1924 United States presidential election in Texas
November 4, 1924
 
Nominee John W. Davis Calvin Coolidge Robert M. La Follette
Party Democratic Republican Progressive
Home state West Virginia Massachusetts Wisconsin
Running mate Charles W. Bryan Charles G. Dawes Burton K. Wheeler
Electoral vote 20 0 0
Popular vote 484,605 130,023 42,881
Percentage 73.70% 19.78% 6.52%
County Results
President before election

Calvin Coolidge
Republican

 Elected President

Calvin Coolidge
Republican

The 1924 United States presidential election in Texas took place on November 4, 1924, as part of the 1924 United States presidential election. State voters chose 20 representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

Ever since statehood, Texas had been very nearly the strongest state for the Democratic Party owing to its initial history being as a Deep South state based around slavery. Even during Reconstruction when African-Americans were briefly enfranchised, the Republican Party won just one statewide election, and after Redemption and the passing of a new constitution in 1876 the GOP became confined largely to areas of abolitionist German refugee settlement in the Hill Country,[1] and to a few South Texas counties where local Republican bosses could until 1920 outcompete their Democratic equivalents.[2] The Terrell Election Law created a poll tax that, from 1902, disenfranchised virtually all remaining African-American voters, the vast majority of Mexican Americans, and also most poor whites.[3] Voter turnout among males over twenty-one fell from over eighty percent to under thirty percent following the poll tax.[4]

The period following this disfranchisement nonetheless saw a considerable amount of typically "Progressive" reform under Governors James Stephen Hogg and Thomas M. Campbell, and despite this progressive faction ceding power in 1906 to the conservatives, Texas proved solid in its support for progressive candidate Woodrow Wilson at the 1912 Democratic National Convention.[5] Another populist, James Ferguson, took the governorship in 1914 on an anti-Prohibition platform, but was impeached for misappropriation of public funds[6]

The 1916 presidential election had seen Democrat Woodrow Wilson establish firmer control over the machine-dominated areas of South Texas, but hostility towards Wilson's peace promises caused some losses amongst the German population.[7] Later Wilson became hated by German and Irish Americans for his entry into the war, his role in drafting the Treaty of Versailles and supporting many anti-German groups during the "Red Scare".[8] His League of Nations proposal was also opposed in the South where isolationism had long been very powerful,[9] but the reaction was much less pronounced than in Acadiana or the Ozarks.[9]

At the beginning of the campaign, the victory in the tantamount-to-election Democratic primary for Governor of Miriam A. Ferguson in opposition to the powerful Ku Klux Klan produced substantial doubt about whether Democratic nominee John W. Davis of West Virginia would maintain even James M. Cox’s reduced vote share from 1920,[10] with suggestions some of her supporters would back incumbent Republican president Calvin Coolidge or Progressive nominee Robert M. La Follette.

Texas had been a Democratic stronghold since it first became a state in 1845, and the first poll taken in early October had Davis winning 56 percent of the vote to 34 percent for Coolidge and 10 percent for La Follette, which constituted a slight decrease on Cox’s already reduced majority four years previously.[11] As it turned out, however, the conservative Southern Democrat Davis restored pre-existing Democratic hegemony in most of the Lone Star State, improving upon Cox‘s 1920 vote by fourteen percent and even exceeding Woodrow Wilson’s 1916 performance, whilst Coolidge fell four percent below what Warren G. Harding managed. Although La Follette would carry his home state of Wisconsin and relegate Davis to third in eleven other states, amongst Texas’ poll-tax-restricted electorate his appeal was almost entirely restricted to German Texans who were more culturally allied to the Midwest than to the South. Texas would be La Follette’s sixteenth-weakest state nationally, but overwhelmingly German Gillespie and Comal Counties would be the only counties in antebellum slave states to be won by La Follette. In fact, in Comal County La Follette received 73.96 percent of the vote, his highest proportion in any county nationwide.[12]

