伊朗原则主义派

原则主义派波斯語羅馬化Osul-Garâyân),也被称作伊朗保守派[11][12]保守-强硬派[13]伊朗右翼[12][14][15]伊斯兰革命之后与改革派构成两大主要政治阵营。某些欧美媒体称其为“强硬派”,通常指的是阵营中的某些极右派系[16],但阵营也包含部分中间倾向的派系 [17]

原则主义派
议会领袖阿里·拉里賈尼[1]
卡泽姆·贾拉利[2]
意識形態保守主义
伊斯兰主义[3]
政治伊斯兰[4]
神权主义[5]
教法学家监护派系:
民粹主义[6]
古典保守主义[6][7]
实用主义[6]
伊斯兰原教旨主义[8]
政治立場右翼
宗教信仰什叶派
伊朗政治
政党 · 选举
原则主义派席次
行政部门
总统
部长
3 / 18(17%)
副总统
2 / 12(17%)
议会
发言人
席次
83 / 290(29%)
司法机构
司法总监
状态优势[9]
监督机构
专家会议
66 / 88(75%)
宪法监督委员会优势[9]
国家利益委员会优势[10]
城市议会
德黑兰
0 / 21(0%)
马什哈德
0 / 15(0%)
伊斯法罕
0 / 13(0%)
卡拉季
0 / 13(0%)
库姆
12 / 13(92%)
设拉子
1 / 13(8%)
大不里士
3 / 13(23%)
亚兹德
2 / 11(18%)
扎黑丹
0 / 11(0%)
拉什特
1 / 9(11%)

在伊朗政治中,“原则”指的是支持伊朗最高领袖,并倡导保护伊斯兰革命早期的守舊派意识形态。[18]侯赛因·穆萨维指出,伊朗原则主义派构筑了伊朗绝大多数的右翼/保守主义,倾向于宗教主义,且比起改革派,他们与库姆教权组织有更多联系。[19]原则主义派声明,会始终保持对伊斯兰教和守舊派伊斯兰革命的忠诚,服从最高领袖的命令和法基赫的监护[20]该阵营反对国际社会方面否认、改變當今伊朗守舊派政治体制的现状[7],且還大力支持目前伊朗国内的守舊派政权之形式。[21]

目前原则主义派在专家会议宪法监督委员会和司法机构中占据主导权。[20]

派系

  • 传统保守派,伊斯兰革命中协助组建了新政府,与鲁霍拉·穆萨维·何梅尼有传统的连接。[22]该派支持伊斯兰政府并倡导文职统治。[24]

选举结果

总统选举

年份 候选人 得票  % 排名
1997 阿里·阿克巴·纳塔格-努里 7,248,317 24.87 2nd
2001 阿赫马德·塔瓦克里 4,387,112 15.58 2nd
2005/1 马哈茂德·艾哈迈迪内贾德 5,711,696 19.43 2nd
穆罕默德·巴吉尔·卡利巴夫 4,095,827 13.93 4th
阿里·拉里賈尼 1,713,810 5.83 5th
Total11,521,33339.19决胜投票
2005/2 马哈茂德·艾哈迈迪内贾德 17,284,782 61.69 1st
2009 马哈茂德·艾哈迈迪内贾德 24,527,516 62.63 1st
穆赫辛·礼萨伊 678,240 1.73 3rd
Total25,205,75664.36 当选
2013 穆罕默德·巴吉尔·卡利巴夫 6,077,292 16.56 2nd
赛义德·賈利利 4,168,946 11.36 3rd
穆赫辛·礼萨伊 3,884,412 10.58 4th
阿里·阿克巴·韦拉亚提 2,268,753 6.18 6th
Total16,399,40344.68失败
2017 埃卜拉希姆·赖西 15,835,794 38.28 2nd
莫斯塔法·米尔-萨利姆 478,267 1.16 3rd
Total16,314,06139.44失败

政党和组织

下面列出了伊朗目前还在活跃的原则主义党派:

  • 兩個社會(非正式)
  • 伊玛目和领袖路线追随者阵线
    • 伊斯兰联盟党
    • 伊斯兰工程师协会
  • 伊斯兰革命稳定阵线
  • 发展与正义党

