secret" within the slave trade.[72]
Slave trade
Caucasus was an ideal area for slave trade, since it was a fragmented border zone affected by constant warfare and political instability.[70] Prior to the Russian conquest, many Circassian tribal leaders and princes acknowledged the suzerainty of the Ottoman sultan and converted to Islam, conducted warfare toward other Circassians and sold the children of their own Circassian serfs to Ottoman slave traders as a way to secure their own finances.[70] Circassian parents became notorious for their alleged willingness to sell their children to Ottoman slave traders, because their poverty made the high demand for Circassian girls highly lucrative.[70]
There was a tendency by Ottomans to claim that slavery was beneficial to the Circassians, since it delivered them from "primitimism to civilisation, from poverty and need to prosperity and happiness", and that the became slaves willingly: "Circassians came to Istanbul willingly 'to become wives of the Sultan and the Pachas, and the young men to become Beys and Pachas'".[73] It was commonly claimed that Circassian girls were eager to be enslaved and asked their parents to sell them to the traders, because it was the only way for them to enhance their class status.[70] It was commonly known that Circassian girls were mainly bought to become wives or concubines to rich men, which made the Circassian slave trade to be viewed as a form of marriage market, with the girls being raised by the slave traders as "apprentices" for marriage and then sold to become the wives or concubines of rich men.[70] The purported villingness to be sold to a rich man and thus escape the poverty of the Caucasus did not apply only to "marriage" as such: concubinage was more common and often a prestage of marriage, but was also seen as social advancement, and the demand for concubines on the Ottoman Middle East slave market grew significantly during the 18th-century.[74] A common claim was also that Circassian girls were seen laughing and joking at the slave market, which was seen as another sign that they participated willingly.[70]
In the Treaty of Adrianople the Russians were given control over the Ottoman forts along the Black Sea coast between Anatolia and the Caucasus, significantly reducing the Circassian slave trade, which caused the price of white women on the markets of Constantinople and Cairo to skyrocket.[69] In the 1840s, the Ottoman Empire agreed to stop their attacks on Russian forts along the Black Sea in exchange for the Russians turning a blind eye to the Circassian slave trade in now Russian Cacucasus, which the Russians agreed to silently tolerate.[69]
In 1854, the Ottoman Empire banned the slave trade in white women after pressure from Great Britain and France.[75] However, in March 1858 the Ottoman Governor of Trapezunt informed the British Consul that the 1854 ban had been a temporary war time ban due to foreign pressure, and that he had been given orders to allow slave ships on the Black Sea pass on their way to Constantiople, and in December formal tax regulations was introduced, legitimizing the Circassian slave trade again.[75]
Between 1856 and 1866, at least half a million Circassians were exiled from Caucasus by the Russians.[70] The Circassian refugee colonies in Anatolia and Constantinople continued to sell girls, in this case, Circassians are noted to have sold the children of their own Circassian slaves or serfs directly to the Ottoman slave traders, or to the buyers themselves.[76] The New York Daily Times reported on August 6, 1856:
- "There has been lately an unusually large number of Circassians going about the streets of Constantinople. [...] They are here as slave dealers, charged with the disposal of the numerous parcels of Circassian girls that have been for some time pouring into this market. Perceiving that when the Russians shall have reoccupied the coast of the Caucasus this traffic in white slaves will be over, the Circassian dealers have redoubled their efforts ever since the commencement of the peace conferences to introduce into Turkey the greatest possible number of women while the opportunity of doing so lasted. They have been so successful, notwithstanding the prohibition of the trade by the Porte, and the presence of so many of Her Majesty’s ships in the Black Sea, that never, perhaps, at any former period, was white human flesh so cheap as it is at this moment."[77]
The slave trade from Caucasus itself also continued. In 1872–1873, British sources and press reported that Circassian slaves were now transported over the Black Sea via regular ships – some of whom owned by European companies – from Black Sea ports such as Trabzon and Samsun to Constantinople.[76]
