Stańczyk
ArtistJan Matejko
Year1862
MediumOil on canvas
Dimensions120 cm × 88 cm (47 in × 35 in)
LocationWarsaw National Museum, Warsaw

Stańczyk (Full title: Stańczyk during a ball at the court of Queen Bona in the face of the loss of Smolensk, Polish: Stańczyk w czasie balu na dworze królowej Bony wobec straconego Smoleńska) is a painting by Jan Matejko finished in 1862. This painting was acquired by the Warsaw National Museum in 1924. During World War II it was looted by the Nazis and subsequently by the Soviet Union, but was returned to Poland around 1956.

It is one of Matejko's most famous works and the one that launched him to fame. It has been described by the Warsaw National Museum as one of the most recognizable paintings in its collection, and is a flagship painting for the "Collection of Polish paintings prior to 1914". Its primary component is the contrast between the solemn jester (the titular Stańczyk) and the lively ball going on in the background. The painting presents Stańczyk with a sense of isolation and hopelessness, which reflects the political situation of Poland during the 19th century.[1]

Stańczyk remains an important symbol of Polish culture. Stańczyk embodied satire to criticize social problems while also offering wisdom to the common people. His character is remembered and is a proud part of Polish national character. [2] The painting has created an image of Stańczyk that has become iconic and widely recognized in Poland.

Stańczyk

Stańczyk, the male figure depicted in the painting, was the court jester when Poland was at the height of its political, economic and cultural power during the era of the Renaissance in Poland, during the reign of King Sigismund I the Old (reigned 1506–1548).[3][4] He was a popular figure; besides his fame as a jester he has been described as an eloquent, witty, and intelligent man, using satire to comment on the nation's past, present, and future.[3][4] Unlike jesters of other European courts, Stańczyk has always been considered as much more than a mere entertainer.[5] Stańczyk's fame and legend were strong in his own time and enjoyed a resurgence in the 19th century, and he remains well known to this day.[6]

Scarcity of sources gave rise to four distinct hypotheses about Stańczyk in the 19th century: that he was entirely invented by Jan Kochanowski and his colleagues, that he was "perhaps a typical jester dressed by his contemporaries in an Aesopian attire, perhaps a Shakespearean vision of 19th-century writers, or perhaps indeed a grey eminence of the societatis ioculatorum".[7][lower-alpha 1] In any measure, consensus among modern scholars is that such a person indeed existed and even if he did not, the figure had a tremendous importance to Polish culture of later centuries, appearing in works of many artists of the 19th and 20th centuries.[7][4] He appears in a work of, among others, Julian Ursyn Niemcewicz (in Jan z Tęczna. Powieść historyczna, 1825)[8] and several works by Józef Ignacy Kraszewski (1839, 1841).[9]

Content

The full title of the painting is Stańczyk w czasie balu na dworze królowej Bony wobec straconego Smoleńska (Stańczyk during a ball at the court of Queen Bona in the face of the loss of Smolensk).[10][lower-alpha 2]

The primary composition of the painting is in the contrast between the solemn jester (Stańczyk) – the focus of the painting – and the lively ball going on in the background.[3] Stańczyk is shown sitting alone in a dark room, while a ball, hosted by the royal family, is in full swing in the neighbouring hall.[3] His appearance is unlike that one would expect in a jester – gloomy, deep in thought.[3] His seriousness is reinforced by his accessories: his marotte lies discarded on the floor, whereas a holy medallion of the Black Madonna of Częstochowa can be seen on his torso.[3] The wrinkled carpet at Stańczyk's feet could have been formed by his collapsing heavily into the chair upon reading the letter, or through a nervous shifting of the feet thereafter. On the table lies a letter likely announcing that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania has lost Smolensk (now in Russia) to the Grand Duchy of Moscow, causing Stańczyk's sorrow and reflection on his fatherland's fate.[3] The letter seems to have been discarded by some official, and only the jester realizes its significance – while the rulers are partying, celebrating the recent victory at the Battle of Orsha, disregarding the bad news about Smolensk.[3][4] The letter bears the year 1533 (A.d. MDXXXIII) and the name "Samogitia", a province of the Commonwealth. The note is incongruent with the actual date of the fall of Smolensk in 1514, and is a matter of ongoing debate, though an outright mistake by the meticulous Matejko, known for use of symbolism and iconography, is unlikely. Another symbol, a lute, symbol of glory, is being carried by a court dwarf, stereotyped as a person of low stature and morale in Matejko's time; this suggests a decline of the Jagiellonian dynasty's fortunes.[3] The window is thrown – or was blown – open, ruffling the tablecloth and alluding to an upset of the present order. Through the open window, the darkened profile of Wawel Cathedral in Krakow is visible – the site of the coronation of Polish kings. Next to it, a comet is seen – a portent of ill-fortune.[3][4] The imagery of downfall is completed with the inclusion of the three stars of Orion's Belt seen above and to the left of the cathedral spire.[13] In Greek mythology, Orion was a powerful hunter blinded by ego and his own greatness, but was ultimately brought down by the pinprick of a scorpion's sting.

