Security patterns can be applied to achieve goals in the area of security. All of the classical design patterns have different instantiations to fulfill some information security goal: such as confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Additionally, one can create a new design pattern to specifically achieve some security goal.

Existing security pattern

The pattern community has provided a collection of security patterns, which were discussed in workshops at Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP) conferences. They have been unified and published in a joint project.[1]

The Open Group provides a set of documented security patterns.

Available system patterns

These are patterns that are concerned with the availability of the assets. The assets are either services or resources offered to users.

  • Check-pointed system pattern describes a design to use replication (computer science) and recover when a component fails.
  • Standby pattern has the goal to provide a fall back component able to resume the service of the failing component.
  • Comparator-checked fault tolerant system pattern provides a way to monitor the failure-free behavior of a component.
  • Replicated system pattern describes a design of redundant components, and a means of load balancing and redirection in between to decrease the chance of non-availability of the service.
  • Error detection/correction pattern has the goal to deduce errors and possibly correct them to guarantee correct information exchange or storage.

Protected system patterns

This is a set of patterns concerned with the confidentiality and integrity of information by providing means to manage access and usage of the sensitive data.

The protected system pattern provides some reference monitor or enclave that owns the resources and therefore must be bypassed to get access. The monitor enforces as the single point a policy. The GoF refers to it as "Protection Proxy".

The policy pattern is an architecture to decouple the policy from the normal resource code. An authenticated user owns a security context (erg. a role) that is passed to the guard of resource. The guard checks inside the policy whether the context of this user and the rules match and provides or denies access to the resource.

The authenticator pattern is also known as the Pluggable Authentication Modules or Java Authentication and Authorization Service (JAAS).

  • Subject descriptor pattern
  • Secure Communication is similar to Single sign-on, RBAC
  • Security Context is a combination of the communication protection proxy, security context and subject descriptor pattern.
  • Security Association is an extension of the secure communication pattern.
  • Secure Proxy pattern can be used for defense in depth.

Security patterns for Java EE, XML Web Services and Identity Management[2]

This is a set of security patterns evolved by Sun Java Center – Sun Microsystems engineers Ramesh Nagappan and Christopher Steel, which helps building end-to-end security into multi-tier Java EE enterprise applications, XML-based Web services, enabling identity management in Web applications including single sign-on authentication, multi-factor authentication, and enabling Identity provisioning in Web-based applications.

  • Authentication Enforcer pattern can be used to manage and delegate authentication processes
  • Authorization Enforcer pattern can be used to manage and delegate authorization processes
  • Intercepting Validator pattern helps performing security validation for input data from clients
  • Secure Base Action pattern shows centralizing handling of security tasks in a base action class
  • Secure Logger pattern can be used to log sensitive data and ensuring tamper-proof storage
  • Secure Session Manager shows securely centralizing session information handling
  • Web Agent Interceptor pattern shows how to use an interceptor mechanism to provide security for Web applications
  • Obfuscated Transfer Object pattern shows how to protect data passed around in transfer objects and between application tiers
  • Audit Interceptor pattern shows to capture security-related events to support logging and auditing
  • Message Inspector pattern shows verification and validation of XML message-level security mechanisms, such as XML Signature and XML Encryption in conjunction with a security token.
  • Message Interceptor Gateway pattern shows a single entry point solution for centralization of security enforcement for incoming and outgoing XML Web Service messages. It helps to apply transport-level and message-level security mechanisms required for securely communicating with a Web services endpoint.
  • Secure Message Router pattern facilitates secure XML communication with multiple partner endpoints that adopt message-level security. It acts as a security intermediary component that applies message-level security mechanisms to deliver messages to multiple recipients where the intended recipient would be able to access only the required portion of the message and remaining message fragments are made confidential.
  • Single Sign-On (SSO) Delegator pattern describes how to construct a delegator agent for handling a legacy system for single sign-on (SSO).
  • Assertion Builder pattern defines how an identity assertion (for example, authentication assertion or authorization assertion) can be built.
  • Credential Synchroniser pattern describes how to securely synchronize credentials and principals across multiple applications using Identity provisioning

References

  1. ↑ Markus Schumacher, Eduardo Fernandez-Buglioni, Duane Hybertson, Frank Buschmann, Peter Sommerlad. Security Patterns: Integrating Security and Systems Engineering, Wiley Series in Software Design Patterns, 2005.
  2. ↑ Ramesh Nagappan, Christopher Steel. Core Security Patterns: Best Practices and Strategies for J2EE, Web Services and Identity Management, Prentice Hall, 2005.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.