In 1873, there were many Circassian slave women in Istanbul who were sold by their Circassian immigrant slave owners to Ottoman citizens but escaped and tried to sue for freedom from the government, and a contemporary report described: "Being slaves of Circassian immigrants and being sold by their owners to buyers in Istanbul, most slave women, after being sold, are applying to the government with claims of freedom", and how these women were kept in the homes of officials until their a court of law could determin if they could be free or was legally slaves. [78] Some women who applied for freedom to a legal court were indeed manumitted, but being a free single woman in an Islamic society offered significant difficulties, unless she was able to be given protection by a family who could arrange a marriage for her.[78]
Officially, slave trade was prohibited in the Ottoman Empire in 1889, but this was mainly an issue of international diplomacy and not practiced, though the open slave markets disappeared and the slave purchases came to be officially termed "adoptions".[79] There was a greater reluctance from Ottoman authorities to prohibit the Circassian slave trade than the African slave trade, because the Circassian slave trade was regarded as in effect a marriage market, and it continued until the end of the Ottoman Empire (1922).[80] The Ottoman elite disliked free employed female servants and preferred slave maids, and while the slaves of the Ottoman Imperial Harem was officially freed in 1909, the rest of the Ottoman elite kept their own household slaves.[79]
Slave market
Constantinople was the center of the Circassian slave trade. From 1846 onward, white slave girls were no longer sold in the open slave market such as the Avret Pazarları, but to the buyer directly in the residence of the slave trader.[81] The Circassian girls were bought by the slave traders very young, were raised by the slave trader and his family as "foster daughters" to become ideal wives, and sold via a "marriage broker" to the buyer for money in the residence of the slave trader.[80] The hidden nature of the Circassian slave trade made it invisible to foreign diplomats, and exposed it to less public criticism than the more open African slave trade.
The Circassian slave trade was considered a luxury trade. White women were sold for six times as much as the ethnic category that was regarded as second best, the Galla (Oromo) women from Abyssinia, which was sold for between a tenth or a 3rd of the price of a white woman, depending of how light her skin was.[69]
The preference of white girls over African girls as sex slaves were noted by the international press, when the slave market was flooded by white girls in the 1850s due to the Circassian genocide, which resulted in the price for white slave girls to become cheaper and Muslim men who was not able to buy white girls before now exchanged their black slave women for white ones. The New York Daily Times reported on August 6, 1856:
- "In former times a “good middling” Circassian girl was thought very cheap at 100 pounds, but at the present moment the same description of goods may be had for 5 pounds! [...] Formerly a Circassian slave girl was pretty sure of being bought into a good family, where not only good treatment, but often rank and fortune awaited her; but at present low rates she may be taken by any huxter who never thought of keeping a slave before. Another evil is that the temptation to possess a Circassian girl at such low prices is so great in the minds of the Turks that many who cannot afford to keep several slaves have been sending their blacks to market, in order to make room for a newly-purchased white girl. The consequence is that numbers of black women, after being as many as eight or ten years in the same hands, have lately been consigned to the broker for disposal. Not a few of those wretched creatures are in a state quite unfit for being sold. I have it on the authority of a respectable slave-broker that at the present moment there have been thrown on the market unusually large numbers of negresses in the family way, some of them even slaves of pashas and men of rank. He finds them so unsalable that he has been obliged to decline receiving any more. A single observation will explain the reason of this, which might appear strange when compared with the value that is attached even to an unborn black baby in some slave countries. In Constantinople it is evident that there is a very large number of negresses living and having habitual intercourse with their Turkish masters—yet it is a rare thing to see a mulatto. What becomes of the progeny of such intercourse? I have no hesitation in saying that it is got rid of by infanticide, and that there is hardly a family in Stanboul where infanticide is not practiced in such cases as a mere matter of course, and without the least remorse or dread."[77]