Results

1924 United States presidential election in Texas[13][lower-alpha 1]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic John W. Davis 484,605 73.70%
Republican Calvin Coolidge (incumbent) 130,023 19.78%
Progressive Robert M. La Follette 42,881 6.52%
Total votes 657,509 100%

Results by county

1924 United States presidential election in Texas by county[14][15]
County John William Davis
Democratic		 John Calvin Coolidge
Republican		 Robert M. La Follette
Progressive		 Margin Total votes cast
#  % #  % #  % #  %
Anderson 374 31.40% 562 47.19% 255 21.41% -188 -15.79% 1,191
Andrews 60 84.51% 7 9.86% 4 5.63% 53 74.65% 71
Angelina 3,914 88.57% 333 7.54% 172 3.89% 3,581 81.04% 4,419
Aransas 195 70.14% 75 26.98% 8 2.88% 120 43.17% 278
Archer 883 79.05% 146 13.07% 88 7.88% 737 65.98% 1,117
Armstrong 426 76.62% 106 19.06% 24 4.32% 320 57.55% 556
Atascosa 869 62.56% 303 21.81% 217 15.62% 566 40.75% 1,389
Austin 2,601 71.71% 457 12.60% 569 15.69% 2,032[lower-alpha 2] 56.02% 3,627
Bailey 166 66.40% 63 25.20% 21 8.40% 103 41.20% 250
Bandera 425 46.00% 442 47.84% 57 6.17% -17 -1.84% 924
Bastrop 2,711 78.53% 494 14.31% 247 7.16% 2,217 64.22% 3,452
Baylor 1,012 87.02% 135 11.61% 16 1.38% 877 75.41% 1,163
Bee 897 45.14% 944 47.51% 146 7.35% -47 -2.37% 1,987
Bell 7,273 76.91% 1,632 17.26% 552 5.84% 5,641 59.65% 9,457
Bexar 10,838 43.88% 9,898 40.07% 3,963 16.05% 940 3.81% 24,699
Blanco 586 54.36% 317 29.41% 175 16.23% 269 24.95% 1,078
Borden 73 42.69% 98 57.31% 0 0.00% -25 -14.62% 171
Bosque 2,524 83.94% 403 13.40% 80 2.66% 2,121 70.54% 3,007
Bowie 3,455 77.40% 740 16.58% 269 6.03% 2,715 60.82% 4,464
Brazoria 1,761 58.82% 1,114 37.21% 119 3.97% 647 21.61% 2,994
Brazos 2,128 87.07% 255 10.43% 61 2.50% 1,873 76.64% 2,444
Brewster 366 73.20% 113 22.60% 21 4.20% 253 50.60% 500
Briscoe 397 83.40% 53 11.13% 26 5.46% 344 72.27% 476
Brooks 205 76.49% 59 22.01% 4 1.49% 146 54.48% 268
Brown 3,467 87.48% 396 9.99% 100 2.52% 3,071 77.49% 3,963
Burleson 2,496 90.96% 224 8.16% 24 0.87% 2,272 82.80% 2,744
Burnet 1,725 83.74% 277 13.45% 58 2.82% 1,448 70.29% 2,060
Caldwell 2,194 78.44% 399 14.27% 204 7.29% 1,795 64.18% 2,797
Calhoun 686 76.05% 181 20.07% 35 3.88% 505 55.99% 902
Callahan 1,614 82.94% 244 12.54% 88 4.52% 1,370 70.40% 1,946
Cameron 2,225 60.68% 1,266 34.52% 176 4.80% 959 26.15% 3,667
Camp 1,186 83.76% 187 13.21% 43 3.04% 999 70.55% 1,416
Carson 611 64.18% 306 32.14% 35 3.68% 305 32.04% 952
Cass 2,125 66.18% 997 31.05% 89 2.77% 1,128 35.13% 3,211
Castro 219 59.35% 68 18.43% 82 22.22% 137[lower-alpha 2] 37.13% 369