参考文献

  1. Bodaghi, Ehsan. . Al-Monitor. 2017-05-04 [2017-06-17]. (原始内容存档于2020-02-07).
  2. Rohollah Faghihi, , Al-Monitor, 2016-11-04 [2017-05-25], (原始内容存档于2020-02-07)
  3. Mehdi Mozaffari, , Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 2007, 8 (1): 17–33, doi:10.1080/14690760601121622, In fact, Iranian ‘Islamists’ of our day call themselves ‘Usul gara’, which literally means ‘fundamentalist’, but in a positive sense. It designates a ‘person of principles’ who is the ‘true Muslim’.
  4. Behrooz Ghamari-Tabrizi, , International Journal of Politics Culture and Society (New York), 2013, 26 (3): 237–253, doi:10.1007/s10767-013-9143-x, “Principlism” or osul-gera’i first appeared in the Iranian political lexicon during the second-term presidency of Mohammad Khatami as an alternative to eslāh-talabi or reformism. Although principlists do not share a uniform political platform, they all believed that the reformist movement would lead the Republic towards secularism. One of the most common elements of their political philosophy is the comprehensiveness of the shari‘a. The responsibility of the Islamic state is to determine ways of implementing the mandates of Islam, rather than the reformist project of reinterpreting the shari‘a to correspond to the demands of contemporary society.
  5. Mohseni, Payam. . Brumberg, Daniel; Farhi, Farideh (编). . Indiana Series in Middle East Studies. Indiana University Press. 2016: 47. ISBN 978-0253020680.
  6. Melody Mohebi, , Palgrave Macmillan: 129–131, 2014, ISBN 978-1-137-40110-6
  7. Robert J. Reardon, , RAND Corporation: 81–82, 2012, ISBN 978-0833076373
  8. Mehdi Moslem, , Syracuse University Press: 135, 2002, ISBN 9780815629788
  9. , Freedom House, 2017 [2017-05-25], (原始内容存档于2017-05-17)
  10. , Agence France-Presse (Yahoo), 2017-08-14 [2017-08-14], (原始内容存档于2019-02-21)
  11. Said Amir Arjomand; Nathan J. Brown. . SUNY Press. 2013: 150. ISBN 978-1-4384-4597-7. “Conservative” is no longer a preferred term in Iranian political discourse. Usulgara', which can be clumsily translated as “principlist” is the term now used to refer to an array of forces that previously identified themselves as conservative, fundamentalist, neo-fundamentalist, or traditionalist. It developed to counter the term eslahgara, or reformist, and is applied to a camp of not necessarily congrous groups and individuals.
  12. Randjbar-Daemi, Siavush. . (学位论文). Martin, Vanessa (Supervisor). Royal Holloway, University of London: 11. 2012 [2019-03-17]. (原始内容存档于2020-11-28). Open access material licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
  13. 李国富. . 当代世界. doi:10.19422/j.cnki.ddsj.2017.07.014.
  14. Haddad Adel, Gholamali; Elmi, Mohammad Jafar; Taromi-Rad, Hassan. . EWI Press. 2012-08-31: 108. ISBN 9781908433022. |entry=被忽略 (帮助)
  15. Robin B. Wright (编), , US Institute of Peace Press: 37, 2010, ISBN 978-1601270849
  16. Masoud Kazemzadeh, , Middle Eastern Studies, 2008, 44 (2): 189–214, doi:10.1080/00263200701874867, In Western sources, the term ‘hard-liners’ is used to refer to the faction under the leadership of Supreme Leader Ali Khamanehi. Members of this group prefer to call themselves ‘Osul-gara’. The word ‘osul’ means ‘fundamentals’, or ‘principles’ or ‘tenets’. And the suffix ‘gara’ means ‘those who uphold or promote’. The more radical elements in the hard-line camp prefer to call themselves ‘Ommat Hezbollah’. ‘Ommat’ is a technical Arabic-Islamic term referring to people who are Muslim. ‘Hezbollah’ literally means ‘Party of Allah’. Before the rise of Ahmadinejad to the presidency in 2005, many official sources in the Islamic Republic referred to this group as ‘mohafezeh-kar’ (‘conservative’). Between 1997 and 2006, many Iranians inside Iran used the terms ‘eqtedar-gara’ (authoritarian) and ‘tamamiyat-khah’ (totalitarian) for what many Western observers have termed ‘hard-liners’. Members of the reformist faction of the fundamentalist oligarchy called the hard-liners ‘eqtedar-gara’.
  17. Banafsheh Keynoush, , Survival: Global Politics and Strategy (New York), 2012, 54 (3): 127–146, doi:10.1080/00396338.2012.690988, What is important, however, is that the principlist camp now increasingly represents not just hardliners but also more centre-right factions.
  18. Ladane Nasseri; Kambiz Foroohar; Yeganeh Salehi. . Bloomberg. 2013-06-16 [2015-03-10]. (原始内容存档于2020-11-11).
  19. Seyed Hossein Mousavian, , Brookings Institution Press: 486, 2012, ISBN 9780870033025
  20. SHAUL, BAKHASH. . Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Tehran Bureau. 2011-09-12 [2015-03-10]. (原始内容存档于2017-08-22).
  21. Etel Solingen (编), , Cambridge University Press: 222, 2012, ISBN 9781107010444
  22. Sherrill, Clifton. . Orbis. 2011, 55 (4): 631–47. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2011.07.002.
  23. . news.163.com. [2019-03-17].
  24. Thaler et. al. . Sacramento, CA: RAND Corporation. 2010. ISBN 978-0-8330-4773-1.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.