文件系统的对比

下列表格对比了一系列文件系统的一般和技术资料,文件系统的具体信息参见链接文章。

一般资料

文件系统 开发者 发布年份 操作系统 许可
DECtape DEC 1964 PDP-6 Monitor
Level-D DEC 1968 TOPS-10
George3 ICT (即之后的 ICL) 1968 George 3
ODS-1 DEC 1972 RSX-11
RT-11 file system DEC 1973 RT-11
DOS (GEC) GEC 1973 Core Operating System
CP/M file system 蓋瑞·基爾多 1974 CP/M
V6FS Bell Labs 1975 Version 6 Unix
OS4000 GEC 1977 OS4000
FAT (8-bit) Marc McDonald, Microsoft 1977 Microsoft Standalone Disk BASIC-80
DOS 3.x Apple Computer 1978 Apple DOS
Pascal Apple Computer 1978 Apple Pascal
CBM DOS Commodore 1978 Microsoft BASIC (for CBM PET)
V7FS Bell Labs 1979 Version 7 Unix
DOS 1.0 Atari Corporation 1979 Atari 8-bit family
ODS-2 DEC 1979 OpenVMS
FAT12 Tim Paterson, Seattle Computer Products 1980 QDOS, 86-DOS
DOMAIN file system Apollo Computer 1981 Domain/OS (Aegis, Domain)
AFS Carnegie Mellon University 1982 Multiplatform MultoOS
DFS Acorn Computers Ltd 1982 Acorn BBC Micro MOS
ADFS Acorn Computers Ltd 1983 Acorn Electron (later Arthur RISC OS)
FFS Kirk McKusick 1983 4.2BSD
ProDOS Apple Computer 1983 ProDOS 8
MFS Apple Computer 1984 Mac OS
FAT16 Microsoft, IBM 1984 PC DOS 3.0/MS-DOS 3.0
Elektronika BK tape format NPO "Scientific centre" (now Sitronics) 1985 Vilnius Basic, BK monitor program
HFS Apple Computer 1985 Mac OS
Amiga OFS Metacomco for Commodore 1985 Amiga OS
High Sierra Ecma International 1985 MS-DOS, Mac OS
NWFS Novell 1985 NetWare 286
FAT16B Compaq 1987 Compaq MS-DOS 3.31, DR DOS 3.31
MINIX V1 FS Andrew S. Tanenbaum 1987 MINIX 1.0
Amiga FFS Commodore 1988 Amiga OS 1.3
HPFS IBM & Microsoft 1988 OS/2
ISO 9660:1988 Ecma International, Microsoft 1988 MS-DOS, Mac OS, and AmigaOS
JFS1 IBM 1990 AIX[1]
VxFS VERITAS, (now Symantec) 1991 Unix System LaboratoriesHP-UX[2] 开发
ext Rémy Card 1992 Linux
WAFL NetApp 1992 Data ONTAP
MINIX V2 FS Andrew S. Tanenbaum 1992 MINIX 1.6 and 2.0
AdvFS DEC 1993[3] Digital Unix
NTFS Version 1.0 Microsoft, Tom Miller, Gary Kimura 1993 Windows NT 3.1 proprietary
LFS Margo Seltzer 1993 Berkeley Sprite
ext2 Rémy Card 1993 Linux, Hurd
UFS1 Kirk McKusick 1994 4.4BSD
XFS SGI 1994 IRIX
HFS (Hierarchical File System) IBM 1994 MVS/ESA (now z/OS)
Rock Ridge Young Minds Inc. 1994 Linux, Mac OS, Amiga OS, and FreeBSD
Joliet ("CDFS") Microsoft 1995 Microsoft Windows, Linux, Mac OS, and FreeBSD
PFS Michiel Pelt 1996 AmigaOS
Romeo Adaptec 1996 Microsoft Windows
UDF ISO/ECMA/OSTA 1995 -
FAT32 Microsoft 1996 Windows 95b[4]
QFS LSC Inc, Sun Microsystems 1996 Solaris
IBM Spectrum Scale IBM 1998 AIX, Linux, Windows
Be File System Be Inc., D. Giampaolo, C. Meurillon 1996 BeOS
HFS Plus Apple Computer 1998 Mac OS 8.1
NSS Novell 1998 NetWare 5
PolyServe File System (PSFS) PolyServe 1998 Windows, Linux
ODS-5 DEC 1998 OpenVMS 7.2
SFS John Hendrikx 1998 AmigaOS, AROS, MorphOS
ext3 Stephen Tweedie 1999 Linux
ISO 9660:1999 Ecma International, Microsoft 1999 Microsoft Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, FreeBSD, and AmigaOS
JFS IBM 1999 OS/2 Warp Server for e-business
GFS Sistina (Red Hat) 2000 Linux
Melio FS Sanbolic 2001 Windows
NTFS Version 3.1 Microsoft 2001 Windows XP proprietary
ReiserFS Namesys 2001 Linux
zFS IBM 2001 z/OS (backported to OS/390)
FATX Microsoft 2002 Xbox
UFS2 Kirk McKusick 2002 FreeBSD 5.0
Lustre Cluster File Systems (later Oracle Corporation) 2002 Linux
OCFS Oracle Corporation 2002 Linux
VMFS2 VMware 2002 VMware ESX Server 2.0
ext3cow Zachary Peterson 2003 Linux
Fossil Bell Labs 2003 Plan 9 from Bell Labs, 4th Edition LPL
Google File System Google 2003 Linux
PramFS MontaVista 2003 Linux
Reliance[5] Datalight 2003 Windows CE, VxWorks, custom ports
VxCFS VERITAS, (now Symantec) 2004 AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Linux
ZFS Sun Microsystems 2004 Solaris CDDL
Reiser4 Namesys 2004 Linux
Non-Volatile File System Palm, Inc. 2004 Palm OS Garnet
MINIX V3 FS Andrew S. Tanenbaum 2005 MINIX 3
OCFS2 Oracle Corporation 2005 Linux
NILFS NTT 2005 Linux
VMFS3 VMware 2005 VMware ESX Server 3.0
GFS2 Red Hat 2006 Linux
ext4 Various 2006 Linux
exFAT Microsoft 2006, 2009 Windows CE 6.0, Windows XP SP3, Windows Vista SP1 proprietary
TexFAT/TFAT Microsoft 2006 Windows CE 6.0
Btrfs Oracle Corporation 2007 Linux GPL
Ceph Sage Weil, Inktank Storage, Red Hat 2007, 2012 Linux
WBFS kwiirk and Waninkoko (Wii homebrew) 2008 Nintendo WII
HAMMER Matthew Dillon 2008 DragonFly BSD
Tux3 Various 2008 Linux
UBIFS Nokia with help of University of Szeged 2008 Linux
Oracle ACFS Oracle Corporation 2009 Linux - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and Oracle Enterprise Linux 5 only
Reliance Nitro[5] Datalight 2009 Windows CE, Windows Mobile, VxWorks, Linux, custom ports proprietary
LTFS IBM 2010 Linux, Mac OS X, planned Microsoft Windows, LGPL
IlesfayFS Ilesfay Technology Group 2011 Microsoft Windows, planned Red Hat Enterprise Linux
VMFS5 VMware 2011 VMware ESXi 5.0tux 3 stats
ReFS Microsoft 2012, 2013 Windows 2012 Server proprietary
Lanyard Filesystem Dan Luedtke 2012 Linux
F2FS Samsung 2012 Linux GPLv2
File system Creator Year
introduced
Original operating system License