Chambers 315 57.80% 219 40.18% 11 2.02% 96 17.61% 545
Cherokee 4,343 85.17% 666 13.06% 90 1.77% 3,677 72.11% 5,099
Childress 1,117 81.77% 178 13.03% 71 5.20% 939 68.74% 1,366
Clay 1,402 76.49% 318 17.35% 113 6.16% 1,084 59.14% 1,833
Cochran 59 81.94% 9 12.50% 4 5.56% 50 69.44% 72
Coke 673 87.86% 80 10.44% 13 1.70% 593 77.42% 766
Coleman 2,763 82.70% 502 15.03% 76 2.27% 2,261 67.67% 3,341
Collin 7,215 77.04% 1,981 21.15% 169 1.80% 5,234 55.89% 9,365
Collingsworth 731 73.99% 234 23.68% 23 2.33% 497 50.30% 988
Colorado 2,105 66.57% 681 21.54% 376 11.89% 1,424 45.03% 3,162
Comal 330 13.39% 312 12.66% 1,823 73.96% -1,493[lower-alpha 2] -60.57% 2,465
Comanche 376 39.75% 456 48.20% 114 12.05% -80 -8.46% 946
Concho 668 85.53% 90 11.52% 23 2.94% 578 74.01% 781
Cooke 3,170 77.58% 525 12.85% 391 9.57% 2,645 64.73% 4,086
Coryell 2,890 85.28% 429 12.66% 70 2.07% 2,461 72.62% 3,389
Cottle 580 88.15% 59 8.97% 19 2.89% 521 79.18% 658
Crockett 69 37.91% 112 61.54% 1 0.55% -43 -23.63% 182
Crosby 1,242 79.92% 278 17.89% 34 2.19% 964 62.03% 1,554
Culberson 93 79.49% 15 12.82% 9 7.69% 78 66.67% 117
Dallam 506 48.42% 254 24.31% 285 27.27% 221[lower-alpha 2] 21.15% 1,045
Dallas 30,207 76.99% 8,018 20.43% 1,012 2.58% 22,189 56.55% 39,237
Dawson 1,079 83.06% 185 14.24% 35 2.69% 894 68.82% 1,299
De Witt 2,131 56.21% 868 22.90% 792 20.89% 1,263 33.32% 3,791
Deaf Smith 538 70.51% 192 25.16% 33 4.33% 346 45.35% 763
Delta 2,186 80.49% 479 17.64% 51 1.88% 1,707 62.85% 2,716
Denton 4,708 81.10% 712 12.27% 385 6.63% 3,996 68.84% 5,805
Dickens 849 83.24% 161 15.78% 10 0.98% 688 67.45% 1,020
Dimmit 289 58.62% 180 36.51% 24 4.87% 109 22.11% 493
Donley 893 72.37% 273 22.12% 68 5.51% 620 50.24% 1,234
Duval[lower-alpha 3] 1,290 92.14% 89 6.36% 21 1.50% 1,201 85.79% 1,400
Eastland 4,548 80.04% 972 17.11% 162 2.85% 3,576 62.94% 5,682
Ector 138 89.03% 12 7.74% 5 3.23% 126 81.29% 155
Edwards 204 36.17% 346 61.35% 14 2.48% -142 -25.18% 564
El Paso[lower-alpha 3] 6,220 54.90% 4,078 35.99% 1,032 9.11% 2,142 18.91% 11,330
Ellis 7,678 84.93% 1,220 13.50% 142 1.57% 6,458 71.44% 9,040
Erath 3,396 85.89% 406 10.27% 152 3.84% 2,990 75.62% 3,954
Falls 2,817 81.51% 448 12.96% 191 5.53% 2,369 68.55% 3,456
Fannin 5,596 86.60% 653 10.11% 213 3.30% 4,943 76.49% 6,462
Fayette 3,851 59.66% 1,450 22.46% 1,154 17.88% 2,401 37.20% 6,455
Fisher 1,653 82.12% 302 15.00% 58 2.88% 1,351 67.11% 2,013
Floyd 1,197 85.99% 166 11.93% 29 2.08% 1,031 74.07% 1,392
Foard 585 81.82% 95 13.29% 35 4.90% 490 68.53% 715
Fort Bend 1,690 75.11% 356 15.82% 204 9.07% 1,334 59.29% 2,250
