The Seebohm Report (1968) or the Seebohm Report on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services was the report of a committee reviewing the organisation and work of social services in the United Kingdom.

It recommended that separate local authority health departments such as children's' mental health, social welfare, and home help, should be condensed into a single department of social service.

Context

Twenty years after the creation of the National Health Service, local authority services were seen as chaotic and not working well. Scandals about the treatment of people with mental health issues, learning disabilities and the elderly had led to distrust of services.[1]

Committee

On 20 December 1965, Douglas Houghton MP created the Committee on Local Authority Personal Social Services, chaired by Frederic (Lord) Seebohm.[2][3]

Report

The Seebohm Committee report recommended that social care services should be more connected with each other and other health and welfare services.[4] They emphasised care in the community and preventative care as being more financially efficient.[2]

In March 1968, the Seebohm report proposed that services for children, the elderly and for mental welfare should be brought together into a single family services department.[5] They used the phrase "one door on which to knock".[6] This approach sought to provide services to prevent ill health and difficulties rather than solve particular needs and problems and challenged the hospital-centred model.[7]

Impact

In a House of Lords session of 1969, Baroness Brooke of Ystradfellte spoke of waiting lists for residential care and spoke in support of the Seebohm Report recommendations.[2]

In 1970, the Local Authority Social Services Act received royal assent, leading to the creation of social services departments in councils as suggested by the Seebohm report.[8][6][9] Richard Crossman, the Labour Member of Parliament who saw this act through, was sceptical about the practicality of the report's recommendations.[10]

Whilst accepting the need for a single authority, the Royal Medico-Psychological Association declared themselvesd against the proposed reorganisation of mental welfare and child guidance services.[11] Nicholas Timmins suggested that the creation of "generic social workers" based on Seebohm recommendations led to the decline of the Medical Officer of Health.[12]

References

  1. ↑ Smith, Randall; Means, Robin, eds. (1998), "The restructuring of welfare services for elderly people", From Poor Law to Community Care: The Development of Welfare Services for Elderly People 1939-1971 (2 ed.), Bristol University Press, pp. 277–318, ISBN 978-1-84742-494-5, retrieved 2024-01-09
  2. 1 2 3 "The Seebohm report". Policy Navigator. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  3. ↑ Report of The Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services, Cmnd. 3703. July 1968.
  4. ↑ "Key milestones in community health services policy". The King's Fund. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  5. ↑ "NHS reform timeline". Nuffield Trust. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  6. 1 2 "Seebohm Report published | Social Work Centenary". sw100.ed.ac.uk. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  7. ↑ Donnison, D. V. (1968). "Seebohm: The Report and its Implications". Social Work (1939-1970). 25 (4): 3–8. ISSN 2398-3973.
  8. ↑ Harvey, Mark (2020-05-29). "Adult social work is fifty years young". Department of Health and Social Care, Social Work with Adults. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  9. ↑ "SOCIAL SERVICES: THE SEEBOHM REPORT". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Lords. 29 January 1969. col. 1168-93.
  10. ↑ "Knock it down and start again". Community Care. 2005-10-20. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  11. ↑ "The Royal Medico-Psychological Association's Memoranda on the Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services (The Seebohm Report): First Memorandum". British Journal of Psychiatry. 115 (522): 605–611. May 1969. doi:10.1192/bjp.115.522.605. ISSN 0007-1250.
  12. ↑ The 1974 NHS Reorganisation: Witness Seminar (PDF). University of Liverpool. 9 November 2016.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.