限制

文件系统 最大文件名称长度 路径字符限制[6] 最大路径名长度 最大文件大小 最大卷大小[7]
Acorn ADFS 10 bytes Any ISO 8859-1 character except: SPACE $ & % @ \ ^ : . # * " ¦ No limit defined 512 MB or 4 GB[8] 512 MB or 4 GB[9]
AdvFS 226 characters Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 16 TB 16 TB
Apple DOS 3.x 30 bytes Any byte except NUL 30 B, no subdirectories (105 files per disk) 未知 140 kB DOS 3.3 (assuming standard 35 tracks)
113.75 kB DOS 3.1, 3.2
Apple ProDOS 15 bytes A-Z, a-z, 0-9, and period 64 B, including slashes[12][13] 16 MB 32 MB
BFS 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 260 GB[14] 2 EB
Btrfs 255 bytes Any byte except NUL 未知 16 EB 16 EB
CBM DOS 16 bytes Any byte except NUL Non-hierarchical 16 MB 16 MB
CP/M file system 8.3 any byte except: SPACE < > . , ; : = ? * [ ] % | ( ) / \[15] 16 "user areas", no subdirectories 8 MB[16] 8 MB to 512 MB[16]
DECtape 6.3 A–Z, 0–9 DTxN:FILNAM.EXT = 15 369280 B (577 * 640) 369920 B (578 * 640)
DOS (GEC) 8 bytes A–Z, 0–9 Non-hierarchical 64 MB 64 MB
Elektronika BK tape format 16 bytes 未知 Non-hierarchical 64 kB 800 kB (approx) per side for 90 min cassette (limited only by tape length)
exFAT 255 characters[17] Any Unicode except NUL No limit defined 127 PB 64 ZB, 512 TB recommended[18]
ext2 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] and / No limit defined[11] 2 TB[7] 32 TB
ext3 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] and / No limit defined[11] 2 TB[7] 32 TB
ext3cow 255 bytes Any byte except NUL,[10] / and @ No limit defined[11] 2 TB[7] 32 TB
ext4 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] and / No limit defined[11] 16 TB[7][19] 1 EB[20]
TexFAT 247 characters Any Unicode except NUL No limit defined 2 GB 500 GB Tested[21]
F2FS 255 bytes 未知 未知 3.94 TB 16 TB
FAT12 8.3 (255 UCS-2 code units with VFAT LFNs)[22] Any byte except for values 0-31, 127 (DEL) and: " * / : < > ? \ | + , . ; = [] (lowcase a-z are stored as A-Z). With VFAT LFN any Unicode except NUL[10][22] No limit defined[11] 32 MB (256 MB) 32 MB (256 MB with 4K sectors and 64 KB clusters)
FAT16 8.3 (255 UCS-2 code units with VFAT LFNs)[22] Any byte except for values 0-31, 127 (DEL) and: " * / : < > ? \ | + , . ; = [] (lowcase a-z are stored as A-Z). With VFAT LFN any Unicode except NUL[10][22] No limit defined[11] 2 GB (4 GB with LFS) 2 GB or 4 GB
FAT32 8.3 (255 UCS-2 code units with VFAT LFNs)[22] Any byte except for values 0-31, 127 (DEL) and: " * / : < > ? \ | + , . ; = [] (lowcase a-z are stored as A-Z). With VFAT LFN any Unicode except NUL[10][22] No limit defined[11] 2 GB (4 GB with LFS) 2 TB[23] (16 TB)
FATX 42 bytes[22] ASCII. Unicode not permitted. No limit defined[11] 2 GB 2 GB
FFS 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 8 ZB 8 ZB
Fossil 65535 bytes of UTF-8 characters Any Unicode except 0-31 No limit defined 8 EB 未知
GFS 255 Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 8 EB[24] 8 EB[24]
IBM Spectrum Scale 255 UTF-8 codepoints Any byte except NUL[10] and / No limit defined[11] 8 EB 8 YB (18 PB tested)
HAMMER 未知 未知 未知 未知 1 EB
HFS 31 bytes Any byte except :[25] Unlimited 2 GB 2 TB
HFS Plus 255 UTF-16 code units[26] Any valid Unicode[10][27] Unlimited 8 EB 8 EB[28][29]
High Sierra 未知 未知 未知 未知 -
HPFS 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[30] No limit defined[11] 2 GB 2 TB[31]
ISO 9660:1988 Level 1: 8.3,
Level 2 & 3: ~ 180
Depends on Level[32] ~ 180 bytes? 4 GB (Level 1 & 2) to 8 TB (Level 3)[33] 8 TB[34]
ISO 9660:1999 未知 (207?) 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
Joliet ("CDFS") 64 Unicode characters All UCS-2 code except * / \ : ; and ?[35] 未知 4 GB (same as ISO 9660:1988) 8 TB (same as ISO 9660:1988)
Lanyard Filesystem 255 bytes Any byte except NUL and /[10] No limit defined 64 ZB 128 kB to 64 ZB[36]
LEAN 4,068 bytes[37] case sensitive, in UTF-8 (any Unicode codepoint) No limit defined 8 EB 8 EB
Level-D 6.3 A–Z, 0–9 DEVICE:FILNAM.EXT[PROJECT,PROGRM] = 7 + 10 + 15 = 32; + 5*7 for SFDs = 67 24 GB (34,359,738,368 words (235-1); 206,158,430,208 SIXBIT bytes) 12 GB (approx; 64 * 178 MB)
LTFS 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
Lustre 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] and / No limit defined[11] 32 PB (on ext4) 1 YB (55 PB tested)
JFS1 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 8 EB 4 PB
JFS 255 bytes Any Unicode except NUL No limit defined[11] 4 PB 32 PB
MFS 255 bytes Any byte except : No path (flat filesystem) 226 MB 226 MB
MicroDOS file system 14 bytes 未知 未知 16 MB 32 MB
MINIX V1 FS 14 or 30 bytes, set at filesystem creation time Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 64 MB[38] 64 MB[38]
MINIX V2 FS 14 or 30 bytes, set at filesystem creation time Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 4 GB[38] 1 GB, then 2 TB[38]
MINIX V3 FS 60 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 4 GB 16 TB[38]
NILFS 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 8 EB 8 EB
NSS 226 characters Depends on namespace used[39] Only limited by client 8 TB 8 TB
NTFS 255 characters[40][41][42] Depends on namespace used[40][41][42][43] 32,767 Unicode characters with each path component (directory or filename) commonly up to 255 characters long[11] 16 EB[44] 16 EB[44]
NWFS 80 bytes[45] Depends on namespace used[39] No limit defined[11] 4 GB 1 TB
OCFS 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 8 TB 8 TB
OCFS2 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 4 PB 4 PB
ODS-5 236 bytes[46] 未知 4,096 bytes[47] 2 TB 2 TB
OS4000 8 bytes A–Z, 0–9
Period is directory separator
No limit defined[11] 2 GB 1 GB (at least)
PramFS 31 bytes Any byte except NUL 未知 1 GB 8 EB
QFS 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 16 EB[48] 4 PB[48]
ReFS 32,767 Unicode characters (255 Unicode characters in Windows 8/8.1)[49] 未知 32,767 Unicode characters in each path component 16 EB 1 YB with 64 kB cluster size (264 × 64 × 210). Windows stack addressing allows 16 EB
ReiserFS 4,032 bytes/226 characters Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 8 TB[50] (v3.6), 2 GB (v3.5) 16 TB
Reiser4 3,976 bytes Any byte except / and NUL No limit defined[11] 8 TB on x86 未知
Reliance 260 bytes OS specific 260 B 4 GB 2 TB
Reliance Nitro 1,024 bytes OS specific 1024 bytes 32 TB 32 TB
RT-11 6.3 A–Z, 0–9, $ Non-hierarchical 32 MB (65536 * 512) 32 MB
IBM SFS 8.8 未知 Non-hierarchical[51] 未知 未知
UDF 255 bytes Any Unicode except NUL 1,023 bytes[52] 16 EB 2 TB (hard disk), 8 TB (optical disc)[53][54]
UFS1 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 226 TB 226 TB
UFS2 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 32 PB 1 YB
V6FS 14 bytes[55] Any byte except NUL and /[10] No limit defined[11] 16 MB[56] 2 TB
V7FS 14 bytes[57] Any byte except NUL and /[10] No limit defined[11] 1 GB[58] 2 TB
VxFS 255 bytes Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 256 TB 256 TB
VMFS2 128 Any byte except NUL and /[10] 2,048 4 TB[59] 64 TB
VMFS3 128 Any byte except NUL and /[10] 2,048 2 TB[59] 64 TB
XFS 255 bytes[60] Any byte except NUL[10] No limit defined[11] 8 EB[61] 8 EB[61]
ZFS 255 bytes Any Unicode except NUL No limit defined[11] 16 EB 256 ZB
File system Maximum filename length Allowable characters in directory entries[6] Maximum pathname length Maximum file size Maximum volume size[7]