Franklin 1,157 86.60% 118 8.83% 61 4.57% 1,039 77.77% 1,336
Freestone 2,484 78.31% 608 19.17% 80 2.52% 1,876 59.14% 3,172
Frio 637 78.84% 158 19.55% 13 1.61% 479 59.28% 808
Gaines 342 77.55% 37 8.39% 62 14.06% 280[lower-alpha 2] 63.49% 441
Galveston 5,068 66.52% 1,912 25.10% 639 8.39% 3,156 41.42% 7,619
Garza 588 62.29% 331 35.06% 25 2.65% 257 27.22% 944
Gillespie 352 13.03% 768 28.42% 1,582 58.55% -814[lower-alpha 4] -30.13% 2,702
Glasscock 89 81.65% 14 12.84% 6 5.50% 75 68.81% 109
Goliad 733 54.99% 438 32.86% 162 12.15% 295 22.13% 1,333
Gonzales 2,499 75.96% 463 14.07% 328 9.97% 2,036 61.88% 3,290
Gray 608 51.14% 581 48.86% 0 0.00% 27 2.27% 1,189
Grayson 7,413 71.73% 1,973 19.09% 949 9.18% 5,440 52.64% 10,335
Gregg 1,286 76.96% 177 10.59% 208 12.45% 1,078[lower-alpha 2] 64.51% 1,671
Grimes 2,136 91.09% 177 7.55% 32 1.36% 1,959 83.54% 2,345
Guadalupe 831 20.32% 1,657 40.52% 1,601 39.15% 56[lower-alpha 4] 1.37% 4,089
Hale 1,446 70.85% 507 24.84% 88 4.31% 939 46.01% 2,041
Hall 1,060 78.34% 229 16.93% 64 4.73% 831 61.42% 1,353
Hamilton 2,035 87.45% 202 8.68% 90 3.87% 1,833 78.77% 2,327
Hansford 263 72.45% 76 20.94% 24 6.61% 187 51.52% 363
Hardeman 1,099 78.05% 256 18.18% 53 3.76% 843 59.87% 1,408
Hardin 1,516 66.55% 645 28.31% 117 5.14% 871 38.24% 2,278
Harris 20,648 63.57% 8,953 27.57% 2,878 8.86% 11,695 36.01% 32,479
Harrison 2,573 78.88% 463 14.19% 226 6.93% 2,110 64.68% 3,262
Hartley 156 64.20% 61 25.10% 26 10.70% 95 39.09% 243
Haskell 2,050 78.66% 428 16.42% 128 4.91% 1,622 62.24% 2,606
Hays 1,616 77.36% 394 18.86% 79 3.78% 1,222 58.50% 2,089
Hemphill 405 62.99% 167 25.97% 71 11.04% 238 37.01% 643
Henderson 3,819 88.73% 405 9.41% 80 1.86% 3,414 79.32% 4,304
Hidalgo 3,662 75.16% 996 20.44% 214 4.39% 2,666 54.72% 4,872
Hill 5,778 86.39% 807 12.07% 103 1.54% 4,971 74.33% 6,688
Hockley 69 73.40% 20 21.28% 5 5.32% 49 52.13% 94
Hood 1,074 85.51% 122 9.71% 60 4.78% 952 75.80% 1,256
Hopkins 4,156 85.97% 557 11.52% 121 2.50% 3,599 74.45% 4,834
Houston 3,289 86.92% 457 12.08% 38 1.00% 2,832 74.84% 3,784
Howard 1,100 76.02% 186 12.85% 161 11.13% 914 63.17% 1,447
Hudspeth 84 59.15% 34 23.94% 24 16.90% 50 35.21% 142
Hunt 6,828 87.43% 836 10.70% 146 1.87% 5,992 76.72% 7,810
Hutchinson 159 67.95% 69 29.49% 6 2.56% 90 38.46% 234
Irion 205 71.18% 73 25.35% 10 3.47% 132 45.83% 288
Jack 1,154 78.50% 290 19.73% 26 1.77% 864 58.78% 1,470
Jackson 758 64.84% 354 30.28% 57 4.88% 404 34.56% 1,169
Jasper 1,526 88.77% 176 10.24% 17 0.99% 1,350 78.53% 1,719
Jeff Davis 117 63.59% 49 26.63% 18 9.78% 68 36.96% 184
Jefferson 5,925 55.09% 4,348 40.42% 483 4.49% 1,577 14.66% 10,756