The Sad Clown Paradox

The Sad Clown Paradox is the concept that someone who looks happy on the outside is actually sad inside. A clown is usually associated with this paradox since clowns are usually seen as a happy figure, but this painting is also a representation of it, since Stańczyk is a jester, whose job is to entertain, yet he is shown in a moment of hopelessness. The dark colors in the painting convey this theme with the contrast of the bright colors in the ball.[14]

History, significance and historiography

Stańczyk (left) displayed in the Warsaw National Museum

Matejko was fascinated by Stańczyk from the times of his youth, and portrayed him in several of his works (most notably, besides the painting discussed here, in Consecration of King Sigismund's Bell, 1874 and Prussian Homage, 1882).[3][4] Working on this painting, Matejko was also inspired by the book Król zamczyska by Seweryn Goszczyński, whose main character – a loner, living in the castle's ruins, trying to reconcile past and present, and himself inspired by Stańczyk – likely influenced this painting.[3][4] Completed in 1862, when Matejko was twenty-four years old, it is one of his most famous works and the one that launched him to fame.[3][4] It is seen as a key painting for the understanding of Matejko's style and intentions in his art.[3][4] Matejko used his own face for Stańczyk, and with this work began a series of paintings analyzing and interpreting the History of Poland through the figure of Stańczyk.[3][4]

The painting is also seen as highly significant for the culture of Poland in general.[4] According to the Warsaw National Museum, Stańczyk is one of the most recognizable paintings in its collection, and is a flagship painting for the "Collection of Polish paintings prior to 1914".[4] The painting has created an image of Stańczyk that has become iconic and has been repeated in other works such as the play Wesele (1901) of Stanisław Wyspiański.[3] Matejko's most famous paintings are usually large, group scenes; individual scenes are less common in his work.[15]

Upon its creation, the painting did not gather much attention, and was acquired by the Kraków Society of Friends of Fine Arts for a purpose of a gift lottery.[16] It was subsequently won by a certain individual, Korytko, in whose possession it was slightly damaged.[16] Upon Matejko's rise to fame, the painting was rediscovered and applauded as a masterpiece, and acquired by the Warsaw National Museum in 1924.[4][16] During World War II it was looted by the Nazis.[10] It was subsequently seized by the Soviet Union and returned to Poland around 1956.[17]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ In English: "jesters' society".
  2. ↑ The title erroneously suggests that Poland was at the time ruled by Queen Bona Sforza, when in fact, on 30 July 1514, when Smolensk was lost to Russia, Poland was ruled by King Sigismund the Old and his first wife, Queen Barbara Zápolya.[4] Zápolya was the queen of Poland from 1512 to 1515; Bona Sforza married Sigismund only in 1518.[11] Smolensk was captured in 1514, during the second Muscovite–Lithuanian War.[12]

References

  1. ↑ Artsapien, Team (4 March 2023). "The Court Jester's Lament: An Analysis of Matejko's Stanczyk". Artsapien. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  2. ↑ Artsapien, Team (4 March 2023). "The Court Jester's Lament: An Analysis of Matejko's Stanczyk". Artsapien. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (in Polish) Marek Rezler, Z Matejką przez polskie dzieje: Stańczyk. Interklasa: polski portal edukacyjny. Last accessed on 23 May 2012.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (in Polish) Renata Higersberger, Jan Matejko (1838–1893). Stańczyk, 1862, Muzeum Narodowe w Warszawie
  5. ↑ The difference between Polish and foreign traditions in this context is discussed in: Hilary Meciszewski (1 May 1844). "Humorystyka". Dwutygodnik Literacki (in Polish). Kraków (3): 68–74.
  6. ↑ Jan Zygmunt Jakubowski, ed. (1959). Przegląd humanistyczny (in Polish). Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. 3: 200. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  7. 1 2 Janusz Pelc; Paulina Buchwald-Pelcowa; Barbara Otwinowska (1989). Jan Kochanowski 1584-1984: epoka, twórczość, recepcja [Jan Kochanowski 1584-1984, the era - creativity - reception : the work of the International and Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference held in Warsaw from 15 October to 19 October 1984] (in Polish). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Lubelskie. pp. 425–438. ISBN 978-83-222-0473-3. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  8. ↑ Julian Krzyżanowski (1958). "Stańczyk w Janie z Tęczyna Niemcewicza". W wieku Reja i Stańczyka: szkice z dziejów Odrodzenia w Polsce. Państwowe Wydawn. Naukowe. p. 371. Retrieved 21 April 2013.
  9. ↑ Andrzej Stoff (2006). "Zagłoba sum!": studium postaci literackiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. p. 111. ISBN 978-83-231-1996-8. Retrieved 21 April 2013.
  10. 1 2 Uniwersytet Łódzki (1955). Zeszyty naukowe. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego: Nauki humanistyczno społeczne. Państowowe Wydawn. Naukowe. p. 131. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
  11. ↑ Anne Markham Schulz; Giammaria Mosca (1998). Giammaria Mosca Called Padovano: A Renaissance Sculptor in Italy and Poland. Penn State University Press. p. 305. ISBN 978-0-271-01674-0. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
  12. ↑ Tony Jaques (2007). Dictionary of Battles and Sieges: P-Z. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 953. ISBN 978-0-313-33539-6. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
  13. ↑ Modabber, Ashkan (22 August 2022). "This Isn't a Villain Origin Story, Just a Self-Portrait of a Miserable Painter". Medium. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  14. ↑ Artsapien, Team (4 March 2023). "The Court Jester's Lament: An Analysis of Matejko's Stanczyk". Artsapien. Retrieved 20 May 2023.
  15. ↑ Janina Mazurkiewicz (27 May 2010). "Astronom Kopernik czyli Rozmowa z Bogiem". Biblioteka Uniwersytecka W Toruniu. Muzeum Okręgowe: 3. Retrieved 26 May 2012.
  16. 1 2 3 Maria Szypowska (1996). Jan Matejko wszystkim znany (in Polish). Fundacja Artibus-Wurlitzer oraz Wydawn. Domu Słowa Polskiego. p. 85.
  17. ↑ Towarzystwo Historyczne (Lwów, Poland); Polskie Towarzystwo Historyczne; Instytut Historii (Polska Akademia Nauk) (1987). Kwartalnik historyczny. Towarzystwo Historyczne. p. 1045. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.