元数据

文件系统 Stores file owner POSIX file permissions Creation timestamps Last access/ read timestamps Last content modification timestamps Disk copy created Last metadata change timestamps Last archive timestamps Access control lists Security/ MAC labels Extended attributes/ Alternate data streams/ forks Checksum/ ECC Max Timestamp Resolution
AdvFS 未知 未知
Be File System 未知 未知 未知
Btrfs 未知 未知 1 nanosecond
CBM DOS 未知
CP/M file system [62] 未知 未知 未知
DECtape 未知 未知 未知
DOS (GEC) 未知 未知
Elektronika BK tape format 未知 未知 未知
ext2 未知 [63] [63] 1 second
ext3 [63] [63] 1 second
ext3cow [63] [63] 1 second
ext4 未知 [63] [63] 部份[64] 1 nanosecond
exFAT 未知 未知 未知 部份 10 milliseconds
FAT12 [65] [66] 部份[67] 部份[67] [68] [69] 10 milliseconds
FAT16 [65] [66] 部份[67] 部份[67] [68] [69] 10 milliseconds
FAT32 部份[67] 部份[67] [68] 10 milliseconds
FFS 未知 未知
Fossil [70] 未知 1 second
GPFS 未知 1 nanosecond
GFS 未知 未知 [63] [63] 未知
HFS 未知
HFS Plus [71] 1 second
HPFS [72] 未知 未知 未知
High Sierra 未知 未知 未知
ISO 9660:1988 [73] [74] [75] 未知 未知
ISO 9660:1999 未知 未知 未知
JFS 未知 1 second
Joliet ("CDFS") [73] [74] [75] 未知 未知
Lanyard Filesystem 1 nanosecond
Level-D 未知 未知 未知
LFS 未知 未知
Lustre 部份[76] 部份[77][78] 未知
NILFS 未知 未知 Planned Planned 未知
NTFS [79] [80] 100 nanoseconds
NSS [81] [81] 未知 未知 [81] 未知 [82][83] 未知
NWFS 未知 [81] [81] 未知 未知 [81] 未知 [82][83] 未知
OCFS 未知 未知 未知
OCFS2 未知 未知 部份[84] 未知
ODS-5 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 [85] 未知
OS4000 未知 未知
PramFS 未知 1 second
QFS 未知 未知 未知
ReiserFS 未知
Reiser4 未知 未知
Reliance 部份[86] 未知
Reliance Nitro Linux port Linux port Linux port 部份[86] 未知
UDF 未知 未知 未知
UFS1 未知 [87] [87] [88] 未知
UFS2 未知 [87] [87] 未知
V6FS 未知 未知
V7FS 未知 未知
VMFS2 未知 未知 未知
VMFS3 未知 未知 未知
VxFS 未知 未知 [63] 未知
XFS 未知 [63] 部份 1 nanosecond
ZFS 未知 [89] [90] 1 nanosecond
File system Stores file owner POSIX file permissions Creation timestamps Last access/read timestamps Last content modification timestamps Disk copy created Last metadata change timestamps Last archive timestamps Access control lists Security/ MAC labels Extended attributes/ Alternate data streams/ forks Checksum/ ECC Max Timestamp Resolution

特点

File system Hard links Symbolic links Block journaling Metadata-only journaling Case-sensitive Case-preserving File Change Log Snapshot XIP Encryption COW Integrated LVM Data deduplication Volumes are resizeable
Be File System 未知 未知
Btrfs Planned[91] 是 (via bedup)[92] Online
CBM DOS
CP/M file system 未知
DECtape 未知
DOS (GEC) 未知
ext2 [93] Offline[94]
ext3 [95] Online (can only be shrunk offline)[94]
ext3cow [95] 未知 未知 未知
ext4 [95] Online (can only be shrunk offline)[94]
exFAT 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
FAT12 部份 Offline[96]
FAT16 部份 Offline[96]
FAT32 部份 Offline[96]
FFS [97] Offline (cannot be shrunk)[98]
Fossil [99] [99] Offline[99]
GFS [100] [101] 未知 未知 未知 Online
GPFS Online
HAMMER 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 On demand 未知
HFS [102] 未知
HFS Plus [103] [104] 部份[105] [106] [107] [108]
HPFS 未知 未知 未知 未知
JFS [109] 未知 未知 Online (cannot be shrunk)[110]
Lanyard Filesystem Offline (cannot be shrunk)
Level-D 未知 未知 未知 未知
LFS [111] 未知 未知 未知 未知
Lustre [95] 是 in 2.0 and later [78] [78] [78] [78] Online[112]
NILFS [111] 未知 未知 Online (since Linux-3.x and nilfs-utils 2.1)
NSS 未知 [113] [113] [114] 未知 未知 未知 未知
NTFS [115] [116] [116] [117] 部份[118] 部份 是 (Windows Server 2012)[119] Online[120]
NWFS [121] [121] [113] [113] [114] 未知 [122] 未知 未知
OCFS 未知 未知 未知 未知
OCFS2 部份[123] 未知 Online for version 1.4 and higher
ODS-2 [124] 未知 未知 未知 未知
ODS-5 [124] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
OS4000 [125] 未知
PramFS
QFS 未知 未知 未知 未知
ReiserFS [126] Online
Reiser4 未知 [127] 未知 Online (can only be shrunk offline)
Reliance [128] 未知
Reliance Nitro [128] 依情況 on OS 未知
RT-11 未知
UDF [111] [111] 未知
UFS1 未知
UFS2 [129][130][131] 未知 Offline (cannot be shrunk)[132]
V6FS 未知
V7FS [133] 未知
VxFS [134] 未知 未知 未知 未知
VMFS2 未知 未知 未知 未知
VMFS3 未知 未知 未知 未知
XFS [135] Online (cannot be shrunk)
ZFS [136] [136] Online (cannot be shrunk)[137]
File system Hard links Symbolic links Block journaling Metadata-only journaling Case-sensitive Case-preserving File Change Log Snapshotting XIP Encryption COW Integrated LVM Data deduplication Volumes are resizeable