Jim Hogg 139 87.97% 19 12.03% 0 0.00% 120 75.95% 158
Jim Wells 654 65.93% 213 21.47% 125 12.60% 441 44.46% 992
Johnson 4,600 79.85% 851 14.77% 310 5.38% 3,749 65.08% 5,761
Jones 3,010 81.86% 566 15.39% 101 2.75% 2,444 66.47% 3,677
Karnes 1,727 69.19% 531 21.27% 238 9.54% 1,196 47.92% 2,496
Kaufman 5,573 85.33% 884 13.54% 74 1.13% 4,689 71.80% 6,531
Kendall 136 11.04% 689 55.93% 407 33.04% 282[lower-alpha 4] 22.89% 1,232
Kenedy 67 89.33% 7 9.33% 1 1.33% 60 80.00% 75
Kent 386 81.43% 80 16.88% 8 1.69% 306 64.56% 474
Kerr 735 40.63% 892 49.31% 182 10.06% -157 -8.68% 1,809
Kimble 465 65.77% 223 31.54% 19 2.69% 242 34.23% 707
King 83 95.40% 4 4.60% 0 0.00% 79 90.80% 87
Kinney 144 45.71% 158 50.16% 13 4.13% -14 -4.44% 315
Kleberg 721 63.52% 206 18.15% 208 18.33% 513[lower-alpha 2] 45.20% 1,135
Knox 1,399 72.30% 455 23.51% 81 4.19% 944 48.79% 1,935
La Salle 458 84.66% 73 13.49% 10 1.85% 385 71.16% 541
Lamar 5,224 87.37% 596 9.97% 159 2.66% 4,628 77.40% 5,979
Lamb 356 70.22% 121 23.87% 30 5.92% 235 46.35% 507
Lampasas 1,596 86.46% 228 12.35% 22 1.19% 1,368 74.11% 1,846
Lavaca 3,290 62.42% 746 14.15% 1,235 23.43% 2,055[lower-alpha 2] 38.99% 5,271
Lee 1,561 68.35% 271 11.87% 452 19.79% 1,109[lower-alpha 2] 48.56% 2,284
Leon 2,004 83.71% 311 12.99% 79 3.30% 1,693 70.72% 2,394
Liberty 1,506 68.80% 639 29.19% 44 2.01% 867 39.61% 2,189
Limestone 4,868 89.58% 523 9.62% 43 0.79% 4,345 79.96% 5,434
Lipscomb 430 45.31% 405 42.68% 114 12.01% 25 2.63% 949
Live Oak 596 57.20% 353 33.88% 93 8.93% 243 23.32% 1,042
Llano 928 86.17% 88 8.17% 61 5.66% 840 77.99% 1,077
Loving 12 85.71% 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 10 71.43% 14
Lubbock 1,710 73.93% 411 17.77% 192 8.30% 1,299 56.16% 2,313
Lynn 1,131 75.35% 313 20.85% 57 3.80% 818 54.50% 1,501
Madison 1,592 91.34% 146 8.38% 5 0.29% 1,446 82.96% 1,743
Marion 620 58.99% 347 33.02% 84 7.99% 273 25.98% 1,051
Martin 327 76.76% 92 21.60% 7 1.64% 235 55.16% 426
Mason 384 53.48% 171 23.82% 163 22.70% 213 29.67% 718
Matagorda 1,353 56.99% 893 37.62% 128 5.39% 460 19.38% 2,374
Maverick 199 40.53% 261 53.16% 31 6.31% -62 -12.63% 491
McCulloch 1,327 71.96% 495 26.84% 22 1.19% 832 45.12% 1,844
McLennan 7,882 73.52% 2,384 22.24% 455 4.24% 5,498 51.28% 10,721
McMullen 109 48.88% 111 49.78% 3 1.35% -2 -0.90% 223
Medina 986 43.26% 816 35.81% 477 20.93% 170 7.46% 2,279
Menard 304 52.60% 247 42.73% 27 4.67% 57 9.86% 578
Midland 399 89.26% 44 9.84% 4 0.89% 355 79.42% 447
Milam 5,087 80.31% 930 14.68% 317 5.00% 4,157 65.63% 6,334
Mills 1,289 85.08% 175 11.55% 51 3.37% 1,114 73.53% 1,515
