The National American Indian Memorial or North American Indian Memorial was a proposed monument to Native Americans to be erected on a bluff overlooking the Narrows, the main entrance to New York Harbor. The major part of the memorial was to be a 165-foot-tall (50 m) statue of a representative American Indian warrior atop a substantial foundation building housing a museum of native cultures, similar in scale to, but higher than, the Statue of Liberty several miles to the north. Ground was broken to begin construction in 1913 but the project was never completed and no physical trace remains today.
Background
In 1908 and 1909, Joseph K. Dixon led two 'expeditions', sponsored by Rodman Wanamaker, wealthy from his involvement with the department store Wanamaker's, to visit Native American tribes as part of increasing white American interest in Native culture and efforts to "assimilate" the tribes into white American society.[1][2] The first expedition, which travelled to Crow Agency, Montana, in 1908, saw Dixon carefully direct filming and photographs in an effort to capture authentic images without "any hint of the white man's foot".[3] The following year Dixon returned to Crow Agency where directed around 100 Native chiefs to film "The Last Great Indian Council" and a reenactment of the Battle of the Little Bighorn.[4]
Concept
In on May 12, 1909,[5][6] shortly after the second expedition ended, a dinner was held at the New York City restaurant Sherry's to honor Buffalo Bill Cody, whose performance was being held in the New York Hippodrome. Over one hundred people attended, including Nelson A. Miles, an American general, and Frederic Remington, an artist. At the dinner, Cody proposed a giant Native American statue—which Wanamaker had suggested to him, that would be set on the shore of New York Harbor. He suggested that it would be "as large" as the Statue of Liberty and would serve to welcome "everyone to this shore." Many guests at the dinner party enthusiastically supported the idea, with Miles saying he was "gratified that there is now a feeling of generosity and respect towards the departing race".[7] The public also met the proposal with general support.[6] In June 1909 the President of the United States, William Howard Taft, received a letter from Wanamaker (historian Alan Trachtenberg theorizes Dixon wrote it) asking for his endorsement of the memorial.[5] A 1910 conception foresaw a Peace Memorial or Great Bronze Column of Staten Island, sitting 580 feet (180 m) above Pavilion Hill in St. George and Tompkinsville, Staten Island on city-donated land (40°38′13″N 74°04′48″W / 40.637°N 74.08°W) and functioning as a Western Hemisphere counterpart to The Hague's Peace Palace.[8][9]
There were varied motivations behind this memorial. Historian Russel Barsh wrote in 1993 that many Americans viewed it as "a celebration of victory" over Native Americans, while others considered it "a constant reminder of the vanishing race to whom we are indebted for the great, free gift of a continent," and some thought the monument would memorialize admirable qualities attributed to Natives and serve as a "lasting beacon of American ideals". Arizona John Burke, who managed Cody, announced that America owed "at least an apology for the exigencies of civilized man and his cupidity in appropriating the red man's land" though he later clarified that "of course, it was all done in the name of progress, and God had foreordained that it should be so, but let us build this monument as a lasting tribute to a dying race and to the genius of the man who suggested it."[10]
The bow and arrow, with the left hand hanging entirely at full length, indicates that he is through with his war weaponry; the uplifted hand, with the two fingers extended toward the open sea, is the universal peace sign of the Indian. Thus he gives, in bronze, a perpetual welcome to the nations of the world, as he gave welcome to the white man when he first came to these shores.
Joseph K. Dixon
Dixon became heavily involved advocating for the monument. He envisioned a major lasting that would be "another WORLD-WONDER", proposing a 60 feet (18 m) tall bronze statue of a Native American warrior,[10] bringing the monument's full height to 165 feet (50 m), or 15 feet (4.6 m) above the Statue of Liberty.[11] Dixon wrote that "it must be the most compelling statue in the world."[12] While he excluded Natives themselves from all planning, he was in contact with several. He formally consulted the Improved Order of Red Men, which actually had no native members.[10] In 1911 Wanamaker founded the National American Indian Memorial Association (NAIMA) for the purpose of constructing the monument.[13] Miles suggested a group of statues for the monument.[12]
Location
Wanamaker had originally proposed Fort Lafayette as a site, and for a time Shore Road in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn was also considered, but in March 1910 Leonard Wood, a general in the US Army, suggested Fort Wadsworth.[12] By April 18, 1912,[14] this had been set as the location. The memorial was to be erected on the site of Fort Tompkins on Staten Island, New York. Fort Tompkins, a component of the larger Fort Wadsworth,[12] is located on a bluff high above the west side of the Narrows. It was and still is owned by the federal government. Virtually all ocean-going ships destined for New York pass the site, so the monument would have been highly visible to visitors, seen well before the Statue of Liberty would come into view.