Allocation and layout policies

File system Block suballocation Variable file block size[138] Extents Allocate-on-flush Sparse files Transparent compression
Be File System 未知
Btrfs 部份[139]
CBM DOS 部份[140]
CP/M filesystem
DECtape
DOS (GEC)
ext2 [141] [142]
ext3 [141]
ext3cow [141]
ext4 [141]
exFAT 未知 未知
FAT12 [143]
FAT16 [143]
FAT32
FFS 8:1[144]
Fossil [99]
GFS 部份[145]
GPFS
HFS Plus
HPFS
JFS only in JFS1 on AIX[146]
Level-D
LFS 8:1[144]
Lustre
NSS 未知
NILFS Planned
NTFS 部份 部份[147]
NWFS [148] 未知
OCFS 未知
OCFS2
ODS-5 未知
OS4000
PramFS
QFS 未知
ReiserFS
Reiser4 [149] [127]
Reliance
Reliance Nitro
UDF 依情況[150]
UFS1 8:1[144]
UFS2 8:1[144]
V6FS
V7FS
VMFS2
VMFS3
VxFS 未知
XFS
ZFS 部份[151]
File system Block suballocation Variable file block size[138] Extents Allocate-on-flush Sparse files Transparent compression

支持的操作系统

文件系统 DOS Windows 9x Windows NT Linux Mac OS Mac OS X FreeBSD BeOS Solaris AIX z/OS OS/2 Windows CE Windows Mobile VxWorks HP-UX Plan 9
BFS 部份 - 需使用第三方驅動程式,只讀 部份 - 需使用第三方驅動程式,只讀 部份 - 只讀 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
Btrfs With WinBtrfs 是: 內核版本 2.6.29 至 3.9 不穩定; 內核版本 3.10 後穩定 未知 未知
DECtape 未知 未知 with AncientFS[152] with AncientFS[152] with AncientFS[152] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
exFAT 部份 需使用第三方驅動程式,只讀  : Win7, Vista SP1, can be added to XP SP2, SP3 是 since kernel 5.4 部份 10.6.5+, 限制簇大小為 1024 位元組 未知 未知 未知
ext2 未知 未知 with Ext2Fsd (complete)[153] or Ext2 IFS (partial, no large inodes)[154] or Ext2Read (read-only, also on LVM2)[155] 是 since kernel 0.99 with ExtFS,[156] fuse-ext2,[157] and ext2fsx[158] 只讀 未知 未知 未知 third-party app[159] with 3rd-party app[160] with 3rd-party app[160] 未知 未知
ext3 未知 未知 with Ext2Fsd (complete)[153] or Ext2 IFS (partial, no large inodes)[154] or Ext2Read (read-only, also on LVM2)[155] 是 since kernel 2.4.15 with ExtFS[156] and fuse-ext2[157] 部份 read-only[161] 未知 未知 未知 未知 with 3rd-party app[160] with 3rd-party app[160] 未知 未知
ext3cow 未知 未知 未知 是 Kernel 2.6.20 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
ext4 部份 with Ext2Fsd (partial, extents limited)[153] or Ext2Read (read-only, also on LVM2)[155] 是 since kernel 2.6.28 with ExtFS (full read/write), [156] fuse-ext2 (partial),[157] and ext4fuse (read-only)[162] 部份 support in kernel since version 10.1 (read-only)[161] or with ext4fuse (read-only)[162] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
FAT12 部份 on diskettes only, through dos* commands 未知 [163] 未知 [164] 未知
FAT16 是 since DOS 3.0, FAT16B since DOS 3.31 部份 on diskettes only, through dos* commands 未知 [163] [164] 未知
FAT32 是 since DOS 7.1[165] 是 since Windows 95 OSR2 是 since Windows 2000 部份 on diskettes only, through dos* commands 未知 with third-party app[166] [163] [164] 未知
FFS 未知 未知 [167] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
Fossil with 3rd-party software[168] with 3rd-party software[168] with 3rd-party software[168] with 3rd-party software[168]
GFS 未知 未知 是 since kernel 2.6.19 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
HFS with third-party app[169] with third-party app[169][170] 部份: read-only since OSX 10.6[171] with third-party app[172][173] 未知 未知 未知 with third-party app[174] 未知
HFS Plus with third-party app[169] with third-party app[169][170] 部份 - write support occurs if journal is empty, but requires a force mount. 是 since Mac OS 8.1 部份 read-only third-party app[175] 未知 未知 未知 with third-party app 未知
HPFS with third-party driver 部份 read-only third-party driver[176] included until v3.51, third-party driver until 4.0[177] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
IBM Spectrum Scale[178] 是 since 2001
IBM HFS 未知 未知 未知 未知
IBM zFS 未知 未知 未知 未知
JFS 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
Level-D 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
LFS 未知 未知 with logfs[179] and others 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
LTFS 未知 未知 未知 未知
Lustre 部份 - under development[180] [181] 部份 - via FUSE 部份 - via FUSE 部份 - under development[182] 未知 未知
NILFS 未知 未知 是 since kernel 2.6.30 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
NSS 未知 未知 未知 with Novell OES2 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
NTFS with third-party driver with third-party driver[183] 是 Kernel 2.2 or newer, or with NTFS-3G or ntfsprogs with NTFS-3G or MacFUSE with NTFS-3G or partial read-only in kernel with NTFS-3G read-only with NTFS-3G on Opensolaris 未知 未知 部份 read-only third-party driver[184] with 3rd-party driver[185] 未知 未知 未知
NWFS 未知 未知 未知 via ncpfs client software[186] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
OCFS 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
OCFS2 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
ODS-2 未知 未知 部份 read-only with tool or kernel module[187] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
ODS-5 未知 未知 部份 read-only with kernel module[187] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
PramFS
QFS 未知 未知 via client software[188] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
ReFS 是 since Windows Server 2012 and Windows 8.1 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
Reiser4 未知 部份 with DiskInternals Linux Reader[170] (read-only) with a kernel patch 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
ReiserFS 未知 部份 with DiskInternals Linux Reader[170] (read-only) 是 since kernel 2.4.1 部份 - read only 部份 - read only 未知 未知 未知 未知 with 3rd-party app[160] with 3rd-party app[160] 未知 未知
Reliance 未知
Reliance Nitro 未知
RT-11 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
UDF 未知 部份 read-only support of UDF 1.02 since Win95 OSR2 [189] 是 since Mac OS 9 部份 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
UFS1 未知 未知 部份 - read only 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
UFS2 未知 部份 - with DiskInternals Linux Reader[170] (read-only) 部份 - read only 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
VMFS2 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
VMFS3 未知 未知 部份 read-only with vmfs[190] 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
VxFS 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
XFS 未知 未知 是 since kernel 2.4 未知 部份: read-only 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知 未知
ZFS with 3rd Party kernel module[191] or FUSE[192] with free 3rd-party software[193] 未知 未知 未知 未知
File system DOS Windows 9x Windows NT Linux Mac OS Mac OS X FreeBSD BeOS Solaris AIX z/OS OS/2 Windows CE Windows Mobile VxWorks HP-UX Plan 9