Mitchell 1,242 85.89% 169 11.69% 35 2.42% 1,073 74.20% 1,446
Montague 2,236 68.40% 586 17.93% 447 13.67% 1,650 50.47% 3,269
Montgomery 1,500 88.81% 166 9.83% 23 1.36% 1,334 78.98% 1,689
Moore 82 89.13% 9 9.78% 1 1.09% 73 79.35% 92
Morris[lower-alpha 3] 964 81.76% 215 18.24% 0 0.00% 749 63.53% 1,179
Motley 453 86.29% 62 11.81% 10 1.90% 391 74.48% 525
Nacogdoches 3,418 93.16% 204 5.56% 47 1.28% 3,214 87.60% 3,669
Navarro 6,408 85.66% 996 13.31% 77 1.03% 5,412 72.34% 7,481
Newton 782 82.49% 145 15.30% 21 2.22% 637 67.19% 948
Nolan 1,421 77.23% 337 18.32% 82 4.46% 1,084 58.91% 1,840
Nueces[lower-alpha 3] 3,214 65.89% 1,537 31.51% 127 2.60% 1,677 34.38% 4,878
Ochiltree 352 62.63% 155 27.58% 55 9.79% 197 35.05% 562
Oldham 187 68.75% 71 26.10% 14 5.15% 116 42.65% 272
Orange 1,385 71.65% 509 26.33% 39 2.02% 876 45.32% 1,933
Palo Pinto 1,926 73.20% 473 17.98% 232 8.82% 1,453 55.23% 2,631
Panola 2,088 93.51% 119 5.33% 26 1.16% 1,969 88.18% 2,233
Parker 2,391 80.26% 438 14.70% 150 5.04% 1,953 65.56% 2,979
Parmer 214 62.76% 91 26.69% 36 10.56% 123 36.07% 341
Pecos 440 66.47% 192 29.00% 30 4.53% 248 37.46% 662
Polk 1,839 85.85% 272 12.70% 31 1.45% 1,567 73.16% 2,142
Potter 2,394 62.82% 831 21.81% 586 15.38% 1,563 41.01% 3,811
Presidio 267 76.72% 68 19.54% 13 3.74% 199 57.18% 348
Rains 899 81.88% 151 13.75% 48 4.37% 748 68.12% 1,098
Randall 627 74.20% 154 18.22% 64 7.57% 473 55.98% 845
Reagan 111 77.08% 31 21.53% 2 1.39% 80 55.56% 144
Real 188 37.75% 300 60.24% 10 2.01% -112 -22.49% 498
Red River 3,183 89.84% 311 8.78% 49 1.38% 2,872 81.06% 3,543
Reeves 387 75.59% 96 18.75% 29 5.66% 291 56.84% 512
Refugio 585 62.63% 256 27.41% 93 9.96% 329 35.22% 934
Roberts 241 69.45% 104 29.97% 2 0.58% 137 39.48% 347
Robertson 1,487 64.60% 751 32.62% 64 2.78% 736 31.97% 2,302
Rockwall 1,371 93.20% 93 6.32% 7 0.48% 1,278 86.88% 1,471
Runnels 2,564 81.09% 458 14.48% 140 4.43% 2,106 66.60% 3,162
Rusk 3,097 81.18% 651 17.06% 67 1.76% 2,446 64.12% 3,815
Sabine 1,150 94.42% 61 5.01% 7 0.57% 1,089 89.41% 1,218
San Augustine[lower-alpha 3] 1,475 94.43% 78 4.99% 9 0.58% 1,397 89.44% 1,562
San Jacinto 585 83.57% 104 14.86% 11 1.57% 481 68.71% 700
San Patricio 1,197 52.89% 987 43.61% 79 3.49% 210 9.28% 2,263
San Saba 1,814 89.94% 187 9.27% 16 0.79% 1,627 80.66% 2,017
Schleicher 246 67.40% 118 32.33% 1 0.27% 128 35.07% 365
Scurry 1,292 80.25% 269 16.71% 49 3.04% 1,023 63.54% 1,610
Shackelford 729 50.07% 727 49.93% 0 0.00% 2 0.14% 1,456
Shelby 3,408 92.16% 160 4.33% 130 3.52% 3,248 87.83% 3,698
Sherman 188 62.67% 87 29.00% 25 8.33% 101 33.67% 300
