Gordon J. Lau Elementary School
Washington Street entrance
Address
950 Clay Street

Chinatown

San Francisco
,
United States
,
California
Coordinates37°47′41″N 122°24′32″W / 37.794588°N 122.408870°W / 37.794588; -122.408870
Information
Former nameThe Chinese School
 (1859–1906)
Oriental Public School
 (1906–24)
Commodore Stockton Elementary School
 (1924–98)
LanguageEnglish, Chinese
Feeder schoolsChinese Primary School
Feeder toMarina Middle School
Websitesfusd.edu/school/gordon-j-lau-elementary-school

Oriental Public School, founded as The Chinese School, was a public school located in Chinatown, San Francisco, California. It was initially set up in 1859 as a segregated school for schoolchildren of Chinese (and later Japanese and Korean) descent, part of the growing anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States that arose in the late 1800s. The school has been renamed a number of times, most recently in 1998 to the Gordon J. Lau Elementary School in honor of the city's first Chinese-American supervisor.

History

A small private school was briefly mentioned as having started in late 1852 in a letter to the editors of the Daily Alta California, warmly concluding "if the Chinese can be induced to settle permanently among us, that in time our country will be greatly benefitted by their accession."[1] A fundraising campaign was started six months later for a Chinese Mission to educate Chinese students in machinery and western religion.[2]

In September 1859, The Chinese School was opened as a segregated public school for Chinese students in San Francisco's Chinatown. "Negroes, Mongolians, and Indians" were legally barred from attending public schools by a state law passed in 1860 which allowed the establishment of segregated schools instead.[3] Prior to this in 1858, the state's first State Superintendent of Schools, Andrew Moulder, spoke about segregation of the state's schools. "If this attempt to force Africans, Chinese, and Diggers into our white schools is persisted, it must result in the ruin of our schools."[4] Attendance was sporadic and low for several years afterwards as many children did not attend school.[5]

One reason for the low attendance rate may have been the lack of control the Chinese Americans had over school administration. Claiming a lack of funds, San Francisco Board of Education closed the school after only four months of operation, only to reopen it after the white community protested about integrating their schools.

San Francisco segregated its Chinese school children from 1859 until 1871, when the city refused to fund any more classes for them.[6] The California Political Code had been amended in 1866 to restrict enrollment in public schools to "all white children, between five and twenty-one years of age" (§53), and required that "children of African or Mongolian descent, and Indian children not living under the care of white persons" be educated in segregated schools (§57) which were to be separate but equal (§59).[7] In 1870, the law was again rewritten to drop the requirement to provide any education for Chinese children, limiting the segregated separate but equal schools to "children of African descent, and Indian children."[8] San Francisco Superintendent Denman cut funding from the Chinese School, which closed on March 1, 1871.[9]: 127–131  After it closed, Chinese parents often sent their children to church schools or hired private teachers.

Tape v. Hurley

What, then, shall be said if the doors of our schoolhouses are to be opened to admit children reared in such an atmosphere? What, indeed, shall be said of the proposition to educate them separate and apart from children of other races, and how can we with consistency deny them this right? Speaking no language but the Chinese, born and nurtured in filth and degradation, it is scarcely probable that any serious attempt could be made to mingle them with the other children of our public schools without kindling a blaze of revolution in our midst. And again, by what right, constitutional or statutory, can we set apart separate schools and a separate fund for their education or maintenance? ... Meanwhile, guard well the doors of our public schools, that they do not enter. For, however hard and stern such a doctrine may sound, it is but the enforcement of the law of self-preservation, the inculcation of the doctrine of true humanity, and an integral part of the enforcement of the iron rule of right by which we hope presently to prove that we can justly and practically defend ourselves from this invasion of Mongolian barbarism.

—The Report of the Special Committee of the Board of Supervisors of San Francisco, on the Condition of the Chinese Quarter of that City (1885)[10]: 60–62 

In 1880, the Political Code was modified to lift the restriction of enrollment to white students (§1662) and the sections requiring separate but equal (§1671) segregated schools (§1669) were repealed.[11] With the change to the Code, in 1884, Joseph and Mary Tape challenged San Francisco's practice by enrolling their daughter, Mamie, in the all-white Spring Valley School. After the school refused to admit Mamie, the Tapes sued the school district in Tape v. Hurley and won. SFUSD appealed the lower court's decision to the California Supreme Court, where the justices sustained the verdict of the lower court.[12][13] The case guaranteed the right of children born to Chinese parents to public education.[14]

Chinese Primary School, 916 Clay

In the wake of Tape v. Hurley, Andrew Moulder, the Superintendent of Public Schools in San Francisco, sent a telegram to Representative W.B. May of the California State Assembly on March 4, 1885 urging passage of bills to reestablish segregated schools. "Without such action I have every reason to believe that some of our classes will be inundated by Mongolians. Trouble will follow."[15] May responded by pushing through Assembly Bill 268, which once again allowed the establishment of "separate schools for children of Mongolian or Chinese descent. When such separate schools are established, Chinese or Mongolian children must not be admitted into any other schools."[16]

