| Nasrallah v. Barr | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 2, 2020 Decided June 1, 2020 | |
| Full case name | Nidal Khalid Nasrallah v. William P. Barr, Attorney General |
| Docket no. | 18-1432 |
| Citations | 590 U.S. ___ (more) 140 S. Ct. 1683 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Nasrallah v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 762 F. App'x 638 (11th Cir. 2019); cert. granted, 140 S. Ct. 428 (2019). |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kavanaugh, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch |
| Dissent | Thomas, joined by Alito |
Nasrallah v. Barr, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled on the question of what appeals courts can review when determining whether a noncitizen who has committed a crime in the United States can be deported.[1] It reversed the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
References
External links
- Text of Nasrallah v. Barr, No. 18-1432, 590 U.S. ___ (2020) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.