Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Government of Israel 1999

PCATI won a historic victory when, on 6 September 1999, in response to petitions of principle PCATI began submitting to the Israeli Supreme Court in 1991, and petitions filed together with the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, Hamoked–Center for the Defense of the Individual and others, the Supreme Court prohibited the use of various means of torture that were systematically employed by the Shin Bet until then. Following the decision, there was a significant decrease in the number of complaints regarding torture or the use of the harsh methods previously used.

However, following the onset of the Second Intifada in September 2000, there was, again, a sharp increase in the number of complaints of torture and ill treatment indicating a reversion to the methods prohibited by the Supreme Court. This resulted from the exploitation of "necessity defense" opening allowed by the Court in its ruling, or by altogether denying the fact that physical force was used in interrogation, which victims would find difficult to challenge. There was also a widening of the phenomenon of the ill treatment of Palestinian detainees by soldiers and other members of the security forces.

In light of this, PCATI expanded its activities and began employing field workers and external attorneys to assist the in-house staff in the investigation and treatment of cases of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment (CIDT). PCATI has, in addition continued to search for additional ways to combat torture, CIDT and related violations of human rights and particularly the issue of impunity, and to develop its legal and public advocacy methodology.

Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Government of Israel 2006

In 2002, PACTI, together with the Palestinian Society for the Protection of Human Rights, brought the Israeli practice of "preventative targeted killings" to the Supreme Court of Israel. In the important case against the Israeli government, often cited in legal literature today,^[3][4] the Supreme Court did not condemn the practice of "targeted killings" as such as illegal under International law, but the lawfulness should be examined after each case under the particular circumstances.^[5] Though the interpretation of the Court on "civilians who take direct part in hostilities" has been criticized in academic publications. Orna Ben-Naftali and Keren Michaeli conclude that "the court has, in effect, created a broad category of 'unlawful combatants' who are not entitled either to the privileges of combatants or to the immunities of civilians".^[6] They add that this decision by the Supreme Court would have contributed more to the international legal discourse if human rights law and the context of long-term occupation would have been applied.^[7]

Referral to the International Criminal Court 2022

On 10 June 2022, PCATI said it was referring 17 cases to the International Criminal Court having concluded that obtaining justice within the Israeli system was impossible.^[8]

Reports

In 2009, PCATI released a report titled "Shackling as a Form of Torture and Abuse" that accused Israel of torturing hundreds of Palestinian prisoners by shackling them in violation of International standards. The report also called into question Israel's refusal to allow the Red Cross to inspect Facility 1391, a secret prison which has been called Israel's "Guantanamo Bay".^[9]

The Public Committee against Torture in Israel is conducting annual reports on the current situation in Israel. In 2022, the report stated that since 2001, over 1400 complaints have been submitted to the Ministry of Justice, whereas supposedly only 3 investigations were opened.^[10] The reports are published in English, Hebrew and Arabic language.

Media Coverage

PCATI is repeatedly referred to in various media. These include articles, about PCATI or with PACTI as a source, in the Israeli newspapers Haaretz,^[11] Times of Israel,^[12] the Jerusalem Post^[13],+972 Magazine^[14] and the British BBC^[15] as well as The Guardian.^[16] On 20 September 2016, NGO Monitor called out the inability of PCATI to base some of their allegations, such as the 2013 claim that Israel placed Palestinian children (and adults) in iron cages.^[17][18] Since then, several news networks circulated this claim, including The Independent^[19] and mondoweiss.^[20]