On December 8, 1911, the United States Congress formally authorized the use of federal land for the monument, though Wanamaker would be responsible for providing funding.[15] The land was to be decided upon by the US Secretary of War and US Secretary of the Navy. The bill had been introduced by Taft.[5]
Groundbreaking
A "Committee of One Hundred" prominent American citizens was organized in support of the monument, with members such as Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Cornelius Vanderbilt, J. P. Morgan, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, William Randolph Hearst, Henry Clay Frick, and Ralph Pulitzer. This group, as well as the Improved Order, offered help fundraising.[16]
It was decided in early 1912 that the memorial would be designed by a sculptor, an architect, and a landscape architect.[14] A $250 contest in 1910 for the contest had produced no credible results.[16] The sculptor Cyrus Edwin Dallin offered to design the sculpture, though he was not selected.[14] After Burnham & Company turned Dixon's request for design help down, the architects Thomas Hastings and Daniel Chester French agreed to handle it, though they were members of the United States Commission of Fine Arts, which would be responsible for selecting and approving the final design. The two later withdrew over allegations of impropriety.[16] They produced a preliminary sketch, though not a formal design.[11] A brochure from the dedication also spoke of a museum of Native culture under the statue.[17] Some criticized the memorial, including the architect Charles Moore, also a member of the Commission of Fine Arts, who described it as an "ungainly Indian on the roof of a Greek temple".[14]
In 1911, the United States Congress had approved the monument to be built on federal land, but groundbreaking did not take place on February 22, 1913, Washington's Birthday, at the old Fort Tompkins on Staten Island. Dixon carefully arranged the ceremony, getting William Howard Taft, the current president of the United States, to agree to come, as well as "thirty of the most famous Chiefs from the Indian Reservations". These thirty were carefully selected to conform to white stereotypes of Natives, and Dixon placed great emphasis on having them wearing traditional clothing. Dixon advertised that the natives had fought at the Battle of the Little Bighorn in 1876, though only one actually did. Similarly, the natives came from seven reservations but Dixon inflated the total to "nearly every tribe in the nation".[18]
The Native group visited F. H. Abbott, the acting Commissioner of Indian Affairs, and James McLaughlin, a worker with the department, in Washington, D.C. The delegation was "supervised" by McLaughlin and upon Abbott's suggestion they developed three speeches pledging allegiance to the United States to present at the groundbreaking. Abbott combined the three into a final pledge.[18]
The actual groundbreaking ceremony was grey and rainy. Though hundreds were in attendance, Thomas L. Sloan was the only Native American in addition to the chiefs. Taft was greeted with a 21-gun salute and spent an hour there, giving a brief speech and digging first with a silver spade and later with a Native stone axe.[19][15][20][21] Other politicians in attendance included members of Taft's cabinet and the Mayor of New York City and the governor of New York State.[22] Shortly after Chief Wooden Leg, who was in the Native delegation, began digging with a buffalo thigh bone. They then raised an American flag while Irving Morgan's "The Indian's Requiem" was playing. the declaration of allegiance was signed, and 27-33 Buffalo nickels were distributed for the first time by George Frederick Kunz.[19][15][20][21]
The delegation toured New York City the following day.[19]
Efforts and failure
Shortly after the ceremony Dixon went on a third expedition.[23] Although he continued to heavily advocate for the memorial, returning to the Fort Wadsworth groundbreaking site in 1914 for the New York Commercial Tercentenary,[24] exhibiting photographs at the Panama–Pacific International Exposition in 1915 and giving lectures to an estimated million people, he gained support but little money. A total of $143.10 was raised for the memorial. Wanamaker was unwilling to provide funding, and the project was overshadowed by the American entry into World War I.[25] A giant bronze statue was also impractical because of a bronze shortage brought about by the war.[13] Dixon and the NAIMA later advocated for all-Native American cavalry regiments and later for Native American citizenship. The press had also begun to deem the project a "philanthropic humbug".[25][15][13]
A bronze tablet from 1913 disappeared. Discussion in 1936 as a Works Progress Administration project led to no tangible result, as did a proposal in the 1940s.[15] A 2012 proposal by Margaret and Robert Boldeagle for a much-reduced version of the monument garnered support from local politicians Andrew Lanza and Louis Tobacco, as well as a supportive editorial in the Staten Island Advance.[26][27] In 2017, the monument was included in "Never Built New York", an exhibition at the Queens Museum that profiled unbuilt proposals for building in New York City.[28][29]
In 1914, actor and activist Chauncey Yellow Robe condemned the project,[30] stating:
We see a monument of the Indian in New York harbor as a memorial of his vanishing race. The Indian wants no such memorial monument, for he is not yet dead. The name of the North American Indian will not be forgotten as long as the rivers flow and the hills and mountains shall stand, and though we have progressed, we have not vanished.[31]
See also
- Native Americans in popular culture
- Indian removal
- Dignity (statue), a 2016 South Dakota statue well-received by the Native community
References
- ↑ Trachtenberg 1998, pp. 3–6, 9–10.