参见

注释

  1. IBM introduced JFS with the initial release of AIX Version 3.1 in 1990. This file system now called JFS1. The new JFS, ported from OS/2 to AIX and Linux, was first shipped in OS/2 Warp Server for e-Business in 1999. It was released as JFS2 on AIX 5L.
  2. through OEM agreement
  3. , , ORNL, (原始内容存档于2012年3月9日)
  4. Microsoft first introduced FAT32 in Windows 95 OSR2 (OEM Service Release 2) and then later in Windows 98. NT-based Windows did not have any support for FAT32 up to Windows NT4; Windows 2000 was the first NT-based Windows OS that received the ability to work with it.
  5. Specifications for the Reliance file systems are available here .
  6. These are the restrictions imposed by the on-disk directory entry structures themselves. Particular Installable File System drivers may place restrictions of their own on file and directory names; and particular and operating systems may also place restrictions of their own, across all filesystems. MS-DOS, Microsoft Windows, and OS/2 disallow the characters \ / : ? * " > < | and NUL in file and directory names across all filesystems. Unix-like systems disallow the characters / and NUL in file and directory names across all filesystems.
  7. For filesystems that have variable allocation unit (block/cluster) sizes, a range of size are given, indicating the maximum volume sizes for the minimum and the maximum possible allocation unit sizes of the filesystem (e.g. 512 bytes and 128 kB for FAT — which is the cluster size range allowed by the on-disk data structures, although some Installable File System drivers and operating systems do not support cluster sizes larger than 32 kB).
  8. While the on-disk filesystem structure uses a 4-byte file length, which allows files up to 4G, the usual disk access APIs use the top three bits of the sector number to specify the drive number, effectively limiting the maximum file size to 512M.
  9. While the on-disk filesystem structure uses a 3-byte sector number, which allows access to 4G of disk space, the usual disk access APIs use the top three bits of the sector number to specify the drive number, effectively limiting the maximum disk size to 512M.
  10. In these filesystems the directory entries named "." and ".." have special status. Directory entries with these names are not prohibited, and indeed exist as normal directory entries in the on-disk data structures. However, they are mandatory directory entries, with mandatory values, that are automatically created in each directory when it is created; and directories without them are considered corrupt.
  11. The on-disk structures have no inherent limit. Particular Installable File System drivers and operating systems may impose limits of their own, however. MS-DOS/PC DOS do not support full pathnames longer than 66 bytes for FAT12, FAT16 and FAT32 volumes. This limit exists because these operating systems were designed around a fixed-length internal data structure named Current Directory Structure, which holds the absolute paths of the current working directories of all volumes. The FAT12/FAT16 file system implementation under Concurrent DOS and DR DOS 3.31 to 6.0 (prior to 1992 updates) did not impose any such limits on the directory depth due to their internal representation of current working directories as dynamically updated chain of double-linked relative directories. The introduction of a DOS-like CDS (instead of only an emulation thereof) for compatibility purposes with BDOS 7.0 in 1992 imposed the same length limits on PalmDOS, DR DOS 6.0 (since 1992 update), Novell DOS, OpenDOS, etc. as known from MS-DOS/PC DOS. Windows NT does not support full pathnames longer than 32,767 bytes for NTFS. Most Windows programs will fail when full path exceeds 255 characters (including Explorer and CMD.EXE). Linux has a pathname limit of 4,096.
  12. . [31 May 2013]. (原始内容存档于2021-02-11).
  13. (PDF). Quality Software. 1985: 2–8 [2015-05-31]. ISBN 0-912985-05-4. (原始内容存档 (PDF)于2020-12-03).
  14. Varies wildly according to block size and fragmentation of block allocation groups.
  15. The CP/M filesystem itself does have limitations in regard to the allowed filename characters to be used, but officially the following characters are not allowed: SPACE < > . , ; : = ? * [ ] % | ( ) / \. CCP reserves the following characters for special purposes: SPACE , = _ . : ;, PIP additionally reserves: < > [ ].
  16. , , Google Groups, [2009-10-09]
  17. Table "Limits" states a maximum of 255 Unicode characters for the filename 页面存档备份,存于
  18. . 2009-01-27 [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2011-05-24). Description of the exFAT file system driver update package [for 32-bit XP]
  19. . FedoraProject. 2008-06-09 [2009-10-09]. (原始内容存档于2018-12-15).
  20. ext4 1.42 页面存档备份,存于 "This release of e2fsprogs has support for file systems > 16 TB"
  21. . 2009-10-14 [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2016-05-10).
  22. Depends on whether the FAT12, FAT16 or FAT32 implementation has support for long filenames (LFNs). Where it does not, as in OS/2, MS-DOS, Windows 95, Windows 98 in DOS-only mode and the Linux "msdos" driver, file names are limited to 8.3 format of 8-bit characters (space padded in both the basename and extension parts) and may not contain NUL (end-of-directory marker). Short names also do not normally contain lowercase letters. Also note that a few special device names should be avoided, as some operating systems (notably DOS and Windows) effectively reserve them.
  23. While FAT32 partitions this large work fine once created, some software won't allow creation of FAT32 partitions larger than 32 GB. This includes, notoriously, the Windows XP installation program and the Disk Management console in Windows 2000, XP, 2003 and Vista. Use FDISK from a Windows ME Emergency Boot Disk to avoid. 页面存档备份,存于
  24. Depends on kernel version and arch. For 2.4 kernels the max is 2 TB. For 32-bit 2.6 kernels it is 16 TB. For 64-bit 2.6 kernels it is 8 EB.
  25. As Mac OS X is a Unix-like system, which supports : in file names, and which uses / as a pathname component separator, : in file names is represented on disk in HFS and HFS+ as /.
  26. The Mac OS provides two sets of functions to retrieve file names from an HFS Plus volume, one of them returning the full Unicode names, the other shortened names fitting in the older 31 byte limit to accommodate older applications.
  27. HFS Plus mandates support for an escape sequence to allow arbitrary Unicode. Users of older software might see the escape sequences instead of the desired characters.
  28. , Apple, [2015-05-31], (原始内容存档于2008-03-17)
  29. , [2015-05-31], (原始内容存档于2012-06-05)
  30. The "." and ".." directory entries in HPFS that are seen by applications programs are a partial fiction created by the Installable File System drivers. The on-disk data structure for a directory does not contain entries by those names, but instead contains a special "start" entry. Whilst on-disk directory entries by those names are not physically prohibited, they cannot be created in normal operation, and a directory containing such entries is corrupt.
  31. This is the limit of the on-disk structures. The HPFS Installable File System driver for OS/2 uses the top 5 bits of the volume sector number for its own use, limiting the volume size that it can handle to 64 GB.
  32. ISO 9660#Restrictions