Smith 4,473 78.16% 1,079 18.85% 171 2.99% 3,394 59.30% 5,723
Somervell 403 85.93% 42 8.96% 24 5.12% 361 76.97% 469
Starr 756 97.05% 23 2.95% 0 0.00% 733 94.09% 779
Stephens 2,184 82.07% 372 13.98% 105 3.95% 1,812 68.09% 2,661
Sterling 243 90.33% 25 9.29% 1 0.37% 218 81.04% 269
Stonewall 778 72.91% 171 16.03% 118 11.06% 607 56.89% 1,067
Sutton 143 53.16% 124 46.10% 2 0.74% 19 7.06% 269
Swisher 573 65.19% 272 30.94% 34 3.87% 301 34.24% 879
Tarrant 13,673 61.73% 5,859 26.45% 2,619 11.82% 7,814 35.28% 22,151
Taylor 3,157 86.26% 441 12.05% 62 1.69% 2,716 74.21% 3,660
Terrell 109 34.49% 122 38.61% 85 26.90% -13 -4.11% 316
Terry 823 82.22% 160 15.98% 18 1.80% 663 66.23% 1,001
Throckmorton 539 74.97% 174 24.20% 6 0.83% 365 50.76% 719
Titus[lower-alpha 3] 1,589 81.70% 348 17.89% 8 0.41% 1,241 63.80% 1,945
Tom Green 2,116 75.73% 554 19.83% 124 4.44% 1,562 55.91% 2,794
Travis 7,573 77.06% 1,909 19.43% 345 3.51% 5,664 57.64% 9,827
Trinity 1,504 88.89% 146 8.63% 42 2.48% 1,358 80.26% 1,692
Tyler 929 88.98% 90 8.62% 25 2.39% 839 80.36% 1,044
Upshur 2,611 89.69% 258 8.86% 42 1.44% 2,353 80.83% 2,911
Upton 35 87.50% 4 10.00% 1 2.50% 31 77.50% 40
Uvalde 1,312 76.50% 351 20.47% 52 3.03% 961 56.03% 1,715
Val Verde 434 43.49% 457 45.79% 107 10.72% -23 -2.30% 998
Van Zandt 3,957 79.16% 1,038 20.76% 4 0.08% 2,919 58.39% 4,999
Victoria 1,653 68.36% 459 18.98% 306 12.66% 1,194 49.38% 2,418
Walker 1,792 89.78% 201 10.07% 3 0.15% 1,591 79.71% 1,996
Waller 1,239 84.80% 203 13.89% 19 1.30% 1,036 70.91% 1,461
Ward 206 75.18% 42 15.33% 26 9.49% 164 59.85% 274
Washington 3,568 86.25% 496 11.99% 73 1.76% 3,072 74.26% 4,137
Webb 1,313 73.19% 429 23.91% 52 2.90% 884 49.28% 1,794
Wharton 2,020 67.58% 858 28.71% 111 3.71% 1,162 38.88% 2,989
Wheeler 908 78.89% 197 17.12% 46 4.00% 711 61.77% 1,151
Wichita 5,831 68.75% 2,189 25.81% 461 5.44% 3,642 42.94% 8,481
Wilbarger 1,222 77.44% 269 17.05% 87 5.51% 953 60.39% 1,578
Willacy 307 70.74% 110 25.35% 17 3.92% 197 45.39% 434
Williamson 6,324 83.45% 934 12.33% 320 4.22% 5,390 71.13% 7,578
Wilson 1,633 66.54% 495 20.17% 326 13.28% 1,138 46.37% 2,454
Winkler 15 93.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 14 87.50% 16
Wise 2,958 81.24% 532 14.61% 151 4.15% 2,426 66.63% 3,641
Wood 2,806 85.55% 342 10.43% 132 4.02% 2,464 75.12% 3,280
Yoakum 95 84.82% 9 8.04% 8 7.14% 86 76.79% 112
Young 2,000 84.28% 322 13.57% 51 2.15% 1,678 70.71% 2,373
Zapata 300 60.24% 197 39.56% 1 0.20% 103 20.68% 498
Zavala 326 71.96% 95 20.97% 32 7.06% 231 50.99% 453
Totals484,60573.70%130,02319.78%42,8816.52%355,62153.92%675,509