As a result, the San Francisco District decided to set up a separate Chinese Primary School the next year. Chinese Primary School had three classes with an enrollment of 90 students in 1895.[17] The first location was at the corner of Jackson and Stone, but the school was later moved to 916 Clay.[18]: 166  The Primary School was mentioned in an 1896 San Francisco Call article profiling the kindergarten at the First Chinese Baptist Church.[19]

The building at 916 Clay was destroyed in the April 1906 earthquake and subsequent fire, and a temporary building was erected at Joice and Clay to continue education.[18]: 166 

Oriental Public School

A cartoon by William Allen Rogers, first published in Harper's Weekly in 1906. In the cartoon, Secretary of Commerce and Labor Victor Metcalf bows deeply to a white schoolboy, intended to symbolize the recalcitrant city of San Francisco, and asks him "For heaven's sake, do not embarrass the Administration!". In the background, a Japanese mother attempts to lead her daughter (both dressed in traditional kimonos) to safety.
W.A. Rogers cartoon for Harper's Weekly (10 Nov 1906), captioned "For Heaven's Sake Do Not Embarrass the Administration!"

On October 11, 1906, amidst agitation for a Japanese exclusion law like the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act, San Francisco Board of Education renamed the Chinese School the "Oriental Public School", and ordered the city's 93 Japanese school children to attend it along with students of Chinese and Korean ancestry.[20] The Japanese government protested that this violated a treaty signed in 1894, which guaranteed the right of Japanese immigration to the United States.[21] President Theodore Roosevelt invited Mayor Eugene Schmitz to Washington, D.C. to resolve the matter.[22] The resulting Gentlemen's Agreement of 1907 overturned the board of education's decision, overturned the segregation of Japanese-American school children, and excluded Japanese laborers from entering the United States.

The building at the present site, designed by Albert Pissis,[23][24] was completed in 1915 with an entrance on Washington, between Stockton and Powell. Local residents objected to the site, as it outside the traditional boundary of Chinatown, west of Stockton.[18]: 168 

The Oriental School was renamed Commodore Stockton School on April 1, 1924.[18]: 169  The Chinese American Citizen Alliance had requested that the name be changed to the Harding Primary School, stating a dislike of implied inferiority in the term "Oriental". Their request was ignored.[25] Across Washington, the Commodore Stockton School Annex opened in 1924, designed by Angus McSweeney.[26] The first Chinese teacher, named in 1927, was Alice Fong Yu, who initially assisted the principal with translation duties to interact with parents and students.[18]: 169  Students were not permitted to speak Chinese in school or on the playground.

Recent developments

In 1998 Commodore Stockton Elementary School was renamed Gordon J. Lau Elementary School in honor of the first Chinese American elected to the Board of Supervisors, Gordon Lau.[27][28]

The San Francisco Unified School District finally repealed the regulation requiring students of Chinese and Korean heritage to attend the Oriental School in a largely symbolic gesture in 2017, more than a hundred years after the 1906 controversy.[29][30]