- ↑ Barsh 1993, p. 93.
- ↑ Trachtenberg 1998, pp. 11–13.
- ↑ Trachtenberg 1998, pp. 13–13.
- 1 2 3 Trachtenberg 2004, p. 258.
- 1 2 Keune 1978, p. 768.
- ↑ Barsh 1993, p. 94.
- ↑ "PEACE MEMORIAL FOR STATEN ISLAND; A Great Bronz Column, 580 Feet High, to be Erected on Pavilion Hill". The New York Times. 1910-01-02. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-07-05.
- ↑ Metal Finishing: Preparation, Electroplating, Coating. P.H. Langdon. 1910.
- 1 2 3 Barsh 1993, pp. 94–95.
- 1 2 Trachtenberg 1998, p. 17.
- 1 2 3 4 Keune 1978, pp. 769–770.
- 1 2 3 Leahy 2008, pp. 115–116.
- 1 2 3 4 Keune 1978, p. 771.
- 1 2 3 4 5 Franz, William C. (April–May 1979). "The Colossus Of Staten Island". American Heritage. Retrieved 2021-06-14.
- 1 2 3 Barsh 1993, p. 97.
- ↑ Trachtenberg 2004, p. 261.
- 1 2 Barsh 1993, pp. 97–98.
- 1 2 3 Barsh 1993, pp. 97–99.
- 1 2 Lindstrom 1996, p. 212.
- 1 2 Trachtenberg 2004, p. 257.
- ↑ Keune 1978, p. 774.
- ↑ Barsh 1993, p. 100.
- ↑ Society, American Scenic and Historic Preservation (1915). Annual Report.
- 1 2 Barsh 1993, pp. 108–110.
- ↑ "The True Native New Yorkers Can Never Truly Reclaim Their Homeland". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2021-07-04.
- ↑ Isl, Staten; Editorial, Advance (2012-07-07). "'A fitting tribute': Idea for North American Indian memorial on Staten Island is revived". silive. Retrieved 2021-07-04.
- ↑ Iovine, Julie V. (2017-10-03). "'Never Built New York' Review: The City That Could Have Been". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2021-06-16.
- ↑ Tiffany, Kaitlyn (2017-09-17). "Never Built New York is a fascinating look at the wild ideas on the city's cutting room floor". The Verge. Retrieved 2021-06-16.
- ↑ Chauncey Yellow Robe (Killed in the Timber) Student File. CARLISLE INDIAN SCHOOL DIGITAL RESOURCE CENTER. Accessed December 19 2022.
- ↑ The Quarterly Journal of the Society of American Indians. The Society. 1914.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
Bibliography
- Barsh, Russel (1993-01-01). "An American Heart of Darkness: The 1913 Expedition for American Indian Citizenship". Great Plains Quarterly.
- Keune, Manfred E. (December 1978). "An Immodest Proposal: A Memorial to the North American Indian". The Journal of American Culture. 1 (4): 766–786. doi:10.1111/j.1542-734X.1978.0104_766.x. ISSN 1542-7331.
- Leahy, Todd (2008). Historical dictionary of Native American movements. Lanham, Md. : Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-5773-5.
- Lindstrom, Richard (1996). ""Not from the Land Side, but from the Flag Side": Native American Responses to the Wanamaker Expedition of 1913". Journal of Social History. 30 (1): 209–227. doi:10.1353/jsh/30.1.209. ISSN 0022-4529. JSTOR 3789755.
- Trachtenberg, Alan (1998). "Wanamaker Indians". The Yale Review. 86 (2): 1–24. doi:10.1111/0044-0124.00208.
- Trachtenberg, Alan (2004). Shades of Hiawatha : staging Indians, making Americans, 1880-1930. New York : Hill and Wang. ISBN 978-0-374-29975-0.
Further reading
- Staten Island Register, May 5, 1998, p. 5