Foundation for Government Accountability
Founder(s)Tarren Bragdon
Established2011
FocusHealth care and welfare policy reform
PresidentTarren Bragdon
BudgetRevenue: $9,424,541
Expenses: $7,890,155
(FYE December 2018)[1]
Address15275 Collier Blvd.
Naples, FL 34119
Location
Naples, Florida[2]
,
United States
Coordinates26°16′19″N 81°41′27″W / 26.2719°N 81.6909°W / 26.2719; -81.6909
Websitethefga.org

The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) is a conservative American public policy think tank based in Naples, Florida. The nonprofit organization primarily focuses on reducing the welfare state, reducing restrictions on teenage workers, and blocking the expansion of Medicaid at both the state and federal levels. FGA conducts policy research and its experts recommend free-market policies intended to promote work, reduce dependency, and increase opportunity. The organization was founded in 2011 by Tarren Bragdon, who now serves as FGA's CEO and president. The group's "emphasis on policy messaging and marketing...has differentiated the group from traditional think tanks."[3]

History

FGA was founded in 2011 by Tarren Bragdon, a former Maine legislator and past CEO of the Maine Heritage Policy Center. According to the organization, FGA was founded with a focus on policy reform in Florida, but adapted to a multi-state focus to implement reforms that reduce government nationwide and cutting social safety net and anti-poverty programs.[4]

FGA is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. FGA states that it is primarily funded by individuals, with the remaining funding coming from foundations and businesses. In 2011, the organization's income was $212,000 and in 2012 its funding grew to $731,000. By 2018, the organization's revenue was $9,424,541.[5]

FGA has a staff of 26. In 2017, the group had $7 million in revenue[3] and $10.6 million in 2020. The FGA's five largest donors in 2022 were the Ed Uihlein Family Foundation, the 85 Fund, a nonprofit connected to political operative Leonard Leo, the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the Searle Freedom Trust, and Donors Trust.[4]

The FGA is unlike traditional think tanks in that its primary focus is on marketing and policy messaging. Jim McGann, the director of the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program at the University of Pennsylvania noted, "FGA isn't doing much 'thinking,' in the traditional sense. But they market policy. They push, repackage and franchise other people's ideas for implementation."[3] The FGA announced it was a part of the State Policy Network at its conference in 2013. The State Policy Network is a confederation of conservative state-level think tanks that practice what leaders call the "Ikea model" of advocacy, creating prefabricated policy projects for state officials and providing research and lobbying support to aid in legislative and administrative implementation. In 2021, Arkansas legislators passed measures backed by the FGA and in 2022, the FGA said it had achieved 144 "state policy reform wins" including 45 related to unemployment and welfare.[4]

Policy issues

Teenage workers

The FGA has designed numerous policies to undermine or repeal parts of the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act, particularly with an eye towards expanding the legality of teenage labor. FGA's framing of these bills includes a stated commitment to expanding parental rights, expanding the US workforce, and deconstructing government regulations, stating that these bills remove a "...permission slip that inserts government in between parents and their teenager's desire to work." According to The Washington Post, the FGA "has called for reforming home-based business laws, fast-tracking permitting processes, cutting social safety nets, and creating other incentives to work." FGA backed legislation reducing child labor protections was proposed or passed in 2023 in a number of states, including Iowa, Arkansas, Georgia, Minnesota, Ohio, and Missouri.[4]

Welfare reform

By studying and tracking the impact of different reforms, the FGA aims to describe what welfare policies have a demonstrable effect on the incomes and independence of people on welfare. The FGA conducted what describes itself as the first and most comprehensive study[6] of the impact of work requirements on able-bodied adults on food stamps. The study concluded that incomes more than doubled within a year for those who transitioned out of the program, in contrast to other studies that found far more modest or even negative gains after comparable programs imposed time limits or means-testing.[7] The study, which was promoted by Republicans, was criticized by both liberal and conservative economists for cherry-picking data, including only reporting outcomes from former food stamp recipients who found jobs after losing benefits.[3]

FGA supports work requirements tied to food stamps. The organization advocated for welfare changes in several different states before beginning to advocate for changes at a federal level in 2017. FGA supports legislation that would require able-bodied individuals between the ages of 18 and 60 to work or attend training programs for 20 hours each week in order to receive benefits.[3]

Medicaid expansion

Blocking Medicaid expansion has been a longtime project of the FGA, as it sees Medicaid spending under the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, as unsustainable, threatening both state budgets and the services provided to traditional Medicaid patients.[8] One study[9] developed a measure of "right-wing network strength" based on activity by organizations including the FGA, and found via linear regression that this measure was a statistically significant factor in whether or not a state expanded the program.

Right to Shop

Right to Shop is an FGA proposal for a mechanism incentivizing patients to shop for health care services based on price and perceived value. It is based on existing programs, including a Massachusetts price transparency component[10] and New Hampshire's Smart Shopper program.[11][12]

References

  1. ↑ "Quickview data". GuideStar.
  2. ↑ Wemple, Erik (January 28, 2014). "MSNBC's Rachel Maddow recommits to her slam on Koch brothers". Washington Post. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Dewey, Caitlin (May 18, 2018). "They're the think tank pushing for welfare work requirements. Republicans say they're experts. Economists call it 'junk science.'". Washington Post. Retrieved 27 February 2019.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Bogage, Jacob; Paul, Maria Luisa (23 April 2023). "The conservative campaign to rewrite child labor laws". Washington Post. Retrieved 27 April 2023.
  5. ↑ "FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC - GuideStar Profile". www.guidestar.org. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  6. ↑ "Report: The Power of Work – How Kansas' Welfare Reform is Lifting Americans Out of Poverty". Retrieved 2016-08-01.
  7. ↑ Robert A Moffitt (30 November 2001). "From Welfare to Work: What the Evidence Shows". Retrieved 2021-05-09.
  8. ↑ "Stop Medicaid Expansion". Retrieved 2016-08-01.
  9. ↑ Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander (April 2016). "Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War over Medicaid Expansion" (PDF). Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 41 (2): 239–86. doi:10.1215/03616878-3476141. PMID 26732316. Retrieved 2016-08-01 – via Duke Journals.
  10. ↑ "Price Tags On Health Care? Only In Massachusetts". 2014-10-09. Retrieved 2016-08-01.
  11. ↑ "Vitals SmartShopper Program, State of New Hampshire Human Resources". das.nh.gov. Retrieved 2016-08-01.
  12. ↑ "Episode 655: Pay Patients, Save Money". NPR. Retrieved 2016-08-01.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.