See also

References

  1. ↑ "School for the Chinese". Daily Alta California. 9 January 1853. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  2. ↑ "The Chinese Mission". Daily Alta California. 23 July 1853. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  3. ↑ California State Assembly. "An Act amendatory of, and supplementary to, "An Act to establish, support, and Regulate, Common Schools, and to Repeal former Acts concerning the same," approved May third, one thousand eight hundred and fifty-five". Eleventh Session of the Legislature. Statutes of California. State of California. Ch. 329 p. 325. Direct URL
  4. ↑ Choy, Philip P. (2012). San Francisco Chinatown: A Guide to Its History & Architecture (1st ed.). San Francisco: City Lights Books. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-872-86-540-2.
  5. ↑ Irwin, Mary Ann. "San Francisco's "Chinese School"". Irwinator. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
  6. ↑ Kuo, Joyce (January 1998). "Excluded, Segregated and Forgotten: A Historical View of the Discrimination of Chinese Americans in Public Schools". Asian American Law Journal. 5 (1). doi:10.15779/Z385G39. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
  7. ↑ California State Assembly. "An Act to provide for a system of Common Schools". Sixteenth Session of the Legislature. Statutes of California. State of California. Ch. 342 p. 383. Direct URL
  8. ↑ California State Assembly. "An Act to amend an Act to provide for a system of Common Schools". Eighteenth Session of the Legislature. Statutes of California. State of California. Ch. 556 p. 824. Direct URL
  9. ↑ Bottoms, D. Michael (2013). "3 "The Most Satanic Hate": Racial Segregation and Reconstruction in California Schools". An Aristocracy of Color: Race and Reconstruction in California and the West, 1850–1890. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 978-0-8061-4335-4. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
  10. ↑ Farwell, Willard B. (1885). The Chinese at home and abroad: together with the Report of the Special Committee of the Board of Supervisors of San Francisco on the Condition of the Chinese quarter of that city. San Francisco: A.L. Bancroft & Co. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
  11. ↑ California State Assembly. "An Act to amend Sections 1517, 1521, 1532, 1543, 1545, 1546, 1548, 1550, 1551, 1564, 1577, 1593, 1597, 1598, 1600, 1611, 1616, 1617, 1619, 1620, 1621, 1622, 1624, 1662, 1663, 1665, 1666, 1696, 1701, 1712, 1715, 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772, 1774, 1775, 1787, 1788, 1790, 1791, 1817, 1818, 1830, 1833, 1834, 1835, 1836, 1837, 1857, 1858, 1859, 1861, 1869, 1871, 1874, and to repeal Sections 1551b, 1652, 1669, 1670, 1671, 1741, 1742, 1743, 1744, 1745, 1746, 1747, 1748, 1749, 1750, 1751, 1752, 1753, 1754, 1755, 1758, 1777, 1792, 1838, 1840, 1841, 1842, 1843, 1844, 1845, 1846, 1847, 1848, 1849, 1850, 1851, 1852, and 1872 of the Political Code, and to add five new sections thereto, to be known as Sections 1565, 1583, 1703, 1704, and 1879, relating to public schools". Twenty-third Session of the Legislature. Statutes of California. State of California. Ch. 44 p. 28. Direct URL
  12. ↑ Tape v. Hurley, 66 Cal 473 (Supreme Court of California 3 March 1885).
  13. ↑ "History of Spring Valley". Spring Valley Science School. Retrieved February 24, 2018.
  14. ↑ Kamiya, Gary (29 April 2017). "How Chinese Americans won right to attend SF schools". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
  15. ↑ "The Chinese school problem". Daily Alta California. 5 March 1885. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
  16. ↑ California State Assembly. "An Act to amend section one thousand six hundred and sixty-two of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, entitled "An Act to establish a Political Code," approved March 12, 1872, relating to public schools". Twenty-sixth Session of the Legislature. Statutes of California. State of California. Ch. 117 p. 99.direct URL
  17. ↑ "A Big Book Purchase". San Francisco Call. 13 April 1895. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 Choy, Philip P. (2012). San Francisco Chinatown: A Guide to Its History & Architecture. San Francisco: City Lights. ISBN 978-0-87286-540-2. Retrieved August 29, 2012.
  19. ↑ Hackett, Fred H. (23 August 1896). "Only One in the World: This City Has a Kindergarten for the Young Heathen Chinee". San Francisco Call. Vol. 80, no. 84. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
  20. ↑ Kennedy, Robert C. (10 November 2001). "On this Day: 'For Heaven's Sake Do Not Embarrass the Administration'". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  21. ↑ "Japanese-American Relations at the Turn of the Century, 1900–1922". Office of the Historian, United States Department of State. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  22. ↑ Eng, Aimee; McFarland, Daniel (2006). "The Japanese Question: San Francisco Education in 1906". Stanford Graduate School of Education. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  23. ↑ Cerny, Susan Dinkelspiel (2007). An Architectural Guidebook to San Francisco and the Bay Area. Salt Lake City: Gibbs Smith. ISBN 978-1-58685-432-4. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  24. ↑ "Private architects to work on school building". Municipal Record. City and County of San Francisco. 15 May 1913. p. 155. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  25. ↑ Choy, Philip P. (2012). San Francisco Chinatown: A Guide to Its History & Architecture (1st ed.). San Francisco: City Lights Books. p. 169. ISBN 978-0-87286-540-2.
  26. ↑ Wiley, Peter Booth (2000). National Trust Guide San Francisco: America's Guide for Architecture and History Travelers. New York: Preservation Press (John Wiley & Sons). p. 187. ISBN 0-471-19120-5. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  27. ↑ "History of San Francisco Chinatown - The largest chinatown outside of Asia". www.sanfranciscochinatown.com. Retrieved 2018-01-19.
  28. ↑ Ostler, Scott (30 October 1998). "S.F. Talk Just Doesn't Translate". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 18 June 2018. How do you honor a man like Gordon [Lau], who died in April? You take a once-segregated grammar school in the heart of Chinatown and give it Lau's name, by unanimous Board of Ed vote. And so the former Commodore Stockton Elementary School becomes Gordon J. Lau Elementary, inheriting a new name and a new spirit.
  29. ↑ Murase, Emily M.; Cook, Stevon (24 January 2017). "Resolution No. ___ Rescinding Policies Excluding Students of Asian Ancestry from SFUSD and Promoting Education and Outreach on Diversity and Inclusion" (PDF). San Francisco Unified School District. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  30. ↑ Tucker, Jill (23 January 2017). "SF school board to repeal old rule segregating Asian students". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 18 June 2018.(subscription required)

Bibliography

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Gordon Lau Elementary.
  • "About Us". Gordon J. Lau Elementary. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.