White women slaves were primarily bought to become wives or concubines (sex slaves) for rich men. To buy a daughter-in-law was seen as a good alternative when arranging a marriage, since she was likely to become humble wife, lacking both her own money as well as relatives, and completely dependent upon her new family.[69] Since white women were very expensive on the slave market, this essentially functioned as a marriage market for the upper classes, and many of the consorts of the Ottoman and Egyptian rulers and other rich men were former victims of the Circassian slave trade, which made it a sensitive subject for Western diplomats to criticize.[82] During the entire 19th-century, many consorts of the Ottoman sultans where described as Circassian women who had been entrusted to the harem as children and brought up as foster daughters of the female family members of the Ottoman dynasty, and then presented to the Ottoman Imperial Harem, where they became the consorts - a euphemism for slave concubines - to the Ottoman sultans. The slave concubines in the Qajar harem in Iran were also Georgian and Armenian girls, some war captives, but also bought on the slave markets and presented as gifts to the shah from the provinces.[83][84]
The Circassian slave trade were maintained in the early 20th-century under the guise as a marriage market. The American journalist E. Alexander Powell described the slave trade to the harems of North African Maghreb in 1912, that when a rich Muslim man wished to enlarge his harem:
- "...he applies to one of the well-known dealers in Tetuan, Tripoli or Trebizond, a marriage contract is drawn up, and all the ceremonies of legal wedlock are gone through by proxy. By resorting to these fictious marriages and similar subterfuges, the owner of a harem may procure as many slaves, white, brown or black, as he wishes, and once they are within the walls of his house, noone can possibly interfere to release them, for, the polic being under no conditions permitted to violate the privance of a harem, there is obviously no safeguard for the liberty, or even then lives, ot its inmates. As a result of this sustem, a constant stream of female slaves - fair-haired beauties from Georgia and Circassia, brown-skinned Arab girls from the borders of the Sahara, and negresses from Equatoria - trickles in to the North African coast towns by various roundabaout channels, and though the European officials are perfectly well aware of this conditions of things, they are poverwless to end it. The women thus obtained, though nominally wives, are in reality slaves, for they are bought for money, they are not consulted about their sale, they cannot go away if they are discontented, and their very lives are at the disposal of their masters. If that is not slavery, I dont know what is".[85]
However, the Circassian slave trade did not exclusively trade in female slaves. During the Qajar dynasty of Iran, slave soldiers, ghilman, were still used for the royal guard, and they were mainly white slaves from Caucasus.[86] The 1828 war with Russia put an end to the import of white slaves from the Russian Empire borderlands as it undermined the trade in Circassians and Georgians, which caused the end of slave military in Iran, when free Iranians were employed in the royal guard instead of the still available African slaves.[86]
Girls from the Caucasus and the Circassian colonies in Anatolia were still trafficked to the Middle East in the 1920s. In 1924, the law prohibited the enslavement of white girls (normally Armenian or Georgian) on Kuwaiti territory, but in 1928 at least 60 white slave girls were discovered.[87] White girls became more and more rare to find in the slave trade from the mid 19th-century onward, and was gradually replaced by light skin women from Africa and Asia, a slave trade that continued until the 1960s and 1970s, when slavery in Saudi Arabia, slavery in the United Arab Emirates and Slavery in Oman was finally banned.
Gallery
- Caffa in ca 1800.
- William Allan (1782-1850) - The Slave Market, Constantinople.
- Charlotte Aïssé, victim of the Crimean slave trade.
- Neshedil Qadin, victim of the Circassian slave trade.
See also
- Avret Pazarları
- Kazakh Khanate slave trade
- Balkan slave trade
- Red Sea slave trade
- History of slavery in the Muslim world
- History of concubinage in the Muslim world
- Human trafficking in the Middle East
- Turkish Abductions
- Barbary slave trade
- Kazakh Khanate slave trade on Russian settlement
- Ottoman wars in Europe
- Slavery in Russia
- Slavery in the Ottoman Empire
- List of Mongol and Tatar attacks in Europe
- Annexation of the Crimean Khanate by the Russian Empire
References
- ↑ Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 3
- ↑ The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. (2023). Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. 160
- ↑ Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 19
- ↑ Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 19
- ↑ Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 5
- 1 2 Korpela, J. (2018). Slaves from the North: Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Nederländerna: Brill. 242
- ↑ Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 19
- ↑ Pargas & Schiel, Damian A.; Juliane (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 131
- 1 2 3 Pargas & Schiel, Damian A.; Juliane (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 161
- ↑ ibn Rustah, Ahmad (2017). Ibn Rustah és Gardízi (in Hungarian). Translated by Nándor Orbán.
