Hong Kong Health Code (Chinese: 香港健康碼) is an online system established on 10 December 2021 for qualified individuals to transfer their personal data including negative nucleic acid test result and vaccination records to the computer system of the Guangdong Health Code or Macao Health Code to facilitate health declaration upon entry to Guangdong or Macao.[1]

History and Developments

In May 2020, Dr. Pak-Leung Ho, a Clinical Associate Professor at the University of Hong Kong, suggested that the GuangdongHong KongMacau Area was ready for a more lenient border control policy. He also suggested that the Hong Kong government could introduce a “health code” policy to replace the existing quarantine procedure, which was already implemented in Macau and part of Mainland China. The proposed health code mobile app would include the users’ nucleic acid test results so that travelers would not have to present hard copies of their test results.[2][3]

On 11 June 2020, the Hong Kong government disclosed that it would soon announce the details of a mutual recognition system for health codes of Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao, intending to restore the traffic between the three regions.[4] It also stated that the government of the three regions were discussing the details and had nearly come to an agreement, and that the details may be announced in as soon as a week if the epidemic remains stable.[5] However, the announcement of the scheme was later postponed, reportedly to 27 June or 28 June. It was also reported that the scheme may be adjusted to be initially between Hong Kong and Guangdong only, and that Macau would only be included in the scheme at a later stage if the scheme is successful.[6] However, the policy was further postponed to August as the epidemic in Hong Kong deteriorated in July.[7]

At a press conference held on 21 August, the Chief Executive Carrie Lam stated that the health code policy will be implemented after the epidemic in Hong Kong stabilizes, but its usage will be limited to border control only and will be without any tracking functions. It was suggested by some pro-establishment parties that all citizens should be required to show their health codes before entering a restaurant, to which Carrie Lam has criticized for being impractical.[8][9]

Opinions in the year 2020

Pro-establishment parties

On 9 August 2020, multiple pro-establishment parties including the DAB, the BPA, the HKFTU, and the NPP held a joint press conference and urged the government to implement a mutual recognition system for health codes in the Greater Bay Area.[10] The BPA further suggested that citizens without a health code should be prohibited from entering public spaces such as restaurants or malls.[11]

Medical Industry

The pulmonologist Dr. Chi-Chiu Leung commented that the health code policy “lacks any scientific evidence” as an epidemic preventive measure, since there was no successful precedent and that it was contrary to epidemiological analysis. As COVID-19 has a quite fluid incubation period, citizens may test negative falsely and as a result travel to multiple locations before any symptoms appear, effectively becoming a superspreader. Thus the health code policy may actually impair the effort against the epidemic. He also opined that in order for the society to resume normal activities, the government should instead focus on controlling this wave of the epidemic while preventing more imported cases. [12][13]

The President of the Hong Kong Medical Association Dr. Kin Choi stated that the users must be tested at least weekly in order for the health code policy to be effective, as otherwise it cannot be guaranteed that the users are truly negative for COVID-19. He further pointed out that without proper support, the health code scheme will just be "an activity exclusive to the wealthy".[12]

Ivan Law, the vice-chairperson of the HA Employees Alliance, pointed out that an app that allows the government to record every place a citizen has been will be controversial, even in a democratic society.[11]

Winnie Yu, the chairperson of the HA Employee Alliance, criticized the government for allowing certain categories of travelers to be exempted from quarantine after entering Hong Kong. As long as the government refuses to completely shut down the border, it is impossible to quench the epidemic from its source. She further pointed out that the social gathering ban and the health code scheme were not epidemic prevention policies, but were in truth political agendas to restrict the citizen's freedom.[11]

Catering Industry

Gordon Lam, convenor at the Hong Kong Small and Medium Restaurant Federation, criticized the government for having its head in the clouds. Gordon pointed out that if a customer was falsely convinced by his/her health code that he/she was free of the virus, it could lead to a new wave of the epidemic. He alternatively suggested that closing the border was the best measure to combat the epidemic.[12]

Information Technology Industry

Wong Ho-wa, an Election Committee member representing the IT industry, once expressed his concern that the health code policy will over-collect personal data. There were multiple doubts regarding the policy that the Hong Kong government has not yet cleared up, including the question of how the governments of Hong Kong, Macau, and Guangdong will utilize the data, and if there will be a data retention period. There was also the concern that citizen's data would lose the protection by the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance as the data will be transferred to Mainland China.[14]

Alex Tang, the chairperson of the Hong Kong Information Technology Workers’ Union, pointed out that the health code scheme will effectively force Hong Kong citizens to transfer their personal data to Mainland China.[14]

Human rights organizations

The director of the Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor Law Yuk Kai pointed out that if the health code policy is implemented in Hong Kong, it will allow the government to classify citizens into different categories and limit some of them from using certain governmental services, effectively implementing a social credit system similar to that in Mainland China.[12]

References

  1. "Hong Kong Health Code".
  2. 李, 恩慈 (12 May 2020). "新冠肺炎|何栢良:三地有望放寬跨境 倡互認檢測結果時效訂7天". HK 01 (in Chinese). Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  3. "粵港澳正磋商特定者出入境豁免強制 何栢良:可用健康碼代替檢疫措施". Ming Pao (in Chinese). 11 May 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  4. "消息:粵港澳互認健康碼制度將公布 設配額及有效期". Radio Television Hong Kong (in Chinese). 11 June 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  5. "粵港澳互認健康碼協議 最快周內公布". Ming Pao (in Chinese). 10 June 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  6. "香港健康码最快本周末出台 首阶段粤港互通". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 23 June 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  7. "健康码料延至八月推出". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 9 July 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  8. "全民檢測|9月1日開展 已採購疫苗 本地健康碼進入餐廳不切實際". HK 01 (in Chinese). 21 August 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  9. "【限聚令延長】林鄭:9月1推全民檢測 參與者須先網上預約". Hong Kong Economic Times (in Chinese). 21 August 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  10. "建制團體聯合聲明 促推健康碼恢復中港經貿活動". Ming Pao (in Chinese). 9 August 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  11. 1 2 3 "香港全民检测成"港版健康码"? 港人质疑变相全民监控". Radio Free Asia (in Chinese). 13 August 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  12. 1 2 3 4 "建制派力推「香港健康碼」 醫學專家指無科學根據「假安全」 人權專家斥如中國「社會信用系統」". The Stand News (in Chinese). 13 August 2020. Archived from the original on 13 September 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  13. "梁子超:以「健康碼」方式為社交活動篩檢 憂引致傳播". Radio Television Hong Kong (in Chinese). 13 August 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  14. 1 2 "【全民檢測】「健康碼」數據庫必定送中 IT界憂不受私隱條例保障". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 14 August 2020. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.