  33. Through the use of multi-extents, a file can consist of multiple segments, each up to 4 GB in size. See ISO 9660#The 2/4 GB file size limit
  34. Assuming the typical 2048 Byte sector size. The volume size is specified as a 32-bit value identifying the number of sectors on the volume.
  35. Joliet Specification 存檔,存档日期2009-04-14.
  36. https://raw.github.com/danrl/lanyfs-docs/master/lanyfs-1.4.txt
  37. . Freedos-32.sourceforge.net. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2021-03-02).
  38. . Minix1.woodhull.com. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2020-02-12).
  39. NSS allows files to have multiple names, in separate namespaces.
  40. NTFS allows files to have multiple names, in separate namespaces: Win32, DOS, Win32&DOS, and Posix. Windows APIs create files with Win32 "long" names (1–255 characters), sometimes with an additional "short"/"alias" DOS name in the "8.3" format (12 characters).
  41. Richard Russon and Yuval Fledel. (PDF). [2011-06-26]. (原始内容存档 (PDF)于2020-07-04).
  42. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2018-06-01). NB: This article includes discussion of the NT & Win32 namespaces used by Windows APIs; these are distinct from the NTFS filename namespaces.
  43. In the Win32 namespace, any UTF-16 code unit (case insensitive) except NUL and \ / : * ? " < > | is allowed; in the Posix namespace, any UTF-16 code unit (case sensitive) except NUL and / is allowed; in the DOS namespace, any character in the U+0021–U+007E range except \ / : * ? " < > | is allowed. Windows APIs require Win32 namespace compatibility, which prevents access to folders & files having only Posix names containing Win32-incompatible characters.
  44. This is the limit of the on-disk structures. The NTFS driver for Windows NT limits the volume size that it can handle to 256 TB and the file size to 16 TB respectively.. [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2017-07-07).
  45. Some namespaces had lower name length limits. "LONG" had an 80-byte limit, "NWFS" 80 bytes, "NFS" 40 bytes and "DOS" imposed 8.3 filename.
  46. Maximum combined filename/filetype length is 236 bytes; each component has an individual maximum length of 255 bytes.
  47. Maximum pathname length is 4,096 bytes, but quoted limits on individual components add up to 1,664 bytes.
  48. QFS allows files to exceed the size of disk when used with its integrated HSM, as only part of the file need reside on disk at any one time.
  49. . Blogs.msdn.com. 2012-01-16 [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2013-05-15).
  50. ReiserFS has a theoretical maximum file size of 1 EB, but "page cache limits this to 8TB on architectures with 32 bit int" 页面存档备份,存于
  51. . Publib.boulder.ibm.com. [2013-02-05].
  52. This restriction might be lifted in newer versions.
  53. 232 × block size
  54. . Google Sites. Section 5.1 Highlight of the UDF Format. 1 February 2009 [17 July 2014]. (原始内容存档于2021-03-08).
  55. See manual . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-07).
  56. See manual . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-04).
  57. See "dir (5)" in Volume 1 of the manual . [2004-08-26]. (原始内容存档于2004-08-26).
  58. The actual maximum was 1,082,201,088 bytes, with 10 direct blocks, 1 singly indirect block, 1 doubly indirect block, and 1 triply indirect block. The 4.0BSD and 4.1BSD versions, and the System V version, used 1,024-byte blocks rather than 512-byte blocks, making the maximum 4,311,812,608 bytes or approximately 4 GB.
  59. Maximum file size on a VMFS volume depends on the block size for that VMFS volume. The figures here are obtained by using the maximum block size.
  60. Note that the filename can be much longer XFS#Extended attributes
  61. XFS has a limitation under Linux 2.4 of 64 TB file size, but Linux 2.4 only supports a maximum block size of 2 TB. This limitation is not present under IRIX.
  62. Implemented in later versions as an extension
  63. Some Installable File System drivers and operating systems may not support extended attributes, access control lists or security labels on these filesystems. Linux kernels prior to 2.6.x may either be missing support for these altogether or require a patch.
  64. ext4 has group descriptor, journal and, starting from Linux kernel 3.5, metadata checksumming
  65. Concurrent DOS, FlexOS, Multiuser DOS, REAL/32, PalmDOS, Novell DOS, OpenDOS, and DR-DOS can store file owner information in reserved fields of directory entries on FAT12 and FAT16 volumes, if the optional multi-user security module is loaded. If loaded, most external commands invoke support for special /U:owner/group command line options to deal with this extra information.
  66. Concurrent DOS, FlexOS, Multiuser DOS, REAL/32, DR DOS, PalmDOS, Novell DOS, OpenDOS, and DR-DOS can store read/write/delete/execute access permissions and file/directory passwords in reserved fields of directory entries on FAT12 and FAT16 volumes. This is an integral part of the design, therefore passwords can be appended to file or directory names with semicolon (for example: dirname;dirpwd\filename;filepwd), the PASSWORD command can be used to control permissions and some commands support a special /P:pwd option to deal with this feature.
  67. File creation and file access timestamps are supported only by DOS 7.0 and higher, and typically only when explicitly enabled.
  68. Some FAT implementations, such as in Linux, show file modification timestamp (mtime) in the metadata change timestamp (ctime) field. This timestamp is however, not updated on file metadata change.
  69. Particular Installable File System drivers and operating systems may not support extended attributes on FAT12 and FAT16. The OS/2 and Windows NT filesystem drivers for FAT12 and FAT16 support extended attributes (using a "EA DATA. SF" pseudo-file to reserve the clusters allocated to them). Other filesystem drivers for other operating systems do not.
  70. File permission in 9P are a variation of the traditional Unix permissions with some minor changes, e.g. the suid bit is replaced by a new 'exclusive access' bit.
  71. . Trustedbsd.org. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2010-01-23).
  72. The f-node contains a field for a user identifier. This is not used except by OS/2 Warp Server, however.
  73. Time the file was recorded on the volume always available; "File Creation Date and Time" available only if the file has an Extended Attribute block.
  74. Not applicable to file systems on a read-only medium.
  75. Available only if the file has an Extended Attribute block.
  76. Creation time is stored in the backing ext4 filesystem, but is not yet sent to clients.
  77. Lustre has checksums for data over the network, but depends on backing filesystem and hardware for checksums of persistent data
  78. Not available with ext3/4, but will be available with ZFS OST/MDT backing filesystems.
  79. NTFS access control lists can express any access policy possible using simple POSIX file permissions (and far more), but use of a POSIX-like interface is not supported without an add-on such as Services for UNIX or Cygwin.
  80. As of Vista, NTFS has support for Mandatory Labels, which are used to enforce Mandatory Integrity Control. See 页面存档备份,存于
  81. The local time, timezone/UTC offset, and date are derived from the time settings of the reference/single timesync source in the NDS tree.
