Description

The Square-1 puzzle scrambled

The Square-1 consists of three layers. The upper and lower layers contain kite and triangular pieces. They are also called corner and edge pieces, respectively. There are altogether 8 kite and 8 triangular pieces. The kite pieces are 60 degrees wide, while the triangular pieces are 30 degrees wide, relative to the center of the layer.

The middle layer contains two trapezoid pieces, which together may form an irregular hexagon or a square.

Each layer can be rotated freely, and if the boundaries of pieces in all layers line up, the puzzle can be twisted vertically, interchanging half of the top layer with half of the bottom. In this way, the pieces of the puzzle can be scrambled. Note that because the kite pieces are precisely twice the angular width of the triangular pieces, the two can be freely intermixed, with two triangular pieces taking the place of a single kite piece and vice versa. This leads to bizarre shape changes within the puzzle at any point.

For the puzzle to be in cube shape, the upper and lower layers must have alternating kite and triangular pieces, with 4 kite and 4 triangular pieces on each layer, and the middle layer must have a square shape. However, since only two shapes are possible for the middle layer, there is a quick sequence of twists which changes the shape of the middle layer from one to the other without touching the rest of the puzzle.

Once the puzzle has a cube shape, the upper and lower layers are cut in an Iron Cross-like fashion, or equivalently cut by two concentric (standard) crosses, that make an angle with each other.

Like Rubik's Cube, the pieces are colored. For the puzzle to be solved, not only does it need to be in cube shape, but each face of the cube must also have a uniform color. In its solved (or original) state, viewing the cube from the face with the word "Square-1" printed on it, the colors are: white on top, green on the bottom, yellow in front, red on the left, orange on the right, and blue behind. Alternative versions of the Square-1 may have different color schemes.

Solutions

The same puzzle in its solved state

A good number of solutions for this puzzle exist on the Internet. Some solutions employ the classical layer-by-layer method, while other approaches include putting the corner pieces in place first, then the edge pieces, or vice versa. Some solutions are a combination of these approaches. Although these solutions use different approaches, most of them try to restore the cube shape of the puzzle first, regardless of the placement of the pieces and the parity of the middle layer, and then proceed to put the pieces in their correct places while preserving the cube shape. The shape is often restored first because it allows for the greatest range of possible moves at any one time – other shapes have fewer moves available.

The majority of solutions provide a large set of algorithms. These are sequences of turns and twists that will rearrange a small number of pieces while leaving the rest of the puzzle untouched. Examples include swapping two pieces, cycling through three pieces, etc. Larger scale algorithms are also possible, such as interchanging the top and bottom layers. Through the systematic use of these algorithms, the puzzle is gradually solved.

Like solutions of the Rubik's Cube, the solutions of Square-1 depend on the use of algorithms discovered either by trial and error, or by using computer searches. However, while solutions of the Rubik's Cube rely on these algorithms more towards the end, they are heavily used throughout the course of solving the Square-1. This is because the uniform shape of the pieces in the Rubik's Cube allows one to focus on positioning a small subset of pieces while disregarding the rest, at least at the beginning of a solution. However, with the Square-1, the free intermixing of corner and edge pieces can sometimes cause a certain desired operation to be physically blocked; so one must take all pieces into account right from the beginning. Some solutions of the Square-1 rely solely on the use of algorithms.

Number of positions

If different rotations of a given permutation are counted only once while reflections are counted individually, there are 170 × 2 × 8! × 8! = 552,738,816,000 positions.

If both rotations and reflections are counted once only, the number of positions reduces to 15! ÷ 3 = 435,891,456,000. Also, it always can be solved in a maximum of 13 twists.^[1]

If instead we wish to count only all those positions where there are no corner pieces in the way of twisting the halves, there are 3678·2·8!·8! = 11,958,666,854,400 twistable positions, and always can be solved in a maximum of 31 face turns.^[2]

Original notation

The original Square-1 notation was created by Jaap Scherphuis:

(x,y)/(x,y)

A slash (/) indicates turning the entire right half of the puzzle by 180°.

First number (x) refers to a number of 30° upper layer clockwise turns.

Second number (y) refers to a number of 30° lower layer clockwise turns.

Negative numbers mean turning counterclockwise.

x and y are always between -5 and 6, and they must not both equal 0.

Karnaukh notation

Karnaukh notation, also known as Karnotation, was created by Daniel Karnaukh. It is based on the original notation, with brackets and slashes being removed, with the latter being replaced with spaces, and with letters being assigned to common move sets. This notation was proposed as an easier way to write, learn and share speedsolving algorithms. It was not intended to be used for scrambling the Square-1. The full notation is here, but this is an abridged version:^[3]

Top 5 solvers by single solve^[4]

Name	Solve	Competition
Max Siauw	3.69s	Uw or U Don't 2023
Ryan Pilat	3.73s	Heartland Championship 2023
Michał Krasowski	3.87s	Olsztyn Squared 2023
Alessandro Ricci	4.00s	Cavarzere Cube Days 2023
Leon Marcell Alamanda	4.11s	Indonesian Championship 2023

Top 5 solvers by Olympic average of 5 solves^[5]

Name	Average	Competition
Max Siauw	4.91s	Stumptown Summer 2023
Sameer Aggarwal	5.12s	Western Championship 2023
Hassan Khanani	5.25s	Cumberland County Cubing 2023
David Epstein	5.37s	Melbourne Summer 2023
Vicenzo Guerino Cecchini	5.46s	Etec Cubatão 2023

Solution

The Square Two, like the Super Square One, isn't much more difficult than the Square-1. In many ways, it's actually easier considering one can always make a slice turn regardless of the positions of the top and bottom layers. Mostly, it's solved just like the Original, merely requiring the extra step of combining the corner wedges. After that, it is solved exactly like the Square-1.

Number of positions

There are a total of 24 wedge pieces on the puzzle.

Any permutation of the wedge pieces is possible, including even and odd permutations. This implies there are 24!=620,448,401,733,239,439,360,000 possible permutations of these pieces.

However, the middle layer has two possible orientations for each position, increasing the number of positions by a factor of 2.

This would theoretically yield a grand total of (24!)*2=1,240,896,803,466,478,878,720,000 possible positions for the puzzle, but since the layers have 12 different orientations for each position, some positions have been counted too many times this way. This reduces the number of positions by 12^2.

The final count is (24!)/72=8,617,338,912,961,658,880,000 total possible positions.