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Owing to problems with the original collection of returns, these figures differ from those in Géoelections and Edgar Eugene Robinson’s work. These totals exclude some counties (noted in the table) where the Texas Secretary of State did not compile data.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 In this county where Coolidge ran third behind La Follette, margin given is Davis vote minus La Follette vote.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Totals for this county are at least partially from the World Almanac and not the official manuscript of returns from the Secretary of State.
  4. 1 2 3 In this county where Davis ran third behind La Follette, margin given is Coolidge vote minus La Follette vote.

References

  1. ↑ Bass, Jack. The Transformation of Southern Politics: Social Change and Political Consequence Since 1945. p. 25. ISBN 0820317284.
  2. ↑ Weeks, O. Douglas (August 1930). "The Texas Mexican and the Politics of South Texas". The American Political Science Review. 24 (3): 606–627.
  3. ↑ Davidson, Chandler. Race and Class in Texas Politics. p. 21. ISBN 0691025398.
  4. ↑ Davidson; Race and Class in Texas Politics, p. 24
  5. ↑ Grantham, Dewey W. The Life and Death of the Solid South: A Political History. pp. 50–52. ISBN 0813148723.
  6. ↑ Warren, Kenneth F. Encyclopedia of U.S. Campaigns, Elections, and Electoral Behavior. p. 788. ISBN 1452265879.
  7. ↑ Murrin, John M.; Johnson, Paul E.; McPherson, James M.; Fahs, Alice; Gerstle, Gary. Liberty, Equality, Power: A History of the American People (Concise Edition). p. 532. ISBN 1285545974.
  8. ↑ Hough, Jerry F. Changing Party Coalitions: The Mystery of the Red State-Blue State Alignment. pp. 83–86. ISBN 0875864082.
  9. 1 2 Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 211 ISBN 9780691163246
  10. ↑ Hart, Albert Bushnell (December 1924). "The Presidential Election in the United States". Current History. University of California Press. 21 (3): 325–328, 436–438.
  11. ↑ "Davis Decreases College's Lead in Straw Ballot". The Austin American. Austin, Texas. October 5, 1924. p. 14.
  12. ↑ "1924 Presidential Election Statistics". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
  13. ↑ "1924 Presidential General Election Results — Texas". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
  14. ↑ Robinson, Edgar Eugene. The Presidential Vote 1896-1932. pp. 331–350, 395–396. ISBN 9780804716963.
  15. ↑ "Popular Vote for Robert LaFollette". Géoelections. (.xlsx file for €15)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.