  82. Novell calls this feature "multiple data streams". Published specifications say that NWFS allows for 16 attributes and 10 data streams, and NSS allows for unlimited quantities of both.
  83. Some file and directory metadata is stored on the NetWare server irrespective of whether Directory Services is installed or not, like date/time of creation, file size, purge status, etc; and some file and directory metadata is stored in NDS/eDirectory, like file/object permissions, ownership, etc.
  84. ocfs2 computes and validates checksums of metadata objects like inodes and directories. It also stores an error correction code capable to fixing single-bite errors.
  85. Record Management Services (RMS) attributes include record type and size, among many others.
  86. CRCs are employed for certain types of metadata.
  87. Access-control lists and MAC labels are layered on top of extended attributes.
  88. Some operating systems implemented extended attributes as a layer over UFS1 with a parallel backing file (e.g., FreeBSD 4.x).
  89. MAC/Sensitivity labels are per filesystem. A label per file are not out of the question as a future compatible change but aren't part of any available version of ZFS.
  90. Solaris "extended attributes" are really full-blown alternate data streams, in both the Solaris UFS and ZFS. ZFS also has "system attributes" used for storing MS-DOS/NTFS compatible attributes for use by CIFS; as well as some attributes ported from FreeBSD
  91. McPherson, Amanda, , Linux Foundation, 2009-06-22 [2009-09-01], (原始内容存档于2012-06-24)
  92. Wiki, BTRFS, , [2015-05-31], (原始内容存档于2021-03-13)
  93. Linux kernel versions 2.6.12 and newer.
  94. Offline growing/shrinking as well as online growing: . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2023-03-25).
  95. Off by default.
  96. , , GNU, [2015-05-31], (原始内容存档于2020-02-25)
  97. "Write Ahead Physical Block Logging" in NetBSD, provides metadata journaling and consistency as an alternative to softdep.
  98. . Openbsd.org. 2008-11-28 [2013-02-05].
  99. When used with venti.
  100. Context based symlinks were supported in GFS, GFS2 only supports standard symlinks since the bind mount feature of the Linux VFS has made context based symlinks obsolete
  101. Optional journaling of data
  102. Mac OS System 7 introduced the 'alias', analogous to the POSIX symbolic link but with some notable differences. Not only could they cross file systems but they could point to entirely different file servers, and recorded enough information to allow the remote file system to be mounted on demand. It had its own API that application software had to use to gain their benefits-- this is the opposite approach from POSIX which introduced specific APIs to avoid the symbolic link nature of the link. The Finder displayed their file names in an italic font (at least in Roman scripts), but otherwise they behaved identically to their referent.
  103. . Developer.apple.com. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2009-07-01).
  104. Metadata-only journaling was introduced in the Mac OS 10.2.2 HFS Plus driver; journaling is enabled by default on Mac OS 10.3 and later.
  105. Although often believed to be case sensitive, HFS Plus normally is not. The typical default installation is case-preserving only. From Mac OS 10.3 on the command newfs_hfs -s 页面存档备份,存于 will create a case-sensitive new file system. HFS Plus version 5 optionally supports case-sensitivity. However, since case-sensitivity is fundamentally different from case-insensitivity, a new signature was required so existing HFS Plus utilities would not see case-sensitivity as a file system error that needed to be corrected. Since the new signature is 'HX', it is often believed this is a new filesystem instead of a simply an upgraded version of HFS Plus. See Apple's File System Comparisons 存檔,存档日期2008-10-06. (which hasn't been updated to discuss HFSX) and Technical Note TN1150: HFS Plus Volume Format 页面存档备份,存于 (which provides a very technical overview of HFS Plus and HFSX).
  106. Mac OS Tiger (10.4) and late versions of Panther (10.3) provide file change logging (it's a feature of the file system software, not of the volume format, actually). See fslogger 页面存档备份,存于.
  107. As of OS X 10.7, HFS+ supports full volume file encryption known as Filevault 2.
  108. Since Mac OS X Snow Leopard, online resizing is supported.. [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2013-09-22).
  109. Particular Installable File System drivers and operating systems may not support case sensitivity for JFS. OS/2 does not, and Linux has a mount option for disabling case sensitivity.
  110. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2010-02-02).
  111. UDF, LFS, and NILFS are log-structured file systems and behave as if the entire file system were a journal.
  112. Can be shrunk online by migrating files off an OST and removing the OST, or offline with ext3/4 backing filesystems by shrinking the OST filesystem
  113. Case-sensitivity/Preservation depends on client. Windows, DOS, and OS/2 clients don't see/keep case differences, whereas clients accessing via NFS or AFP may.
  114. The file change logs, last entry change timestamps, and other filesystem metadata, are all part of the extensive suite of auditing capabilities built into NDS/eDirectory called NSure Audit. (Filesystem Events tracked by NSure 页面存档备份,存于)
  115. As of Windows Vista, NTFS fully supports soft links. See this Microsoft article on Vista kernel improvements 页面存档备份,存于. NTFS 5.0 (Windows 2000) and higher can create junctions 页面存档备份,存于, which allow any valid local directory (but not individual files) ("target" of junction) to be mapped to an NTFS version thereof ("source" = location of junction). The source directory must lie on an NTFS 5+ partition, but the target directory can lie on any valid local partition and needn't be NTFS. Junctions are implemented through reparse points, which allow the normal process of filename resolution to be extended in a flexible manner.
  116. NTFS stores everything, even the file data, as meta-data, so its log is closer to block journaling.
  117. While NTFS itself supports case sensitivity, the Win32 environment subsystem cannot create files whose names differ only by case for compatibility reasons. When a file is opened for writing, if there is any existing file whose name is a case-insensitive match for the new file, the existing file is truncated and opened for writing instead of a new file with a different name being created. Other subsystems like e. g. Services for Unix, that operate directly above the kernel and not on top of Win32 can have case-sensitivity.
  118. NTFS does not internally support snapshots, but in conjunction with the Volume Shadow Copy Service can maintain persistent block differential volume snapshots.
  119. Rick Vanover. . [2011-12-02]. (原始内容存档于2012-07-04).
  120. . Bleepingcomputer.com. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2011-09-03).
  121. Available only in the "NFS" namespace.
  122. Limited capability. Volumes can span physical disks (volume segment)
  123. OCFS2 supports creating multiple write-able snapshots of regular files using REFLINK.
  124. These are referred to as "aliases".
  125. Symlinks only visible to NFS clients. References and Off-Disk Pointers (ODPs) provide local equivalent.
  126. Full block journaling for ReiserFS was not added to Linux 2.6.8 for obvious reasons.
  127. Reiser4 supports transparent compression and encryption with the cryptcompress plugin which is the default file handler in version 4.1.