- ↑ Pargas & Schiel, Damian A.; Juliane (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 126
- ↑ The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. (2023). Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 126
- ↑ Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 242
- ↑ The slave trade of European women to the Middle East and Asia from antiquity to the ninth century. by Kathryn Ann Hain. Department of History The University of Utah. December 2016. Copyright © Kathryn Ann Hain 2016. All Rights Reserved. https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6616pp7. p. 244-246
- 1 2 Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 35
- 1 2 Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 38
- 1 2 Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 39
- ↑ Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 38-41
- ↑ Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 41
- 1 2 Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 20
- ↑ Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill. 1
- ↑ Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill, p.
- ↑ Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p. 19
- ↑ Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p.24-25
- 1 2 3 Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 132
- ↑ Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 42
- ↑ Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 21-22
- ↑ Pargas & Schiel, Damian A.; Juliane (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery Throughout History. Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 162
- ↑ Tardy, Lajos (1980). A Tatárországi Rabszolgakereskedelem és a Magyarok a XIII-XV. Században [The Tatar Slave Trade and the Hungarians in the XIII-XV Centuries] (in Hungarian). Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Kiadó [Hungarian Academy of Sciences Publisher].
- 1 2 Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p. 35-36
- ↑ Eurasian Slavery, Ransom and Abolition in World History, 1200-1860. (2016). Storbritannien: Taylor & Francis. p. 9
- ↑ Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 32-33
- ↑ Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p. 27-28
- ↑ Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill, p. 29-31
- ↑ Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 7
- ↑ Slavery in the Black Sea Region, C.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. (2021). Nederländerna: Brill.
- 1 2 Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth - Early Eighteenth Centuries). Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 193
- ↑ Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 43
- ↑ Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth - Early Eighteenth Centuries). Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 194-195
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Peirce, L. (2017). Empress of the East: How a European Slave Girl Became Queen of the Ottoman Empire. USA: Basic Books.
- 1 2 3 4 Antunes & Tagliacozzo, Cátia; Eric (2023). The Cambridge History of Global Migrations: Volume 1: Migrations, 1400–1800. The Cambridge History of Global Migrations. "1". Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-48754-2.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 25
- ↑ Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 24-25
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 173-176
- 1 2 Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth - Early Eighteenth Centuries). Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 201
- ↑ Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth - Early Eighteenth Centuries). Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 203
- ↑ Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill p. 337-385
- ↑ Yaşa, F. (2022). Review of Felicia Roșu (ed.) 2022. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900-1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection between Christianity and Islam. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 75(2), 331, xxiii + 448 pp-340. https://doi.org/10.1556/062.2022.00250
- 1 2 3 4 5 Yaşa, Fırat (2022-06-03). ”Review of Felicia Roșu (ed.) 2022. Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900: Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection between Christianity and Islam” (på engelska). Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 75 (2): sid. 331–340. doi:10.1556/062.2022.00250. ISSN 0001-6446
- 1 2 Davies, Brian (2014). Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-55283-2. p. 17
- 1 2 Roşu, Felicia (2021). Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill p. 173-176
- ↑ Korpela, Jukka Jari (2018). Slaves from the North – Finns and Karelians in the East European Slave Trade, 900–1600. Studies in Global Slavery, Band: 5. Nederländerna: Brill. p. 237-238
- 1 2 3 4 Karolinska förbundets årsbok. (1991). Sverige: Karolinska förbundet.. s. 7-10
- ↑ Åberg, A. (2001). Karolinska kvinnoöden. Sverige: Natur och Kultur.
- ↑ Åberg, Alf, (in Swedish) Karolinska kvinnoöden ['Fates of Carolinian Women'], Natur och kultur, Stockholm, 1999
- ↑ Åberg, Alf (1991). Fångars elände: karolinerna i Ryssland 1700-1723. ['Misery of prisoners. The Carolinians in Russia in 1700-1723'] Stockholm: Natur & Kultur. Libris 7228808. ISBN 91-27-02743-0 (in Swedish)
- ↑ Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth - Early Eighteenth Centuries). Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 198
- ↑ Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth - Early Eighteenth Centuries). Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 215
- ↑ Dávid, Géza (2007). Ransom Slavery Along the Ottoman Borders: (Early Fifteenth - Early Eighteenth Centuries). Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-15704-0. p. 198
- ↑ Gregg, John R. (2018-07-30). Sex, the Illustrated History: Through Time, Religion, and Culture: Volume Iii; Sex in the Modern World; Europe from the 17Th Century to the 21St Century, Colonial North and South America to the 21St Century, Slavery and Homosexual Histories, and Bisexuality. Xlibris Corporation. ISBN 978-1-9845-2419-5.
- ↑ Roşu, Felicia (2021) . Slavery in the Black Sea Region, c.900–1900 – Forms of Unfreedom at the Intersection Between Christianity and Islam. Studies in Global Slavery, Volume: 11. Brill. p. 173-176
- ↑ Pargas & Roşu, Damian Alan; Felicia (2017). Critical Readings on Global Slavery. Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-34661-1. p. 975
- 1 2 3 Argit Bİ. The Imperial Harem and Its Residents. In: Life after the Harem: Female Palace Slaves, Patronage and the Imperial Ottoman Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020:38-77. doi:10.1017/9781108770316.002
- ↑ Pargas & Roşu, Damian Alan; Felicia (2017). Critical Readings on Global Slavery. Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-34661-1. p. 978-979
- ↑ Pargas & Roşu, Damian Alan; Felicia (2017). Critical Readings on Global Slavery. Nederländerna: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-34661-1. p. 980
- ↑ Jutta Sperling, Shona Kelly Wray, Gender, Property, and Law in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Communities in p. 256
- ↑ Mary Ann Fay, Unveiling the Harem: Elite Women and the Paradox of Seclusion in Eighteenth 256
- ↑ Sussan Babaie, Kathryn Babayan, Ina Baghdiantz-MacCabe, Mussumeh Farhad: Slaves of the Shah: New Elites of Safavid Iran, Bloomsbury Academic, 2004
- 1 2 3 4 5 Gordon, Murray (1989). Slavery in the Arab World. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-941533-30-0. p.79-89
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 126-127
- ↑ Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p.
- ↑ Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 210
- ↑ Globalization. (2001). Storbritannien: Duke University Press. p. 240-241
- ↑ Šmigeľ M. (2020). Metamorphoses of the Circassian Slave Trade (13th–19th centuries): Aspects of Women as the "Live Goods". Slavery: Theory and Practice. 5(1): 19–36
- 1 2 Toledano, Ehud R. (1998). Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle East. University of Washington Press. p. 31-32
- 1 2 Toledano, Ehud R. (1998). Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle East. University of Washington Press. p. 31-33
- 1 2 "Horrible Traffic in Circassian Women—Infanticide in Turkey," New York Daily Times, August 6, 1856, p. 6.
- 1 2 Globalization. (2001). Storbritannien: Duke University Press. p. 217-241
- 1 2 B. Belli, “Registered female prostitution in the Ottoman Empire (1876-1909),” Ph.D. - Doctoral Program, Middle East Technical University, 2020.
- 1 2 Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 217
- ↑ Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press. p. 177
- ↑ Zilfi, M. (2010). Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference. Storbritannien: Cambridge University Press.
- ↑ ʿĀżod-al-Dawla, Solṭān-Aḥmad Mirzā (1997) [1376 Š.]. ʿAbd-al-Ḥosayn Navāʾi (ed.). Tāriḵ-e ʿażodi. Tehran. p. 336.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ↑ "FATḤ-ʿALĪ SHAH QĀJĀR". Encyclopaedia Iranica. 2012.
- ↑ Powell, E. A. (2023). The Last Frontier: The White Man's War for Civilisation in Africa. Tjeckien: Good Press.
- 1 2 BARDA and BARDA-DĀRI iv. From the Mongols to the abolition of slavery
- ↑ ZDANOWSKI, J. The Manumission Movement in the Gulf in the First Half of the Twentieth Century, Middle Eastern Studies, 47:6, 2011, p. 871.