  128. File system implements reliability via atomic transactions.
  129. "Soft dependencies" (softdep) in NetBSD, called "soft updates" in FreeBSD provide meta-data consistency at all times without double writes (journaling).
  130. Block level journals can be added by using gjournal module in FreeBSD.
  131. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2017-05-30).
  132. . Freebsd.org. 2012-04-30 [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-04).
  133. System V Release 4, and some other Unix systems, retrofitted symbolic links to their versions of the Version 7 Unix file system, although the original version didn't support them.
  134. VxFS provides an optional feature called "Storage Checkpoints" which allows for advanced file system snapshots.
  135. Optionally no on IRIX and Linux.
  136. ZFS is a transactional filesystem using copy-on-write semantics, guaranteeing an always-consistent on-disk state without the use of a traditional journal. However, it does also implement an intent log to provide better performance when synchronous writes are requested.
  137. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2020-02-16).
  138. Variable block size refers to systems which support different block sizes on a per-file basis. (This is similar to extents but a slightly different implementational choice.) The current implementation in UFS2 is read-only.
  139. Btrfs can only inline files smaller than 3916B with its metadata. [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2015-06-27).
  140. only for .REL (record structured) files, up to 254 bytes/record
  141. Fragments were planned, but never actually implemented on ext2 and ext3.
  142. e2compr, a set of patches providing block-based compression for ext2, has been available since 1997, but has never been merged into the mainline Linux kernel.
  143. SuperStor in DR DOS 6.0 and PC DOS 6.1, DoubleSpace in MS-DOS 6.0, DriveSpace in MS-DOS 6.22, Windows 95 and Windows 98, and Stacker in Novell DOS 7, OpenDOS 7.01, DR-DOS 7.02/7.03 and PC DOS 7.0/2000 were data compression schemes for FAT.
  144. Other block:fragment size ratios supported; 8:1 is typical and recommended by most implementations.
  145. Only for "stuffed" inodes
  146. . IBM. [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2020-04-18).
  147. Only if formatted with 4kB-sized clusters or smaller
  148. Each possible size (in sectors) of file tail has a corresponding suballocation block chain in which all the tails of that size are stored. The overhead of managing suballocation block chains is usually less than the amount of block overhead saved by being able to increase the block size but the process is less efficient if there is not much free disk space.
  149. In "extents" mode.
  150. Depends on UDF implementation.
  151. When enabled, ZFS's logical-block based compression behaves much like tail-packing for the last block of a file.
  152. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2015-02-02).
  153. Ext2Fsd is an open source ext2/ext3/ext4 kernel-level file system driver for Windows systems (NT/2K/XP/VISTA/7, X86/AMD64) that provides both read/write access to the file system. Currently, does not fully support extents (no size truncating/extending, no file deletion), a default feature of ext4. 页面存档备份,存于
  154. Ext2 IFS for Windows provides kernel-level read/write access to ext2 and ext3 volumes in Windows NT4, 2000, XP, Vista and Windows 2008. Does not support inodes size above 128 bytes and does not support ext4. 页面存档备份,存于
  155. Ext2Read is an explorer-like utility to explore ext2/ext3/ext4 file systems that provides read-only access to the file system. It supports extents, large inodes, and LVM2 volumes.Ext2Read 页面存档备份,存于
  156. Paragon ExtFS for Mac is a low-level file system driver specially developed to bridge file system incompatibility between Linux and Mac by providing full read/write access to the Ext2, Ext3 and Ext4 file systems under Mac OS X. 页面存档备份,存于
  157. Fuse-ext2 is a multi OS FUSE module to mount ext2 and ext3 file system devices and/or images with read and write support.
  158. Ext2fsx is the first and old implementation of the Ext2 (Linux) filesystem for Mac OS X. 页面存档备份,存于
  159. . [2020-01-31]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-04).
  160. See Total Commander, which supports accessing ext2, ext3, and ReiserFS from Windows, Windows CE, and Windows Mobile.
  161. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2019-01-18).
  162. ext4fuse is a free software multi OS FUSE module to mount ext4 file system devices and/or images with read-only support. 页面存档备份,存于
  163. Files, Databases, and Persistent Storage 页面存档备份,存于. MSDN.
  164. Via dosFs.
  165. Native FAT32 support with MS-DOS 7.10 and 8.0. Loadable FAT32 support for any DOS since 3.31 with DRFAT32 redirector driver. Native FAT32 support since OEM DR-DOS 7.04, bootable FAT32 support since OEM DR-DOS 7.06. Native FAT32 support with OEM PC DOS 7.10.
  166. . Hobbes.nmsu.edu. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-04).
  167. . Wiki.netbsd.se. [2009-10-09]. (原始内容存档于2008年3月19日).
  168. Via Plan 9 from User Space; initial checkin . [2013-11-24]. (原始内容存档于2013-12-03).
  169. Cross-platform Drive Solutions. . Macwindows.com. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2011-06-20).
  170. DiskInternals Linux Reader 页面存档备份,存于 is an application for Windows NT that allows reading of Ext2/3/4, ReiserFS, Reiser4, HFS/HFS+, FAT/exFAT, NTFS, ReFS, and UFS2 filesystems.
  171. Gagne, Ken. . Computerworld. 2009-08-31 [2009-09-07]. (原始内容存档于2009-09-03).
  172. . Freshports.org. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2018-02-18).
  173. . Freshports.org. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2019-01-18).
  174. . Hobbes.nmsu.edu. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-04).
  175. . Hem.bredband.net. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2013-02-02).
  176. . Hobbes.nmsu.edu. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-04).
  177. . [2020-01-31]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-04).
  178. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2014-04-30).
  179. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2021-03-22).
  180. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2011-03-14).
  181. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2018-12-15).
  182. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2011-07-27).
  183. . Download.chip.eu. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-04).
  184. . Hobbes.nmsu.edu. [2013-02-05]. (原始内容存档于2016-08-07).
  185. Tuxera NTFS for Windows CE. See . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2012-09-18). and announcement 存檔,存档日期2011-05-22..
  186. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2008-05-15).
  187. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2021-01-18).
  188. Using SAM-QFS on Linux Clients 存檔,存档日期2011-10-02.
  189. . Which CD or DVD format should I use?. Microsoft. [2008-11-22]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-02).
  190. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2009-03-02).
  191. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2019-05-22).
  192. ZFS on FUSE 存檔,存档日期2013-05-13.
  193. . [2015-05-31]. (原始内容存档于2014-02-11).

外部链接

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.